Skip to content

A Phase IIIb Study of BMS-188667 in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

A Phase IIIB Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess Short-term Changes in Synovitis and Structural Damage Outcomes in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Methotrexate, Treated With Abatacept Versus Placebo on a Background Therapy With Methotrexate

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00420199
Enrollment
50
Registered
2007-01-09
Start date
2007-05-31
Completion date
2010-05-31
Last updated
2012-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

The only trial in participants who are methotrexate-inadequate responders and have active Rheumatoid Arthritis, in which gadolinium-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Bone Mineral Density; and biochemical markers of bone, cartilage, and synovial tissue metabolism are used to evaluate early effects (4 months) of Abatacept on inflammation/structural damage. Study will provide valuable mechanism-of-action information on how Abatacept exerts its effects (including on bone) through new techniques.

Interventions

DRUGAbatacept

Vials (250 mg/vial), intravenous (IV), 10 mg/kg, monthly infusion , 12 months of treatment

DRUGPlacebo

Intravenous (IV) bags, IV, 0 mg, monthly infusion, 12 months of treatment

Sponsors

Bristol-Myers Squibb
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Disease activity as defined by a Disease Activity Score 28-C-Reactive Protein (CRP) \>3.2 or \>6 swollen and ≥6 tender joints and CRP greater than the upper limit of normal * At least 1 erosion in hands/wrists or positive anticyclic citrullinated peptides or rheumatoid factor * Clinically detectable synovitis of at least 1 wrist/ankle at screening and baseline * Participants must have been treated with methotrexate, on a weekly dose of at least 15 mg or a maximum tolerated dose (such as, 10 mg weekly) for at least 3 months before screening. Dose of methotrexate must be stable for at least 28 days prior to the first study dose (Day 1)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Double-blind Period: Mean Synovitis Scores at Baseline As Measured by the Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials 6 (OMERACT 6) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (RAMRIS)At baselineWrist synovitis was assessed by postgadolinium MRI enhancement according to OMERACT 6 RAMRIS in 3 wrist regions: distal radioulnar, radiocarpal, and intercarpal and carpometacarpal joints. For each wrist region, possible score ranges from 0-3, with 0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe damage. The total synovitis score per wrist=the sum of the individual scores for the 3 wrist regions. Minimum score per wrist ranges from 0, indicating no damage, to 9 (score of 3\*3 wrist regions), indicating most severe damage. Change in synovitis = Follow-up synovitis score - baseline score.
Double-blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in OMERACT 6 Wrist Synovitis Score: Planned Analysis Using Non-Parametric ANCOVABaseline to Day 113Wrist synovitis was assessed by postgadolinium MRI enhancement according to OMERACT 6 RAMRIS in 3 wrist regions: distal radioulnar, radiocarpal, and intercarpal and carpometacarpal joints. For each wrist region, possible score ranges from 0-3, with 0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe damage. The total synovitis score per wrist=the sum of the individual scores for the 3 wrist regions. Minimum score per wrist ranges from 0, indicating no damage, to 9 (score of 3\*3 wrist regions), indicating most severe damage. Change in synovitis=Follow-up synovitis score-baseline score.
Double-blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in OMERACT 6 Wrist Synovitis Score: Post Hoc Sensitivity Analysis Using Parametric ANCOVA AnalysisBaseline to Day 113Wrist synovitis was assessed by postgadolinium MRI enhancement according to OMERACT 6 RAMRIS in 3 wrist regions: distal radioulnar, radiocarpal, and intercarpal and carpometacarpal joints. For each wrist region, possible score ranges from 0-3, with 0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe damage. The total synovitis score per wrist=the sum of the individual scores for the 3 wrist regions. Minimum score per wrist ranges from 0, indicating no damage, to 9 (score of 3\*3 wrist regions), indicating most severe damage. Change in synovitis score=Follow-up synovitis score-baseline synovitis score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Double-blind Period: Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Osteitis OMERACT 6 ScoresBaseline to Day 113Osteitis assessed at 23 anatomic locations: 15 in 1 wrist and 8 in attached. Each site scored in 1.0 increments, indicating involvement of original articular bone (0=none to 3=severe). Total score for hands/wrists is sum of scores for each location. Maximum score per hand/wrist is 23 (total anatomic locations)\*3 (maximum score per joint)=69. Minimum score=0(normal). Increasing score=greater severity. Adjusted mean change from baseline in osteitis score=mean score at Day 113-mean score at baseline. Adjustment based on ANCOVA model with treatment=factor and baseline value=covariate.
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Newly Involved Joints in Bone Erosion, Edema/Osteitis, and SynovitisBaseline to Day 113Bone erosion and osteitis were assessed at a total of 23 anatomic locations according to erosion (for bone erosion) or involvement (for osteitis) of the original articular bone. Synovitis assessed as above-normal post-gadolinium enhancement in 3 wrist regions: distal radioulnar joint, radiocarpal joint, and intercarpal and carpometacarpal joints.
Double-blind Period: Baseline Mean RAMRIS ScoresBaselineRAMRIS score is the sum of its core components: Synovitis Score, Osteitis Score, and Erosion Score. Synovitis scored from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity). Osteitis scored 0 (normal) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement). Erosion scored from 0 (normal) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=Synovial Score + Osteitis Score + Erosion Score. Minimum RAMRIS score=0 (normal), maximum RAMRIS score=308 (severe structural damage). For Synovial Score, Osteitis Score, Erosion Score, and RAMRIS score, increasing number=increasing severity.
Double-blind Period: Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in RAMRIS ScoresBaseline to Day 113RAMRIS Score=sum of core components: Synovitis (S), Osteitis (O), and Erosion (E) Scores. S scored 0 (none) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity); O scored 0 (none) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement); E scored 0 (none) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=S+O+E Scores. RAMRIS minimum score=0 (normal), maximum=308 (severe structural damage). Adjusted change from baseline in RAMRIS=mean RAMRIS at Day 113-mean RAMRIS at baseline. Adjustment based on ANCOVA model: treatment=factor, baseline value=covariate.
Double-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Baseline to Days 15, 29, 57, 85, and 113PINP and osteocalcin are markers of bone formation. Osteocalcin is synthesized by osteoblasts and is associated with osteoblast synthetic activity. Osteoblasts secrete type 1 procollagen, and cleavage of large fragments from the carboxy and amino terminal ends result in formation of mature type 1 collagen and production of PINP fragments.
Double-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Baseline to Days 15, 29, 57, 85, and 113CTX-I and ICTP are biochemical markers of bone resorption or bone degradation
Double-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in a Systemic Marker of Cartilage Degradation (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Carboxyterminal Crosslinking Telopeptide of Type II Collagen [UCTX2C])Baseline to Days 15, 29, 57, 85, and 113Urinary CTX-II is a biochemical marker of type II collagen breakdown. In participants with early rheumatoid arthritis, increased levels of CTX-II can be predictive of rapid radiographic progression over periods of 1 to 5 years. These markers of cartilage destruction can predict progression of joint damage, independent of clinical and biologic indices of disease activity and baseline joint damage.
Double-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Marker of Synovial Tissue Metabolism (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Glucosyl-Galactosyl-Pyridinoline [UGGPC])Baseline to Days 15, 29, 57, 85, and 113Glucosyl-galactosyl-pyridinoline (Glc-Gal-PYD) is a specific biochemical marker reflecting the degradation of the synovial tissue membrane. It is a glycosylated derivative of the collagen crosslink pyridinoline, and it is present in significant amounts only in the synovial membrane; it is absent from bone and present in minutes amounts in cartilage and other soft tissues. Increased urinary levels of Glc-Gal-PYD have been found in early and long-standing rheumatoid arthritis, high levels being associated with rapid destruction.
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationFrom Day 1 to Day 113, and up to 56 days post last dose of double-blind period, or start of first dose of open-label periodAn AE is any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is any unfavorable medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency or abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=possibly, probably, or certainly related to and of unknown relationship to study treatment.
Double-blind Period: Baseline Mean Erosion OMERACT 6 ScoresAt baselineBone erosion assessed at a total of 23 anatomic locations: 15 in 1 wrist and 8 in the hand of the same side. Each site is scored in 1.0 increments from 0 (no damage) to 10 (severe damage) according to erosion of the original articular bone (each unit=10% loss of articular bone). The total erosion score for the hands/wrists is the sum of the individual scores for each location. Thus the maximum score achievable per hand/wrist is 230. Increasing score=greater severity.
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Infections/Infestations of Special InterestFrom Day 1 to Day 113, and up to 56 days post last dose of double-blind period, or start of first dose of open-label periodInfections/Infestations of Special Interest are AEs and SAEs considered possibly, probably, or certainly related to study treatment, graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5=Death). AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Acute Infusional AEs of Special InterestFrom Day 1 to Day 113, and up to 56 days post last dose of double-blind period, or start of first dose of open-label periodAcute infusional AEs are AEs with onset during the first hour after the start of study drug infusion. An AE is any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. AEs considered possibly, probably, or certainly related to study treatment were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ,Version 3.0 (Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5=Death).
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Peri-infusional AEs of Special InterestFrom Day 1 to Day 113, and up to 56 days post last dose of double-blind period, or start of first dose of open-label periodPeri-infusional AEs are AEs occurring during the first 24 hours after the start of study drug infusion. An AE is any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. AEs considered possibly, probably, or certainly related to study treatment were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0 (Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5=Death).
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityFrom Day 1 to Day 113, and up to 56 days post last dose of double-blind period, or start of first dose of open-label periodBL=baseline; LLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal. Marked abnormality criteria: Hemoglobin: \>3 g/dL decrease from BL. Hematocrit: \<0.75\*BL. Erythrocytes: \<0.75\*BL. Platelets: \<0.67\*LLN/\>1.5\*ULN, or if BL \<LLN, use 0.5\*BL/\<100,000 mm\^3. Leukocytes: \<0.75\*LLN/\>1.25\*ULN, or if BL\<LLN, use \<0.8\*BL/\>ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use \>1.2\*BL/\<LLN. Neutrophils+bands: \<1.0\*10\^3 c/uL. Eosinophils: \>0.750\*10\^3 c/uL. Basophils: \> 400 mm\^3. Monocytes: \>2000 mm\^3. Lymphocytes: \<0.750\*10\^3 c/uL/\>7.50\*10\^3 c/uL.
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Liver and Kidney Function Meeting Criteria for Marked AbnormalityFrom Day 1 to Day 113, and including up to 56 days post last dose of double-blind period, or start of first dose of open-label periodULN=upper limit of normal; BL=baseline. Marked abnormality criteria: Alkaline phosphatase: \>2\*ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use \>3\*BL; aspartate aminotransferase: \>3\*ULN, or if BL\>ULN,use \>4\*BL; alanine aminotransferase: \>3\*ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use \>4\*BL; G-Glutamyl transferase: \>2\*ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use \>3\*BL; Bilirubin: \>2\*ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use \>4\*BL; blood urea nitrogen: \>2\*BL; creatinine: \>1.5\*BL.
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityFrom Day 1 to Day 113, and up to 56 days post last dose of double-blind period, or start of first dose of open-label periodLLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal; BL=baseline. Marked abnormality: Sodium: \<0.95\*LLN/\>1.05\*ULN,or if BL\<LLN, use 0.95\*BL or \>ULN,or if BL\>ULN, use\>1.05\*BL or \<LLN. Potassium: \<0.9\*LLN/\>1.1\* ULN,or if BL\<LLN, use 0.9\*BL or \>ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use\>1.1\*BL or \<LLN. Chloride: \<0.9\*LLN/\>1.1\*ULN, or if BL\<LLN, use 0.9\*BL or \>ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use\>1.1\*BL or \<LLN. Calcium: \<0.8\*LLN/\>1.2\*ULN, or if BL\<LLN, use 0.75\*BL or \>ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use\>1.25\*BL or \<LLN. Phosphorous: \<0.75\*LLN/\>1.25\*ULN, or if BL\<LLN, use 0.67\*BL or \>ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use\>1.33\*BL or \<LLN.
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityFrom Day 1 to Day 113, and up to 56 days post last dose of double-blind period, or start of first dose of open-label periodLLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal; BL-baseline. Marked abnormality c: serum glucose:\<65 mg/dL/\>220 mg/dL; fasting serum glucose: \<0.8\* LLN/\>1.5\* ULN, or if BL\<LLN, use 0.8\*BL or \>ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use \>2.0\*BL or \<LLN; total protein: \<0.9\*LLN/\>1.1\* ULN; albumin: \<0.9\*LLN,or if BL\<LLN, use \<0.75 BL; uric acid: \>1.5\* ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use \>2\*BL. Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, red blood cells, white blood cells):Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4,or when predose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when predose=1. Use ≥4 when predose=2 or 3
Double-blind Period:Number of Participants With Significantly Abnormal Changes in Vital SignsDays 1, 15, 29, 57, 85, and 113Vital signs, which included blood pressure, heart rate, respiration, and temperature, were monitored predose and 1 hour after start of infusion. Changes in vital signs were determined to be significantly abnormal at the discretion of the investigator but were generally those that either exceeded, or failed to reach, normal parameters. Normal vital sign parameter ranges varied by site.
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Positive Antibodies to Abatacept by Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) AssayDay 1 to Day 113On-Rx=on treatment; post-Rx=post treatment. ECL screened sera for drug-specific antibodies; immunocompetition was used to identify specific anti-Abatacept reactivity. Cytotoxic leukocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) and Possibly Immunoglobulin (Ig) Category=reactivity against extracellular domain of human CTLA4, constant regions of human IgG1, or both (CTLA4Ig; Abatacept molecule). Ig and/or Junction Category=reactivity against constant regions and/or hinge region of human IgG1.
Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestFrom Day 1 to Day 113, and up to 56 days post last dose of double-blind period, or start of first dose of open-label periodAn AE is any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs, including serious, opportunistic, and all other infections; autoimmune disorders; neoplasms; acute infusional AEs (prespecified AEs occurring within 1 hour of start of infusion) and peri-infusional AEs (prespecified AEs occurring within 24 hours of start of infusion).
Double-blind Period: Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Erosion OMERACT 6 ScoresBaseline to Day 113Bone erosion assessed at 23 anatomic locations: 15 in 1 wrist and 8 in attached hand. Each site is scored in 1.0 increments from 0 (no damage) to 10 (severe damage), indicating erosion (each unit=10% bone loss) of original articular bone. Total erosion score for hands/wrists is sum of the individual scores for each location. Thus the maximum score per hand/wrist is 230. Increasing score=greater severity. Adjusted change from baseline in erosion score=mean score at Day 113-mean erosion score at baseline. Adjustment based on ANCOVA model with treatment=factor and baseline value=covariate.
Double-blind Period: Baseline Mean Osteitis OMERACT 6 ScoresAt baselineOsteitis assessed at a total of 23 anatomic locations: 15 in 1 wrist and 8 in the hand of the same side. Each site is scored in 1.0 increments from 0 to 3, indicating involvement of original articular bone. The total score for the hands/wrists is the sum of the individual scores for each location. Thus the maximum score achievable per hand/wrist is 23 (total number of anatomic locations) \* 3 (maximum per joint)=69. Minimum score=0, indicating normal. Increasing score=greater severity.

Countries

Belgium, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Abatacept (ABA) + Methotrexate (MTX)
Abatacept was administered IV on Day 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days up to and including Day 113.Abatacept was given as a dose based on body weight: 500 mg for participants weighing \< 60 kg, 750 mg for participants weighing 60 to 100 kg and 1 gram for participants weighing \> 100 kg.
27
Placebo (PLA) + MTX
PLA was administered IV on Day 1, 15, 29 and every 28 days up to and including Day 113. In addition, participants received a weekly dose of MTX of at least 15 mg or a maximum tolerated dose (ie, 10 mg weekly)
23
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyParticipant no longer met study criteria10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAbatacept (ABA) + Methotrexate (MTX)TotalPlacebo (PLA) + MTX
Age Continuous51.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
52.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
52.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
Anti-CCP2 Status
Negative
14 participants20 participants6 participants
Anti-CCP2 Status
Positive
13 participants30 participants17 participants
Cross Classification of RF Status and CCP2 Status at Baseline
RF negative, anti-CCP2 negative
12 participants15 participants3 participants
Cross Classification of RF Status and CCP2 Status at Baseline
RF negative, anti-CCP2 positive
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Cross Classification of RF Status and CCP2 Status at Baseline
RF positive, anti-CCP2 negative
2 participants5 participants3 participants
Cross Classification of RF Status and CCP2 Status at Baseline
RF positive, anti-CCP2 positive
13 participants29 participants16 participants
Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 (C-Reactive Protein [CRP])5.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
5.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
5.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Duration of Rheumatoid Arthritis25.7 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18
26.8 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.4
28.2 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
Number of Swollen Joints11.3 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
10.0 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
8.5 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
Number of Tender Joints12.9 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
13.1 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
13.3 joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
9 participants16 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
10 participants16 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
3 participants7 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
2 participants4 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
2 participants5 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
1 participants2 participants1 participants
Rheumatoid Factor (RF) Status
Negative
12 participants16 participants4 participants
Rheumatoid Factor (RF) Status
Positive
15 participants34 participants19 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants32 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants18 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 278 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 272 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Double-blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in OMERACT 6 Wrist Synovitis Score: Planned Analysis Using Non-Parametric ANCOVA

Wrist synovitis was assessed by postgadolinium MRI enhancement according to OMERACT 6 RAMRIS in 3 wrist regions: distal radioulnar, radiocarpal, and intercarpal and carpometacarpal joints. For each wrist region, possible score ranges from 0-3, with 0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe damage. The total synovitis score per wrist=the sum of the individual scores for the 3 wrist regions. Minimum score per wrist ranges from 0, indicating no damage, to 9 (score of 3\*3 wrist regions), indicating most severe damage. Change in synovitis=Follow-up synovitis score-baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 113

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had wrist synovitis assessments available at baseline and Day 113.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in OMERACT 6 Wrist Synovitis Score: Planned Analysis Using Non-Parametric ANCOVA-0.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.47
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in OMERACT 6 Wrist Synovitis Score: Planned Analysis Using Non-Parametric ANCOVA0.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.38
Comparison: Comparison in change from baseline of wrist synovitis using OMERACT 6 rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score method between abatacept and placebo at Day 113 based on a nonparametric analysis of covariance model. Baseline and changes from baseline of the total wrist synovitis scores were ranked, and the model included the rank score for change from baseline as the dependent variable with treatment group as a main effect and the rank score for baseline as an additional covariate.p-value: 0.103ANCOVA
Primary

Double-blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in OMERACT 6 Wrist Synovitis Score: Post Hoc Sensitivity Analysis Using Parametric ANCOVA Analysis

Wrist synovitis was assessed by postgadolinium MRI enhancement according to OMERACT 6 RAMRIS in 3 wrist regions: distal radioulnar, radiocarpal, and intercarpal and carpometacarpal joints. For each wrist region, possible score ranges from 0-3, with 0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe damage. The total synovitis score per wrist=the sum of the individual scores for the 3 wrist regions. Minimum score per wrist ranges from 0, indicating no damage, to 9 (score of 3\*3 wrist regions), indicating most severe damage. Change in synovitis score=Follow-up synovitis score-baseline synovitis score.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 113

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and who had wrist synovitis assessments available at baseline and Day 113.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in OMERACT 6 Wrist Synovitis Score: Post Hoc Sensitivity Analysis Using Parametric ANCOVA Analysis-0.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Mean Change From Baseline in OMERACT 6 Wrist Synovitis Score: Post Hoc Sensitivity Analysis Using Parametric ANCOVA Analysis0.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.27
Comparison: Comparison in change from baseline of wrist synovitis using OMERACT 6 rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) score method between ABA and PLA at Day 113 based on a parametric analysis of covariance model (ANCOVA). The model included the score change from baseline as the dependent variable, treatment group as a main effect and baseline score as an additional covariate.p-value: 0.078ANCOVA
Primary

Double-blind Period: Mean Synovitis Scores at Baseline As Measured by the Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials 6 (OMERACT 6) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (RAMRIS)

Wrist synovitis was assessed by postgadolinium MRI enhancement according to OMERACT 6 RAMRIS in 3 wrist regions: distal radioulnar, radiocarpal, and intercarpal and carpometacarpal joints. For each wrist region, possible score ranges from 0-3, with 0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe damage. The total synovitis score per wrist=the sum of the individual scores for the 3 wrist regions. Minimum score per wrist ranges from 0, indicating no damage, to 9 (score of 3\*3 wrist regions), indicating most severe damage. Change in synovitis = Follow-up synovitis score - baseline score.

Time frame: At baseline

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had synovitis assessments available at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Mean Synovitis Scores at Baseline As Measured by the Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials 6 (OMERACT 6) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (RAMRIS)4.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Mean Synovitis Scores at Baseline As Measured by the Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials 6 (OMERACT 6) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (RAMRIS)3.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.43
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Erosion OMERACT 6 Scores

Bone erosion assessed at 23 anatomic locations: 15 in 1 wrist and 8 in attached hand. Each site is scored in 1.0 increments from 0 (no damage) to 10 (severe damage), indicating erosion (each unit=10% bone loss) of original articular bone. Total erosion score for hands/wrists is sum of the individual scores for each location. Thus the maximum score per hand/wrist is 230. Increasing score=greater severity. Adjusted change from baseline in erosion score=mean score at Day 113-mean erosion score at baseline. Adjustment based on ANCOVA model with treatment=factor and baseline value=covariate.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 113

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had erosion OMERACT 6 assessments available at baseline and Day 113.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Erosion OMERACT 6 Scores0.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Erosion OMERACT 6 Scores0.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Comparison: Comparison in the change from baseline of erosion score using the OMERACT 6 RA MRI score method between Abatacept and Placebo at Day 113 was based on a non-parametric analysis of covariance model (ANCOVA). Change from BL = Post-BL measurement-BL value. Adjustment was based on ANCOVA model with treatment as a factor and BL value a covariate.95% CI: [-1.77, 0.76]ANCOVA
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Osteitis OMERACT 6 Scores

Osteitis assessed at 23 anatomic locations: 15 in 1 wrist and 8 in attached. Each site scored in 1.0 increments, indicating involvement of original articular bone (0=none to 3=severe). Total score for hands/wrists is sum of scores for each location. Maximum score per hand/wrist is 23 (total anatomic locations)\*3 (maximum score per joint)=69. Minimum score=0(normal). Increasing score=greater severity. Adjusted mean change from baseline in osteitis score=mean score at Day 113-mean score at baseline. Adjustment based on ANCOVA model with treatment=factor and baseline value=covariate.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 113

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had osteitis OMERACT 6 assessments available at baseline and Day 113.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Osteitis OMERACT 6 Scores-1.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Osteitis OMERACT 6 Scores1.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Comparison: Comparison in the change from baseline of Edema/Osteitis score using the OMERACT 6 RA MRI score method between Abatacept and Placebo at Day 113 was based on a non-parametric analysis of covariance model (ANCOVA). Change from BL = Post-BL measurement-BL value. Adjustment was based on ANCOVA model with treatment as a factor and BL value a covariate.95% CI: [-6, -0.96]ANCOVA
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in RAMRIS Scores

RAMRIS Score=sum of core components: Synovitis (S), Osteitis (O), and Erosion (E) Scores. S scored 0 (none) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity); O scored 0 (none) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement); E scored 0 (none) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=S+O+E Scores. RAMRIS minimum score=0 (normal), maximum=308 (severe structural damage). Adjusted change from baseline in RAMRIS=mean RAMRIS at Day 113-mean RAMRIS at baseline. Adjustment based on ANCOVA model: treatment=factor, baseline value=covariate.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 113

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had RAMRIS assessments available at baseline and Day 113.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in RAMRIS Scores-1.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in RAMRIS Scores2.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
Comparison: Comparison in the change from baseline of RAMRIS score using the OMERACT 6 RA MRI score method between Abatacept and Placebo at Day 113 was based on a non-parametric analysis of covariance model (ANCOVA). Change from BL = Post-BL measurement-BL value. Adjustment was based on ANCOVA model with treatment as a factor and BL value a covariate.95% CI: [-8, -1.42]ANCOVA
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Baseline Mean Erosion OMERACT 6 Scores

Bone erosion assessed at a total of 23 anatomic locations: 15 in 1 wrist and 8 in the hand of the same side. Each site is scored in 1.0 increments from 0 (no damage) to 10 (severe damage) according to erosion of the original articular bone (each unit=10% loss of articular bone). The total erosion score for the hands/wrists is the sum of the individual scores for each location. Thus the maximum score achievable per hand/wrist is 230. Increasing score=greater severity.

Time frame: At baseline

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had erosion OMERACT 6 assessments available at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Baseline Mean Erosion OMERACT 6 Scores12.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.41
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Baseline Mean Erosion OMERACT 6 Scores9.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.11
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Baseline Mean Osteitis OMERACT 6 Scores

Osteitis assessed at a total of 23 anatomic locations: 15 in 1 wrist and 8 in the hand of the same side. Each site is scored in 1.0 increments from 0 to 3, indicating involvement of original articular bone. The total score for the hands/wrists is the sum of the individual scores for each location. Thus the maximum score achievable per hand/wrist is 23 (total number of anatomic locations) \* 3 (maximum per joint)=69. Minimum score=0, indicating normal. Increasing score=greater severity.

Time frame: At baseline

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had osteitis OMERACT 6 assessments available at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Baseline Mean Osteitis OMERACT 6 Scores7.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.04
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Baseline Mean Osteitis OMERACT 6 Scores8.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.72
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Baseline Mean RAMRIS Scores

RAMRIS score is the sum of its core components: Synovitis Score, Osteitis Score, and Erosion Score. Synovitis scored from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity). Osteitis scored 0 (normal) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement). Erosion scored from 0 (normal) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=Synovial Score + Osteitis Score + Erosion Score. Minimum RAMRIS score=0 (normal), maximum RAMRIS score=308 (severe structural damage). For Synovial Score, Osteitis Score, Erosion Score, and RAMRIS score, increasing number=increasing severity.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had RAMRIS assessments available at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Baseline Mean RAMRIS Scores24.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.36
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Baseline Mean RAMRIS Scores21.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.45
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in a Systemic Marker of Cartilage Degradation (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Carboxyterminal Crosslinking Telopeptide of Type II Collagen [UCTX2C])

Urinary CTX-II is a biochemical marker of type II collagen breakdown. In participants with early rheumatoid arthritis, increased levels of CTX-II can be predictive of rapid radiographic progression over periods of 1 to 5 years. These markers of cartilage destruction can predict progression of joint damage, independent of clinical and biologic indices of disease activity and baseline joint damage.

Time frame: Baseline to Days 15, 29, 57, 85, and 113

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in a Systemic Marker of Cartilage Degradation (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Carboxyterminal Crosslinking Telopeptide of Type II Collagen [UCTX2C])Day 29 UCTX2C (n=21, n=19)-3.40 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in a Systemic Marker of Cartilage Degradation (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Carboxyterminal Crosslinking Telopeptide of Type II Collagen [UCTX2C])Day 85 UCTX2C (n=22, n=20)-10.83 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in a Systemic Marker of Cartilage Degradation (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Carboxyterminal Crosslinking Telopeptide of Type II Collagen [UCTX2C])Day 57 UCTX2C (n=23, n=19)0.24 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in a Systemic Marker of Cartilage Degradation (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Carboxyterminal Crosslinking Telopeptide of Type II Collagen [UCTX2C])Day 113 UCTX2C (n=22, n=20)-18.49 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in a Systemic Marker of Cartilage Degradation (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Carboxyterminal Crosslinking Telopeptide of Type II Collagen [UCTX2C])Day 15 UCTX2C (n=24, n=21)-8.51 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in a Systemic Marker of Cartilage Degradation (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Carboxyterminal Crosslinking Telopeptide of Type II Collagen [UCTX2C])Day 113 UCTX2C (n=22, n=20)9.86 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in a Systemic Marker of Cartilage Degradation (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Carboxyterminal Crosslinking Telopeptide of Type II Collagen [UCTX2C])Day 15 UCTX2C (n=24, n=21)5.14 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in a Systemic Marker of Cartilage Degradation (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Carboxyterminal Crosslinking Telopeptide of Type II Collagen [UCTX2C])Day 29 UCTX2C (n=21, n=19)6.81 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in a Systemic Marker of Cartilage Degradation (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Carboxyterminal Crosslinking Telopeptide of Type II Collagen [UCTX2C])Day 57 UCTX2C (n=23, n=19)5.43 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in a Systemic Marker of Cartilage Degradation (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Carboxyterminal Crosslinking Telopeptide of Type II Collagen [UCTX2C])Day 85 UCTX2C (n=22, n=20)9.67 percent change
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Marker of Synovial Tissue Metabolism (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Glucosyl-Galactosyl-Pyridinoline [UGGPC])

Glucosyl-galactosyl-pyridinoline (Glc-Gal-PYD) is a specific biochemical marker reflecting the degradation of the synovial tissue membrane. It is a glycosylated derivative of the collagen crosslink pyridinoline, and it is present in significant amounts only in the synovial membrane; it is absent from bone and present in minutes amounts in cartilage and other soft tissues. Increased urinary levels of Glc-Gal-PYD have been found in early and long-standing rheumatoid arthritis, high levels being associated with rapid destruction.

Time frame: Baseline to Days 15, 29, 57, 85, and 113

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Marker of Synovial Tissue Metabolism (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Glucosyl-Galactosyl-Pyridinoline [UGGPC])Day 29 UGGPC (n=22, n=18)-1.83 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Marker of Synovial Tissue Metabolism (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Glucosyl-Galactosyl-Pyridinoline [UGGPC])Day 85 UGGPC (n=22, n=18)0.32 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Marker of Synovial Tissue Metabolism (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Glucosyl-Galactosyl-Pyridinoline [UGGPC])Day 57 UGGPC (n=23, n=16)1.58 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Marker of Synovial Tissue Metabolism (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Glucosyl-Galactosyl-Pyridinoline [UGGPC])Day 113 UGGPC (n=22, n=18)-12.16 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Marker of Synovial Tissue Metabolism (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Glucosyl-Galactosyl-Pyridinoline [UGGPC])Day 15 UGGPC (n=24, n=20)4.44 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Marker of Synovial Tissue Metabolism (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Glucosyl-Galactosyl-Pyridinoline [UGGPC])Day 113 UGGPC (n=22, n=18)-3.10 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Marker of Synovial Tissue Metabolism (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Glucosyl-Galactosyl-Pyridinoline [UGGPC])Day 15 UGGPC (n=24, n=20)-3.84 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Marker of Synovial Tissue Metabolism (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Glucosyl-Galactosyl-Pyridinoline [UGGPC])Day 29 UGGPC (n=22, n=18)-3.19 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Marker of Synovial Tissue Metabolism (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Glucosyl-Galactosyl-Pyridinoline [UGGPC])Day 57 UGGPC (n=23, n=16)5.73 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Marker of Synovial Tissue Metabolism (Creatinine-corrected Urinary Glucosyl-Galactosyl-Pyridinoline [UGGPC])Day 85 UGGPC (n=22, n=18)16.29 percent change
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])

CTX-I and ICTP are biochemical markers of bone resorption or bone degradation

Time frame: Baseline to Days 15, 29, 57, 85, and 113

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 15 ICTP (n=25, n=21)-5.56 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 85 CTX-1 (n=24, n=21)-6.94 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 29 ICTP (n=26, n=21)-3.47 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 85 ICTP (n=24, n=21)-6.36 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 29 CTX-1 (n=26, n=21)0.48 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 113 CTX-1 (n=24, n=21)-7.23 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 57 CTX-1 (n=25, n=21)15.13 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 113 ICTP (n=24, n=21)-11.29 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 57 ICTP (n=25, n=21)-5.08 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 15 CTX-1 (n=25, n=21)1.65 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 57 CTX-1 (n=25, n=21)7.02 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 15 CTX-1 (n=25, n=21)-6.37 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 15 ICTP (n=25, n=21)6.25 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 29 CTX-1 (n=26, n=21)-0.72 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 29 ICTP (n=26, n=21)4.34 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 57 ICTP (n=25, n=21)8.73 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 85 CTX-1 (n=24, n=21)15.65 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 85 ICTP (n=24, n=21)2.25 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 113 CTX-1 (n=24, n=21)0.00 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Destruction (Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen [CTX-I] and Serum Pyridinoline Cross-linked Telopeptide Domain of Type I Collagen [ICTP])Day 113 ICTP (n=24, n=21)11.64 percent change
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)

PINP and osteocalcin are markers of bone formation. Osteocalcin is synthesized by osteoblasts and is associated with osteoblast synthetic activity. Osteoblasts secrete type 1 procollagen, and cleavage of large fragments from the carboxy and amino terminal ends result in formation of mature type 1 collagen and production of PINP fragments.

Time frame: Baseline to Days 15, 29, 57, 85, and 113

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 15 osteocalcin (n=25, n=21)1.82 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 15 serum intact PINP (n=25, n=21)6.83 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 29 osteocalcin (n=26, n=21)2.43 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 29 serum intact PINP (n=26, n=21)11.62 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 57 osteocalcin (n=25, n=21)4.02 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 57 serum intact PINP (n=25, n=21)3.68 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 85 osteocalcin (n=24, n=21)4.76 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 85 serum intact PINP (n=24, n=21)5.97 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 113 osteocalcin (n=24, n=21)3.18 percent change
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 113 serum intact PINP (n=24, n=21)2.98 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 85 serum intact PINP (n=24, n=21)-7.23 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 15 osteocalcin (n=25, n=21)4.41 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 57 serum intact PINP (n=25, n=21)12.18 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 15 serum intact PINP (n=25, n=21)3.94 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 113 serum intact PINP (n=24, n=21)4.75 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 29 osteocalcin (n=26, n=21)12.14 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 85 osteocalcin (n=24, n=21)10.62 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 29 serum intact PINP (n=26, n=21)-0.18 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 113 osteocalcin (n=24, n=21)7.87 percent change
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Median Percent Change From Baseline in Systemic Markers of Bone Formation: Osteocalcin and Serum Intact N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (PINP)Day 57 osteocalcin (n=25, n=21)10.53 percent change
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Acute Infusional AEs of Special Interest

Acute infusional AEs are AEs with onset during the first hour after the start of study drug infusion. An AE is any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. AEs considered possibly, probably, or certainly related to study treatment were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ,Version 3.0 (Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5=Death).

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 113, and up to 56 days post last dose of double-blind period, or start of first dose of open-label period

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Acute Infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 1 overdose0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Acute Infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 1 diarrhea0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Acute Infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 1 headache0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Acute Infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 1 flushing0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Acute Infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 1 flushing1 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Acute Infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 1 headache1 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Acute Infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 1 diarrhea1 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Acute Infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 1 overdose1 participants
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest

An AE is any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs, including serious, opportunistic, and all other infections; autoimmune disorders; neoplasms; acute infusional AEs (prespecified AEs occurring within 1 hour of start of infusion) and peri-infusional AEs (prespecified AEs occurring within 24 hours of start of infusion).

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 113, and up to 56 days post last dose of double-blind period, or start of first dose of open-label period

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestMalignancies0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestAcute infusional AEs0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestAutoimmune disorders0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestPeri-infusional AEs4 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestInfections1 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestPeri-infusional AEs5 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestInfections0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestMalignancies0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestAutoimmune disorders0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestAcute infusional AEs4 participants
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation

An AE is any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is any unfavorable medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency or abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=possibly, probably, or certainly related to and of unknown relationship to study treatment.

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 113, and up to 56 days post last dose of double-blind period, or start of first dose of open-label period

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs Leading to Discontinuation0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDeaths0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationSAEs0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationTreatment-related SAEs0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationSAEs Leading to Discontinuation0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs20 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationTreatment-related AEs8 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs Leading to Discontinuation0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationSAEs Leading to Discontinuation0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDeaths0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationTreatment-related AEs6 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationSAEs2 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs14 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationTreatment-related SAEs0 participants
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Infections/Infestations of Special Interest

Infections/Infestations of Special Interest are AEs and SAEs considered possibly, probably, or certainly related to study treatment, graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5=Death). AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 113, and up to 56 days post last dose of double-blind period, or start of first dose of open-label period

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Infections/Infestations of Special Interest1 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Infections/Infestations of Special Interest0 participants
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked Abnormality

LLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal; BL=baseline. Marked abnormality: Sodium: \<0.95\*LLN/\>1.05\*ULN,or if BL\<LLN, use 0.95\*BL or \>ULN,or if BL\>ULN, use\>1.05\*BL or \<LLN. Potassium: \<0.9\*LLN/\>1.1\* ULN,or if BL\<LLN, use 0.9\*BL or \>ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use\>1.1\*BL or \<LLN. Chloride: \<0.9\*LLN/\>1.1\*ULN, or if BL\<LLN, use 0.9\*BL or \>ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use\>1.1\*BL or \<LLN. Calcium: \<0.8\*LLN/\>1.2\*ULN, or if BL\<LLN, use 0.75\*BL or \>ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use\>1.25\*BL or \<LLN. Phosphorous: \<0.75\*LLN/\>1.25\*ULN, or if BL\<LLN, use 0.67\*BL or \>ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use\>1.33\*BL or \<LLN.

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 113, and up to 56 days post last dose of double-blind period, or start of first dose of open-label period

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow sodium0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh sodium0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow potassium0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh potassium1 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow chloride0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh chloride0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow calcium0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh calcium0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow phosphorous0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh phosphorous0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh calcium0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow sodium0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh chloride0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh sodium0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh phosphorous0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow potassium0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow calcium0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh potassium0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow phosphorous0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Electrolytes Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow chloride0 participants
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Liver and Kidney Function Meeting Criteria for Marked Abnormality

ULN=upper limit of normal; BL=baseline. Marked abnormality criteria: Alkaline phosphatase: \>2\*ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use \>3\*BL; aspartate aminotransferase: \>3\*ULN, or if BL\>ULN,use \>4\*BL; alanine aminotransferase: \>3\*ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use \>4\*BL; G-Glutamyl transferase: \>2\*ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use \>3\*BL; Bilirubin: \>2\*ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use \>4\*BL; blood urea nitrogen: \>2\*BL; creatinine: \>1.5\*BL.

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 113, and including up to 56 days post last dose of double-blind period, or start of first dose of open-label period

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Liver and Kidney Function Meeting Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh alanine aminotransferase0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Liver and Kidney Function Meeting Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh bilirubin0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Liver and Kidney Function Meeting Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh aspartate aminotransferase0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Liver and Kidney Function Meeting Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh blood urea nitrogen0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Liver and Kidney Function Meeting Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh G-Glutamyl transferase0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Liver and Kidney Function Meeting Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh creatinine1 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Liver and Kidney Function Meeting Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh alkaline phosphatase0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Liver and Kidney Function Meeting Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh creatinine0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Liver and Kidney Function Meeting Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh alkaline phosphatase0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Liver and Kidney Function Meeting Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh aspartate aminotransferase0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Liver and Kidney Function Meeting Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh alanine aminotransferase0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Liver and Kidney Function Meeting Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh G-Glutamyl transferase0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Liver and Kidney Function Meeting Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh bilirubin0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results for Liver and Kidney Function Meeting Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh blood urea nitrogen0 participants
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked Abnormality

BL=baseline; LLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal. Marked abnormality criteria: Hemoglobin: \>3 g/dL decrease from BL. Hematocrit: \<0.75\*BL. Erythrocytes: \<0.75\*BL. Platelets: \<0.67\*LLN/\>1.5\*ULN, or if BL \<LLN, use 0.5\*BL/\<100,000 mm\^3. Leukocytes: \<0.75\*LLN/\>1.25\*ULN, or if BL\<LLN, use \<0.8\*BL/\>ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use \>1.2\*BL/\<LLN. Neutrophils+bands: \<1.0\*10\^3 c/uL. Eosinophils: \>0.750\*10\^3 c/uL. Basophils: \> 400 mm\^3. Monocytes: \>2000 mm\^3. Lymphocytes: \<0.750\*10\^3 c/uL/\>7.50\*10\^3 c/uL.

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 113, and up to 56 days post last dose of double-blind period, or start of first dose of open-label period

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow erythrocytes0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow neutrophils+bands0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh platelets0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow lymphocytes2 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow hematocrit0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh lymphocytes0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow leukocytes0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh monocytes0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow platelets0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh basophils0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh leukocytes1 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh eosinophils0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow hemoglobin0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh eosinophils0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow hemoglobin1 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow hematocrit1 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow erythrocytes0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow platelets0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh platelets1 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow leukocytes0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh leukocytes0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow neutrophils+bands1 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow lymphocytes2 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh lymphocytes0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh monocytes0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Hematology Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh basophils0 participants
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked Abnormality

LLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal; BL-baseline. Marked abnormality c: serum glucose:\<65 mg/dL/\>220 mg/dL; fasting serum glucose: \<0.8\* LLN/\>1.5\* ULN, or if BL\<LLN, use 0.8\*BL or \>ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use \>2.0\*BL or \<LLN; total protein: \<0.9\*LLN/\>1.1\* ULN; albumin: \<0.9\*LLN,or if BL\<LLN, use \<0.75 BL; uric acid: \>1.5\* ULN, or if BL\>ULN, use \>2\*BL. Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, red blood cells, white blood cells):Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4,or when predose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when predose=1. Use ≥4 when predose=2 or 3

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 113, and up to 56 days post last dose of double-blind period, or start of first dose of open-label period

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow serum glucose (n=27, n=23)1 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh serum glucose (n=27, n=23)1 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow fasting glucose (n=20, n=17)0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh fasting glucose (n=20, n=17)1 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow total protein (n=27, n=23)0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh total protein (n=27, n=23)0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow albumin (n=27, n=23)0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh uric acid (n=27, n=23)0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh urine protein (n=27, n=23)1 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh urine glucose (n=27, n=23)0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh urine blood (n=27, n=23)2 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh leukocyte esterase (n=27, n=23)4 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh urine white blood cells (n=10, n=9)2 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh urine red blood cells (n=10, n=8)3 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh urine blood (n=27, n=23)1 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow serum glucose (n=27, n=23)0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh uric acid (n=27, n=23)0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh serum glucose (n=27, n=23)1 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh urine white blood cells (n=10, n=9)3 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow fasting glucose (n=20, n=17)0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh urine protein (n=27, n=23)1 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh fasting glucose (n=20, n=17)0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh leukocyte esterase (n=27, n=23)4 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow total protein (n=27, n=23)0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh urine glucose (n=27, n=23)0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh total protein (n=27, n=23)0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityHigh urine red blood cells (n=10, n=8)3 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results in Other Chemistries and Urinalysis Meeting the Criteria for Marked AbnormalityLow albumin (n=27, n=23)0 participants
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Newly Involved Joints in Bone Erosion, Edema/Osteitis, and Synovitis

Bone erosion and osteitis were assessed at a total of 23 anatomic locations according to erosion (for bone erosion) or involvement (for osteitis) of the original articular bone. Synovitis assessed as above-normal post-gadolinium enhancement in 3 wrist regions: distal radioulnar joint, radiocarpal joint, and intercarpal and carpometacarpal joints.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 113

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had erosion, edema, and synovitis assessments available at baseline and Day 113.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Newly Involved Joints in Bone Erosion, Edema/Osteitis, and Synovitis0 newly involved joints (Bone Erosion)20 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Newly Involved Joints in Bone Erosion, Edema/Osteitis, and Synovitis≥1 newly involved joints (Bone Erosion)5 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Newly Involved Joints in Bone Erosion, Edema/Osteitis, and Synovitis0 newly involved joints (Edema/Osteitis)18 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Newly Involved Joints in Bone Erosion, Edema/Osteitis, and Synovitis≥1 newly involved joints (Edema/Osteitis)7 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Newly Involved Joints in Bone Erosion, Edema/Osteitis, and Synovitis0 newly involved joints (Synovitis)23 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Newly Involved Joints in Bone Erosion, Edema/Osteitis, and Synovitis≥1 newly involved joints (Synovitis)2 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Newly Involved Joints in Bone Erosion, Edema/Osteitis, and Synovitis0 newly involved joints (Synovitis)20 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Newly Involved Joints in Bone Erosion, Edema/Osteitis, and Synovitis0 newly involved joints (Bone Erosion)16 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Newly Involved Joints in Bone Erosion, Edema/Osteitis, and Synovitis≥1 newly involved joints (Edema/Osteitis)7 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Newly Involved Joints in Bone Erosion, Edema/Osteitis, and Synovitis≥1 newly involved joints (Bone Erosion)7 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Newly Involved Joints in Bone Erosion, Edema/Osteitis, and Synovitis≥1 newly involved joints (Synovitis)3 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Newly Involved Joints in Bone Erosion, Edema/Osteitis, and Synovitis0 newly involved joints (Edema/Osteitis)16 participants
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Peri-infusional AEs of Special Interest

Peri-infusional AEs are AEs occurring during the first 24 hours after the start of study drug infusion. An AE is any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. AEs considered possibly, probably, or certainly related to study treatment were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0 (Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5=Death).

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 113, and up to 56 days post last dose of double-blind period, or start of first dose of open-label period

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Peri-infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 1 nausea3 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Peri-infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 1 headache0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Peri-infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 2 headache1 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Peri-infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 1 flushing0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Peri-infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 2 arthralgia0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Peri-infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 1 cough0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Peri-infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 2 arthralgia1 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Peri-infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 1 nausea0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Peri-infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 1 flushing2 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Peri-infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 1 headache1 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Peri-infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 1 cough1 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Peri-infusional AEs of Special InterestGrade 2 headache1 participants
Secondary

Double-blind Period: Number of Participants With Positive Antibodies to Abatacept by Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) Assay

On-Rx=on treatment; post-Rx=post treatment. ECL screened sera for drug-specific antibodies; immunocompetition was used to identify specific anti-Abatacept reactivity. Cytotoxic leukocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) and Possibly Immunoglobulin (Ig) Category=reactivity against extracellular domain of human CTLA4, constant regions of human IgG1, or both (CTLA4Ig; Abatacept molecule). Ig and/or Junction Category=reactivity against constant regions and/or hinge region of human IgG1.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 113

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Positive Antibodies to Abatacept by Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) AssayOverall on-Rx visits, CTLA4 + possibly Ig (n=27)0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Positive Antibodies to Abatacept by Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) AssayOverall on-Rx visits, Ig and/or junction (n=27)0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Positive Antibodies to Abatacept by Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) AssayOverall post-Rx visits, CTLA4 + possibly Ig (n=1)0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Positive Antibodies to Abatacept by Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) AssayOverall post-Rx visits, Ig and/or junction (n=1)0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Positive Antibodies to Abatacept by Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) AssayOverall visits, CTLA4 + possibly Ig (n=27)0 participants
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period: Number of Participants With Positive Antibodies to Abatacept by Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) AssayOverall visits, Ig and/or junction (n=27)0 participants
Secondary

Double-blind Period:Number of Participants With Significantly Abnormal Changes in Vital Signs

Vital signs, which included blood pressure, heart rate, respiration, and temperature, were monitored predose and 1 hour after start of infusion. Changes in vital signs were determined to be significantly abnormal at the discretion of the investigator but were generally those that either exceeded, or failed to reach, normal parameters. Normal vital sign parameter ranges varied by site.

Time frame: Days 1, 15, 29, 57, 85, and 113

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Abatacept + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period:Number of Participants With Significantly Abnormal Changes in Vital Signs0 participants
Placebo + MethotrexateDouble-blind Period:Number of Participants With Significantly Abnormal Changes in Vital Signs0 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 25, 2026