Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell
Conditions
Brief summary
This is a pilot study evaluating tumor activity using Positron Emission Tomography, which is also known as a PET scan. This study will assess the safety of using PD-0332991 in patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
Interventions
125 mg, oral, Days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Histologically documented MCL. * Must have received at least one prior therapy. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤1. * Adequate organ function as outlined in the protocol.
Exclusion criteria
* Major surgery, radiation therapy, or systemic therapy within 4 weeks of study enrollment. * Prior radiation therapy to \>25% of the bone marrow (whole pelvis is 25%). * Uncontrolled brain metastases, spinal cord compression, carcinomatous meningitis, or leptomeningeal disease.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study medication | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The events which were considered treatment-related by sponsor and/or investigator were reported. |
| Ki-67 Composite Score at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Cycle 1 Day 21 | Percentage of Ki-67 positive cells was determined by Immunohistochemical staining technique. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Composite score ranges from 0 (no staining) to 300 (100% of cells with 3 staining intensity). |
| Cyclin D1 Composite Score at Baseline | Baseline | Percentage of Cyclin D1 positive cells was determined by Immunohistochemical staining technique. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Composite score ranges from 0 (no staining) to 300 (100% of cells with 3 staining intensity). |
| Cyclin D1 Composite Score at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Cycle 1 Day 21 | Percentage of Cyclin D1 positive cells was determined by Immunohistochemical staining technique. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Composite score ranges from 0 (no staining) to 300 (100% of cells with 3 staining intensity). |
| Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities | Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study medication | Criteria for laboratory test abnormality: Hematology (Hemoglobin \[\<0.8\*lower limit of normal {LLN}\], Platelets \[\<0.5\*LLN/ \>1.75\*upper limit of normal {ULN}\], White blood cells \[\<0.6\*LLN/ \>1.5\*ULN\], Lymphocytes, Neutrophils \[\<0.8\*LLN/ \>1.2\*ULN\], Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes \[\>1.2\*ULN\]); Liver Function (Total bilirubin \[\>1.5\*ULN\], Aspartate aminotransferase, Alanine aminotransferase, Lactate dehydrogenase, Alkaline phosphatase \[\>0.3\*ULN\], Total protein, Albumin \[\<0.8\*LLN/ \>1.2\*ULN\]); Renal Function (Blood urea nitrogen, Creatinine \[\>1.3\*ULN\], Uric acid \[\>1.2\*ULN\]); Electrolytes (sodium \[\<0.95\*LLN/ \>1.05\*ULN\], potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium \[\<0.9\*LLN/ \>1.1\*ULN\], phosphate \[\<0.8\*LLN/ \>1.2\*ULN\]); Other (Glucose \[\<0.6\*LLN/ \>1.5\*ULN\]). |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Severity | Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study medication | AE = any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Severity was assessed as: Grade 1 (Mild); Grade 2 (Moderate); Grade 3 (Severe) = unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, and requiring systemic medication therapy/other treatment; Grade 4 (Life-threatening) = events causing participant to be in imminent danger of death; Grade 5 (Death) = death related to an AE. Treatment-emergent events = between first dose of study medication and up to 28 days after last dose, that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. A participant may be represented in more than 1 category. |
| Correlation Coefficient Between Change From Baseline in Fluoro-L-thymidine Positron Emission Tomography (FLT-PET) Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) and in Phosphorylated Retinoblastoma (Phospho-Rb) Percent Positive Cells at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 21 | Maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was defined as the maximum value attained for the ratio of tissue radioactivity concentration at any time and the injected radioactivity concentration divided by the body weight (in kilogram \[kg\]). Phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein in the tumor cells, expressed as phospho-Rb percent positive cells, was assessed using Immunohistochemical staining technique. Change from baseline in \[(18)F\]-FLT-PET SUVmax at Cycle 1 Day 21 and change from baseline in Phospho-Rb percent positive cells at Cycle 1 Day 21 were analyzed. The change values of FLT-PET SUVmax and Phospho-Rb percent positive cells were then correlated. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure. |
| Correlation Coefficient Between Change From Baseline in Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) and in Phosphorylated Retinoblastoma (Phospho-Rb) Percent Positive Cells at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 21 | Maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was defined as the maximum value attained for the ratio of tissue radioactivity concentration at any time and the injected radioactivity concentration divided by the body weight (in kilogram \[kg\]). Phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein in the tumor cells, expressed as phospho-Rb percent positive cells, was assessed using Immunohistochemical staining technique. Change from baseline in \[(18)F\]-FDG-PET SUVmax at Cycle 1 Day 21 and change from baseline in Phospho-Rb percent positive cells at Cycle 1 Day 21 were analyzed. The change values of FLT-PET SUVmax and Phospho-Rb percent positive cells were then correlated. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure. |
| Change From Baseline in Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 21 | Maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was defined as the maximum value attained for the ratio of tissue radioactivity concentration at any time and the injected radioactivity concentration divided by the body weight (in kilogram \[kg\]). Change from baseline in SUVmax was assessed using \[(18)F\]-FLT-PET and \[(18)F\]-FDG-PET techniques. |
| Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 21 for PET response; Screening until tumor progression or death, assessed on Day 1 of every alternate cycle starting from Cycle 1 up to end of treatment (Day 609) or early withdrawal (if not completed during last 6 weeks) for PFS | PET response was defined as complete response (CR) = mean SUVmax same as of background; partial response (PR) = mean SUVmax less than (\<) 75 percent (%) of baseline; progressive disease (PD) = mean SUVmax greater than (\>) 125% of baseline; stable disease (SD) = mean SUVmax greater than or equal to (\>=) 75% of baseline and mean SUVmax less than or equal to (\<=) 125% of baseline. PFS was defined as the time from first dose of study medication to the first documentation of objective tumor progression, or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Tumor progression was defined as \>50% increase in sum of products of diameters, of dominant nodes and documented non-nodal sites or appearance of new sites of disease. |
| Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Objective Response (OR) | Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 21 for PET response; Screening until tumor progression or death, assessed on Day 1 of every alternate cycle starting from Cycle 1 up to end of treatment (Day 609) or early withdrawal (if not completed during last 6 weeks) for OR | OR: CR= disappearance of all clinical/radiographic evidence of disease, disease related symptoms and biochemical abnormalities, nodal masses regressed to normal size, if spleen and bone marrow were involved, spleen regressed to normal size and not palpable and clear infiltrate on repeat bone marrow aspiration; PR= dominant nodes decreased by \>50% in sum of products of diameters (SPD), no increase in size of other nodes/liver/spleen, lesions regressed by \>50% in SPD, no new sites of disease; SD= response \<PR and no PD, documented \>=1 time after start of therapy, no new sites of disease; PD= \>50% increase in SPD of dominant nodes and other nodes or appearance of new sites of disease. PET response: CR= mean SUVmax same as background; PR= mean SUVmax \<75% of baseline; PD= mean SUVmax \>125% of baseline; SD= mean SUVmax \>=75% of baseline but \<=125% of baseline. Correlation was reported as conjoint number of participants with PET response at Cycle 1 Day 21 and OR at end of study. |
| Phosphorylated Retinoblastoma (Phospho-Rb) Percent Positive Cells at Baseline | Baseline | Phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein in the tumor cells, expressed as phospho-Rb percent positive cells, was assessed using Immunohistochemical staining technique. |
| Phosphorylated Retinoblastoma (Phospho-Rb) Percent Positive Cells at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Cycle 1 Day 21 | Phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein in the tumor cells, expressed as phospho-Rb percent positive cells, was assessed using Immunohistochemical staining technique. |
| Ki-67 Composite Score at Baseline | Baseline | Percentage of Ki-67 positive cells was determined by Immunohistochemical staining technique. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Composite score ranges from 0 (no staining) to 300 (100% of cells with 3 staining intensity). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | Screening until tumor progression or death, assessed on Day 1 of every alternate cycle starting from Cycle 1 up to end of treatment (Day 609) or early withdrawal (if not completed during last 6 weeks) | OR is defined as the percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR). Confirmed responses are those that persist on repeat imaging study 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. Complete response (CR)= disappearance of all detectable clinical/radiographic evidence of disease, disease related symptoms present before therapy and biochemical abnormalities attributable to disease, nodal masses regressed to normal size, if spleen and bone marrow were involved, spleen regressed to normal size and not palpable and clear infiltrate on repeated bone marrow aspiration; Partial response (PR)= dominant nodes decreased by \>50% in sum of products of diameters (SPD), no increase in size of other nodes/liver/spleen, lesions in organs (spleen/liver) regressed by \>50% in SPD, no new sites of disease. |
| Duration of Response (DR) | Screening until tumor progression or death, assessed on Day 1 of every alternate cycle starting from Cycle 1 up to end of treatment (Day 609) or early withdrawal (if not completed during last 6 weeks) | Time in months from first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed, to objective tumor progression (PD) or death due to any cause. DR= (date of first documentation of PD or death, minus the date of first CR or PR plus 1) divided by 30.44. CR= disappearance of all detectable clinical/radiographic evidence of disease, disease related symptoms present before start of therapy and biochemical abnormalities attributable to disease, nodal masses regressed to normal size, if spleen and bone marrow were involved, spleen regressed to normal size and not palpable and clear infiltrate on repeated bone marrow aspiration. PR= dominant nodes decreased by \>50% in sum of products of diameters (SPD), no increase in size of other nodes/liver/spleen, lesions in organs (spleen/liver) regressed by \>50% in SPD, no new sites of disease. PD= \>50% increase in SPD of dominant nodes and other nodes or appearance of new sites of disease. |
| Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) | Screening until tumor progression or death, assessed on Day 1 of every alternate cycle starting from Cycle 1 up to end of treatment (Day 609) or early withdrawal (if not completed during last 6 weeks) | Time in months from date of first dose of study medication to first documentation of objective tumor progression (PD). TTP= (last known progression-free date minus date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.44. PD was defined as greater than 50% increase in sum of products of diameters, of dominant nodes and documented non-nodal sites or appearance of new sites of disease. |
| Correlation Coefficient Between Plasma PD 0332991 Concentration and Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and SUVmax at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 21 | Plasma PD 0332991 concentration at Cycle 1 Day 21 was analyzed. Change from baseline in biomarkers (Ki-67 composite score, Cyclin D1 composite score, phospho-Rb positive cells) and SUVmax (FLT-PET SUVmax, FDG-PET SUVmax) at Cycle 1 Day 21 were analyzed. Correlation between PD 0332991 concentration and change in biomarkers (concentration versus Ki-67, concentration versus Cyclin, and concentration versus phospho-Rb) and SUVmax (concentration versus FLT-PET SUVmax, concentration versus FDG-PET SUVmax) was then assessed. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure. |
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | Screening until tumor progression or death, assessed on Day 1 of every alternate cycle starting from Cycle 1 up to end of treatment (Day 609) or early withdrawal (if not completed during last 6 weeks) | PFS was defined as the time from first dose of study medication to the first documentation of objective tumor progression, or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Tumor progression was defined as \>50% increase in sum of products of diameters, of dominant nodes and documented non-nodal sites or appearance of new sites of disease. PFS= (first event date minus the first dose date plus 1) divided by 30.44. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| PD 0332991 PD 0332991 125 milligram (mg) capsule orally once daily in cycles of continuous dosing for 3 weeks followed by 1-week rest, with no dosing (schedule 3/1) until objective disease progression, withdrawal due to unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent by the participant. Dose was reduced up to PD 0332991 75 mg once daily depending on the type and severity of toxicity encountered and as per investigator's discretion. | 17 |
| Total | 17 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Objective progression or relapse | 17 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | PD 0332991 |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 66.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 3 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 14 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 17 / 17 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 17 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Cycle 1 Day 21
Maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was defined as the maximum value attained for the ratio of tissue radioactivity concentration at any time and the injected radioactivity concentration divided by the body weight (in kilogram \[kg\]). Change from baseline in SUVmax was assessed using \[(18)F\]-FLT-PET and \[(18)F\]-FDG-PET techniques.
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 21
Population: Imaging analysis set included participants in FAS who completed baseline \[(18)F\]-FDG-PET and \[(18)F\]-FLT-PET, and at least 1 on-treatment (Day 21) PET.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PD 0332991 | Change From Baseline in Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Baseline: FLT-PET | 9.964 standard uptake value (SUV) | Standard Deviation 4.929 |
| PD 0332991 | Change From Baseline in Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Baseline: FDG-PET | 9.049 standard uptake value (SUV) | Standard Deviation 4.654 |
| PD 0332991 | Change From Baseline in Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Change at Cycle 1 Day 21: FLT-PET | -4.551 standard uptake value (SUV) | Standard Deviation 2.968 |
| PD 0332991 | Change From Baseline in Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Change at Cycle 1 Day 21: FDG-PET | -2.271 standard uptake value (SUV) | Standard Deviation 2.913 |
Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Objective Response (OR)
OR: CR= disappearance of all clinical/radiographic evidence of disease, disease related symptoms and biochemical abnormalities, nodal masses regressed to normal size, if spleen and bone marrow were involved, spleen regressed to normal size and not palpable and clear infiltrate on repeat bone marrow aspiration; PR= dominant nodes decreased by \>50% in sum of products of diameters (SPD), no increase in size of other nodes/liver/spleen, lesions regressed by \>50% in SPD, no new sites of disease; SD= response \<PR and no PD, documented \>=1 time after start of therapy, no new sites of disease; PD= \>50% increase in SPD of dominant nodes and other nodes or appearance of new sites of disease. PET response: CR= mean SUVmax same as background; PR= mean SUVmax \<75% of baseline; PD= mean SUVmax \>125% of baseline; SD= mean SUVmax \>=75% of baseline but \<=125% of baseline. Correlation was reported as conjoint number of participants with PET response at Cycle 1 Day 21 and OR at end of study.
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 21 for PET response; Screening until tumor progression or death, assessed on Day 1 of every alternate cycle starting from Cycle 1 up to end of treatment (Day 609) or early withdrawal (if not completed during last 6 weeks) for OR
Population: PET response was analyzed using Imaging analysis set and OR was analyzed using response analysis set (all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study medication in cycle 1 and for whom a post-treatment response assessment was completed).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Objective Response (OR) | FLT-PET PR, Objective CR | 1 participants |
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Objective Response (OR) | FLT-PET PR, Objective PR | 2 participants |
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Objective Response (OR) | FLT-PET PR, Objective SD | 7 participants |
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Objective Response (OR) | FLT-PET PR, Objective PD | 4 participants |
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Objective Response (OR) | FLT-PET PR, Indetermined Objective Response | 1 participants |
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Objective Response (OR) | FLT-PET SD, Objective PD | 2 participants |
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Objective Response (OR) | FDG-PET PR, Objective PR | 2 participants |
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Objective Response (OR) | FDG-PET PR, Objective SD | 3 participants |
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Objective Response (OR) | FDG-PET PR, Objective PD | 2 participants |
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Objective Response (OR) | FDG-PET SD, Objective CR | 1 participants |
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Objective Response (OR) | FDG-PET SD, Objective SD | 4 participants |
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Objective Response (OR) | FDG-PET SD, Objective PD | 4 participants |
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Objective Response (OR) | FDG-PET SD, Objective Indetermined Response | 1 participants |
Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PET response was defined as complete response (CR) = mean SUVmax same as of background; partial response (PR) = mean SUVmax less than (\<) 75 percent (%) of baseline; progressive disease (PD) = mean SUVmax greater than (\>) 125% of baseline; stable disease (SD) = mean SUVmax greater than or equal to (\>=) 75% of baseline and mean SUVmax less than or equal to (\<=) 125% of baseline. PFS was defined as the time from first dose of study medication to the first documentation of objective tumor progression, or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Tumor progression was defined as \>50% increase in sum of products of diameters, of dominant nodes and documented non-nodal sites or appearance of new sites of disease.
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 21 for PET response; Screening until tumor progression or death, assessed on Day 1 of every alternate cycle starting from Cycle 1 up to end of treatment (Day 609) or early withdrawal (if not completed during last 6 weeks) for PFS
Population: Analysis for this outcome measure was not run as there were so few responders.
Correlation Coefficient Between Change From Baseline in Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) and in Phosphorylated Retinoblastoma (Phospho-Rb) Percent Positive Cells at Cycle 1 Day 21
Maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was defined as the maximum value attained for the ratio of tissue radioactivity concentration at any time and the injected radioactivity concentration divided by the body weight (in kilogram \[kg\]). Phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein in the tumor cells, expressed as phospho-Rb percent positive cells, was assessed using Immunohistochemical staining technique. Change from baseline in \[(18)F\]-FDG-PET SUVmax at Cycle 1 Day 21 and change from baseline in Phospho-Rb percent positive cells at Cycle 1 Day 21 were analyzed. The change values of FLT-PET SUVmax and Phospho-Rb percent positive cells were then correlated. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 21
Population: SUVmax was analyzed using imaging analysis set (participants in FAS who completed baseline \[(18)F\]-FDG-PET and \[(18)F\]-FLT-PET, and at least 1 on-treatment \[Day 21\] PET) and phospho-Rb was analyzed using tumor analysis set (participants in FAS who completed tumor biomarker assessments at baseline and Day 21).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Coefficient Between Change From Baseline in Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) and in Phosphorylated Retinoblastoma (Phospho-Rb) Percent Positive Cells at Cycle 1 Day 21 | 0.13551 correlation coefficient |
Correlation Coefficient Between Change From Baseline in Fluoro-L-thymidine Positron Emission Tomography (FLT-PET) Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) and in Phosphorylated Retinoblastoma (Phospho-Rb) Percent Positive Cells at Cycle 1 Day 21
Maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was defined as the maximum value attained for the ratio of tissue radioactivity concentration at any time and the injected radioactivity concentration divided by the body weight (in kilogram \[kg\]). Phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein in the tumor cells, expressed as phospho-Rb percent positive cells, was assessed using Immunohistochemical staining technique. Change from baseline in \[(18)F\]-FLT-PET SUVmax at Cycle 1 Day 21 and change from baseline in Phospho-Rb percent positive cells at Cycle 1 Day 21 were analyzed. The change values of FLT-PET SUVmax and Phospho-Rb percent positive cells were then correlated. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 21
Population: SUVmax was analyzed using imaging analysis set (participants in FAS who completed baseline \[(18)F\]-fluorodeoxyglucose PET \[FDG-PET\] and \[(18)F\]-FLT-PET, and at least 1 on-treatment \[Day 21\] PET) and phospho-Rb was analyzed using tumor analysis set (participants in FAS who completed tumor biomarker assessments at baseline and Day 21).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Coefficient Between Change From Baseline in Fluoro-L-thymidine Positron Emission Tomography (FLT-PET) Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) and in Phosphorylated Retinoblastoma (Phospho-Rb) Percent Positive Cells at Cycle 1 Day 21 | -0.25034 correlation coefficient |
Cyclin D1 Composite Score at Baseline
Percentage of Cyclin D1 positive cells was determined by Immunohistochemical staining technique. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Composite score ranges from 0 (no staining) to 300 (100% of cells with 3 staining intensity).
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Tumor analysis set include all participants in FAS who completed tumor biomarker assessments at baseline and Day 21. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| PD 0332991 | Cyclin D1 Composite Score at Baseline | 165.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 78.17 |
Cyclin D1 Composite Score at Cycle 1 Day 21
Percentage of Cyclin D1 positive cells was determined by Immunohistochemical staining technique. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Composite score ranges from 0 (no staining) to 300 (100% of cells with 3 staining intensity).
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 21
Population: Tumor analysis set include all participants in FAS who completed tumor biomarker assessments at baseline and Day 21. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| PD 0332991 | Cyclin D1 Composite Score at Cycle 1 Day 21 | 124.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 47.58 |
Ki-67 Composite Score at Baseline
Percentage of Ki-67 positive cells was determined by Immunohistochemical staining technique. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Composite score ranges from 0 (no staining) to 300 (100% of cells with 3 staining intensity).
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Tumor analysis set include all participants in FAS who completed tumor biomarker assessments at baseline and Day 21. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| PD 0332991 | Ki-67 Composite Score at Baseline | 191.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 64.56 |
Ki-67 Composite Score at Cycle 1 Day 21
Percentage of Ki-67 positive cells was determined by Immunohistochemical staining technique. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Composite score ranges from 0 (no staining) to 300 (100% of cells with 3 staining intensity).
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 21
Population: Tumor analysis set include all participants in FAS who completed tumor biomarker assessments at baseline and Day 21. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| PD 0332991 | Ki-67 Composite Score at Cycle 1 Day 21 | 78.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 110.02 |
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Criteria for laboratory test abnormality: Hematology (Hemoglobin \[\<0.8\*lower limit of normal {LLN}\], Platelets \[\<0.5\*LLN/ \>1.75\*upper limit of normal {ULN}\], White blood cells \[\<0.6\*LLN/ \>1.5\*ULN\], Lymphocytes, Neutrophils \[\<0.8\*LLN/ \>1.2\*ULN\], Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes \[\>1.2\*ULN\]); Liver Function (Total bilirubin \[\>1.5\*ULN\], Aspartate aminotransferase, Alanine aminotransferase, Lactate dehydrogenase, Alkaline phosphatase \[\>0.3\*ULN\], Total protein, Albumin \[\<0.8\*LLN/ \>1.2\*ULN\]); Renal Function (Blood urea nitrogen, Creatinine \[\>1.3\*ULN\], Uric acid \[\>1.2\*ULN\]); Electrolytes (sodium \[\<0.95\*LLN/ \>1.05\*ULN\], potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium \[\<0.9\*LLN/ \>1.1\*ULN\], phosphate \[\<0.8\*LLN/ \>1.2\*ULN\]); Other (Glucose \[\<0.6\*LLN/ \>1.5\*ULN\]).
Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study medication
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| PD 0332991 | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities | 16 participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Severity
AE = any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Severity was assessed as: Grade 1 (Mild); Grade 2 (Moderate); Grade 3 (Severe) = unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, and requiring systemic medication therapy/other treatment; Grade 4 (Life-threatening) = events causing participant to be in imminent danger of death; Grade 5 (Death) = death related to an AE. Treatment-emergent events = between first dose of study medication and up to 28 days after last dose, that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. A participant may be represented in more than 1 category.
Time frame: Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study medication
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PD 0332991 | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Severity | Grade 1 | 4 participants |
| PD 0332991 | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Severity | Grade 2 | 2 participants |
| PD 0332991 | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Severity | Grade 3 | 7 participants |
| PD 0332991 | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Severity | Grade 4 | 3 participants |
| PD 0332991 | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Severity | Grade 5 | 1 participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The events which were considered treatment-related by sponsor and/or investigator were reported.
Time frame: Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study medication
Population: Safety analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PD 0332991 | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 16 participants |
| PD 0332991 | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 2 participants |
Phosphorylated Retinoblastoma (Phospho-Rb) Percent Positive Cells at Baseline
Phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein in the tumor cells, expressed as phospho-Rb percent positive cells, was assessed using Immunohistochemical staining technique.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Tumor analysis set include all participants in FAS who completed tumor biomarker assessments at baseline and Day 21. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| PD 0332991 | Phosphorylated Retinoblastoma (Phospho-Rb) Percent Positive Cells at Baseline | 47.9 percentage of tumor cells | Standard Deviation 25.72 |
Phosphorylated Retinoblastoma (Phospho-Rb) Percent Positive Cells at Cycle 1 Day 21
Phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein in the tumor cells, expressed as phospho-Rb percent positive cells, was assessed using Immunohistochemical staining technique.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 21
Population: Tumor analysis set include all participants in FAS who completed tumor biomarker assessments at baseline and Day 21. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| PD 0332991 | Phosphorylated Retinoblastoma (Phospho-Rb) Percent Positive Cells at Cycle 1 Day 21 | 7.2 percentage of tumor cells | Standard Deviation 14.4 |
Correlation Coefficient Between Plasma PD 0332991 Concentration and Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and SUVmax at Cycle 1 Day 21
Plasma PD 0332991 concentration at Cycle 1 Day 21 was analyzed. Change from baseline in biomarkers (Ki-67 composite score, Cyclin D1 composite score, phospho-Rb positive cells) and SUVmax (FLT-PET SUVmax, FDG-PET SUVmax) at Cycle 1 Day 21 were analyzed. Correlation between PD 0332991 concentration and change in biomarkers (concentration versus Ki-67, concentration versus Cyclin, and concentration versus phospho-Rb) and SUVmax (concentration versus FLT-PET SUVmax, concentration versus FDG-PET SUVmax) was then assessed. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 21
Population: PD 0332991 concentration was analyzed using pharmacokinetic analysis set (participants in FAS who had also completed pharmacokinetic blood sampling for at least 1 day); SUVmax and biomarkers were analyzed using imaging analysis set and tumor analysis set respectively. n= participants evaluable for this measure for specified comparisons.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Coefficient Between Plasma PD 0332991 Concentration and Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and SUVmax at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Concentration versus Ki-67 (n=6) | 0.27677 correlation coefficient |
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Coefficient Between Plasma PD 0332991 Concentration and Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and SUVmax at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Concentration versus Cyclin D1 (n= 6) | -0.69081 correlation coefficient |
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Coefficient Between Plasma PD 0332991 Concentration and Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and SUVmax at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Concentration versus phospho-Rb (n= 10) | -0.55533 correlation coefficient |
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Coefficient Between Plasma PD 0332991 Concentration and Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and SUVmax at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Concentration versus FLT-PET SUVmax (n= 16) | 0.28767 correlation coefficient |
| PD 0332991 | Correlation Coefficient Between Plasma PD 0332991 Concentration and Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and SUVmax at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Concentration versus FDG-PET SUVmax (n= 16) | -0.18526 correlation coefficient |
Duration of Response (DR)
Time in months from first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed, to objective tumor progression (PD) or death due to any cause. DR= (date of first documentation of PD or death, minus the date of first CR or PR plus 1) divided by 30.44. CR= disappearance of all detectable clinical/radiographic evidence of disease, disease related symptoms present before start of therapy and biochemical abnormalities attributable to disease, nodal masses regressed to normal size, if spleen and bone marrow were involved, spleen regressed to normal size and not palpable and clear infiltrate on repeated bone marrow aspiration. PR= dominant nodes decreased by \>50% in sum of products of diameters (SPD), no increase in size of other nodes/liver/spleen, lesions in organs (spleen/liver) regressed by \>50% in SPD, no new sites of disease. PD= \>50% increase in SPD of dominant nodes and other nodes or appearance of new sites of disease.
Time frame: Screening until tumor progression or death, assessed on Day 1 of every alternate cycle starting from Cycle 1 up to end of treatment (Day 609) or early withdrawal (if not completed during last 6 weeks)
Population: For duration of response, the number of participants experiencing objective response was less than 50%, and therefore, it was not feasible to calculate duration of response using Kaplan-Meier method. Hence, no participant was analyzed for this outcome measure.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
OR is defined as the percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR). Confirmed responses are those that persist on repeat imaging study 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. Complete response (CR)= disappearance of all detectable clinical/radiographic evidence of disease, disease related symptoms present before therapy and biochemical abnormalities attributable to disease, nodal masses regressed to normal size, if spleen and bone marrow were involved, spleen regressed to normal size and not palpable and clear infiltrate on repeated bone marrow aspiration; Partial response (PR)= dominant nodes decreased by \>50% in sum of products of diameters (SPD), no increase in size of other nodes/liver/spleen, lesions in organs (spleen/liver) regressed by \>50% in SPD, no new sites of disease.
Time frame: Screening until tumor progression or death, assessed on Day 1 of every alternate cycle starting from Cycle 1 up to end of treatment (Day 609) or early withdrawal (if not completed during last 6 weeks)
Population: Response analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study medication in cycle 1 and for whom a post-treatment response assessment was completed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| PD 0332991 | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | 18.8 percentage of participants |
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from first dose of study medication to the first documentation of objective tumor progression, or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Tumor progression was defined as \>50% increase in sum of products of diameters, of dominant nodes and documented non-nodal sites or appearance of new sites of disease. PFS= (first event date minus the first dose date plus 1) divided by 30.44.
Time frame: Screening until tumor progression or death, assessed on Day 1 of every alternate cycle starting from Cycle 1 up to end of treatment (Day 609) or early withdrawal (if not completed during last 6 weeks)
Population: Response analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study medication in cycle 1 and for whom a post-treatment response assessment was completed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| PD 0332991 | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | 5.5 months |
Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)
Time in months from date of first dose of study medication to first documentation of objective tumor progression (PD). TTP= (last known progression-free date minus date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.44. PD was defined as greater than 50% increase in sum of products of diameters, of dominant nodes and documented non-nodal sites or appearance of new sites of disease.
Time frame: Screening until tumor progression or death, assessed on Day 1 of every alternate cycle starting from Cycle 1 up to end of treatment (Day 609) or early withdrawal (if not completed during last 6 weeks)
Population: Response analysis set included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of study medication in cycle 1 and for whom a post-treatment response assessment was completed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| PD 0332991 | Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) | 5.5 months |