Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Targeted Therapy and Chemotherapy

A Single Arm, Multicenter Phase II Study of Everolimus in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Whose Cancer Has Progressed Despite Prior Therapy With an Anti-EGFR Antibody (if Appropriate), Bevacizumab, Fluoropyrimidine, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan-based Regimens

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00419159
Enrollment
199
Registered
2007-01-08
Start date
2006-12-31
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2019-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

Colorectal cancer, metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, anti-EGFR antibody

Brief summary

To assess the safety and efficacy of weekly (70 mg per week) and daily (10 mg per day) everolimus in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer whose cancer has progressed despite prior treatment with targeted therapy and chemotherapy.

Interventions

DRUGEverolimus (RAD001)

Everolimus was supplied in 5 mg tablets in blister packs.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years old. * Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). * Patients must have sufficient and obtainable tumor tissue for biomarker analysis from original surgical resection. * Patients with documented disease progression within 6 months of their most recent dose of chemotherapeutic regimens. * Patients with at least one measurable lesion. * Adequate bone marrow function. * Adequate liver function. * Adequate renal function. * Patients with a life expectancy of \> 3 months. * Patients with a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status of 0, 1, or 2. * Women of childbearing potential must have had a negative serum pregnancy test 72 hours prior to the administration of the first study treatment. * Patients who give a written informed consent obtained according to local guidelines.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients currently receiving anti-cancer agents or who have received these within 4 weeks prior to study entry. * Patients who have previously received RAD001. * Patients with a known hypersensitivity to everolimus or other rapamycins (sirolimus, temsirolimus) or to its excipients. * Chronic treatment with steroids or another immunosuppressive agent. * Patients with untreated central nervous system (CNS) metastases or neurologically unstable CNS metastases. * HIV seropositivity. * Patients with an active, bleeding diathesis. Patients may use enoxaparin. * Patients who have any severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions or other conditions that could affect their participation in the study. * Patients who have a history of another primary malignancy \< 3 years, with the exceptions of non-melanoma skin cancer, and carcinoma in situ of uterine cervix. * Female patients who are pregnant or breast feeding, or adults of reproductive potential who are not using effective birth control methods. * Patients who are using other investigational agents or who had received investigational drugs ≤ 4 weeks prior to first study treatment. * Patients unwilling to or unable to comply with the protocol. Other protocol defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease Control Rate (DCR) and Objective Response Rate (ORR) According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Imaging every 8 weeksRECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) is a set of published rules that define when cancer patients improve (respond), stay the same (stable) or worsen (progression) during treatments. Disease Control Rate (DCR) defined as the percentage of participants with Disease Control best overall response (complete response, partial response or stable disease)and Objective Response Rate (ORR) defined as the percentage of participants with best overall Objective Response (complete response or partial response).
The Number of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Imaging every 8 weeksRECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) is a set of published rules that define when cancer patients improve (respond), stay the same (stable) or worsen (progression) during treatments. Best Over Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR, No lesions), Partial Response (PR, 30% decrease in lesions), and Stable Disease (SD, none of the above)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients Who Died, Had an Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Had Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Event (AE), Discontinued Due to an AE, or Had a Clinical Notable AE by Treatment (tr).From the first day of treatment until 28 days after discontinuation of study treatmentToxicity assessed using the NIH-NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0 (CTCAEv3.0). On treatment death defined as deaths occurring no more than 28 days after the discontinuation of study treatment.
Biomarker Predictive of Clinical Benefit (DCR by KRAS) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekScreening and Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4 and end of treatmentThe efficacy variable compared in this biomarker analysis is disease control rate (DCR) within the 70mg/week arm in the analysis not adjusted for prognostic factors: from archival tumor tissue (and additionally from a biopsy at a metastatic site, if available), collected during screening: KRAS gene mutation. From blood plasma, collected at screening then on day 1 at cycles 2, 3 and 4, and at the end of treatment: blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme fractionation and serum levels of sVEGFR2, bFGF, PLGF and VEGF.
Biomarker Predictive of Clinical Benefit (DCR by KRAS) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayScreening and Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4 and end of treatmentThe efficacy variable compared in this biomarker analysis is disease control rate (DCR) within the 10mg/day arm in the analysis not adjusted for prognostic factors: from archival tumor tissue (and additionally from a biopsy at a metastatic site, if available), collected during screening: KRAS gene mutation. From blood plasma, collected at screening then on day 1 at cycles 2, 3 and 4, and at the end of treatment: blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme fractionation and serum levels of sVEGFR2, bFGF, PLGF and VEGF.
Biomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by KRAS ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/WeekScreening and Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4 and end of treatmentThe efficacy variable that was compared in the biomarker analysis are Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) within the Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/week arm in the analysis not adjusted for prognostic factors: from archival tumor tissue (and additionally from a biopsy at a metastatic site, if available), collected during screening: KRAS gene mutation. From blood plasma, collected at screening then on day 1 at cycles 2, 3 and 4, and at the end of treatment: blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme fractionation and serum levels of sVEGFR2, bFGF, PLGF and VEGF.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Imaging every 8 weeksDuration in months from the date of first study treatment to the date of the first documented disease progression or death due to any cause.
Biomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (DCR by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/WeekScreening and Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4 and end of treatmentThe efficacy variable that was compared in the biomarker analysis is DCR within the Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/week arm in the analysis not adjusted for prognostic factors: from archival tumor tissue (and additionally from a biopsy at a metastatic site, if available), collected during screening: PTEN loss (imunohistochemistry, IHC), phosphoAKT (IHC), phosphoS6 (IHC), and p53 (IHC). From blood plasma, collected at screening then on day 1 at cycles 2, 3 and 4, and at the end of treatment: blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme fractionation and serum levels of sVEGFR2, bFGF, PLGF and VEGF.
Biomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (DCR by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/DayScreening and Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4 and end of treatmentThe efficacy variable that was compared in the biomarker analysis is DCR within the Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/day arm in the analysis not adjusted for prognostic factors: from archival tumor tissue (and additionally from a biopsy at a metastatic site, if available), collected during screening: PTEN loss (imunohistochemistry, IHC), phosphoAKT (IHC), phosphoS6 (IHC), and p53 (IHC). From blood plasma, collected at screening then on day 1 at cycles 2, 3 and 4, and at the end of treatment: blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme fractionation and serum levels of sVEGFR2, bFGF, PLGF and VEGF.
Biomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/WeekScreening and Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4 and end of treatmentThe efficacy variable that was compared in the biomarker analysis are PFS & OS within the Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/Week arm in the analysis not adjusted for prognostic factors: from archival tumor tissue (and additionally from a biopsy at a metastatic site, if available), collected during screening: PTEN loss (imunohistochemistry, IHC), phosphoAKT (IHC), phosphoS6 (IHC), and p53 (IHC). From blood plasma, collected at screening then on day 1 at cycles 2, 3 and 4, and at the end of treatment: blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme fractionation and serum levels of sVEGFR2, bFGF, PLGF and VEGF.
Biomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/DayScreening and Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4 and end of treatmentThe efficacy variable that was compared in the biomarker analysis are PFS & OS within the Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/day arm in the analysis not adjusted for prognostic factors: from archival tumor tissue (and additionally from a biopsy at a metastatic site, if available), collected during screening: PTEN loss (imunohistochemistry, IHC), phosphoAKT (IHC), phosphoS6 (IHC), and p53 (IHC). From blood plasma, collected at screening then on day 1 at cycles 2, 3 and 4, and at the end of treatment: blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme fractionation and serum levels of sVEGFR2, bFGF, PLGF and VEGF.
Biomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by KRAS) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/DayScreening and Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4 and end of treatmentThe efficacy variable that was compared in the biomarker analysis are Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) within the Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/day arm in the analysis not adjusted for prognostic factors: from archival tumor tissue (and additionally from a biopsy at a metastatic site, if available), collected during screening: KRAS gene mutation. From blood plasma, collected at screening then on day 1 at cycles 2, 3 and 4, and at the end of treatment: blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme fractionation and serum levels of sVEGFR2, bFGF, PLGF and VEGF.
Overall Survival (OS)Every 3 monthsOverall survival defined as the time from date of first study treatment to the date of death due to any cause.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/Week
Participants self-administered weekly oral dose of Everolimus (RAD001). Drug supplied as 5 mg tablets in blister packs.
99
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/Day
Participants self-administered daily oral dose of Everolimus (RAD001). Drug supplied as 5 mg tablets in blister packs.
100
Total199

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAbnormal laboratory value(s)02
Overall StudyAdverse Event715
Overall StudyDeath22
Overall StudyDisease progression7976
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudySubject's no longer requires study drug01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject103

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEverolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayEverolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekTotal
Age, Continuous60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
60.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
60.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
Age, Customized
45 to <55 Years
17 Participants22 Participants39 Participants
Age, Customized
<45 Years
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Age, Customized
55 to <65 Years
33 Participants29 Participants62 Participants
Age, Customized
> or = to 65 Years
40 Participants38 Participants78 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
48 Participants47 Participants95 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
52 Participants52 Participants104 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
99 / 9998 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
34 / 9922 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

Disease Control Rate (DCR) and Objective Response Rate (ORR) According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) is a set of published rules that define when cancer patients improve (respond), stay the same (stable) or worsen (progression) during treatments. Disease Control Rate (DCR) defined as the percentage of participants with Disease Control best overall response (complete response, partial response or stable disease)and Objective Response Rate (ORR) defined as the percentage of participants with best overall Objective Response (complete response or partial response).

Time frame: Imaging every 8 weeks

Population: Per Protocol Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekDisease Control Rate (DCR) and Objective Response Rate (ORR) According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Disease Control Rate (DCR)31.0 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekDisease Control Rate (DCR) and Objective Response Rate (ORR) According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Objective Response Rate (ORR)0 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayDisease Control Rate (DCR) and Objective Response Rate (ORR) According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Disease Control Rate (DCR)32.4 Percentage of participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayDisease Control Rate (DCR) and Objective Response Rate (ORR) According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Objective Response Rate (ORR)0 Percentage of participants
Primary

The Number of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) is a set of published rules that define when cancer patients improve (respond), stay the same (stable) or worsen (progression) during treatments. Best Over Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR, No lesions), Partial Response (PR, 30% decrease in lesions), and Stable Disease (SD, none of the above)

Time frame: Imaging every 8 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekThe Number of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Stable Disease (SD)25 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekThe Number of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Disease Control (CR or PR or SD)25 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekThe Number of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Partial Response (PR)0 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekThe Number of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Objective Response (CR or PR)0 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekThe Number of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Progressive Disease (PD)58 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekThe Number of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Unknown16 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekThe Number of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Complete Response (CR)0 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayThe Number of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Unknown19 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayThe Number of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Complete Response (CR)0 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayThe Number of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Partial Response (PR)0 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayThe Number of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Stable Disease (SD)26 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayThe Number of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Progressive Disease (PD)55 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayThe Number of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Disease Control (CR or PR or SD)26 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayThe Number of Participants With Best Overall Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)Objective Response (CR or PR)0 Participants
Secondary

Biomarker Predictive of Clinical Benefit (DCR by KRAS) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/Day

The efficacy variable compared in this biomarker analysis is disease control rate (DCR) within the 10mg/day arm in the analysis not adjusted for prognostic factors: from archival tumor tissue (and additionally from a biopsy at a metastatic site, if available), collected during screening: KRAS gene mutation. From blood plasma, collected at screening then on day 1 at cycles 2, 3 and 4, and at the end of treatment: blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme fractionation and serum levels of sVEGFR2, bFGF, PLGF and VEGF.

Time frame: Screening and Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4 and end of treatment

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekBiomarker Predictive of Clinical Benefit (DCR by KRAS) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/Day17.1 percentage of participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayBiomarker Predictive of Clinical Benefit (DCR by KRAS) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/Day35.0 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.0795% CI: [0.135, 1.083]Unadjusted Logistic Regression
Secondary

Biomarker Predictive of Clinical Benefit (DCR by KRAS) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/Week

The efficacy variable compared in this biomarker analysis is disease control rate (DCR) within the 70mg/week arm in the analysis not adjusted for prognostic factors: from archival tumor tissue (and additionally from a biopsy at a metastatic site, if available), collected during screening: KRAS gene mutation. From blood plasma, collected at screening then on day 1 at cycles 2, 3 and 4, and at the end of treatment: blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme fractionation and serum levels of sVEGFR2, bFGF, PLGF and VEGF.

Time frame: Screening and Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4 and end of treatment

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekBiomarker Predictive of Clinical Benefit (DCR by KRAS) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/Week33.3 percentage of participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayBiomarker Predictive of Clinical Benefit (DCR by KRAS) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/Week21.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.25395% CI: [0.657, 4.929]Unadjusted Logistic Regression
Secondary

Biomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (DCR by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/Day

The efficacy variable that was compared in the biomarker analysis is DCR within the Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/day arm in the analysis not adjusted for prognostic factors: from archival tumor tissue (and additionally from a biopsy at a metastatic site, if available), collected during screening: PTEN loss (imunohistochemistry, IHC), phosphoAKT (IHC), phosphoS6 (IHC), and p53 (IHC). From blood plasma, collected at screening then on day 1 at cycles 2, 3 and 4, and at the end of treatment: blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme fractionation and serum levels of sVEGFR2, bFGF, PLGF and VEGF.

Time frame: Screening and Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4 and end of treatment

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (DCR by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/Day26.9 percentage of participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (DCR by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/Day26.1 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.93895% CI: [0.352, 3.099]Unadjusted Logistic Regression
Secondary

Biomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (DCR by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/Week

The efficacy variable that was compared in the biomarker analysis is DCR within the Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/week arm in the analysis not adjusted for prognostic factors: from archival tumor tissue (and additionally from a biopsy at a metastatic site, if available), collected during screening: PTEN loss (imunohistochemistry, IHC), phosphoAKT (IHC), phosphoS6 (IHC), and p53 (IHC). From blood plasma, collected at screening then on day 1 at cycles 2, 3 and 4, and at the end of treatment: blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme fractionation and serum levels of sVEGFR2, bFGF, PLGF and VEGF.

Time frame: Screening and Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4 and end of treatment

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (DCR by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/Week20.9 percentage of participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (DCR by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/Week33.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.23895% CI: [0.184, 1.523]Unadjusted Logistic Regression
Secondary

Biomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by KRAS) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/Day

The efficacy variable that was compared in the biomarker analysis are Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) within the Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/day arm in the analysis not adjusted for prognostic factors: from archival tumor tissue (and additionally from a biopsy at a metastatic site, if available), collected during screening: KRAS gene mutation. From blood plasma, collected at screening then on day 1 at cycles 2, 3 and 4, and at the end of treatment: blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme fractionation and serum levels of sVEGFR2, bFGF, PLGF and VEGF.

Time frame: Screening and Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4 and end of treatment

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by KRAS) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/DayMedian PFS1.71 months
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by KRAS) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/DayMedian OS5.59 months
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by KRAS) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/DayMedian PFS1.77 months
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by KRAS) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/DayMedian OS7.06 months
p-value: 0.44195% CI: [0.752, 1.923]Unadjusted Logistic Regression
p-value: 0.12695% CI: [0.884, 2.708]Unadjusted Logistic Regression
Secondary

Biomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by KRAS ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/Week

The efficacy variable that was compared in the biomarker analysis are Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) within the Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/week arm in the analysis not adjusted for prognostic factors: from archival tumor tissue (and additionally from a biopsy at a metastatic site, if available), collected during screening: KRAS gene mutation. From blood plasma, collected at screening then on day 1 at cycles 2, 3 and 4, and at the end of treatment: blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme fractionation and serum levels of sVEGFR2, bFGF, PLGF and VEGF.

Time frame: Screening and Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4 and end of treatment

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by KRAS ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/WeekMedian PFS1.77 months
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by KRAS ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/WeekMedian OS6.18 months
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by KRAS ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/WeekMedian PFS1.71 months
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by KRAS ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/WeekMedian OS4.90 months
p-value: 0.39995% CI: [0.505, 1.312]Unadjusted Logistic Regression
p-value: 0.99595% CI: [0.62, 1.617]Unadjusted Logistic Regression
Secondary

Biomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/Day

The efficacy variable that was compared in the biomarker analysis are PFS & OS within the Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/day arm in the analysis not adjusted for prognostic factors: from archival tumor tissue (and additionally from a biopsy at a metastatic site, if available), collected during screening: PTEN loss (imunohistochemistry, IHC), phosphoAKT (IHC), phosphoS6 (IHC), and p53 (IHC). From blood plasma, collected at screening then on day 1 at cycles 2, 3 and 4, and at the end of treatment: blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme fractionation and serum levels of sVEGFR2, bFGF, PLGF and VEGF.

Time frame: Screening and Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4 and end of treatment

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/DayMedian PFS1.81 months
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/DayMedian OS10.38 months
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/DayMedian PFS1.68 months
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 10mg/DayMedian OS6.34 months
p-value: 0.58895% CI: [0.521, 1.447]Unadjusted Cox Model
p-value: 0.14895% CI: [0.314, 1.191]Unadjusted Cox Model
Secondary

Biomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/Week

The efficacy variable that was compared in the biomarker analysis are PFS & OS within the Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/Week arm in the analysis not adjusted for prognostic factors: from archival tumor tissue (and additionally from a biopsy at a metastatic site, if available), collected during screening: PTEN loss (imunohistochemistry, IHC), phosphoAKT (IHC), phosphoS6 (IHC), and p53 (IHC). From blood plasma, collected at screening then on day 1 at cycles 2, 3 and 4, and at the end of treatment: blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme fractionation and serum levels of sVEGFR2, bFGF, PLGF and VEGF.

Time frame: Screening and Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4 and end of treatment

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/WeekMedian PFS1.71 months
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/WeekMedian OS5.98 months
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/WeekMedian PFS1.77 months
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayBiomarkers Predictive of Clinical Benefit (Median PFS and OS by PTEN ) on Everolimus (RAD001) 70mg/WeekMedian OS4.37 months
p-value: 0.14595% CI: [0.875, 2.484]Unadjusted Cox Model
p-value: 0.58395% CI: [0.696, 1.903]Unadjusted Cox Model
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Died, Had an Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Had Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Event (AE), Discontinued Due to an AE, or Had a Clinical Notable AE by Treatment (tr).

Toxicity assessed using the NIH-NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0 (CTCAEv3.0). On treatment death defined as deaths occurring no more than 28 days after the discontinuation of study treatment.

Time frame: From the first day of treatment until 28 days after discontinuation of study treatment

Population: Safety set analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekNumber of Patients Who Died, Had an Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Had Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Event (AE), Discontinued Due to an AE, or Had a Clinical Notable AE by Treatment (tr).Deaths86 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekNumber of Patients Who Died, Had an Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Had Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Event (AE), Discontinued Due to an AE, or Had a Clinical Notable AE by Treatment (tr).On-treatment Death11 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekNumber of Patients Who Died, Had an Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Had Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Event (AE), Discontinued Due to an AE, or Had a Clinical Notable AE by Treatment (tr).SAE regardless of relationship to study treatment34 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekNumber of Patients Who Died, Had an Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Had Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Event (AE), Discontinued Due to an AE, or Had a Clinical Notable AE by Treatment (tr).SAE with suspected relationship to study treatment7 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekNumber of Patients Who Died, Had an Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Had Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Event (AE), Discontinued Due to an AE, or Had a Clinical Notable AE by Treatment (tr).AE Grade 3-4, regardless of relationship to study58 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekNumber of Patients Who Died, Had an Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Had Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Event (AE), Discontinued Due to an AE, or Had a Clinical Notable AE by Treatment (tr).AE Grade 3-4, suspected relationship to study tr31 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekNumber of Patients Who Died, Had an Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Had Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Event (AE), Discontinued Due to an AE, or Had a Clinical Notable AE by Treatment (tr).AE leading to discontinuation9 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekNumber of Patients Who Died, Had an Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Had Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Event (AE), Discontinued Due to an AE, or Had a Clinical Notable AE by Treatment (tr).Clinically notable adverse event85 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayNumber of Patients Who Died, Had an Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Had Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Event (AE), Discontinued Due to an AE, or Had a Clinical Notable AE by Treatment (tr).Clinically notable adverse event76 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayNumber of Patients Who Died, Had an Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Had Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Event (AE), Discontinued Due to an AE, or Had a Clinical Notable AE by Treatment (tr).Deaths65 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayNumber of Patients Who Died, Had an Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Had Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Event (AE), Discontinued Due to an AE, or Had a Clinical Notable AE by Treatment (tr).AE Grade 3-4, regardless of relationship to study50 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayNumber of Patients Who Died, Had an Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Had Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Event (AE), Discontinued Due to an AE, or Had a Clinical Notable AE by Treatment (tr).On-treatment Death14 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayNumber of Patients Who Died, Had an Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Had Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Event (AE), Discontinued Due to an AE, or Had a Clinical Notable AE by Treatment (tr).AE leading to discontinuation20 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayNumber of Patients Who Died, Had an Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Had Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Event (AE), Discontinued Due to an AE, or Had a Clinical Notable AE by Treatment (tr).SAE regardless of relationship to study treatment22 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayNumber of Patients Who Died, Had an Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Had Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Event (AE), Discontinued Due to an AE, or Had a Clinical Notable AE by Treatment (tr).AE Grade 3-4, suspected relationship to study tr26 Participants
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayNumber of Patients Who Died, Had an Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Had Grade 3 to 4 Adverse Event (AE), Discontinued Due to an AE, or Had a Clinical Notable AE by Treatment (tr).SAE with suspected relationship to study treatment6 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival defined as the time from date of first study treatment to the date of death due to any cause.

Time frame: Every 3 months

Population: Overall Survival \[OS\] was analyzed in Full Analysis Set \[FAS\].

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekOverall Survival (OS)4.90 Months
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayOverall Survival (OS)5.88 Months
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Duration in months from the date of first study treatment to the date of the first documented disease progression or death due to any cause.

Time frame: Imaging every 8 weeks

Population: Progression- Free Survival (PFS) was analyzed in Full Analysis Set \[FAS\].

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus (RAD001) 70 mg/WeekProgression-free Survival (PFS)1.77 Months
Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/DayProgression-free Survival (PFS)1.77 Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026