Skip to content

Clinical Trial Comparing Three Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructive Procedures

Functional, Clinical & Radiological Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Randomized Control Clinical Trial Studies Comparing Bone Patella Bone, Single Bundle and Double Bundle Method.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00418964
Enrollment
62
Registered
2007-01-05
Start date
2006-12-31
Completion date
2011-06-30
Last updated
2012-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Injuries

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament rupture, Anterior cruciate ligament(A02.513.514.100)

Brief summary

The objective of this prospective study is to assess the clinical, functional and radiological outcomes of three different ACL reconstruction procedures: Bone Patella Bone graft, Single bundle hamstring graft and anatomical Double bundle graft in terms of pain, swelling, mobility, quadriceps girth size, stability, proprioception, bone mineral density and functional status.

Detailed description

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery is one of the common procedures performed by orthopedic surgeons with approximately 100,000 cases performed per year in the United States. A large amount of sports injuries were related to ACL problem. As such, ACL injuries and treatment is still widely under intensive study. Traditionally, ACL surgery has been focused on using bone patella bone graft and single bundle hamstring graft. Problems of knee pain, unstable fixation, rotational instability and degenerative changes were reported. Recently, the use of double bundle hamstring graft to reconstruct the ACL according its anatomy aiming to improve the rotational stability was proposed. However, results about the clinical, functional and radiological outcomes are limited. The objective of this prospective pilot study is to assess the clinical, functional and radiological outcomes of three different ACL reconstruction procedures: Bone Patella Bone graft, Single bundle hamstring graft and anatomical Double bundle graft in terms of pain, swelling, mobility, quadriceps girth size, stability, proprioception, skin sensation, bone mineral density and functional status. Subjects to be operated for ACL reconstruction and meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be recruited. Subjects will be randomly assigned to the three surgical groups by block randomization. Demographic information, parameters in recovery domain, functional domain and stability domain, isokinetic test, motion analysis domain, proprioception and radiographical measurements will be made at baseline and at day 1, week 2, week 4, week 8, month 3, month 5, 1 year and 2 years post-surgery. The effect of different surgical techniques and time on the different outcomes will be analysed by 2-way ANOVA.

Interventions

PROCEDURESingle bundle hamstring

Single bundle hamstring

PROCEDUREDouble bundle hamstring

Double bundle hamstring

PROCEDUREBone patellar tendon bone

Bone patellar tendon bone

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men above age 18-40 years old * First ACL reconstruction surgery * Single leg involvement

Exclusion criteria

* ACL injury less than 6 weeks as deleterious effect of the injury may affect the extension range * Injury on Duty (IOD) cases * Other associated injuries (Fractures, other ligaments involvement, neurovascular bundles injury),Chondral lesion with co-commitment intervention * Concomitant meniscus repair in same operation, or within 3 months before the operation * Significant OA changes * Known chronic disease or receiving long term medications affecting bone metabolism, including anabolic steroids, medication for thyroid hormone therapy or osteoporosis * Neurological deficit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC)Knee Form 2000 Score1 yearIt is a score on a scale from 0 to 100. It is a knee-specific measure of symptoms, function and sports activity of subjects based on self-report. 0 represents the worst while 100 represents the best score. The higher the score, the better the knee function.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Distal Femoral Bone Mineral Density (BMD)Decrease1 year% BMD decrease of distal femur of injured side with reference to the BMD at day 1 after surgery

Countries

China

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HT-SB
Single bundle hamstring (hamstring autograft in a single bone tunnel)
22
HT-DB
Double bundle hamstring (hamstring autograft in two bone tunnels)
20
BPTB
Bone Patellar Tendon Bone (Bone patellar tendon bone autograft in a single bone tunnel)
20
Total62

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHT-DBBPTBHT-SBTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants20 Participants22 Participants62 Participants
Age Continuous26.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
26.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
23.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
25.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
Region of Enrollment
China
20 participants20 participants22 participants62 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants20 Participants22 Participants62 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 220 / 200 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC)Knee Form 2000 Score

It is a score on a scale from 0 to 100. It is a knee-specific measure of symptoms, function and sports activity of subjects based on self-report. 0 represents the worst while 100 represents the best score. The higher the score, the better the knee function.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HT-SBInternational Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC)Knee Form 2000 Score85.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
HT-DBInternational Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC)Knee Form 2000 Score87.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.8
BPTBInternational Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC)Knee Form 2000 Score84.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
Secondary

Percentage Distal Femoral Bone Mineral Density (BMD)Decrease

% BMD decrease of distal femur of injured side with reference to the BMD at day 1 after surgery

Time frame: 1 year

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026