Skip to content

FREEDOM - A Frequent Optimization Study Using the QuickOpt Method

FREEDOM - A Frequent Optimization Study Using the QuickOpt Method

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00418314
Enrollment
1647
Registered
2007-01-04
Start date
2006-10-31
Completion date
2009-09-30
Last updated
2019-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrhythmias, Heart Failure

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to demonstrate that frequent atrio-ventricular (AV/PV) and inter-ventricular (V-V) delay optimization using QuickOpt in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy device results in improved clinical response over standard of care (i.e. empiric programming or one-time optimization using any non-intracardiac electrogram optimization methods).

Detailed description

* This is a prospective, double-blinded, multicenter, randomized study * Patient could be enrolled up to 2 weeks post CRT-D implant and are followed for 12 months post implant with follow-up visits at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months * Patients will be randomized at enrollment to either Group 1 (QuickOpt Group) or Group 2 (Control Group). * Group 1 - The patient's device is programmed to sequential biventricular pacing mode with AV/PV and VV delays optimized using QuickOpt. For Group 1 patients, optimization using QuickOpt is performed at enrollment, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, 12 month and at any unscheduled follow-up visits. * Group 2 - The patient's device is programmed to either simultaneous or sequential BiV pacing mode as per physician's discretion. The AV/PV and inter-ventricular (VV) delays could be programmed empirically or optimized using any non-IEGM based method as per sites standard of care. However, the Group 2 patients can be optimized only once within the first 4 weeks post implant. Any AV/PV and VV delay optimizations performed after 4 weeks post implant in Group 2 patients will be considered protocol deviations.

Interventions

DEVICEControl

Empiric programming or one-time optimization using a non-IEGM method.

DEVICEQuickOpt

Frequent optimization using QuickOpt to optimize AV/PV and VV delays.

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient meets current CRT-D indications and be implanted with a St. Jude Medical (SJM) CRT¬D device with VV timing and a compatible lead system. * Patient has the ability to complete a 6-minute hall walk with the only limiting factor to be fatigue or shortness of breath. * Patient has the ability to independently comprehend and complete a QOL questionnaire.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has an epicardial ventricular lead system. * Patient has the ability to walk ≥ 450 meters in 6 minutes * Patient has limited intrinsic atrial activity (≤ 40 bpm). * Patient has persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). * Patient has a 2° or 3° heart block. * Patient's life expectancy is less than 1 year. * Patient is pregnant. * Patient is on IV inotropic agents.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart Failure Clinical Composite Score12 monthsThe clinical composite score classifies each randomized patient as improved, unchanged, or worse depending on the clinical response during and the clinical status at the end of the trial. Patients are considered improved if at the final visit they experienced a favorable change in NYHA functional class or in the patient global assessment (or both) but did not experience any major adverse clinical events during the course of the trial. Patients are considered worse if they experienced a major clinical event during the study duration or reported worsening of their NYHA class or global assessment at the final visit. Patients are considered unchanged if they are neither improved nor worse.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
All-cause, Cardiovascular and Heart Failure Mortality;12 months
All Cause, Cardiovascular and Heart Failure Hospitalization12 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
QuickOpt (Treatment)
Frequent optimization using QuickOpt to optimize the AV/PV and VV Delays.
817
Control
Empiric programming or one-time optimization using a non-IEGM method.
830
Total1,647

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicQuickOpt (Treatment)ControlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
510 Participants490 Participants1000 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
307 Participants340 Participants647 Participants
Age, Continuous66.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
66.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
66.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Region of Enrollment
Australia
17 participants15 participants32 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
32 participants35 participants67 participants
Region of Enrollment
Europe
282 participants288 participants570 participants
Region of Enrollment
Middle East
3 participants4 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
Southeast Asia
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
482 participants487 participants969 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
196 Participants238 Participants434 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
621 Participants592 Participants1213 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
184 / 816177 / 828
serious
Total, serious adverse events
120 / 816111 / 828

Outcome results

Primary

Heart Failure Clinical Composite Score

The clinical composite score classifies each randomized patient as improved, unchanged, or worse depending on the clinical response during and the clinical status at the end of the trial. Patients are considered improved if at the final visit they experienced a favorable change in NYHA functional class or in the patient global assessment (or both) but did not experience any major adverse clinical events during the course of the trial. Patients are considered worse if they experienced a major clinical event during the study duration or reported worsening of their NYHA class or global assessment at the final visit. Patients are considered unchanged if they are neither improved nor worse.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
QuickOpt (Treatment)Heart Failure Clinical Composite ScoreImproved551 participants
QuickOpt (Treatment)Heart Failure Clinical Composite ScoreUnchanged76 participants
QuickOpt (Treatment)Heart Failure Clinical Composite ScoreWorsened189 participants
ControlHeart Failure Clinical Composite ScoreUnchanged86 participants
ControlHeart Failure Clinical Composite ScoreImproved559 participants
ControlHeart Failure Clinical Composite ScoreWorsened183 participants
Secondary

All Cause, Cardiovascular and Heart Failure Hospitalization

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
QuickOpt (Treatment)All Cause, Cardiovascular and Heart Failure Hospitalization294 participants
ControlAll Cause, Cardiovascular and Heart Failure Hospitalization303 participants
Secondary

All-cause, Cardiovascular and Heart Failure Mortality;

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
QuickOpt (Treatment)All-cause, Cardiovascular and Heart Failure Mortality;44 participants
ControlAll-cause, Cardiovascular and Heart Failure Mortality;42 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026