Skip to content

Standard Versus Continuous Capecitabine in Advanced Breast Cancer

Randomized Phase II Trial of Continuous Versus Standard Capecitabine in Advanced Breast Cancer.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00418028
Enrollment
195
Registered
2007-01-04
Start date
2005-09-30
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2019-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Breast Cancer

Keywords

capecitabine, schedule, breast cancer

Brief summary

Capecitabine is active in metastatic breast cancer but the conventional schedule (1250 mg/m2/12 hr 2 weeks on, one week off) produces grade 2 or greater hand and foot syndrome in up to 50% of patients leading to those reductions. There are theoretical reasons to administer S-phase specific agents in continuous, protracted rather than intermittent schedules. The investigators study compares the standard schedule (1250 mg/m2/12 hr 2 weeks on, one week off) with a continuous administration schedule (800 mg/m2/12hr). The latter administer approximately the same cumulative dose of capecitabine as the standard schedule. The study hypothesis is that grade 2 or greater hand and foot syndrome will be reduced from 50% (standard arm) to 20% (experimental arm). The investigators assume similar antitumor activity in both arms.

Detailed description

Capecitabine is active in metastatic breast cancer but the conventional schedule (1250 mg/m2/12 hr 2 weeks on, one week off) produces grade 2 or greater hand and foot syndrome in up to 50% of patients leading to those reductions. Some authors have tested continuous administration schedules of capecitabine, showing better tolerance and apparently similar antitumor activity. Capecitabine is a pro-drug of 5-FU and mimics an i.v. continuous infusion administration of this antimetabolite. On the other hand, there are theoretical reasons to administer S-phase specific agents in continuous, protracted rather than intermittent schedules. Our study compares the standard schedule(1250 mg/m2/12 hr 2 weeks on, one week off)with a continuous administration schule (800 mg/m2/12hr). The latter schedule administer approximately the same cumulative dose of capecitabine as the standard one. The study hypothesis is that grade 2 or greater hand and foot syndrome will be reduced from 50% (standard arm) to 20% (experimental arm). The investigators assume similar antitumor activity in both arms.

Interventions

DRUGCapecitabine

Sponsors

Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer 2. Patients that either have received previous treatment with anthracyclines and/or taxanes or not (either as advance or in metastatic disease). 3. The patient is ambulatory with a functional ECOG \< 2 status (see Appendix 2). 4. Patient presents, at least one lesion measurable according to RECIST criteria (see Appendix 3) 5. Patients with a life expectancy of at least 3 months. 6. Patients that agree to and are able to fulfill the requirements of the whole protocol through the whole study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients that have previously shown unexpected severe reactions to therapy with fluoropyrimidines or with a known sensitivity to 5-fluorouracile. 2. Patients previously treated with capecitabine. 3. Patients with organ transplants. 4. Other diseases or severe affections: 1. Patients with previous convulsions, central nervous system diseases or psychiatric diseases, including dementia, that the investigator might consider clinically significant and which adversely affect therapeutic compliance. 2. Patients with severe intellectual impairment, unable to carry out basic daily routines and established depression. 3. Clinical significant cardiac disease (e. g. . congestive heart failure, symptomatic coronary artery disease and cardiac arrhythmia not fully controlled with medication) or myocardial infarction within the last 12 months. 4. Severe renal impairment (baseline creatinine clearance \< 30 ml/min) 5. Patients with signs of metastasis in the CNS. Patients with a history of uncontrolled convulsions, central nervous system disorders or psychiatric disability judged by the investigator to be clinically significant precluding informed consent or interfering with compliance for oral drug intake should be excluded. 6. Patients with an active infection. 7. Patients with a history of other neoplasias during the previous five years, except for basal cell skin cancer or cervical cancer in situ, both cured. 8. Patients showing the following laboratory values: 1. Neutrophil count \< 555 x 109/l 2. Platelet count\< 100 x 109/l 3. Serum creatinine \> 1,5 x upper normality limit 4. seric bilirubin \> 2,0 x upper normality limit 5. ALAT, ASAT \> 2,5 x upper normality limit or \> 5 x upper normality limit in case of liver metastases 6. Alkaline phosphatase \> 2,5 x upper normality limit \> 5 x upper normality limit in case of liver metastases o \> 10 x upper normality limit in case of bone metastases. 9. Patients under radiotherapy four weeks prior to the initiation of the study treatment, or under previous radiotherapy on the marker lesions be measured during the study (new marker lesions that appear in previously irradiated areas are accepted) or patients who are receiving programmed radiotherapy. 10. Patients under major surgery within 4 weeks prior to study treatment or who have not completely recovered from the effects of major surgery. 11. Patients who lack upper gastrointestinal tract physical integrity or with malabsorption syndrome. 12. Patients who have received more than two cycles of chemotherapy for the metastatic disease. 13. Patients Her2 + per FISH ó +++ Immunohistochemistry

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to ProgressionAfter 1 year from the treatment start day.Time to Progression (TTP) is defined as the time (in months) from the moment the patient starts the study treatment to the date of progressive disease. That is, a patient has an event is she progresses or dies due to progressive disease. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response DurationTime from the moment the Partial or Complete Response is reported to the date the patient Progresses or Dies, whichever happens first, assessed up to 72 weeks.Response duration is computed for all patients with Partial Response or Complete Response, during the treatment period, as the time from the moment the Partial or Complete Response is reported to the date the patient Progresses or Dies, whichever happens first. A patient is censored if she does not progress or die. In these cases Response duration is computed as the time from the moment the Partial or Complete Response is reported to the last contact date.
Time to Treatment FailureTime (in months) from the moment the patient starts the study treatment to the end of treatment date (due to death, progressive disease, adverse events, patient's decision or investigator criteria, assessed up to 72 months.Time to treatment failure (TTF) is defined as the time (in months) from the moment the patient starts the study treatment to the end of treatment date (due to death, progressive disease, adverse events, patient's decision or investigator criteria. If a patient did not end the treatment, it is censored. The censoring date is the date of the last dose received.
Response RateThrough the study treatment, an average of 5 months.Response was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), every 3 cycles of chemotherapy (each cycle lasts 3 weeks) and at the end of treatment (at 21 weeks from the start of treatment).
Clinical BenefitMonths from CR,PR or SD (the first one) until Progression date, new treatment or last contact date.A patient experiences a Clinical Benefit if the following is satisfied: Criterion: The patient has Complete response, Partial Response or Stable Disease and it continues during more than 3 months.
Progression Free SurvivalTime (in months) from the moment the patient starts the study treatment to the date of progressive disease assessed up to 84 months.Progression Free Survival is defined as the time (in months) from the moment the patient starts the study treatment to the date of progressive disease. That is, a patient has an event is she progresses or dies for any reason.
Overall SurvivalTime to survival is the number of months from the study treatment start date to the date of death, assessed up to 100 months.An event is defined as death. A patient is censored if she does not die. The censoring date is last contact date.

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Between November 2004 and August 2010, 195 patients were randomly assigned to Cint (97) and Ccont (98) in 13 GEICAM sites in Spain.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A (Cint)
Capecitabine will be administered orally at a dose of 1250 mg/m2 twice-daily (in the morning and in the evening, the equivalent of a total daily dose of 2500 mg/m2) for 14 days, in 3 week cycles with a resting period of 7 days,until disease progression or severe toxicity. Dose adjustments were made in patients with grade 3 or greater diarrhea or hand and food syndrome. capecitabine: 1250 mg/m2 twice a day orally x 14 days every 3 weeks until disease progression or severe toxicity. Dose adjustments were made in patients with grade 3 or greater diarrhea or hand and food syndrome.
97
Arm B (Ccont)
Capecitabine 800 mg/m2 orally twice-daily (in the morning and in the evening the equivalent of one dose of 1600 mg/m2) for 21 days, in 3 week cycles without resting period, until disease progression or severe toxicity. Dose adjustments were made in patients with grade 3 or greater diarrhea or hand and food syndrome. drug: capecitabine: 800 mg/m2 twice a day orally continuous administration until disease progression or severe toxicity. Dose adjustments were made in patients with grade 3 or greater diarrhea or hand and food syndrome.
98
Total195

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm B (Ccont)Arm A (Cint)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
33 Participants42 Participants75 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
65 Participants55 Participants120 Participants
Age, Continuous58.59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.66
61.07 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.21
59.82 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.48
Region of Enrollment
Spain
98 participants97 participants195 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
98 Participants97 Participants195 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
81 / 9551 / 97
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 954 / 97

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Progression

Time to Progression (TTP) is defined as the time (in months) from the moment the patient starts the study treatment to the date of progressive disease. That is, a patient has an event is she progresses or dies due to progressive disease. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0).

Time frame: After 1 year from the treatment start day.

Population: A total of 192 patients (95 in Arm A and 97 in Arm B) were considered for this analysis but 36 were censored (23 in Arm A and 13 in Arm B). Patients censored are those that did not progress or die due to progressive disease during the study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A (Cint)Time to Progression8.68 months
Arm B (Ccont)Time to Progression6.84 months
p-value: 0.122495% CI: [0.9, 1.7]Log Rank
Secondary

Clinical Benefit

A patient experiences a Clinical Benefit if the following is satisfied: Criterion: The patient has Complete response, Partial Response or Stable Disease and it continues during more than 3 months.

Time frame: Months from CR,PR or SD (the first one) until Progression date, new treatment or last contact date.

Population: Only 179 patients had tumor evaluation data.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm A (Cint)Clinical Benefit56 Participants
Arm B (Ccont)Clinical Benefit56 Participants
p-value: 0.4984Chi-squared
Secondary

Overall Survival

An event is defined as death. A patient is censored if she does not die. The censoring date is last contact date.

Time frame: Time to survival is the number of months from the study treatment start date to the date of death, assessed up to 100 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A (Cint)Overall Survival27.34 Months
Arm B (Ccont)Overall Survival24.11 Months
p-value: 0.568895% CI: [0.66, 1.25]Log Rank
Secondary

Progression Free Survival

Progression Free Survival is defined as the time (in months) from the moment the patient starts the study treatment to the date of progressive disease. That is, a patient has an event is she progresses or dies for any reason.

Time frame: Time (in months) from the moment the patient starts the study treatment to the date of progressive disease assessed up to 84 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A (Cint)Progression Free Survival8.52 Months
Arm B (Ccont)Progression Free Survival6.84 Months
p-value: 0.255695% CI: [0.88, 1.63]Log Rank
Secondary

Response Duration

Response duration is computed for all patients with Partial Response or Complete Response, during the treatment period, as the time from the moment the Partial or Complete Response is reported to the date the patient Progresses or Dies, whichever happens first. A patient is censored if she does not progress or die. In these cases Response duration is computed as the time from the moment the Partial or Complete Response is reported to the last contact date.

Time frame: Time from the moment the Partial or Complete Response is reported to the date the patient Progresses or Dies, whichever happens first, assessed up to 72 weeks.

Population: From 192 patients (95 in Arm A and 97 in Arm B), 61 patients had Complete Response or Partial Response (30 in Arm A and 31 in Arm B).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A (Cint)Response Duration10.07 Months
Arm B (Ccont)Response Duration7.20 Months
p-value: 0.570395% CI: [0.67, 2.07]Log Rank
Secondary

Response Rate

Response was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), every 3 cycles of chemotherapy (each cycle lasts 3 weeks) and at the end of treatment (at 21 weeks from the start of treatment).

Time frame: Through the study treatment, an average of 5 months.

Population: There were 95 patients in Arm A and 97 patients in Arm B. There were 13 patients without response evaluation (9 in Arm A and 4 in Arm B).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm A (Cint)Response Rate30 Participants
Arm B (Ccont)Response Rate31 Participants
p-value: 0.8269Chi-squared
Secondary

Time to Treatment Failure

Time to treatment failure (TTF) is defined as the time (in months) from the moment the patient starts the study treatment to the end of treatment date (due to death, progressive disease, adverse events, patient's decision or investigator criteria. If a patient did not end the treatment, it is censored. The censoring date is the date of the last dose received.

Time frame: Time (in months) from the moment the patient starts the study treatment to the end of treatment date (due to death, progressive disease, adverse events, patient's decision or investigator criteria, assessed up to 72 months.

Population: This outcome only was analyzed in the Per Protocol Population (182 patients).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A (Cint)Time to Treatment Failure5.41 Months
Arm B (Ccont)Time to Treatment Failure5.87 Months
p-value: 0.467695% CI: [0.83, 1.5]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026