Multiple Myeloma
Conditions
Keywords
multiple myeloma, autologous stem cell transplantation, high-dose melphalan, bortezomib, consolidation, event free survival, phase III
Brief summary
Multiple myeloma is a malignant incurable hematological disease where survival has been significantly improved by high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell support (ASCT) in younger patients. However, the disease will eventually relapse and new treatment is demanded. Bortezomib is a newly approved drug for treating relapsing multiple myeloma. It has a different biological effect and response even in patients refractory to conventional chemotherapy. The purpose of the study is in a randomized design to investigate if addition of bortezomib by 20 injections during a 4 months period starting 3 month after ASCT can prolong the time to progression compared to patients receiving no consolidation or maintenance therapy.
Detailed description
Rationale: ASCT prolongs EFS and OS for myeloma patients \< 65 years of age. During the period from ASCT to progression most myeloma patients experience few symptoms and have a good quality of life11. A further prolongation of EFS would be a big step forward in myeloma treatment. Bortezomib is a new promising agent, which has shown clear anti-myeloma effect in heavily pre-treated patients. After ASCT the tumour cell burden is low and it is the hypothesis of this clinical trial that the unique mechanism of action of bortezomib may reduce the number of tumour cells even further and by doing so prolong EFS. Primary objective: \* Evaluate the effect on EFS (an event is defined as either progression or death of any cause without preceding progression) of consolidation treatment with bortezomib after ASCT compared to no consolidation Secondary objectives: * Overall survival from ASCT * Overall survival from start of relapse treatment * Time to need for relapse treatment * Response rate in patients not in CR following ASCT * Toxicity from consolidation treatment * Quality of life * Cost utility * Planned subgroup analysis: comparison of primary and secondary endpoint in patients receiving one vs. two high dose treatments
Interventions
DRUGbortezomib
Bortezomib 1,3 mg/sqm Days 1,4,8,11 for two 3-week cycles and then once a week for three weeks in 4 4-week cycles
Sponsors
Janssen-Cilag Ltd.
Nordic Myeloma Study Group
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Symptomatic myeloma diagnosis according to criteria in attachment 3 * ASCT is performed or has been performed in the last five weeks (time limit two weeks for patients randomised at 2nd transplantation) as a part of primary therapy * Signed informed consent given prior to any study related activities have been performed
Exclusion criteria
* Prior exposure to bortezomib * Allogeneic transplantation scheduled as a part of the primary treatment * Neuropathy \> Grade 2 (neurological symptoms interfering with ADL) * Non-secreting myeloma * Other concurrent disease making bortezomib treatment unsuitable * Positive pregnancy test (only applicable for women with childbearing potential) * Has known or suspected hypersensitivity or intolerance to boron, mannitol, or heparin, if an indwelling catheter is used * Uncontrolled or severe cardiovascular disease including myocardial infarction within 6 months of enrolment, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV heart failure (Attachment 6, NYHA Classification of Cardiac Disease), uncontrolled angina, clinically significant pericardial disease, or cardiac amyloidosis * History of hypotension or has decreased blood pressure (sitting systolic blood pressure \[SBP\] £100 mmHg and/or sitting diastolic blood pressure \[DBP\] £60 mmHg) * Serious medical or psychiatric illness likely to interfere with participation in this clinical study * Have received an experimental drug or used an experimental medical device within 4 weeks prior to inclusion into the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Evaluate the effect on EFS (an event is defined as either progression or death of any cause without preceding progression) of consolidation treatment with bortezomib after ASCT compared to no consolidation | 1 year after randomization of the last patient |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Overall survival from start of relapse treatment | — |
| Time to need for relapse treatment | — |
| Response rate in patients not in CR following ASCT | — |
| Overall survival from ASCT | — |
| Quality of life | — |
| Cost utility | — |
| Planned subgroup analysis: comparison of primary and secondary endpoint in patients receiving one vs. two high dose treatments | — |
| Toxicity from consolidation treatment | — |
Countries
Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden
Outcome results
None listed