Skip to content

A Multicenter Study to Compare Multiple Doses of Intravitreal Microplasmin Versus Sham Injection for Treatment of Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)

A Randomized, Sham-Injection Controlled, Double-Masked, Ascending-Dose, Dose-Range-Finding Trial of Microplasmin Intravitreal Injection for Non-Surgical Posterior Vitreous Detachment (PVD) Induction for Treatment of DME.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00412451
Acronym
MIVI-II
Enrollment
51
Registered
2006-12-18
Start date
2006-12-31
Completion date
2010-03-31
Last updated
2014-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Macular Edema

Keywords

Diabetic Macular Edema, PVD, DME, Diabetic Retinopathy

Brief summary

A multicenter study to compare multiple doses of intravitreal microplasmin for non-surgical PVD induction for treatment of patients with DME.

Interventions

Intravitreal injection, single administration

OTHERSham injection

Sham intravitreal injection

Sponsors

ThromboGenics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

include: * patients \>18 years of age with Diabetic Macular Edema

Exclusion criteria

include: * PVD present at baseline * Vitreous hemorrhage * Certain vitreoretinal conditions including proliferative disease, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) * Patients who have had a vitrectomy in the study eye at any time

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PVD InductionDay 14 post-injectionThe primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients with total posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) on Day 14 as determined by a masked central reading center (CRC) using 4-quadrant B-scan and optical coherence tomography (OCT)

Countries

Belgium, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The first patient was enrolled on 15 December 2006 and the last patient completed the last visit on 19 January 2010. All patients were selected in medical clinics

Pre-assignment details

The trial investigated 3 doses: 25, 75 and 125µg in 3 consecutive cohorts. Patients in each cohort were to be randomized to active treatment or sham injection in a 3:1 ratio. Enrolment into the high dose microplasmin groups was to start only after acceptable safety had been achieved with the previous doses as determined by a Study Safety Committee.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ocriplasmin 25µg
25µg ocriplasmin intravitreal injection versus sham injection
8
Ocriplasmin 75µg
75µg ocriplasmin intravitreal injection versus sham injection
15
Ocriplasmin 125µg
125µg ocriplasmin intravitreal injection versus sham injection
15
Sham Injection
Sham injection Sham injection : Sham intravitreal injection
13
Total51

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOcriplasmin 25µgOcriplasmin 75µgOcriplasmin 125µgSham InjectionTotal
Age, Continuous61.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
67.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
69.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
63.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants6 Participants4 Participants4 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants9 Participants11 Participants9 Participants32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 84 / 155 / 157 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 84 / 155 / 159 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

PVD Induction

The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients with total posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) on Day 14 as determined by a masked central reading center (CRC) using 4-quadrant B-scan and optical coherence tomography (OCT)

Time frame: Day 14 post-injection

Population: Intent-To-Treat (ITT), Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ocriplasmin 25µgPVD Induction0 percentage of participants
Ocriplasmin 75µgPVD Induction20 percentage of participants
Ocriplasmin 125µgPVD Induction13.3 percentage of participants
Sham InjectionPVD Induction30.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.13195% CI: [0.001, 999.999]Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.6795% CI: [0.132, 2.4]Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.37295% CI: [0.07, 1.703]Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026