Skip to content

Single vs Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplants in Children With High Risk Leukemia and Myelodysplasia (BMT CTN 0501)

Multi-center, Open Label, Randomized Trial Comparing Single Versus Double Umbilical Cord Blood (UCB) Transplantation in Pediatric Patients With High Risk Leukemia and Myelodysplasia (BMT CTN #0501)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00412360
Enrollment
224
Registered
2006-12-18
Start date
2006-12-31
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2021-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Natural Killer Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma

Keywords

Double cord blood

Brief summary

This study is a Phase III, randomized, open-label, multi-center, prospective study of single umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation versus double UCB transplantation in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies.

Detailed description

BACKGROUND: In nearly every large single center or registry analysis of outcomes after UCB transplantation, cell dose is identified as an important factor influencing the incidence and rate of hematopoietic recovery, risk of transplant-related mortality, and probability of survival. Pilot data suggest that infusion of two partially human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched UCB units, which always augments the graft cell dose, is safe and may improve neutrophil recovery and survival. To determine whether the infusion of two UCB units enhances survival, a multi-center, open-label, randomized trial is proposed. As adequate single UCB units can be identified for more than 80% of pediatric recipients (in contrast to less than 30% for adults), this study will be open only to pediatric patients. The population will be restricted to patients with high-risk hematologic malignancy, the most common indication of UCB transplantation in children. DESIGN NARRATIVE: Participants will include patients 1 to 21 years of age with a diagnosis of hematological malignancy and with two partially HLA-matched UCB units. Units must be HLA-matched at 3 of 6 HLA-A and B (intermediate resolution molecular typing) and DRB1 (high resolution molecular typing) with each other and 4 of 6 with the recipient. Two appropriately HLA-matched units must be available such that one unit delivers a pre-cryopreserved, nucleated cell dose of at least 2.5 x 10\^7 per kilogram and the second unit delivers at least 1.5 x 10\^7 per kilogram. Patients will be randomized no more than 14 days prior to initiation of conditioning. UCB units will be shipped prior to initiation of conditioning. The preparative regimen will consist of the following: * Fludarabine: 25 mg/m2/day IV on Days -10, -9, and -8. * Total Body Irradiation (TBI): 165 cGy twice daily on Days -7, -6, -5, and -4. * Cyclophosphamide: 60 mg/kg/day x 2 on Days -3 and -2. * Day 0 will be the day of the UCB transplant. The Graft-vs-Host-Disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimen will be mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 15 mg/kg IV BID on Day -3 to Day + 45 and cyclosporine A (CSA) to maintain level 200-400 ng/mL beginning on Day -3. Patients will be followed for at least 24 months post-transplant.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALSingle Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplant

Unrelated donor, single umbilical cord blood unit; conditioning regimen: TBI/cyclophosphamide/fludarabine; GVHD prophylaxis: cyclosporine/MMF

BIOLOGICALDouble Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplant

Unrelated donor, double umbilical cord blood unit; Conditioning regimen: TBI/cyclophosphamide/fludarabine; GVHD prophylaxis: cyclosporine/MMF

RADIATIONTotal Body Irradiation

The TBI will be delivered from either a linear accelerator or cobalt source at a dose rate of between 4 and 26 cGy/minute using energies of between 1 and 25 MV.

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg/day will be administered as a 2 hour intravenous infusion with a high volume fluid flush on Days -3 and -2.

DRUGFludarabine

Fludarabine 25 mg/m2/day will be administered over 30-60 minutes intravenous infusion on Days -10 through -8. Fludarabine will not be dose adjusted for body weight.

DRUGCyclosporine A

CSA will be administered beginning on Day -3 and doses will be adjusted to maintain a level of 200-400 ng/mL by TDX method (or 100-250 ng/mL by Tandem MS or equivalent level for other CSA testing methods). CSA can be administered per institutional practice.

DRUGMycophenolate Mofetil

MMF will be given at a dose of 1 gram IV q 8 hours if \> 50 kg or 15 mg/kg IV q 8 hours if \< 50 kg beginning the morning of Day -3.

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network
CollaboratorNETWORK
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
National Marrow Donor Program
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical College of Wisconsin
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Two partially HLA-matched UCB units. Units must be HLA-matched minimally at 4 of 6 HLA-A and B (at intermediate resolution by molecular typing) and DRB1 (at high resolution by molecular typing) loci with the patient, and the units must be HLA-matched at 3 of 6 HLA- A, B, DRB1 loci with each other (using same resolution of molecular typing as indicated above). Two appropriately HLA-matched units must be available such that one unit delivers a pre-cryopreserved nucleated cell dose of at least 2.5 x 10\^7 per kilogram and the second unit at least 1.5 x 10\^7 per kilogram. * Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) at the following stages: 1. High risk first complete remission (CR1), defined as the following: * Having preceding myelodysplasia (MDS) * High risk cytogenetics (high risk cytogenetics: del (5q) -5, -7, abn (3q), t (6;9) complex karyotype \[at least 5 abnormalities\],)the presence of a high FLT3 ITD-AR (\> 0.4) * Requiring more than 1 cycle of chemotherapy to obtain complete remission (CR); * FAB M6 2. Second or greater CR 3. First relapse with less than 25% blasts in bone marrow 4. Morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery * Therapy-related AML for which prior malignancy has been in remission for at least 12 months * Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) at the following stages: 1. High risk first remission, defined as one of the following conditions: * Philadelphia chromosome-positive adult lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) * Mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) rearrangement with slow early response (defined as having M2 \[5-25% blasts\] or M3 \[more than 25% blasts on bone marrow examination on Day 14 of induction therapy\]) * Hypodiploidy (less than 44 chromosomes or DNA index less than 0.81) * End of induction M3 bone marrow * End of induction M2 with M2-3 at Day 42 * Evidence of minimal residual disease (MRD). If a patient's only high risk criterion is MRD, approval by a protocol chair or protocol officer is required for enrollment. For COG centers, this will only be for MRD greater than 1 percent by flow MRD at the end of extended induction. 2. High risk second remission, defined as one of the following conditions: * Philadelphia chromosome-positive adult lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) * Bone marrow relapse less than 36 months from induction * T-lineage relapse at any time * Very early isolated central nervous system (CNS) relapse (6 months from diagnosis) * Slow reinduction (M2-3 at Day 28) after relapse at any time * Evidence of minimal residual disease (MRD). If a patient's only high risk criterion is MRD, approval by a protocol chair or protocol officer is required for enrollment. For COG centers, this will only be for MRD greater than 1 percent by flow MRD at the end of extended induction. 3. Any third or subsequent CR * NK cell lymphoblastic leukemia in any CR * Biphenotypic or undifferentiated leukemia in any CR or if in first relapse must have less than 25% blasts in bone marrow (BM) * Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) at any stage * Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in chronic or accelerated phase * All patients with evidence of CNS leukemia must be treated and be in CNS CR to be eligible for study. * Patients 16 years old or older must have a Karnofsky score of at least 70% and patients younger than 16 years old must have a Lansky score of at least 70%. * Patients with adequate physical function as measured by: 1. Cardiac: Left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 40% or shortening fraction greater than 26% 2. Hepatic: Bilirubin no more than 2.5 mg/dL; alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) no more than 5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) 3. Renal: Serum creatinine within normal range for age, or if serum creatinine is outside normal range for age, then renal function (creatinine clearance or GFR) greater than 70 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 4. Pulmonary: Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), or forced vital capacity (FVC) greater than 50% of predicted value (corrected for hemoglobin); if unable to perform pulmonary function tests, then O2 saturation greater than 92% of room air

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant (β-positive human chorionic gonadotropin \[HCG\]) or breastfeeding * Evidence of HIV infection or HIV positive serology * Current uncontrolled bacterial, viral, or fungal infection (currently taking medication and progression of clinical symptoms) * Autologous transplant less than 12 months prior to enrollment * Prior autologous transplant for the disease for which the UCB transplant will be performed * Prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant * Active malignancy other than the one for which the UCB transplant is being performed within 12 months of enrollment * Inability to receive TBI * Requirement of supplemental oxygen * HLA-matched related donor able to donate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival1 year post-randomizationOverall survival is defined as survival of death from any cause.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil and Platelet EngraftmentDays 42 and 100Neutrophil engraftment is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count greater than 500x10\^6/liter for three consecutive measurements on different days. The first of the three days will be designated the day of neutrophil engraftment. Platelet engraftment is defined as achieving platelet counts greater than 50,000/microliter for consecutive measurements over 7 days without requiring platelet transfusions. The first of the 7 days will be designated the day of platelet engraftment. Subjects must not have had platelet transfusions during the preceding 7 days.
Time to Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment2 years post-transplantPlatelet engraftment is defined as achieving platelet counts greater than 50,000/microliter for consecutive measurements over 7 days without requiring platelet transfusions. The first of the 7 days will be designated the day of platelet engraftment. Subjects must not have had platelet transfusions during the preceding 7 days.
Percentage of Participants With Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)Day 100 post-randomizationAcute GVHD is graded according to the scoring system proposed by Przepiorka et al.1995: Skin stage: 0: No rash 1. Rash \<25% of body surface area 2. Rash on 25-50% of body surface area 3. Rash on \> 50% of body surface area 4. Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation Liver stage (based on bilirubin level)\*: 0: \<2 mg/dL 1. 2-3 mg/dL 2. 3.01-6 mg/dL 3. 6.01-15.0 mg/dL 4. \>15 mg/dL GI stage\*: 0: No diarrhea or diarrhea \<500 mL/day 1. Diarrhea 500-999 mL/day or persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD 2. Diarrhea 1000-1499 mL/day 3. Diarrhea \>1500 mL/day 4. Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus \* If multiple etiologies are listed for liver or GI, the organ system is downstaged by 1. GVHD grade: 0: All organ stages 0 or GVHD not listed as an etiology I: Skin stage 1-2 and liver and GI stage 0 II: Skin stage 3 or liver or GI stage 1 III: Liver stage 2-3 or GI stage 2-4 IV: Skin or liver stage 4
Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD1 year post-randomizationIncidences of chronic GVHD will be graded per Shulman et al. 1980. This reference categorizes chronic GVHD as either limited or extensive. For this outcome, participants developing either type are considered to have a chronic GVHD event.
Percentage of Participants With Disease-free Survival1 year post-randomizationDisease-free survival is defined as survival without relapse of the primary disease.
Percentage of Participants With Relapse1 year post-randomizationRelapse is defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of AML, ALL, CML, or MDS consistent with pre-transplant features. Testing for recurrent malignancy in the blood, marrow or other sites will be used to assess relapse after transplantation.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality1 year post-randomizationTreatment related mortality is defined as death without relapse of the primary disease.
Number of Participants With Engraftment SyndromeDay 100 post-transplant
Number of Infections Per Participant2 years post-randomization

Countries

Australia, Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Single UCB Transplant
Single Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation
113
Double UCB Transplant
Double Umbilical Cord Blood Unit Transplantation
111
Total224

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyNot Transplanted12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSingle UCB TransplantTotalDouble UCB Transplant
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia Disease Status
First Complete Remission (CR)
5 Participants6 Participants1 Participants
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia Disease Status
Second CR
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Age, Continuous10.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
10.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
10.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
ALL Disease Status
First Complete Remission (CR)
19 Participants38 Participants19 Participants
ALL Disease Status
Morphologic CR before Complete-Blood-Count Recover
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
ALL Disease Status
Second CR
29 Participants57 Participants28 Participants
ALL Disease Status
Subsequent CR
13 Participants23 Participants10 Participants
AML Disease Status
First Complete Remission (CR)
17 Participants31 Participants14 Participants
AML Disease Status
First Relapse
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
AML Disease Status
Morphologic CR before Complete-Blood-Count Recover
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
AML Disease Status
Secondary or Therapy-related
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
AML Disease Status
Second or Later CR
16 Participants35 Participants19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
22 Participants42 Participants20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
88 Participants176 Participants88 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Karnofsky Performance Score
100%
58 Participants115 Participants57 Participants
Karnofsky Performance Score
70%
4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Karnofsky Performance Score
80%
13 Participants22 Participants9 Participants
Karnofsky Performance Score
90%
38 Participants81 Participants43 Participants
MDS Disease Status
Refractory Anemia
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
MDS Disease Status
Refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts 1 (RAEB1)
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
MDS Disease Status
Refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts 2 (RAEB2)
0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
MDS Disease Status
Refractory Cytopenia with Multilineage Dysplasia
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
MDS Disease Status
Unclassified
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Primary Disease
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia
6 Participants8 Participants2 Participants
Primary Disease
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
61 Participants119 Participants58 Participants
Primary Disease
Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)
39 Participants77 Participants38 Participants
Primary Disease
Acute Undifferentiated Leukemia
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Primary Disease
Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML)
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Primary Disease
Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
5 Participants18 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
13 Participants24 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
12 Participants19 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
80 Participants165 Participants85 Participants
Recipient CMV Status
Inconclusive
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Recipient CMV Status
Negative
51 Participants90 Participants39 Participants
Recipient CMV Status
Positive
58 Participants124 Participants66 Participants
Recipient CMV Status
Unknown
3 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
Recipient to First Cord Blood Unit ABO Match
Bidirectional Mismatch
10 Participants18 Participants8 Participants
Recipient to First Cord Blood Unit ABO Match
Major Mismatch
30 Participants55 Participants25 Participants
Recipient to First Cord Blood Unit ABO Match
Minor Mismatch
24 Participants59 Participants35 Participants
Recipient to First Cord Blood Unit ABO Match
No Mismatch
44 Participants80 Participants36 Participants
Recipient to First Cord Blood Unit ABO Match
Unknown
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Recipient to First Cord Blood Unit HLA Match
3/6
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Recipient to First Cord Blood Unit HLA Match
4/6
44 Participants77 Participants33 Participants
Recipient to First Cord Blood Unit HLA Match
5/6
51 Participants110 Participants59 Participants
Recipient to First Cord Blood Unit HLA Match
6/6
16 Participants30 Participants14 Participants
Recipient to Second Cord Blood Unit ABO Match
Bidirectional mismatch
4 Participants4 Participants
Recipient to Second Cord Blood Unit ABO Match
Major mismatch
31 Participants31 Participants
Recipient to Second Cord Blood Unit ABO Match
Minor mismatch
29 Participants29 Participants
Recipient to Second Cord Blood Unit ABO Match
No mismatch
38 Participants38 Participants
Recipient to Second Cord Blood Unit ABO Match
Unknown
6 Participants6 Participants
Recipient to Second Cord Blood Unit HLA Match
3/6
1 Participants1 Participants
Recipient to Second Cord Blood Unit HLA Match
4/6
43 Participants43 Participants
Recipient to Second Cord Blood Unit HLA Match
5/6
43 Participants43 Participants
Recipient to Second Cord Blood Unit HLA Match
6/6
21 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
55 Participants96 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
58 Participants128 Participants70 Participants
Weight at Infusion39.6 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.2
39.15 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.7
38.7 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.2

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1120 / 108
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 11214 / 108

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as survival of death from any cause.

Time frame: 1 year post-randomization

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Single UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Overall Survival73 percentage of participants
Double UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Overall Survival65 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in overall survival at one year post-randomization between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant. The targeted sample size of 110 participants per treatment group was sufficient to maintain a type I error rate of 5% and provide more than 86% power to detect an increase in overall survival from 57% among participants receiving a single unit graft to 77% for those receiving a double-unit graft.p-value: 0.17Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Infections Per Participant

Time frame: 2 years post-randomization

Population: Transplanted participants

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single UCB TransplantNumber of Infections Per Participant010 Participants
Single UCB TransplantNumber of Infections Per Participant115 Participants
Single UCB TransplantNumber of Infections Per Participant212 Participants
Single UCB TransplantNumber of Infections Per Participant319 Participants
Single UCB TransplantNumber of Infections Per Participant417 Participants
Single UCB TransplantNumber of Infections Per Participant57 Participants
Single UCB TransplantNumber of Infections Per Participant6-1019 Participants
Single UCB TransplantNumber of Infections Per ParticipantMore than 1013 Participants
Double UCB TransplantNumber of Infections Per ParticipantMore than 1010 Participants
Double UCB TransplantNumber of Infections Per Participant09 Participants
Double UCB TransplantNumber of Infections Per Participant415 Participants
Double UCB TransplantNumber of Infections Per Participant113 Participants
Double UCB TransplantNumber of Infections Per Participant6-1024 Participants
Double UCB TransplantNumber of Infections Per Participant215 Participants
Double UCB TransplantNumber of Infections Per Participant512 Participants
Double UCB TransplantNumber of Infections Per Participant310 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Engraftment Syndrome

Time frame: Day 100 post-transplant

Population: Transplanted participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single UCB TransplantNumber of Participants With Engraftment Syndrome11 Participants
Double UCB TransplantNumber of Participants With Engraftment Syndrome7 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)

Acute GVHD is graded according to the scoring system proposed by Przepiorka et al.1995: Skin stage: 0: No rash 1. Rash \<25% of body surface area 2. Rash on 25-50% of body surface area 3. Rash on \> 50% of body surface area 4. Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation Liver stage (based on bilirubin level)\*: 0: \<2 mg/dL 1. 2-3 mg/dL 2. 3.01-6 mg/dL 3. 6.01-15.0 mg/dL 4. \>15 mg/dL GI stage\*: 0: No diarrhea or diarrhea \<500 mL/day 1. Diarrhea 500-999 mL/day or persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD 2. Diarrhea 1000-1499 mL/day 3. Diarrhea \>1500 mL/day 4. Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus \* If multiple etiologies are listed for liver or GI, the organ system is downstaged by 1. GVHD grade: 0: All organ stages 0 or GVHD not listed as an etiology I: Skin stage 1-2 and liver and GI stage 0 II: Skin stage 3 or liver or GI stage 1 III: Liver stage 2-3 or GI stage 2-4 IV: Skin or liver stage 4

Time frame: Day 100 post-randomization

Population: Transplanted participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Single UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)Acute GVHD Grade II-IV57 percentage of participants
Single UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)Acute GVHD Grade III-IV13 percentage of participants
Double UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)Acute GVHD Grade II-IV56 percentage of participants
Double UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)Acute GVHD Grade III-IV23 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the cumulative incidence of Grade II-IV acute GVHD between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant.p-value: 0.78Gray's test
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the cumulative incidence of Grade III-IV acute GVHD between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant.p-value: 0.02Gray's test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD

Incidences of chronic GVHD will be graded per Shulman et al. 1980. This reference categorizes chronic GVHD as either limited or extensive. For this outcome, participants developing either type are considered to have a chronic GVHD event.

Time frame: 1 year post-randomization

Population: Transplanted participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Single UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Chronic GVHDChronic GVHD30 percentage of participants
Single UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Chronic GVHDExtensive Chronic GVHD9 percentage of participants
Double UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Chronic GVHDChronic GVHD32 percentage of participants
Double UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Chronic GVHDExtensive Chronic GVHD15 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant.p-value: 0.51Gray's test
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the cumulative incidence of extensive chronic GVHD between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant.p-value: 0.05Gray's test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Disease-free Survival

Disease-free survival is defined as survival without relapse of the primary disease.

Time frame: 1 year post-randomization

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Single UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Disease-free Survival70 percentage of participants
Double UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Disease-free Survival64 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in disease-free survival at one year post-randomization between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant.p-value: 0.11Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment

Neutrophil engraftment is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count greater than 500x10\^6/liter for three consecutive measurements on different days. The first of the three days will be designated the day of neutrophil engraftment. Platelet engraftment is defined as achieving platelet counts greater than 50,000/microliter for consecutive measurements over 7 days without requiring platelet transfusions. The first of the 7 days will be designated the day of platelet engraftment. Subjects must not have had platelet transfusions during the preceding 7 days.

Time frame: Days 42 and 100

Population: Transplanted participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Single UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Neutrophil and Platelet EngraftmentPlatelet Engraftment at Day 10076 percentage of participants
Single UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Neutrophil and Platelet EngraftmentNeutrophil Engraftment at Day 4289 percentage of participants
Double UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Neutrophil and Platelet EngraftmentNeutrophil Engraftment at Day 4288 percentage of participants
Double UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Neutrophil and Platelet EngraftmentPlatelet Engraftment at Day 10065 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant.p-value: 0.29Gray's test
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant.p-value: 0.04Gray's test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Relapse

Relapse is defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of AML, ALL, CML, or MDS consistent with pre-transplant features. Testing for recurrent malignancy in the blood, marrow or other sites will be used to assess relapse after transplantation.

Time frame: 1 year post-randomization

Population: Transplanted participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Single UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Relapse12 percentage of participants
Double UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Relapse14 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the cumulative incidence of relapse between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant.p-value: 0.12Gray's test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality

Treatment related mortality is defined as death without relapse of the primary disease.

Time frame: 1 year post-randomization

Population: Transplanted participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Single UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality19 percentage of participants
Double UCB TransplantPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality22 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality between participants receiving single- and double-unit cord blood transplant.p-value: 0.43Gray's test
Secondary

Time to Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment

Platelet engraftment is defined as achieving platelet counts greater than 50,000/microliter for consecutive measurements over 7 days without requiring platelet transfusions. The first of the 7 days will be designated the day of platelet engraftment. Subjects must not have had platelet transfusions during the preceding 7 days.

Time frame: 2 years post-transplant

Population: Transplanted participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Single UCB TransplantTime to Neutrophil and Platelet EngraftmentNeutrophil Engraftment21 days
Single UCB TransplantTime to Neutrophil and Platelet EngraftmentPlatelet Engraftment58 days
Double UCB TransplantTime to Neutrophil and Platelet EngraftmentNeutrophil Engraftment23 days
Double UCB TransplantTime to Neutrophil and Platelet EngraftmentPlatelet Engraftment84 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026