Skip to content

Panitumumab Regimen Evaluation in Colorectal Cancer to Estimate Primary Response to Treatment

Multi Center, Open Label, Single Arm Trial Evaluating Panitumumab in Combination With FOLFIRI Therapy Following First Line FOLFOX and Bevacizumab Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00411450
Acronym
PRECEPT
Enrollment
116
Registered
2006-12-14
Start date
2006-11-30
Completion date
2010-10-31
Last updated
2016-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Colon Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Metastatic Cancer, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, Oncology, Rectal Cancer

Keywords

k-ras, biomarker, colorectal, colon, rectal, FOLFOX, FOLFIRI

Brief summary

The primary objective is to estimate the effect of the human homolog of the Kirsten rat sarcoma-2 virus oncogene (KRAS) mutation status (wild type versus mutant) from tumor tissue on efficacy endpoints in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving second-line chemotherapy with panitumumab after failing first-line treatment.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALPanitumumab

Administered by intravenous infusion

DRUGFOLFIRI

Chemotherapy consisting of irinotecan with infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. Recommended dosage regimen and administration of FOLFIRI was based on local standard of care, the package insert for each product, and institutional guidelines.

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum * Available paraffin-embedded tumor tissue * Failure of first line treatment containing fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin based chemotherapy with bevacizumab for mCRC * Measurable disease * Adequate hematologic, renal, hepatic and metabolic function

Exclusion criteria

* Radiotherapy ≤ 2 weeks prior to Day 1 of Cycle 1 * Unresolved toxicity(ies) from prior anti cancer therapy that, in the opinion of the investigator, precludes the subject from study enrollment * Prior irinotecan therapy, anti epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) therapy, or vaccine for the treatment of mCRC * CYP3A4 enzyme inducers, inhibitors, and substrates (eg, phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, ketoconazole, rifampin, rifabutin, and St. John's Wort) ≤ 2 weeks prior to Day 1 of Cycle 1 * Infection requiring systemic anti infectives completed ≤ 2 weeks prior to Day 1 of Cycle 1 * Clinically significant cardiovascular disease * History of interstitial lung disease (eg, pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis) * Pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, or other significant thromboembolic event ≤ 8 weeks prior to Day 1 of Cycle 1 * Any significant bleeding ≤ 6 weeks prior to Day 1 of Cycle 1, per the investigator's judgement * Gastroduodenal ulcer(s) determined by endoscopy to be active or uncontrolled gastrointestinal ulcer ≤ 4 weeks prior to Day1 of Cycle 1 * Any co-morbid disease or condition that could increase the risk of toxicity (eg, dihydropyrimidine deficiency, significant ascites, or pleural effusion) * Major surgery (requiring general anesthesia), open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury ≤ 4 weeks prior to Day1 of Cycle 1. Subjects must have recovered from surgery and have no significant complications

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to ResponseTumor response was assessed at Weeks 9, 17, 25, and 33, and once every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of second-line treatment; maximum time on treatment was 77 weeks.Time to response of second-line treatment is defined as the time from study Day 1 to the date of first documentation of CR or PR, calculated for those participants with an objective tumor response of CR or PR.
Overall SurvivalFrom Study Day 1 until the data cut-off date of 2 January 2009; median follow-up time was 39 weeks, with a maximum of 93 weeks.Overall survival is defined as as the number of days from Study Day 1 to the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method; participants who were lost to follow-up or who had not died at the end of the study (52 weeks after the last participant was enrolled) were censored at the date of last contact.
Time to Treatment FailureTumor response was assessed at Weeks 9, 17, 25, and 33, and once every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of second-line treatment; maximum time on treatment was 77 weeks.Time to failure of second-line treatment is defined as the time from study Day 1 to the date of the earliest of the following events: end of second-line therapy due to any reason except for complete response and curative surgery; progressive disease; or death due to any cause. Time to treatment failure was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods; participants who did not discontinue second-line treatment or discontinue due to complete response or curative surgery, who were still alive, and who did not have disease progression were censored at the date of the last contact.
Time to ProgressionFrom Study Day 1 until the data cut-off date of 2 January 2009; median follow-up time was 39 weeks, with a maximum of 93 weeks.Time to progression is defined as the time from study Day 1 to the date of observed disease progression. Time to progression was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods; participants who did not have disease progression were censored at the date of last evaluable tumor assessment.
Objective Response Rate at Weeks 17 and 25Week 17 and Week 25Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with a best response of complete response or partial response. Disease assessments were based on investigator review of scans using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. A complete or partial response was confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Participants with no radiographic tumor assessment(s) at Week 17 or 25 were considered non-responders. Complete Response (CR): disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the size of target lesions with no progression of non-target lesions (defined as a ≥ 25% increase in lesion size) and no new lesions, or, the disappearance of all target lesions but persistence of 1 or more non-target lesions not qualifying for either CR or progressive disease (PD) and no new lesions.
Best Response During Second-Line TreatmentTumor response was assessed at Weeks 9, 17, 25, and 33, and once every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of second-line treatment; maximum time on treatment was 77 weeks.Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with a best response of complete response or partial response based on investigator review of scans using modified RECIST criteria. A complete or partial response was confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Participants with no post-baseline radiographic tumor assessment(s) were considered non-responders. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the size of target lesions with no progression of non-target lesions (defined as a ≥ 25% increase in lesion size) and no new lesions, or, the disappearance of all target lesions but persistence of 1 or more non-target lesions not qualifying for either CR or PD and no new lesions.
Progression-free Survival Rate at Weeks 17 and 25Week 17 and Week 25The progression-free survival rate is defined as the Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimator of progression-free survival at Week 17 and Week 25 reported as the probability of being event (disease progression or death)-free. Tumor assessments were evaluated by the investigator according to modified RECIST criteria. PD: At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions since the treatment started or at least a 25% increase in the size of non-target lesions and the lesion(s) measure ≥ 10 mm, or the appearance of any new lesions. Participants who withdraw from the study prior to completion of Week 17 or 25 radiographic tumor assessments were censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment.
Progression-free Survival TimeFrom Study Day 1 until the data cut-off date of 2 January 2009; median follow-up time was 39 weeks, with a maximum of 93 weeks.Progression-free survival time was defined as the time from Study Day 1 to the date of disease progression (based on investigator assessment) or the date of death due to any cause. Participants who terminated from the study early (eg, prior to disease progression due to fully withdrawn informed consent) were censored at their last tumor assessment.
Disease Control Rate at Weeks 17 and 25Week 17 and Week 25The percentage of participants whose best response was either a complete or partial response or stable disease, based on modified RECIST criteria as assessed by the investigator. Stable diease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD of target lesions and no progression of existing non-target lesions and no new lesions, or, the persistence of 1 or more non-target lesions not qualifying for either CR or PD if no target lesions were identified at Baseline.
Duration of ResponseTumor response was assessed at Weeks 9, 17, 25, and 33, and once every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of second-line treatment; maximum time on treatment was 77 weeks.Duration of response is defined as the time from the date of first response to the date of first progression of disease during second-line treatment (as evaluated by the investigator) or death (if the death was due to disease progression but not detected earlier) in the subset of participants who responded (CR or PR, as evaluated by the investigator). Duration of response was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods; participants who responded but did not progress while on study were censored at the date of last tumor assessment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Grade 4 Laboratory ToxicitiesFrom the first dose date to 30 days after the last dose date. The median time frame is 4.5 months.Laboratory toxicities were graded according to CTCAE version 3.
Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to PanitumumabPrior to first dose and 28 days after the last dose of second-line treatmentThe immunogenicity of panitumumab was evaluated using 2 different screening immunoassays for the detection of anti-panitumumab antibodies: an acid dissociation bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; detecting high-affinity antibodies) and a Biacore® biosensor immunoassay (detecting both high and low-affinity antibodies). When either of the 2 screening assays yielded a positive result, that particular sample was subjected to an in vitro bioassay for the detection of neutralizing antibodies.
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsFrom the first dose date to 30 days after the last dose date. The median time frame is 4.5 months.The severity of adverse events (AEs) was graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0, except for panitumumab related skin toxicities, where Grade 1 = Mild AE; Grade 2 = Moderate AE; Grade 3 = Severe AE; Grade 4 = Life-threatening or disabling AE; Grade 5 = Death related to AE. The relationship of each adverse event to the panitumumab and/or FOLFIRI regimen was assessed by the investigator. A serious adverse event was defined as an adverse event that • is fatal • is life threatening • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • is a congenital anomaly/birth defect • other significant medical hazard.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 56 sites in the United States. The first patient enrolled on 30 November 2006 and the last patient enrolled on 07 January 2008.

Pre-assignment details

Participants recived second-line therapy until disease progression, intolerability, death, or study withdrawal. Participants completed a safety visit 4 weeks after the last dose. Participants were followed for survival every 12 weeks from the safety visit until the end of the study; the data cut-off date for results is 2 January 2009.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI
Participants received 6 mg/kg panitumumab intravenously (IV) once every 14 days in combination with FOLFIRI chemotherapy regimen consisting of irinotecan, infusional 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin, until disease progression, intolerability, death, or study withdrawal.
116
Total116

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyOngoing at time of data cut-off.3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPanitumumab Plus FOLFIRI
Age, Continuous60.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Gene (KRAS) Mutation Status
Mutant
45 participants
Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Gene (KRAS) Mutation Status
Unevaluable
6 participants
Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Gene (KRAS) Mutation Status
Wild-type
65 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
13 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
8 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or Caucasian
94 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
75 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
114 / 115
serious
Total, serious adverse events
46 / 115

Outcome results

Primary

Best Response During Second-Line Treatment

Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with a best response of complete response or partial response based on investigator review of scans using modified RECIST criteria. A complete or partial response was confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Participants with no post-baseline radiographic tumor assessment(s) were considered non-responders. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the size of target lesions with no progression of non-target lesions (defined as a ≥ 25% increase in lesion size) and no new lesions, or, the disappearance of all target lesions but persistence of 1 or more non-target lesions not qualifying for either CR or PD and no new lesions.

Time frame: Tumor response was assessed at Weeks 9, 17, 25, and 33, and once every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of second-line treatment; maximum time on treatment was 77 weeks.

Population: Tumor Response Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Wild-type KRASBest Response During Second-Line Treatment23 percentage of participants
Mutant KRASBest Response During Second-Line Treatment16 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-11, 23]
Primary

Disease Control Rate at Weeks 17 and 25

The percentage of participants whose best response was either a complete or partial response or stable disease, based on modified RECIST criteria as assessed by the investigator. Stable diease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD of target lesions and no progression of existing non-target lesions and no new lesions, or, the persistence of 1 or more non-target lesions not qualifying for either CR or PD if no target lesions were identified at Baseline.

Time frame: Week 17 and Week 25

Population: Tumor Response Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Wild-type KRASDisease Control Rate at Weeks 17 and 25Week 1764 percentage of participants
Wild-type KRASDisease Control Rate at Weeks 17 and 25Week 2564 percentage of participants
Mutant KRASDisease Control Rate at Weeks 17 and 25Week 1758 percentage of participants
Mutant KRASDisease Control Rate at Weeks 17 and 25Week 2558 percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference at Week 1795% CI: [-14, 25]
Comparison: Difference at Week 2595% CI: [-14, 25]
Primary

Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined as the time from the date of first response to the date of first progression of disease during second-line treatment (as evaluated by the investigator) or death (if the death was due to disease progression but not detected earlier) in the subset of participants who responded (CR or PR, as evaluated by the investigator). Duration of response was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods; participants who responded but did not progress while on study were censored at the date of last tumor assessment.

Time frame: Tumor response was assessed at Weeks 9, 17, 25, and 33, and once every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of second-line treatment; maximum time on treatment was 77 weeks.

Population: Responders of Tumor Response Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Wild-type KRASDuration of Response29 weeks
Mutant KRASDuration of Response23 weeks
95% CI: [0.2, 2]
Primary

Objective Response Rate at Weeks 17 and 25

Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with a best response of complete response or partial response. Disease assessments were based on investigator review of scans using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. A complete or partial response was confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Participants with no radiographic tumor assessment(s) at Week 17 or 25 were considered non-responders. Complete Response (CR): disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the size of target lesions with no progression of non-target lesions (defined as a ≥ 25% increase in lesion size) and no new lesions, or, the disappearance of all target lesions but persistence of 1 or more non-target lesions not qualifying for either CR or progressive disease (PD) and no new lesions.

Time frame: Week 17 and Week 25

Population: Tumor Response Analysis Set (all participants who provided informed consent prior to the initiation of any study specific procedures, received at least 1 dose of panitumumab, who had valid KRAS mutation status data available and with at least 1 uni-dimensionally measurable lesion per the local investigator)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Wild-type KRASObjective Response Rate at Weeks 17 and 25Week 1720 percentage of participants
Wild-type KRASObjective Response Rate at Weeks 17 and 25Week 2522 percentage of participants
Mutant KRASObjective Response Rate at Weeks 17 and 25Week 1714 percentage of participants
Mutant KRASObjective Response Rate at Weeks 17 and 25Week 2514 percentage of participants
Comparison: Difference at Week 1795% CI: [-11, 21]
Comparison: Difference at Week 2595% CI: [-9, 23]
Primary

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as as the number of days from Study Day 1 to the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method; participants who were lost to follow-up or who had not died at the end of the study (52 weeks after the last participant was enrolled) were censored at the date of last contact.

Time frame: From Study Day 1 until the data cut-off date of 2 January 2009; median follow-up time was 39 weeks, with a maximum of 93 weeks.

Population: Primary Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Wild-type KRASOverall Survival50 weeks
Mutant KRASOverall Survival31 weeks
95% CI: [0.4, 0.9]
Primary

Progression-free Survival Rate at Weeks 17 and 25

The progression-free survival rate is defined as the Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimator of progression-free survival at Week 17 and Week 25 reported as the probability of being event (disease progression or death)-free. Tumor assessments were evaluated by the investigator according to modified RECIST criteria. PD: At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions since the treatment started or at least a 25% increase in the size of non-target lesions and the lesion(s) measure ≥ 10 mm, or the appearance of any new lesions. Participants who withdraw from the study prior to completion of Week 17 or 25 radiographic tumor assessments were censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment.

Time frame: Week 17 and Week 25

Population: Primary Analysis Set (all participants who provided informed consent prior to the initiation of any study specific procedures, received at least 1 dose of panitumumab, and who had valid KRAS mutation status data available)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Wild-type KRASProgression-free Survival Rate at Weeks 17 and 25Week 1767 percent probability
Wild-type KRASProgression-free Survival Rate at Weeks 17 and 25Week 2552 percent probability
Mutant KRASProgression-free Survival Rate at Weeks 17 and 25Week 1755 percent probability
Mutant KRASProgression-free Survival Rate at Weeks 17 and 25Week 2541 percent probability
Comparison: Difference at Week 1795% CI: [-6.3, 31.4]
Comparison: Difference at Week 2595% CI: [-8.4, 30.2]
Primary

Progression-free Survival Time

Progression-free survival time was defined as the time from Study Day 1 to the date of disease progression (based on investigator assessment) or the date of death due to any cause. Participants who terminated from the study early (eg, prior to disease progression due to fully withdrawn informed consent) were censored at their last tumor assessment.

Time frame: From Study Day 1 until the data cut-off date of 2 January 2009; median follow-up time was 39 weeks, with a maximum of 93 weeks.

Population: Primary Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Wild-type KRASProgression-free Survival Time26 weeks
Mutant KRASProgression-free Survival Time19 weeks
95% CI: [0.5, 1.1]
Primary

Time to Progression

Time to progression is defined as the time from study Day 1 to the date of observed disease progression. Time to progression was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods; participants who did not have disease progression were censored at the date of last evaluable tumor assessment.

Time frame: From Study Day 1 until the data cut-off date of 2 January 2009; median follow-up time was 39 weeks, with a maximum of 93 weeks.

Population: Primary Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Wild-type KRASTime to Progression26 weeks
Mutant KRASTime to Progression17 weeks
95% CI: [0.5, 1.2]
Primary

Time to Response

Time to response of second-line treatment is defined as the time from study Day 1 to the date of first documentation of CR or PR, calculated for those participants with an objective tumor response of CR or PR.

Time frame: Tumor response was assessed at Weeks 9, 17, 25, and 33, and once every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of second-line treatment; maximum time on treatment was 77 weeks.

Population: Responders in the Tumor Response Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Wild-type KRASTime to Response9.1 weeks
Mutant KRASTime to Response9.3 weeks
Primary

Time to Treatment Failure

Time to failure of second-line treatment is defined as the time from study Day 1 to the date of the earliest of the following events: end of second-line therapy due to any reason except for complete response and curative surgery; progressive disease; or death due to any cause. Time to treatment failure was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods; participants who did not discontinue second-line treatment or discontinue due to complete response or curative surgery, who were still alive, and who did not have disease progression were censored at the date of the last contact.

Time frame: Tumor response was assessed at Weeks 9, 17, 25, and 33, and once every 12 weeks thereafter until the end of second-line treatment; maximum time on treatment was 77 weeks.

Population: Primary Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Wild-type KRASTime to Treatment Failure19 weeks
Mutant KRASTime to Treatment Failure15 weeks
95% CI: [0.5, 1.1]
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to Panitumumab

The immunogenicity of panitumumab was evaluated using 2 different screening immunoassays for the detection of anti-panitumumab antibodies: an acid dissociation bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; detecting high-affinity antibodies) and a Biacore® biosensor immunoassay (detecting both high and low-affinity antibodies). When either of the 2 screening assays yielded a positive result, that particular sample was subjected to an in vitro bioassay for the detection of neutralizing antibodies.

Time frame: Prior to first dose and 28 days after the last dose of second-line treatment

Population: Safety Analysis Set with baseline anti-panitumumab antibody testing sample available

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to PanitumumabBinding antibody positive1 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to PanitumumabNeutralizing antibody positive0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

The severity of adverse events (AEs) was graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0, except for panitumumab related skin toxicities, where Grade 1 = Mild AE; Grade 2 = Moderate AE; Grade 3 = Severe AE; Grade 4 = Life-threatening or disabling AE; Grade 5 = Death related to AE. The relationship of each adverse event to the panitumumab and/or FOLFIRI regimen was assessed by the investigator. A serious adverse event was defined as an adverse event that • is fatal • is life threatening • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • is a congenital anomaly/birth defect • other significant medical hazard.

Time frame: From the first dose date to 30 days after the last dose date. The median time frame is 4.5 months.

Population: Safety analysis set (all participants who provided informed consent prior to the initiation of any study specific procedure and who received at least 1 dose of panitumumab)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsEnded second-line treatment due to adverse events18 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsEnded panitumumab due to adverse events20 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsEnded FOLFIRI due to adverse events28 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsDeath due to adverse events8 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsPanitumumab infusion reactions2 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsDeaths during study71 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsChemotherapy-related adverse events112 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Adverse Events≥ grade 3 panitumumab-related adverse events56 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Adverse Events≥ grade 3 chemotherapy-related adverse events65 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAny adverse event115 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsGrade 3 or higher adverse event94 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsPanitumumab-related adverse events107 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious adverse events46 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious panitumumab-related adverse events15 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious chemotherapy-related adverse events24 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsLife-threatening adverse events18 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Grade 4 Laboratory Toxicities

Laboratory toxicities were graded according to CTCAE version 3.

Time frame: From the first dose date to 30 days after the last dose date. The median time frame is 4.5 months.

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Grade 4 Laboratory ToxicitiesHyperbilirubinaemia1 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Grade 4 Laboratory ToxicitiesAnemia1 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Grade 4 Laboratory ToxicitiesNeutropenia4 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Grade 4 Laboratory ToxicitiesHypomagnesaemia8 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Grade 4 Laboratory ToxicitiesHypokalemia1 participants
Wild-type KRASNumber of Participants With Grade 4 Laboratory ToxicitiesHypocalcaemia3 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026