Skip to content

A Study of Mirabegron (YM178) in Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) and Bladder Outlet Obstruction (BOO)

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Urodynamics and Safety of YM178 in Male Subjects With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) and Bladder Outlet Obstruction (BOO)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00410514
Enrollment
200
Registered
2006-12-13
Start date
2006-12-31
Completion date
2008-08-31
Last updated
2014-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bladder Outlet Obstruction, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Keywords

Beta-3 Receptor Agonist, YM178, Men, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Bladder Outlet Obstruction

Brief summary

This study examined the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of mirabegron (YM178) compared to placebo.

Interventions

DRUGMirabegron

oral

DRUGPlacebo

oral

Sponsors

Astellas Pharma Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men 45 years of age or older * Documented bladder outlet obstruction

Exclusion criteria

* History of urinary retention * Symptomatic and recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Maximum Flow Rate (Qmax)Baseline and Week 12Maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) was measured by the Investigator using cystometry and was sent to an independent central reading center for review and interpretation. Least squares means (LSM) were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Detrusor Pressure at Maximum Flow Rate (PdetQmax)Baseline and Week 12Detrusor pressure at maximum urinary flow rate (PdetQmax) was measured by the Investigator using cystometry and was sent to an independent central reading center for review and interpretation. Least squares means (LSM) were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12Healthy micturitions (urinations) result in complete emptying of the bladder. Post Void Residual (PVR) is the volume of urine retained after voiding and was assessed using abdominal ultrasound. An increasing PVR over time is an indicator of abnormal bladder function or detrusor decompensation. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.
Safety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsFrom first dose to within 30 days after last dose of double blind study medication (up to 16 weeks).Abnormal laboratory parameters, vital signs or ECG data were defined as AEs if the abnormality induced clinical signs or symptoms, needed active intervention, interruption or discontinuation of study medication or was clinically significant. A serious AE was an event resulting in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly or birth defect, was life-threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization or was considered medically important. AEs were assessed by the Investigator for intensity as mild, moderate or severe and for causal relationship to study drug.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Total ScoreBaseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12The IPSS is a validated global questionnaire used to assess the degree of bother from benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms and is based on the answers to 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms. Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The total score can therefore range from 0 to 35 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Voiding ScoreBaseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12The IPSS is a validated global questionnaire used to assess the degree of bother from benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms based on the answers to 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms. Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The voiding score is the sum of the responses to 4 questions relating to urination (incomplete emptying, intermittency, weak stream and straining) and ranges from 0 to 20 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Storage Symptom ScoreBaseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12The IPSS is a validated global questionnaire used to assess the degree of bother from benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms based on the answers to 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms. Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The storage symptom score is the sum of the responses to 3 questions relating to storage symptoms (frequency, urgency and nocturia) and ranges from 0 to 15 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12The patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC) asks participants to assess their bladder condition using a 6-point validated Likert scale which ranges from 1 (does not cause me any problems at all) to 6 (causes me many severe problems). Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursBaseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12A micturition is any voluntary urination, excluding episodes of incontinence only. The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Bladder Contractile Index (BCI)Baseline and Week 12The Bladder Contractile Index (BCI) is a value used to measure the degree of contractility. BCI was calculated using the following formula: BCI = pdetQmax + 5Qmax. Strong contractility is a BCI \> 150, normal contractility is a BCI of 100-150 and weak contractility is a BCI of \< 100. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursBaseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12The mean number of incontinence episodes (the involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per MicturitionBaseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12The mean volume voided per micturition was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Symptom ScoreBaseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Male lower urinary tract symptoms were assessed by the ICIQ MaleLUTS questionnaire which consists of 13 questions each on a 0-4 scale (larger scores correspond to worse conditions). The total symptom score ranges from 0 to 52. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Bother ScoreBaseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12The degree to which urinary symptoms bothered participants was assessed by the ICIQ MaleLUTS questionnaire which consists of 13 symptom bother questions each on a 0-10 scale (larger scores correspond to worse outcomes). The total bother score ranges from 0 to 130. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Symptom ScoreBaseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Quality of life was assessed by the ICIQ-LUTSqol questionnaire which consists of 19 questions each on a 1-4 scale (larger scores correspond to less quality of life). The total symptom score ranges from 19 - 76. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Overall Symptom Interference of Life ScoreBaseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Participants were asked to rate how much their urinary symptoms interfered overall with their everyday life on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (a great deal). Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes With Urgency Severity ≥ 3 Per 24 HoursBaseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12For each micturition and/or incontinence episode in the 3 days preceding the clinic visit, participants rated the degree of associated urgency (the sudden compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer) according to the following scale: 0: No Urgency, felt no need to empty my bladder but did so for another reason; 1: Mild Urgency, could postpone passing water for as long as necessary; 2: Moderate Urgency, could postpone passing water for a short while; 3: Severe Urgency, could not postpone passing water; 4: Urge Incontinence, leaked before reaching the toilet. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Bladder Voiding Efficiency (BVE)Baseline and Week 12Bladder Voiding Efficiency (BVE) is a product of bladder contractility against the urethral resistance and is measured according to the degree of bladder emptying. BVE is expressed as a percentage and is calculated using the formula: Bladder Voiding efficiency = (Voided volume x 100)/maximum cystometric capacity. A higher number indicates a higher voiding efficiency. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once daily for 12 weeks.
65
Mirabegron 50 mg
Participants received 50 mg mirabegron tablets orally once daily for 12 weeks.
70
Mirabegron 100 mg
Participants received 100 mg mirabegron tablets orally once daily for 12 weeks.
65
Total200

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event222
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up002
Overall StudyNon-compliant with study procedures002
Overall StudyProtocol Violation011

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboMirabegron 50 mgMirabegron 100 mgTotal
Age, Continuous61.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.43
64.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.82
62.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.92
62.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan native
1 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 participants3 participants2 participants6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
6 participants6 participants4 participants16 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 participants1 participants0 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
56 participants60 participants59 participants175 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
65 Participants70 Participants65 Participants200 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 654 / 702 / 65
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 650 / 700 / 65

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Detrusor Pressure at Maximum Flow Rate (PdetQmax)

Detrusor pressure at maximum urinary flow rate (PdetQmax) was measured by the Investigator using cystometry and was sent to an independent central reading center for review and interpretation. Least squares means (LSM) were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had both Qmax \& PdetQmax measurements at Baseline \& 1 or both at any postbaseline on-treatment visit. Data include the last on-treatment assessment for patients who did not complete the Week 12 visit.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Detrusor Pressure at Maximum Flow Rate (PdetQmax)2.92 cmH2OStandard Error 2.906
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Detrusor Pressure at Maximum Flow Rate (PdetQmax)-3.03 cmH2OStandard Error 2.872
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Detrusor Pressure at Maximum Flow Rate (PdetQmax)1.53 cmH2OStandard Error 3.086
Comparison: The study was designed to show non-inferiority of mirabegron compared to placebo for both primary outcome measures. The comparison between mirabegron 50 mg and placebo was conducted first. If non-inferiority was demonstrated in this comparison, mirabegron 100 mg was compared to placebo. However, if the first comparison did not demonstrate non-inferiority, no further comparison was made. This procedure maintained the overall type I error of one-sided 2.5%.95% CI: [-13.98, 2.09]ANCOVA
Comparison: The study was designed to show non-inferiority of mirabegron compared to placebo for both primary outcome measures. The comparison between mirabegron 50 mg and placebo was conducted first. If non-inferiority was demonstrated in this comparison, mirabegron 100 mg was compared to placebo. However, if the first comparison did not demonstrate non-inferiority, no further comparison was made. This procedure maintained the overall type I error of one-sided 2.5%.95% CI: [-9.73, 6.96]ANCOVA
Primary

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Maximum Flow Rate (Qmax)

Maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) was measured by the Investigator using cystometry and was sent to an independent central reading center for review and interpretation. Least squares means (LSM) were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had both Qmax \& PdetQmax measurements at Baseline \& 1 or both at any postbaseline on-treatment visit. Data include the last on-treatment assessment for patients who did not complete the Week 12 visit.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Maximum Flow Rate (Qmax)-0.33 mL/secStandard Error 0.37
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Maximum Flow Rate (Qmax)0.07 mL/secStandard Error 0.366
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Maximum Flow Rate (Qmax)0.30 mL/secStandard Error 0.388
Comparison: The study was designed to show non-inferiority of mirabegron compared to placebo for both primary outcome measures. The comparison between mirabegron 50 mg and placebo was conducted first. If non-inferiority was demonstrated in this comparison, mirabegron 100 mg was compared to placebo. However, if the first comparison did not demonstrate non-inferiority, no further comparison was made. This procedure maintained the overall type I error of one-sided 2.5%.95% CI: [-0.63, 1.42]ANCOVA
Comparison: The study was designed to show non-inferiority of mirabegron compared to placebo for both primary outcome measures. The comparison between mirabegron 50 mg and placebo was conducted first. If non-inferiority was demonstrated in this comparison, mirabegron 100 mg was compared to placebo. However, if the first comparison did not demonstrate non-inferiority, no further comparison was made. This procedure maintained the overall type I error of one-sided 2.5%.95% CI: [-0.43, 1.68]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Bladder Contractile Index (BCI)

The Bladder Contractile Index (BCI) is a value used to measure the degree of contractility. BCI was calculated using the following formula: BCI = pdetQmax + 5Qmax. Strong contractility is a BCI \> 150, normal contractility is a BCI of 100-150 and weak contractility is a BCI of \< 100. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had both Qmax \& PdetQmax measurements at Baseline \& 1 or both at any postbaseline on-treatment visit. Data include the last on-treatment assessment for patients who did not complete the Week 12 visit.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Bladder Contractile Index (BCI)1.25 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.363
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Bladder Contractile Index (BCI)-2.60 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.324
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Bladder Contractile Index (BCI)2.51 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.567
Secondary

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Bladder Voiding Efficiency (BVE)

Bladder Voiding Efficiency (BVE) is a product of bladder contractility against the urethral resistance and is measured according to the degree of bladder emptying. BVE is expressed as a percentage and is calculated using the formula: Bladder Voiding efficiency = (Voided volume x 100)/maximum cystometric capacity. A higher number indicates a higher voiding efficiency. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had both Qmax \& PdetQmax measurements at Baseline \& 1 or both at any postbaseline on-treatment visit. Data include the last on-treatment assessment for patients who did not complete the Week 12 visit.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Bladder Voiding Efficiency (BVE)-3.01 Percent voiding efficiencyStandard Error 3.163
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Bladder Voiding Efficiency (BVE)-5.49 Percent voiding efficiencyStandard Error 3.093
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Bladder Voiding Efficiency (BVE)2.06 Percent voiding efficiencyStandard Error 3.277
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Storage Symptom Score

The IPSS is a validated global questionnaire used to assess the degree of bother from benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms based on the answers to 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms. Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The storage symptom score is the sum of the responses to 3 questions relating to storage symptoms (frequency, urgency and nocturia) and ranges from 0 to 15 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had both Qmax \& PdetQmax measurements at baseline \& 1 or both at any postbaseline on-treatment visit. End of treatment (EOT) includes the last on-treatment assessment for patients who didn't complete Week 12; N is the number of patients included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Storage Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=59; 61; 52]-2.2 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Storage Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 57]-2.1 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Storage Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 63; 57]-0.7 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Storage Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 62; 58]-1.7 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Storage Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]-2.2 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Storage Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 57]-3.2 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Storage Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 63; 57]-1.4 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Storage Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 62; 58]-2.6 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Storage Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=59; 61; 52]-3.4 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Storage Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]-3.3 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Storage Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]-2.5 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Storage Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=59; 61; 52]-2.5 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Storage Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 63; 57]-1.0 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Storage Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 57]-2.6 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Storage Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 62; 58]-2.3 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Total Score

The IPSS is a validated global questionnaire used to assess the degree of bother from benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms and is based on the answers to 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms. Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The total score can therefore range from 0 to 35 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had both Qmax \& PdetQmax measurements at baseline \& 1 or both at any postbaseline on-treatment visit. End of treatment (EOT) includes the last on-treatment assessment for patients who didn't complete Week 12; N is the number of patients included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 63; 57]-1.7 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=58; 61; 52]-5.2 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 56]-5.0 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]-5.0 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.78
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 62; 58]-4.0 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]-6.2 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 63; 57]-2.4 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 62; 58]-5.2 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 56]-6.3 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=58; 61; 52]-6.3 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.81
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 62; 58]-4.4 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]-4.8 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=58; 61; 52]-4.8 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.89
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 63; 57]-1.6 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Total ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 56]-5.3 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Voiding Score

The IPSS is a validated global questionnaire used to assess the degree of bother from benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms based on the answers to 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms. Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The voiding score is the sum of the responses to 4 questions relating to urination (incomplete emptying, intermittency, weak stream and straining) and ranges from 0 to 20 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had both Qmax \& PdetQmax measurements at baseline \& 1 or both at any postbaseline on-treatment visit. End of treatment (EOT) includes the last on-treatment assessment for patients who didn't complete Week 12; N is the number of patients included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Voiding ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=58; 61; 52]-3.0 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Voiding ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 56]-3.0 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Voiding ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 63; 57]-0.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Voiding ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 62; 58]-2.3 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Voiding ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]-2.8 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Voiding ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 56]-3.1 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Voiding ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 63; 57]-1.0 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Voiding ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 62; 58]-2.5 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Voiding ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=58; 61; 52]-2.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Voiding ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]-2.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.51
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Voiding ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]-2.4 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.54
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Voiding ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=58; 61; 52]-2.3 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Voiding ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 63; 57]-0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Voiding ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 56]-2.7 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) Voiding ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 62; 58]-2.1 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

The mean number of incontinence episodes (the involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had both Qmax \& PdetQmax measurements at Baseline \& 1 or both at any postbaseline on-treatment visit. The analysis only includes patients with \>0 incontinence episodes at baseline. End of treatment (EOT) includes patients who didn't complete Week 12.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=9; 17; 13]-0.98 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.528
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=9; 17; 13]-0.77 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.558
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=9; 18; 13]-1.16 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.561
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=9; 18; 13-0.99 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.638
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at EOT [N=9; 18; 13]-0.96 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.516
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=9; 17; 13]-0.70 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.396
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=9; 18; 13]-0.18 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.386
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=9; 18; 13-0.42 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.439
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=9; 17; 13]-0.91 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.374
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at EOT [N=9; 18; 13]-0.89 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.355
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at EOT [N=9; 18; 13]-1.98 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.474
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=9; 17; 13]-2.03 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.485
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=9; 18; 13]-0.97 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.516
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=9; 17; 13]-2.31 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.513
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=9; 18; 13-1.60 Incontinence episodesStandard Error 0.586
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

A micturition is any voluntary urination, excluding episodes of incontinence only. The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had both Qmax \& PdetQmax measurements at baseline \& 1 or both at any postbaseline on-treatment visit. End of treatment (EOT) includes the last on-treatment assessment for patients who didn't complete Week 12; N is the number of patients included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 64; 57]-0.15 micturitionsStandard Error 0.295
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=62; 63; 54]-0.27 micturitionsStandard Error 0.322
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 57]-0.61 micturitionsStandard Error 0.337
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]-0.31 micturitionsStandard Error 0.317
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 64; 58]-0.36 micturitionsStandard Error 0.333
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]-1.35 micturitionsStandard Error 0.313
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 64; 57]-0.58 micturitionsStandard Error 0.291
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 64; 58]-0.90 micturitionsStandard Error 0.328
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 57]-1.32 micturitionsStandard Error 0.333
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=62; 63; 54]-1.33 micturitionsStandard Error 0.318
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 64; 58]-1.36 micturitionsStandard Error 0.347
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]-1.37 micturitionsStandard Error 0.331
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=62; 63; 54]-1.23 micturitionsStandard Error 0.348
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 64; 57]-0.48 micturitionsStandard Error 0.311
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 57]-1.41 micturitionsStandard Error 0.352
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes With Urgency Severity ≥ 3 Per 24 Hours

For each micturition and/or incontinence episode in the 3 days preceding the clinic visit, participants rated the degree of associated urgency (the sudden compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer) according to the following scale: 0: No Urgency, felt no need to empty my bladder but did so for another reason; 1: Mild Urgency, could postpone passing water for as long as necessary; 2: Moderate Urgency, could postpone passing water for a short while; 3: Severe Urgency, could not postpone passing water; 4: Urge Incontinence, leaked before reaching the toilet. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had both Qmax \& PdetQmax measurements at baseline \& 1 or both at any postbaseline on-treatment visit. End of treatment (EOT) includes the last on-treatment assessment for patients who didn't complete Week 12; N is the number of patients included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes With Urgency Severity ≥ 3 Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=62; 63; 54]-0.33 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.295
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes With Urgency Severity ≥ 3 Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 57]-0.35 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.288
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes With Urgency Severity ≥ 3 Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 64; 57]0.09 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.256
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes With Urgency Severity ≥ 3 Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 64; 58]-0.11 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.284
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes With Urgency Severity ≥ 3 Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]-0.33 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.29
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes With Urgency Severity ≥ 3 Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 57]-1.43 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.285
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes With Urgency Severity ≥ 3 Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 64; 57]-0.81 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.253
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes With Urgency Severity ≥ 3 Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 64; 58]-1.13 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.281
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes With Urgency Severity ≥ 3 Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=62; 63; 54]-1.65 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.292
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes With Urgency Severity ≥ 3 Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]-1.60 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.287
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes With Urgency Severity ≥ 3 Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]-0.93 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.304
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes With Urgency Severity ≥ 3 Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=62; 63; 54]-0.90 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.32
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes With Urgency Severity ≥ 3 Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 64; 57]-0.60 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.271
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes With Urgency Severity ≥ 3 Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 57]-0.98 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.302
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes With Urgency Severity ≥ 3 Per 24 HoursChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 64; 58]-0.95 Urgency episodesStandard Error 0.298
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition

The mean volume voided per micturition was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for the 3 days preceding each clinic visit. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had both Qmax \& PdetQmax measurements at baseline \& 1 or both at any postbaseline on-treatment visit. End of treatment (EOT) includes the last on-treatment assessment for patients who didn't complete Week 12; N is the number of patients included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per MicturitionChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=62; 63; 54]4.49 mLStandard Error 4.61
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per MicturitionChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 57]4.53 mLStandard Error 4.93
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per MicturitionChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 64; 57]2.75 mLStandard Error 4.58
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per MicturitionChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 64; 58]10.25 mLStandard Error 4.779
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per MicturitionChange from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]5.40 mLStandard Error 4.608
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per MicturitionChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 57]14.52 mLStandard Error 4.859
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per MicturitionChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 64; 57]6.71 mLStandard Error 4.508
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per MicturitionChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 64; 58]12.55 mLStandard Error 4.705
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per MicturitionChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=62; 63; 54]16.62 mLStandard Error 4.549
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per MicturitionChange from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]15.82 mLStandard Error 4.537
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per MicturitionChange from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]15.80 mLStandard Error 4.823
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per MicturitionChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=62; 63; 54]16.20 mLStandard Error 5
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per MicturitionChange from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 64; 57]10.38 mLStandard Error 4.833
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per MicturitionChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 57]22.83 mLStandard Error 5.163
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Mean Voided Volume Per MicturitionChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 64; 58]18.31 mLStandard Error 5.001
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)

The patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC) asks participants to assess their bladder condition using a 6-point validated Likert scale which ranges from 1 (does not cause me any problems at all) to 6 (causes me many severe problems). Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had both Qmax \& PdetQmax measurements at baseline \& 1 or both at any postbaseline on-treatment visit. End of treatment (EOT) includes the last on-treatment assessment for patients who didn't complete Week 12; N is the number of patients included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Change from Baseline at Week 12 [N=60; 61; 53]-0.6 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Change from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 57]-0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Change from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 63; 57]-0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Change from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 62; 58]-0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Change from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]-0.6 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Change from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 57]-0.7 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Change from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 63; 57]-0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Change from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 62; 58]-0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Change from Baseline at Week 12 [N=60; 61; 53]-0.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Change from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]-0.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Change from Baseline at EOT [N=63; 64; 58]-0.8 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Change from Baseline at Week 12 [N=60; 61; 53]-0.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Change from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 63; 57]-0.6 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Change from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 63; 57]-0.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)Change from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 62; 58]-0.6 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)

Healthy micturitions (urinations) result in complete emptying of the bladder. Post Void Residual (PVR) is the volume of urine retained after voiding and was assessed using abdominal ultrasound. An increasing PVR over time is an indicator of abnormal bladder function or detrusor decompensation. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12

Population: The Safety Analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. End of treatment (EOT) analysis includes the last assessment for patients who did not complete the Week 12 visit; N indicates the number of patients included at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)Change from Baseline at Week 12 [N=59; 63; 57]4.65 mLStandard Error 11.598
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)Change from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 67; 61]-9.92 mLStandard Error 6.922
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)Change from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 66; 63]-8.10 mLStandard Error 6.512
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)Change from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 67; 63]1.08 mLStandard Error 6.734
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)Change from Baseline at EOT [N=64; 70; 65]0.55 mLStandard Error 10.702
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)Change from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 67; 61]5.11 mLStandard Error 6.621
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)Change from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 66; 63]-2.93 mLStandard Error 6.316
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)Change from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 67; 63]-1.03 mLStandard Error 6.506
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)Change from Baseline at Week 12 [N=59; 63; 57]21.13 mLStandard Error 11.235
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)Change from Baseline at EOT [N=64; 70; 65]17.89 mLStandard Error 10.19
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)Change from Baseline at EOT [N=64; 70; 65]30.77 mLStandard Error 10.598
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)Change from Baseline at Week 12 [N=59; 63; 57]33.22 mLStandard Error 11.822
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)Change from Baseline at Week 1 [N=63; 66; 63]0.51 mLStandard Error 6.48
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)Change from Baseline at Week 8 [N=62; 67; 61]-3.71 mLStandard Error 6.972
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)Change from Baseline at Week 4 [N=63; 67; 63]8.63 mLStandard Error 6.702
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Overall Symptom Interference of Life Score

Participants were asked to rate how much their urinary symptoms interfered overall with their everyday life on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (a great deal). Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had both Qmax \& PdetQmax measurements at baseline \& 1 or both at any postbaseline on-treatment visit. End of treatment (EOT) includes the last on-treatment assessment for patients who didn't complete Week 12; N is the number of patients included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Overall Symptom Interference of Life ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=61; 62; 58]-0.4 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Overall Symptom Interference of Life ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=60; 63; 57]-0.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Overall Symptom Interference of Life ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=59; 61; 53]-1.1 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Overall Symptom Interference of Life ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=62; 63; 58]-1.1 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Overall Symptom Interference of Life ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=62; 63; 58]-2.0 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Overall Symptom Interference of Life ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=61; 62; 58]-1.2 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Overall Symptom Interference of Life ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=59; 61; 53]-2.1 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Overall Symptom Interference of Life ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=60; 63; 57]-1.7 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Overall Symptom Interference of Life ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=62; 63; 58]-1.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Overall Symptom Interference of Life ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=60; 63; 57]-1.7 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Overall Symptom Interference of Life ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=59; 61; 53]-1.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Overall Symptom Interference of Life ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=61; 62; 58]-1.0 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Symptom Score

Quality of life was assessed by the ICIQ-LUTSqol questionnaire which consists of 19 questions each on a 1-4 scale (larger scores correspond to less quality of life). The total symptom score ranges from 19 - 76. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had both Qmax \& PdetQmax measurements at baseline \& 1 or both at any postbaseline on-treatment visit. End of treatment (EOT) includes the last on-treatment assessment for patients who didn't complete Week 12; N is the number of patients included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=41; 37; 33]-3.2 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.97
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=39; 36; 31]-4.8 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=40; 30;26]-4.7 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=47; 40; 36]-4.8 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.95
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=47; 40; 36]-6.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.03
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=41; 37; 33]-4.1 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.03
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=40; 30;26]-6.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.29
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=39; 36; 31]-6.4 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.06
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=47; 40; 36]-5.0 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.11
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=39; 36; 31]-5.7 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.18
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=40; 30;26]-5.7 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.47
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol) Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=41; 37; 33]-3.1 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.13
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Bother Score

The degree to which urinary symptoms bothered participants was assessed by the ICIQ MaleLUTS questionnaire which consists of 13 symptom bother questions each on a 0-10 scale (larger scores correspond to worse outcomes). The total bother score ranges from 0 to 130. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had both Qmax \& PdetQmax measurements at baseline \& 1 or both at any postbaseline on-treatment visit. End of treatment (EOT) includes the last on-treatment assessment for patients who didn't complete Week 12; N is the number of patients included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Bother ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=58; 53; 56]-7.5 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.71
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Bother ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=57; 57; 53]-11.6 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.77
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Bother ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=54; 53; 51]-15.1 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Bother ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=60; 57; 58]-14.0 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.15
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Bother ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=60; 57; 58]-20.1 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.21
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Bother ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=58; 53; 56]-13.6 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.82
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Bother ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=54; 53; 51]-19.3 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.35
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Bother ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=57; 57; 53]-21.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.76
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Bother ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=60; 57; 58]-18.6 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.2
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Bother ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=57; 57; 53]-19.3 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.86
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Bother ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=54; 53; 51]-17.4 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.44
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Bother ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=58; 53; 56]-10.0 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.75
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Symptom Score

Male lower urinary tract symptoms were assessed by the ICIQ MaleLUTS questionnaire which consists of 13 questions each on a 0-4 scale (larger scores correspond to worse conditions). The total symptom score ranges from 0 to 52. Least squares means were derived from an ANCOVA model with the pooled study center and treatment as factors and the baseline value as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug \& had both Qmax \& PdetQmax measurements at baseline \& 1 or both at any postbaseline on-treatment visit. End of treatment (EOT) includes the last on-treatment assessment for patients who didn't complete Week 12; N is the number of patients included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=60; 60; 58]-2.8 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.61
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=61; 61; 56]-3.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.65
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=58; 60; 53]-4.2 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.76
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=62; 61; 58]-3.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=62; 61; 58]-4.8 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=60; 60; 58]-4.0 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.61
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=58; 60; 53]-4.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.74
Mirabegron 50 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=61; 61; 56]-5.1 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.65
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at EOT [N=62; 61; 58]-5.5 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 8 [N=61; 61; 56]-4.9 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 12 [N=58; 60; 53]-5.4 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Mirabegron 100 mgChange From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and End of Treatment in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (ICIQ MLUTS) Total Symptom ScoreChange from Baseline at Week 4 [N=60; 60; 58]-3.5 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
Secondary

Safety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory Tests

Abnormal laboratory parameters, vital signs or ECG data were defined as AEs if the abnormality induced clinical signs or symptoms, needed active intervention, interruption or discontinuation of study medication or was clinically significant. A serious AE was an event resulting in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly or birth defect, was life-threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization or was considered medically important. AEs were assessed by the Investigator for intensity as mild, moderate or severe and for causal relationship to study drug.

Time frame: From first dose to within 30 days after last dose of double blind study medication (up to 16 weeks).

Population: The Safety Analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsAdverse events28 participants
PlaceboSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsMild intensity adverse events17 participants
PlaceboSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsModerate intensity adverse events7 participants
PlaceboSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsSevere intensity adverse events4 participants
PlaceboSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsDrug-related adverse events8 participants
PlaceboSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsSerious adverse events0 participants
PlaceboSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsAEs leading to study drug discontinuation2 participants
PlaceboSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsDeaths0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsModerate intensity adverse events10 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsAEs leading to study drug discontinuation1 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsSevere intensity adverse events2 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsDrug-related adverse events5 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsSerious adverse events0 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsAdverse events28 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsMild intensity adverse events16 participants
Mirabegron 50 mgSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsDeaths0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsModerate intensity adverse events14 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsMild intensity adverse events20 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsAdverse events34 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsSevere intensity adverse events0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsAEs leading to study drug discontinuation2 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsSerious adverse events0 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsDrug-related adverse events11 participants
Mirabegron 100 mgSafety Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Electrocardiogram (ECG), Vital Signs, Physical Exam and Laboratory TestsDeaths0 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026