Skip to content

A Study of Abatacept in Patients With Active Ulcerative Colitis

A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Induction and Maintenance Therapy With Abatacept in Subjects With Active Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Who Have Had an Inadequate Clinical Response and/or Intolerance to Medical Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00410410
Enrollment
591
Registered
2006-12-12
Start date
2006-12-31
Completion date
2009-11-30
Last updated
2015-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ulcerative Colitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if abatacept can improve signs and symptoms of active ulcerative colitis in patients who have not had an adequate response to other therapies. The safety of this treatment will also be studied

Detailed description

The Induction Period First Cohort (IP1C) arms (30/10 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg) were placebo-controlled arms that were used for the primary endpoint and its analysis. The Induction Period Second Cohort arms (IP2C 30/10 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg) were not placebo-controlled, their sole purpose being to provide sufficient numbers of participants for the maintenance phase. The first cohort (IP1C) was randomized to receive placebo or 1 of 3 doses of abatacept. Following completion of the IP1C randomization, a second cohort (IP2C) was randomized to receive 1 of 2 doses of abatacept. After all participants in the IP1C completed or discontinued, the data was locked and the formal analysis for the Induction Period primary endpoint was performed. Summary tables for the second cohort (IP2C) and the Maintenance and Open-label phases were generated from a second, subsequent data lock.

Interventions

DRUGabatacept (ABA)

Dextrose 5% in water, IV. Placebo on days IP-1, IP-15,IP-29, IP-57; 3 mg/kg on days IP-1, IP-15,IP-29, IP-57; 10 mg/kg on days IP-1, IP-15,IP-29, IP-57; or 30 mg/kg on days IP-1,IP-15 and \ 10 mg/kg on days IP-29, IP-57 (ABA 30/\ 10 mg/kg Group). Induction Period 3 months Maintenance Period 12 months

DRUGplacebo

Normal saline, IV, 0 mg/kg, every 28 days. Induction Period 3 months Maintenance Period 12 months

DRUGabatacept

\ 10 mg/kg, once monthly Open- Label Extension Period until the drug is marketed for UC or the UC development program for abatacept is discontinued

Sponsors

Bristol-Myers Squibb
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men or women 18 years or older * Ulcerative colitis for at lease 3 months * Moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis * Inadequate response or intolerance to standard ulcerative colitis treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Induction Period (IP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP Cohort 1 (IP1C)Week 12 (Day IP-85)The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.
Maintenance Period (MP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Month 12Month 12 (Day MP-365)The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.
Open-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDay OL-1 through the end of the OLAE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestDay OL-1 through Day OL-729AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs, including all infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections; autoimmune disorders; neoplasms; acute infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 1 hour of start of infusion) and peri-infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 24 hours of the start of infusion).
OL; Number of Participants With Physical Examination FindingsDay OL-1 through Day OL-729Complete physical examination was obtained at the Screening Visit, Day MP-365, and OL Final Visit/Early Termination visits. Interim physical examinations were performed at other study visits. Interim physical exam were not as comprehensive as the initial full examination but did note any changes in the participant's condition since the last assessment and did not preclude examination of any of the body systems as clinically indicated. Participants were observed for AEs and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature).
OL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesDay OL-1 through Day OL-729High=greater than Upper Normal Limit (ULN), Low=lower than Lower Normal Limit (LLN). LLN/ULN= Hemoglobin (HGB): \>3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: \<0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: \<0.75 x BL; Platelets (PLT): \<0.67 x LLN/\>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.25 x ULN; neutrophils+bands: \<1.0 x 10\^3 c/uL; eosinophils: \>0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL; monocytes: \>2000 mm3; lymphocytes: \<0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL/ \>7.50 x 10\^3 c/uL.
OL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory AbnormalitiesDay OL-1 through Day OL-729Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): \>2 x ULN; aspartate aminotransferase (AST): \>3 x ULN; alanine aminotransferase (ALT): \>3 x ULN; G-Glutamyl transferase (GGT): \>2 x ULN; Bilirubin: \>2 x ULN; blood urea nitrogen (BUN): \>2 x BL; creatinine: \>4 x BL; potassium (K): \<0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; calcium (Ca): \<0.8 x LLN/\>1.2 x ULN; phosphorous (P): \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.2 5 x ULN
OL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesDay OL-1 through Day OL-729Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): \<65 mg/dL/ \>220 mg/dL; fasting serum Glu: \<0.8 x LLN/ \>1.5 x ULN; total protein: \< 0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; albumin:\<0.9 x LLN; uric acid: \>1.5 x ULN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells \[RBCs\], White Blood Cells \[WBCs\]): Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when pre-dose=1. Use ≥4 when pre-dose=2 or 3

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CDay IP-85 (Week 12)The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute PGA subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.
IP; Number of Participants Who Are Anti-TNF-Inadequate Responders/Anti-TNF Intolerant With Clinical Response At Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1CWeek 12 (Day IP-85)The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance=inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
IP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response At Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1CWeek 12 (Day IP-85)The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance=inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
IP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1CWeek 12 (Day IP-85)The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance =inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
IP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1CWeek 12 (Day IP-85)The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance = inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
IP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CDay IP-1 through Day IP-85AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CDay IP-1 through Day IP-85AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs, including all infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections; autoimmune disorders; neoplasms; acute infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 1 hour of start of infusion) and peri-infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 24 hours of the start of infusion).
IP; Number of Participants With Physical Examination Findings: IP1C + IP2CDay IP-1 through Day IP-85Complete physical examination was obtained at the Screening Visit, Day MP-365, and OL Final Visit/Early Termination visits. Interim physical examinations were performed at other study visits. Interim physical exam were not as comprehensive as the initial full examination but did note any changes in the participant's condition since the last assessment and did not preclude examination of any of the body systems as clinically indicated. Participants were observed for AEs and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature).
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CDay IP-1 through Day IP-85High=greater than Upper Normal Limit (ULN), Low=lower than Lower Normal Limit (LLN). LLN/ULN= Hemoglobin (HGB): \>3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: \<0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: \<0.75 x BL; Platelets (PLT): \<0.67 x LLN/\>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.25 x ULN; neutrophils+bands: \<1.0 x 10\^3 c/uL; eosinophils: \>0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL; monocytes: \>2000 mm3; lymphocytes: \<0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL/ \>7.50 x 10\^3 c/uL.
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CDay IP-1 through Day IP-85Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): \>2 x ULN; aspartate aminotransferase (AST): \>3 x ULN; alanine aminotransferase (ALT): \>3 x ULN; G-Glutamyl transferase (GGT): \>2 x ULN; Bilirubin: \>2 x ULN; blood urea nitrogen (BUN): \>2 x BL; creatinine: \>4 x BL; Sodium (Na): \<0.95 x LLN/ \>1.05 x ULN; potassium (K): \<0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; calcium (Ca): \<0.8 x LLN/\>1.2 x ULN; phosphorous (P): \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.2 5 x ULN
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CDay IP-1 through Day IP-85Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): \<65 mg/dL/ \>220 mg/dL; total protein: \< 0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; albumin:\<0.9 x LLN; uric acid: \>1.5 x ULN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells \[RBCs\], White Blood Cells \[WBCs\]): Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when pre-dose=1. Use ≥4 when pre-dose=2 or 3
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CDay IP-1 through Day IP-85High=greater than Upper Normal Limit (ULN), Low=lower than Lower Normal Limit (LLN). LLN/ULN= Hemoglobin (HGB): \>3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: \<0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: \<0.75 x BL; Platelets (PLT): \<0.67 x LLN/\>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.25 x ULN; eosinophils: \>0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL; monocytes: \>2000 mm3; lymphocytes: \<0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL/ \>7.50 x 10\^3 c/uL; blood urea nitrogen (BUN): \>2 x BL; creatinine: \>4 x BL; Sodium (Na): \<0.95 x LLN/ \>1.05 x ULN; potassium (K): \<0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; phosphorous (P): \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.2 5 x ULN;
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CDay IP-1 through Day IP-85Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): \<65 mg/dL/ \>220 mg/dL; total protein: \< 0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; albumin:\<0.9 x LLN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells \[RBCs\], White Blood Cells \[WBCs\]): Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when pre-dose=1. Use ≥4 when pre-dose=2 or 3
IP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies: IP1C + IP2CFor participants treated in MP: Day IP-1 (Baseline) to Day MP-1 (Day IP-85). For participants treated in OL directly after IP: Day IP-1 to Day OL-1. For participants treated only in IP: All measurements after Day IP-1 (including follow-up visits)A electrochemiluminescent immunoassay screened sera for drug-specific antibodies, immunocompetition was used to identify specific anti-Abatacept reactivity. CTLA4 and Possibly Ig category=reactivity against extracellular domain of human CTLA4, constant regions of human IgG1, or both (CTLA4Ig; Abatacept molecule). Ig and/or Junction category=reactivity against constant regions and/or hinge region of human IgG1. Drug-induced seropositivity was defined as a post-baseline titer higher than Baseline, or any post-baseline positivity if Baseline value was missing.
MP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Month 12Month 12 (Day MP-365)The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Endoscopic Subscores Indicating Mucosal Healing (≤1 Point) at Month 12Month 12 (Day MP-365)The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 point
MP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Both Month 6 and Month 12Month 6 (Day MP-169), Month 12 (Day MP-365)The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
MP; Number of Participants With Baseline Oral Corticosteroid Use Who Have Discontinued Corticosteroids and Achieved Clinical Remission by Month 12Day MP-365 (Month 12)Baseline corticosteroids equivalent of ≤30 mg prednisone daily. The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater frequency or severity. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
MP; Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 in IBDQDay MP-365The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) was used to measure disease specific quality of life. The IBDQ consists of a self-administered 32-item questionnaire that evaluates quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: Bowel, Systemic, Social and Emotional. The response to each question can range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating severe problem and 7 indicating normal health. The total IBDQ is computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
MP; Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Short Form-36 (SF-36)Day MP-365The SF-36 is a validated instrument to measure health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. Individual subscale scores and 2 summary scores are calculated: (1) physical component summary (PCS) which includes physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health; (2) mental component summary (MCS) which includes vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight, with values ranging from worse health (0) to best health (100).
MP; Number of Participants With Baseline Oral Corticosteroid Use Who Have Discontinued Corticosteroids for 90 Consecutive Days and Achieved Clinical Remission by Month 12Day MP-365 (Month 12)Baseline corticosteroids equivalent of ≤30 mg prednisone daily. The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater frequency or severity. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Month 12Day MP-365 (Month 12)The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Month 12Day MP-365 (Month 12)The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute stool frequency subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo PGA Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Month 12Day MP-365 (Month 12)The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute PGA subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.
MP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Month 12 Among Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-TNF Therapy (Infliximab)Month 12 (Day MP-365)The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance=inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
IP; Baseline Mayo Score: IP1CBaselineThe Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.
MP; Number of Participants With Clinical Mucosal Healing at Month 12 Among Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-TNF Therapy (Infliximab)Month 12 (Day MP-365)The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance = inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
MP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced AntibodiesFor participants not entering OL: All measurements starting after Day MP-1 (including follow-up visits). For participants entering OL: From first measurement after Day MP-1 to Day MP-365 (Day OL-1).A electrochemiluminescent immunoassay screened sera for drug-specific antibodies, immunocompetition was used to identify specific anti-Abatacept reactivity. CTLA4 and Possibly Ig category=reactivity against extracellular domain of human CTLA4, constant regions of human IgG1, or both (CTLA4Ig; Abatacept molecule). Ig and/or Junction category=reactivity against constant regions and/or hinge region of human IgG1. Drug-induced seropositivity was defined as a post-baseline titer higher than Baseline, or any post-baseline positivity if Baseline value was missing.
MP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDay MP-1 through Day MP-365AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
MP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestDay MP-1 through Day MP-365AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs, including all infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections; autoimmune disorders; neoplasms; acute infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 1 hour of start of infusion) and peri-infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 24 hours of the start of infusion).
MP; Number of Participants With Physical Examination FindingsDay IP-85 through Day MP-365Complete physical examination was obtained at the Screening Visit, Day MP-365, and OL Final Visit/Early Termination visits. Interim physical examinations were performed at other study visits. Interim physical exam were not as comprehensive as the initial full examination but did note any changes in the participant's condition since the last assessment and did not preclude examination of any of the body systems as clinically indicated. Participants were observed for AEs and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature).
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesDay IP-85 through Day MP-365High=greater than ULN, Low=lower than LLN. LLN/ULN= HGB: \>3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: \<0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: \<0.75 x BL; PLT: \<0.67 x LLN/\>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.25 x ULN; neutrophils+bands: \<1.0 x 10\^3 c/uL; eosinophils: \>0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL; monocytes: \>2000 mm3; lymphocytes: \<0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL/ \>7.50 x 10\^3 c/uL; GGT: \>2 x ULN; Bilirubin: \>2 x ULN; BUN: \>2 x BL; Na: \<0.95 x LLN/ \>1.05 x ULN; K: \<0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; Ca: \<0.8 x LLN/\>1.2 x ULN
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesDay IP-85 through Day MP-365Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): \<65 mg/dL/ \>220 mg/dL; fasting serum Glu: \<0.8 x LLN/ \>1.5 x ULN; total protein: \< 0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; albumin:\<0.9 x LLN; uric acid: \>1.5 x ULN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells \[RBCs\], White Blood Cells \[WBCs\]): Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when pre-dose=1. Use ≥4 when pre-dose=2 or 3
OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Response Over TimeDay OL-1 through Day OL-729The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.
OL; Number of Participants Using Corticosteroids During OLDay OL-1 through Day OL-729Participants taking oral corticosteroids (equivalent of ≤ 30 mg prednisone daily) must have met minimum treatment duration at entry into IP and had stable dose for ≥2 weeks prior to entry into the IP.
OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Over TimeDay OL-1 through Day OL-729The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
OL; Number of Participants With Mayo Endoscopic Subscores Indicating Mucosal Healing (≤1 Point) During OLOpen-Label Period (Day OL-1 through Day OL-729)The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 point
OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Response or Clinical Remission Upon Retreatment With Abatacept Among Those Who Received Abatacept in the IP or MP PeriodLast Study Visit (Day OL-729)The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. Clinical remission = Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point. Change from Baseline= post-Baseline - Baseline value.
OL; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced AntibodiesFor participants receiving OL medication, all measurements starting after Day OL-1 (including follow-up visits and at 56 and 85 days after last dose)A electrochemiluminescent immunoassay screened sera for drug-specific antibodies, immunocompetition was used to identify specific anti-Abatacept reactivity. CTLA4 and Possibly Ig category=reactivity against extracellular domain of human CTLA4, constant regions of human IgG1, or both (CTLA4Ig; Abatacept molecule). Ig and/or Junction category=reactivity against constant regions and/or hinge region of human IgG1. Drug-induced seropositivity was defined as a post-baseline titer higher than Baseline, or any post-baseline positivity if Baseline value was missing.
MP; Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Month 12 Among Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-TNF Therapy (Infliximab)Month 12 (Day MP-365)The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance =inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
IP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1CWeek 12 (Day IP-85)The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
IP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1CWeek 12 (Day IP-85)The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 point
IP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1CWeek 12 (Day IP-85)The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.
IP; Baseline Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score: IP1CBaselineThe Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) was used to measure disease specific quality of life. The IBDQ consists of a self-administered 32-item questionnaire that evaluates quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: Bowel, Systemic, Social and Emotional. The response to each question can range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating severe problem and 7 indicating normal health. The total IBDQ is computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
IP; Mean Change From Baseline To Week 12 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ): IP1CBaseline (Day IP-1), Day IP-85 (Week 12)The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) was used to measure disease specific quality of life. The IBDQ consists of a self-administered 32-item questionnaire that evaluates quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: Bowel, Systemic, Social and Emotional. The response to each question can range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating severe problem and 7 indicating normal health. The total IBDQ is computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CDay IP-85 (Week 12)The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CDay IP-85 (Week 12)The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute stool frequency subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, India, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Puerto Rico, South Africa, South Korea, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

In this study, a first cohort (Induction Period First Cohort, IP1C) of 490 participants was randomized and used for analysis of the primary endpoint. Following randomization of IP1C, a second cohort (IP2C) of 146 participants was randomized to provide a sufficient number of participants for the Maintenance Period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \ 10 mg/kg.
141
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \ 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
139
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57 at a dose of 3 mg/kg (fixed dose).
70
IP1C-Placebo
During the IP, placebo was administered IV on Days IP-1, IP-15, IP-29, and IP-57.
140
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered intravenously (IV) on Days IP-1 and IP-15 at a dose of 30 mg/kg (fixed dose). Following this, on Days IP-29 and IP-57 abatacept was administered IV at a dose of \ 10 mg/kg.
51
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
During IP, abatacept was administered IV on Days IP-1,IP-15, IP-29,and IP-57 at a dose of \ 10 mg/kg (weight-tiered).
50
Total591

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008
Induction Period (IP)Administrative Reason By Sponsor00002221000
Induction Period (IP)Adverse Event342410000
Induction Period (IP)Death100000000
Induction Period (IP)Lack of Efficacy26248877000
Induction Period (IP)Lost to Follow-up222301000
Induction Period (IP)Other001000000
Induction Period (IP)Subject No Longer Meets Study Criteria001000000
Induction Period (IP)Withdrawal by Subject353520000
Maintenance Period (MP)Administrative Reason By Sponsor00000021250
Maintenance Period (MP)Adverse Event000000130
Maintenance Period (MP)Death000000100
Maintenance Period (MP)Lack of Efficacy00000025240
Maintenance Period (MP)Lost to Follow-up000000120
Maintenance Period (MP)Withdrawal by Subject000000110
Open-Label Period (OL)Administrative Reason By Sponsor00000000145
Open-Label Period (OL)Adverse Event0000000010
Open-Label Period (OL)Death000000001
Open-Label Period (OL)Lack of Efficacy00000000161
Open-Label Period (OL)Lost to Follow-up000000004
Open-Label Period (OL)Other000000007
Open-Label Period (OL)Pregnancy000000001
Open-Label Period (OL)Withdrawal by Subject0000000020

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalInduction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP1C-PlaceboIP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kg
Age, Customized
30-50 years
324 participants70 participants84 participants35 participants73 participants30 participants32 participants
Age, Customized
<30 years
117 participants26 participants23 participants18 participants34 participants12 participants4 participants
Age, Customized
>50 years
150 participants45 participants32 participants17 participants33 participants9 participants14 participants
Participants with Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-Tumor (TNF) Therapy (Infliximab)
Inadequate Response/Intolerant to prior Infliximab
202 participants45 participants46 participants24 participants45 participants21 participants21 participants
Participants with Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-Tumor (TNF) Therapy (Infliximab)
No Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Infliximab
389 participants96 participants93 participants46 participants95 participants30 participants29 participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
34 participants8 participants7 participants4 participants13 participants1 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
17 participants4 participants6 participants1 participants5 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
41 participants10 participants5 participants5 participants11 participants4 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
40 participants9 participants12 participants2 participants13 participants1 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
1 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
37 participants7 participants12 participants6 participants6 participants1 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
9 participants2 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants2 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
India
51 participants12 participants12 participants10 participants10 participants5 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ireland
3 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
21 participants7 participants6 participants2 participants3 participants2 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
11 participants4 participants3 participants1 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
68 participants20 participants14 participants10 participants8 participants7 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
13 participants2 participants5 participants1 participants2 participants2 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
6 participants2 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Puerto Rico
2 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
27 participants9 participants8 participants5 participants3 participants2 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
6 participants1 participants1 participants1 participants2 participants1 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
9 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants3 participants2 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
195 participants43 participants42 participants22 participants55 participants20 participants13 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
248 Participants57 Participants52 Participants26 Participants66 Participants21 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
343 Participants84 Participants87 Participants44 Participants74 Participants30 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
49 / 14113 / 5121 / 7048 / 13913 / 5020 / 65137 / 34945 / 14024 / 66
serious
Total, serious adverse events
22 / 1416 / 518 / 7020 / 1394 / 507 / 6566 / 3497 / 1404 / 66

Outcome results

Primary

Induction Period (IP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP Cohort 1 (IP1C)

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.

Time frame: Week 12 (Day IP-85)

Population: All participants who were randomized and received at least one infusion of study medication (Intent To Treat Population, ITT) were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgInduction Period (IP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP Cohort 1 (IP1C)30 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgInduction Period (IP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP Cohort 1 (IP1C)26 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgInduction Period (IP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP Cohort 1 (IP1C)14 participants
IP1C-PlaceboInduction Period (IP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP Cohort 1 (IP1C)41 participants
Comparison: Null hypothesis=no treatment difference between ABA arm and placebo (PLA) arm. ABA 30/\~10 mg/kg vs PLA: power=98%, sample size=140 per arm,expected PLA response rate=40%, ABA 30/\~10 mg/kg=65%. ABA \~10 mg/kg vs. PLA: power=90%, sample size=140 per arm, 5% significance; expected PLA response rate= 40%, ABA \~10=60%.p-value: 0.12495% CI: [0.48, 1.09]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Maintenance Period (MP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Month 12

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.

Time frame: Month 12 (Day MP-365)

Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMaintenance Period (MP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Month 1211 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMaintenance Period (MP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Month 1211 participants
Primary

OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest

AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs, including all infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections; autoimmune disorders; neoplasms; acute infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 1 hour of start of infusion) and peri-infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 24 hours of the start of infusion).

Time frame: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729

Population: All participants who received at least 1 infusion of open-label study medication at any time were included in the safety analyses of the Open-Label Extension phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestInfections and Infestations127 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestSerious Infections9 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestOpportunistic Infections-Total2 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestOpportunistic Infections-cytomegalovirus1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestOpportunistic Infections-listeriosis1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestMalignancies-Total5 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestMalignancies-Basal Cell Carcinoma2 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestMalignancies-Bowen's Disease1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestMalignancies-Chronic Myeloid Leukemia1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestMalignancies-Squamous Cell Carcinoma1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestAutoimmune Disorders-Total5 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestAutoimmune Disorders-episcleritis2 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestAutoimmune Disorders-anemia hemolytic autoimmune1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestAutoimmune Disorders-psoriasis1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestPeri-infusional AEs25 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestAutoimmune Disorders-scleritis1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestAcute Infusional AEs12 participants
Primary

OL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities

Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): \<65 mg/dL/ \>220 mg/dL; fasting serum Glu: \<0.8 x LLN/ \>1.5 x ULN; total protein: \< 0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; albumin:\<0.9 x LLN; uric acid: \>1.5 x ULN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells \[RBCs\], White Blood Cells \[WBCs\]): Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when pre-dose=1. Use ≥4 when pre-dose=2 or 3

Time frame: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729

Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow albumin; n=33112 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Glu; n=2454 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Glu; n=2456 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow protein; n=3313 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine protein; n=31211 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine Glu; n=3124 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine blood; n=31227 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh leukocyte esterase; n=12210 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine RBC; n=11522 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine WBC; n=15045 participants
Primary

OL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities

Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): \>2 x ULN; aspartate aminotransferase (AST): \>3 x ULN; alanine aminotransferase (ALT): \>3 x ULN; G-Glutamyl transferase (GGT): \>2 x ULN; Bilirubin: \>2 x ULN; blood urea nitrogen (BUN): \>2 x BL; creatinine: \>4 x BL; potassium (K): \<0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; calcium (Ca): \<0.8 x LLN/\>1.2 x ULN; phosphorous (P): \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.2 5 x ULN

Time frame: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729

Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh BUN; n=31010 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh ALP, n=3314 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh AST, n=3313 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh ALT; n=3313 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh GGT; n=33217 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh bilirubin, n=3311 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh creatinine; n=3305 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow K; n=3317 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Ca; n=3302 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow P; n=3304 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh P, n=3301 participants
Primary

OL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities

High=greater than Upper Normal Limit (ULN), Low=lower than Lower Normal Limit (LLN). LLN/ULN= Hemoglobin (HGB): \>3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: \<0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: \<0.75 x BL; Platelets (PLT): \<0.67 x LLN/\>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.25 x ULN; neutrophils+bands: \<1.0 x 10\^3 c/uL; eosinophils: \>0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL; monocytes: \>2000 mm3; lymphocytes: \<0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL/ \>7.50 x 10\^3 c/uL.

Time frame: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729

Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow HGB; n=32620 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow hematocrit; n=32217 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow erythrocytes; n=3266 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh PLT; n=3233 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow leukocytes; n=3263 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh leukocytes; n=32618 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow neutrophils + bands; n=3241 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh eosinophils; n=32417 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh monocytes; n=3242 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow lymphocytes; n=32443 participants
Primary

OL; Number of Participants With Physical Examination Findings

Complete physical examination was obtained at the Screening Visit, Day MP-365, and OL Final Visit/Early Termination visits. Interim physical examinations were performed at other study visits. Interim physical exam were not as comprehensive as the initial full examination but did note any changes in the participant's condition since the last assessment and did not preclude examination of any of the body systems as clinically indicated. Participants were observed for AEs and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature).

Time frame: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729

Population: As the results of this study were presented in a synoptic report, physical examination evaluations were not summarized. Laboratory abnormalities and vital signs were collected and summarized.

Primary

Open-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation

AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.

Time frame: Day OL-1 through the end of the OL

Population: All participants who received at least 1 infusion of open-label study medication at any time were included in the safety analyses of the Open-Label Extension phase.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOpen-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs241 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOpen-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationRelated AEs100 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOpen-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationSAEs66 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOpen-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationRelated SAEs9 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOpen-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs Leading to Discontinuation7 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOpen-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationSAEs Leading to Discontinuation4 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOpen-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDeaths1 participants
Secondary

IP; Baseline Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score: IP1C

The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) was used to measure disease specific quality of life. The IBDQ consists of a self-administered 32-item questionnaire that evaluates quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: Bowel, Systemic, Social and Emotional. The response to each question can range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating severe problem and 7 indicating normal health. The total IBDQ is computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Baseline Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score: IP1C120.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.43
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Baseline Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score: IP1C121.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.42
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Baseline Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score: IP1C126.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.93
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Baseline Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score: IP1C124.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.43
Secondary

IP; Baseline Mayo Score: IP1C

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Baseline Mayo Score: IP1C8.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Baseline Mayo Score: IP1C8.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Baseline Mayo Score: IP1C8.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Baseline Mayo Score: IP1C8.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
Secondary

IP; Mean Change From Baseline To Week 12 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ): IP1C

The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) was used to measure disease specific quality of life. The IBDQ consists of a self-administered 32-item questionnaire that evaluates quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: Bowel, Systemic, Social and Emotional. The response to each question can range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating severe problem and 7 indicating normal health. The total IBDQ is computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline (Day IP-1), Day IP-85 (Week 12)

Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Mean Change From Baseline To Week 12 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ): IP1C9.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.514
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Mean Change From Baseline To Week 12 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ): IP1C13.36 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.476
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Mean Change From Baseline To Week 12 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ): IP1C9.87 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.108
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Mean Change From Baseline To Week 12 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ): IP1C23.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.268
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C

The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance =inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.

Time frame: Week 12 (Day IP-85)

Population: All participants in ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing. Prior inadequate response/intolerance was to an approved anti-TNF agent at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C2 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C0 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C0 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C4 participants
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.

Time frame: Week 12 (Day IP-85)

Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C3 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C6 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C4 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C15 participants
Comparison: Null hypothesis=no treatment difference between each of the ABA and placebo (PLA). At 5% significance level, Aba 30/\~10 vs. PLA: power=96%, sample size=140 per arm, expected PLA rate=15%. ABA 30/\~10 =35%; Aba \~10 vs. PLA: power=82%, sample size=140 per arm, expected PLA response rate= 15%, ABA/\~10 mg/kg=30%95% CI: [0.06, 0.67]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance = inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.

Time frame: Week 12 (Day IP-85)

Population: All participants in ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing. Prior inadequate response/intolerance was to an approved anti-TNF agent at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C4 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C4 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C1 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C13 participants
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 point

Time frame: Week 12 (Day IP-85)

Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C24 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C20 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C11 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C36 participants
Comparison: Null hypothesis=no treatment difference (relative risk \[RR\] of ABA over placebo=1) for mucosal healing. ABA 30/\~10 vs. placebo: power=99%, sample size=140 per arm, expected PLA response rate=30%, ABA 30/\~10 mg/kg=60%. ABA \~10 vs. placebo: power=98%, sample size=140 per arm, 5% significance; expected PLA response rate= 30%, ABA \~10 mg/kg=55%95% CI: [0.42, 1.05]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants Who Are Anti-TNF-Inadequate Responders/Anti-TNF Intolerant With Clinical Response At Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C

The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance=inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.

Time frame: Week 12 (Day IP-85)

Population: All participants in ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing. Prior inadequate response/intolerance was to an approved anti-TNF agent at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants Who Are Anti-TNF-Inadequate Responders/Anti-TNF Intolerant With Clinical Response At Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C12 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants Who Are Anti-TNF-Inadequate Responders/Anti-TNF Intolerant With Clinical Response At Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C4 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants Who Are Anti-TNF-Inadequate Responders/Anti-TNF Intolerant With Clinical Response At Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C7 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants Who Are Anti-TNF-Inadequate Responders/Anti-TNF Intolerant With Clinical Response At Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C8 participants
Comparison: The Cochran-Armitage trend test was performed to evaluate whether a relationship existed between the response and dose regimen by comparing the proportion of participants in response across all four treatment arms. Normal approximation was used if the number of responses in a treatment group is at least 5. Otherwise an exact method was used.p-value: 0.149Cochran-Armitage Trend Test
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies: IP1C + IP2C

A electrochemiluminescent immunoassay screened sera for drug-specific antibodies, immunocompetition was used to identify specific anti-Abatacept reactivity. CTLA4 and Possibly Ig category=reactivity against extracellular domain of human CTLA4, constant regions of human IgG1, or both (CTLA4Ig; Abatacept molecule). Ig and/or Junction category=reactivity against constant regions and/or hinge region of human IgG1. Drug-induced seropositivity was defined as a post-baseline titer higher than Baseline, or any post-baseline positivity if Baseline value was missing.

Time frame: For participants treated in MP: Day IP-1 (Baseline) to Day MP-1 (Day IP-85). For participants treated in OL directly after IP: Day IP-1 to Day OL-1. For participants treated only in IP: All measurements after Day IP-1 (including follow-up visits)

Population: All subjects with at least one post-baseline immunogenicity measurement during the study period were included in the immunogenicity data set. Positive was defined as positive post-baseline IP-1 and with a titer value greater than the baseline titer value. Participants with missing baseline titer were assumed negative at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies: IP1C + IP2CIg and/or Ig Junction4 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies: IP1C + IP2CTotal6 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies: IP1C + IP2CCTLA4/Possibly Ig2 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies: IP1C + IP2CIg and/or Ig Junction3 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies: IP1C + IP2CCTLA4/Possibly Ig17 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies: IP1C + IP2CTotal19 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies: IP1C + IP2CTotal4 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies: IP1C + IP2CCTLA4/Possibly Ig4 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies: IP1C + IP2CIg and/or Ig Junction0 participants
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2C

AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.

Time frame: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85

Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CRelated SAEs4 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CSAEs Leading to Discontinuation1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CAEs Leading to Discontinuation4 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CRelated AEs48 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CAEs85 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CDeaths1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CSAEs22 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CRelated AEs46 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CRelated SAEs1 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CDeaths0 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CAEs92 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CAEs Leading to Discontinuation6 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CSAEs Leading to Discontinuation2 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CSAEs20 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CDeaths0 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CRelated AEs23 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CAEs39 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CSAEs8 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CRelated SAEs1 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CSAEs Leading to Discontinuation1 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CAEs Leading to Discontinuation2 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CRelated SAEs3 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CAEs86 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CRelated AEs37 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CDeaths0 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CAEs Leading to Discontinuation5 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CSAEs7 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CSAEs Leading to Discontinuation3 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CDeaths0 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CRelated AEs10 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CSAEs Leading to Discontinuation1 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CAEs Leading to Discontinuation1 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CSAEs6 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CAEs26 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CRelated SAEs1 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CAEs Leading to Discontinuation0 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CSAEs4 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CDeaths0 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CSAEs Leading to Discontinuation0 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CRelated AEs11 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CAEs27 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2CRelated SAEs0 participants
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C

AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs, including all infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections; autoimmune disorders; neoplasms; acute infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 1 hour of start of infusion) and peri-infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 24 hours of the start of infusion).

Time frame: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85

Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2COpportunistic Infections-esophageal candidiasis0 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2COpportunistic Infections-candidiasis0 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2COpportunistic Infections-Total0 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CInfections and Infestations23 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-psoriasis1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-scleritis0 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-episcleritis0 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CPeri Infusional AEs17 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAcute Infusional AEs4 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-uveitis1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-Total2 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CMalignancies-malignant melanoma0 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CMalignancies-basal cell carcinoma1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CMalignancies-Total1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CSerious Infections5 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-rheumatoid arthritis0 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAcute Infusional AEs4 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CPeri Infusional AEs20 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CSerious Infections0 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2COpportunistic Infections-Total1 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2COpportunistic Infections-candidiasis0 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2COpportunistic Infections-esophageal candidiasis1 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CMalignancies-Total0 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CMalignancies-basal cell carcinoma0 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CMalignancies-malignant melanoma0 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-Total1 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-uveitis1 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-episcleritis0 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-scleritis0 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-rheumatoid arthritis0 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CInfections and Infestations29 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-psoriasis0 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CMalignancies-basal cell carcinoma0 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-scleritis0 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-psoriasis0 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-rheumatoid arthritis0 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2COpportunistic Infections-esophageal candidiasis0 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAcute Infusional AEs0 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2COpportunistic Infections-candidiasis1 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CMalignancies-malignant melanoma0 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CSerious Infections1 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-Total0 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CMalignancies-Total0 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CPeri Infusional AEs5 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2COpportunistic Infections-Total1 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-uveitis0 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CInfections and Infestations8 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-episcleritis0 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-episcleritis1 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CSerious Infections0 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-scleritis1 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CMalignancies-basal cell carcinoma0 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-psoriasis0 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2COpportunistic Infections-candidiasis0 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CMalignancies-Total1 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-rheumatoid arthritis1 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-Total4 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CPeri Infusional AEs14 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CInfections and Infestations25 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2COpportunistic Infections-esophageal candidiasis0 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2COpportunistic Infections-Total0 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-uveitis1 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAcute Infusional AEs2 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CMalignancies-malignant melanoma1 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-rheumatoid arthritis0 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2COpportunistic Infections-esophageal candidiasis0 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CMalignancies-basal cell carcinoma0 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CMalignancies-malignant melanoma0 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CPeri Infusional AEs2 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-episcleritis0 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-Total0 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-uveitis0 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAcute Infusional AEs0 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-psoriasis0 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-scleritis0 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CInfections and Infestations12 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CSerious Infections0 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CMalignancies-Total0 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2COpportunistic Infections-Total0 participants
IP Cohort 2 (IP2C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2COpportunistic Infections-candidiasis0 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CInfections and Infestations7 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CMalignancies-basal cell carcinoma0 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CSerious Infections0 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2COpportunistic Infections-candidiasis0 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-episcleritis0 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-Total0 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2COpportunistic Infections-esophageal candidiasis0 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2COpportunistic Infections-Total0 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CMalignancies-malignant melanoma0 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CMalignancies-Total0 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CPeri Infusional AEs4 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-psoriasis0 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-rheumatoid arthritis0 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-scleritis0 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAcute Infusional AEs0 participants
IP2C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2CAutoimmune Disorders-uveitis0 participants
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response At Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C

The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance=inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.

Time frame: Week 12 (Day IP-85)

Population: All participants in ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing. Prior inadequate response/intolerance was to an approved anti-TNF agent at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response At Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C8 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response At Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C7 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response At Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C4 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response At Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C12 participants
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.

Time frame: Week 12 (Day IP-85)

Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C41 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C14 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C26 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C30 participants
Comparison: The Cochran-Armitage trend test was performed to evaluate whether a relationship existed between the response and dose regimen by comparing the proportion of participants in response across all four treatment arms.p-value: 0.044Cochran-Armitage Trend Test
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C

Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): \<65 mg/dL/ \>220 mg/dL; total protein: \< 0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; albumin:\<0.9 x LLN; uric acid: \>1.5 x ULN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells \[RBCs\], White Blood Cells \[WBCs\]): Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when pre-dose=1. Use ≥4 when pre-dose=2 or 3

Time frame: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85

Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine WBC; n=64, n=56, n=27, n=5814 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine RBC; n=47, n=42, n=17, n=529 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine blood; n=132, n=129, n=66, n=1286 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow albumin; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1357 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh leukocyte esterase; n=54, n=51, n=27, n=521 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow Glu; n=88, n=91, n=41, n=1051 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh protein; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine protein; n=132, n=129, n=66, n=1285 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine Glu; n=132, n=129, n=66, n=1284 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow protein; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1355 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh Glu; n=88, n=91, n=41, n=1050 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow albumin; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1355 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow Glu; n=88, n=91, n=41, n=1056 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh Glu; n=88, n=91, n=41, n=1050 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine protein; n=132, n=129, n=66, n=1283 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine blood; n=132, n=129, n=66, n=1287 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh leukocyte esterase; n=54, n=51, n=27, n=525 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine RBC; n=47, n=42, n=17, n=528 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine WBC; n=64, n=56, n=27, n=5821 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow protein; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1353 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh protein; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1351 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine Glu; n=132, n=129, n=66, n=1281 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine Glu; n=132, n=129, n=66, n=1282 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine RBC; n=47, n=42, n=17, n=524 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine WBC; n=64, n=56, n=27, n=583 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow Glu; n=88, n=91, n=41, n=1052 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh Glu; n=88, n=91, n=41, n=1051 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine protein; n=132, n=129, n=66, n=1282 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow protein; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1353 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow albumin; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1353 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh leukocyte esterase; n=54, n=51, n=27, n=522 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine blood; n=132, n=129, n=66, n=1284 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh protein; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow albumin; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow protein; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh leukocyte esterase; n=54, n=51, n=27, n=522 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine WBC; n=64, n=56, n=27, n=5814 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine Glu; n=132, n=129, n=66, n=1284 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow Glu; n=88, n=91, n=41, n=1050 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine protein; n=132, n=129, n=66, n=1284 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh protein; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh Glu; n=88, n=91, n=41, n=1050 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine RBC; n=47, n=42, n=17, n=5212 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh urine blood; n=132, n=129, n=66, n=12811 participants
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C

Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): \<65 mg/dL/ \>220 mg/dL; total protein: \< 0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; albumin:\<0.9 x LLN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells \[RBCs\], White Blood Cells \[WBCs\]): Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when pre-dose=1. Use ≥4 when pre-dose=2 or 3

Time frame: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85

Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow Glu; n=37, n=280 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow protein; n=50, n=502 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow albumin; n=50, n=502 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine protein; n=50, n=480 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine RBC; n=15, n=200 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine WBC; n=24, n=237 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh Glu; n=37, n=280 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine Glu; n=50, n=480 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine blood; n=50, n=482 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh leukocyte esterase; n=21, n=164 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine Glu; n=50, n=482 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh Glu; n=37, n=282 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow Glu; n=37, n=282 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow protein; n=50, n=500 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine WBC; n=24, n=236 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow albumin; n=50, n=500 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine protein; n=50, n=484 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh leukocyte esterase; n=21, n=162 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine blood; n=50, n=483 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine RBC; n=15, n=204 participants
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C

High=greater than Upper Normal Limit (ULN), Low=lower than Lower Normal Limit (LLN). LLN/ULN= Hemoglobin (HGB): \>3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: \<0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: \<0.75 x BL; Platelets (PLT): \<0.67 x LLN/\>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.25 x ULN; neutrophils+bands: \<1.0 x 10\^3 c/uL; eosinophils: \>0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL; monocytes: \>2000 mm3; lymphocytes: \<0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL/ \>7.50 x 10\^3 c/uL.

Time frame: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85

Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow lymphocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=13123 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow leukocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1331 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh monocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1310 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow neutrophils + bands; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1310 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow PLT; n=136, n=133, n=66, n=1331 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh PLT; n=136, n=133, n=66, n=1330 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow erythrocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1332 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh eosinophils; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1316 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow hematocrit; n=134, n=133, n=67, n=1311 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow HGB; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1333 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh leukocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=13310 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow HGB; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1332 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh PLT; n=136, n=133, n=66, n=1332 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow leukocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1330 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh leukocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1336 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh eosinophils; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1314 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh monocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1310 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow hematocrit; n=134, n=133, n=67, n=1312 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow erythrocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1332 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow PLT; n=136, n=133, n=66, n=1330 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow neutrophils + bands; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1310 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow lymphocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=13113 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh eosinophils; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1313 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh monocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1311 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow lymphocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=13111 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow neutrophils + bands; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1311 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow hematocrit; n=134, n=133, n=67, n=1314 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh PLT; n=136, n=133, n=66, n=1330 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow PLT; n=136, n=133, n=66, n=1331 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh leukocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1333 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow HGB; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1336 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow leukocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1334 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow erythrocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1334 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow lymphocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=13126 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow hematocrit; n=134, n=133, n=67, n=1311 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow PLT; n=136, n=133, n=66, n=1330 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow erythrocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1331 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh monocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1310 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow leukocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1331 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow HGB; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1331 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh leukocytes; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1335 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow neutrophils + bands; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1310 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh eosinophils; n=136, n=134, n=67, n=1314 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh PLT; n=136, n=133, n=66, n=1330 participants
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C

High=greater than Upper Normal Limit (ULN), Low=lower than Lower Normal Limit (LLN). LLN/ULN= Hemoglobin (HGB): \>3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: \<0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: \<0.75 x BL; Platelets (PLT): \<0.67 x LLN/\>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.25 x ULN; eosinophils: \>0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL; monocytes: \>2000 mm3; lymphocytes: \<0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL/ \>7.50 x 10\^3 c/uL; blood urea nitrogen (BUN): \>2 x BL; creatinine: \>4 x BL; Sodium (Na): \<0.95 x LLN/ \>1.05 x ULN; potassium (K): \<0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; phosphorous (P): \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.2 5 x ULN;

Time frame: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85

Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine WBC; n=24, n=237 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow hematocrit; n=50, n=491 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh PLT; n=50, n=490 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow leukocytes; n=50, n=490 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh leukocytes; n=50, n=493 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh eosinophils; n=49, n=493 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh monocytes; n=49, n=490 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh BUN; n=46, n=443 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow Na; n=50, n=501 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow K; n=50, n=502 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow P; n=50, n=501 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow protein; n=50, n=502 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine protein; n=50, n=480 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine Glu; n=50, n=480 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh leukocyte esterase; n=21, n=164 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow erythrocytes; n=50, n=491 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow lymphocytes; n=49, n=495 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh creatinine; n=50, n=501 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow Glu; n=37, n=280 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh Glu; n=37, n=280 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow albumin; n=50, n=502 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine blood; n=50, n=482 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine RBC; n=15, n=200 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow HGB; n=50, n=492 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh leukocytes; n=50, n=494 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow HGB; n=50, n=492 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow protein; n=50, n=500 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow hematocrit; n=50, n=490 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow erythrocytes; n=50, n=490 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow Glu; n=37, n=282 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh PLT; n=50, n=491 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine protein; n=50, n=484 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow leukocytes; n=50, n=491 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow albumin; n=50, n=500 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine Glu; n=50, n=482 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh eosinophils; n=49, n=491 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine blood; n=50, n=483 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh monocytes; n=49, n=491 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow lymphocytes; n=49, n=493 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow Na; n=50, n=500 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh BUN; n=46, n=441 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh creatinine; n=50, n=500 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh leukocyte esterase; n=21, n=162 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine WBC; n=24, n=236 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow K; n=50, n=501 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh urine RBC; n=15, n=204 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CLow P; n=50, n=500 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2CHigh Glu; n=37, n=282 participants
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C

Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): \>2 x ULN; aspartate aminotransferase (AST): \>3 x ULN; alanine aminotransferase (ALT): \>3 x ULN; G-Glutamyl transferase (GGT): \>2 x ULN; Bilirubin: \>2 x ULN; blood urea nitrogen (BUN): \>2 x BL; creatinine: \>4 x BL; Sodium (Na): \<0.95 x LLN/ \>1.05 x ULN; potassium (K): \<0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; calcium (Ca): \<0.8 x LLN/\>1.2 x ULN; phosphorous (P): \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.2 5 x ULN

Time frame: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85

Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh K; n=138, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh ALP, n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1351 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow Ca; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow P; n=137, 135, n=66, n=1350 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow Na; n=138, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow K; n=138, n=135, n=66, n=1351 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh ALT; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh GGT; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1356 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh creatinine; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh BUN; n=127, n=130, n=62, n=1240 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh ALP, n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh GGT; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1352 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow Na; n=138, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow Ca; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1351 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow P; n=137, 135, n=66, n=1351 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh ALT; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1351 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow K; n=138, n=135, n=66, n=1352 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh K; n=138, n=135, n=66, n=1351 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh creatinine; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh BUN; n=127, n=130, n=62, n=1242 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh BUN; n=127, n=130, n=62, n=1242 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh creatinine; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow Na; n=138, n=135, n=66, n=1352 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh K; n=138, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh ALT; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow K; n=138, n=135, n=66, n=1352 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow P; n=137, 135, n=66, n=1350 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh ALP, n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow Ca; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1352 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh GGT; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow P; n=137, 135, n=66, n=1353 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh ALT; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh GGT; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1352 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh K; n=138, n=135, n=66, n=1351 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh ALP, n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh BUN; n=127, n=130, n=62, n=1243 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CHigh creatinine; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1351 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow Na; n=138, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow K; n=138, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1CLow Ca; n=137, n=135, n=66, n=1350 participants
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute PGA subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.

Time frame: Day IP-85 (Week 12)

Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CPGA Subscore=02 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CPGA Subscore=122 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CPGA Subscore=125 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CPGA Subscore=04 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CPGA Subscore=03 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CPGA Subscore=115 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CPGA Subscore=011 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CPGA Subscore=134 participants
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.

Time frame: Day IP-85 (Week 12)

Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CRectal Subscore=028 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CRectal Subscore=131 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CRectal Subscore=130 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CRectal Subscore=036 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CRectal Subscore=016 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CRectal Subscore=113 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CRectal Subscore=047 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CRectal Subscore=127 participants
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute stool frequency subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.

Time frame: Day IP-85 (Week 12)

Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CStool Frequency Subscore=114 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CStool Frequency Subscore=013 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CStool Frequency Subscore=121 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CStool Frequency Subscore=08 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CStool Frequency Subscore=04 participants
IP1C-ABA 3 mg/kgIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CStool Frequency Subscore=110 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CStool Frequency Subscore=014 participants
IP1C-PlaceboIP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1CStool Frequency Subscore=132 participants
Secondary

IP; Number of Participants With Physical Examination Findings: IP1C + IP2C

Complete physical examination was obtained at the Screening Visit, Day MP-365, and OL Final Visit/Early Termination visits. Interim physical examinations were performed at other study visits. Interim physical exam were not as comprehensive as the initial full examination but did note any changes in the participant's condition since the last assessment and did not preclude examination of any of the body systems as clinically indicated. Participants were observed for AEs and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature).

Time frame: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85

Population: As the results of this study were presented in a synoptic report, physical examination evaluations were not summarized. Laboratory abnormalities and vital signs were collected and summarized.

Secondary

MP; Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 in IBDQ

The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) was used to measure disease specific quality of life. The IBDQ consists of a self-administered 32-item questionnaire that evaluates quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: Bowel, Systemic, Social and Emotional. The response to each question can range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating severe problem and 7 indicating normal health. The total IBDQ is computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.

Time frame: Day MP-365

Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary endpoint analysis for changes from baseline in IBDQ responses were not conducted for the MP as planned.

Secondary

MP; Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Short Form-36 (SF-36)

The SF-36 is a validated instrument to measure health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. Individual subscale scores and 2 summary scores are calculated: (1) physical component summary (PCS) which includes physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health; (2) mental component summary (MCS) which includes vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight, with values ranging from worse health (0) to best health (100).

Time frame: Day MP-365

Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary endpoint analysis for changes from baseline in SF-36 responses were not conducted for the MP as planned.

Secondary

MP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Both Month 6 and Month 12

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.

Time frame: Month 6 (Day MP-169), Month 12 (Day MP-365)

Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary endpoint analysis to determine the percentage of participants in clinical remission at both Month 6 and Month 12 was not conducted for the MP as planned.

Secondary

MP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Month 12

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.

Time frame: Month 12 (Day MP-365)

Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Month 128 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Month 129 participants
Secondary

MP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies

A electrochemiluminescent immunoassay screened sera for drug-specific antibodies, immunocompetition was used to identify specific anti-Abatacept reactivity. CTLA4 and Possibly Ig category=reactivity against extracellular domain of human CTLA4, constant regions of human IgG1, or both (CTLA4Ig; Abatacept molecule). Ig and/or Junction category=reactivity against constant regions and/or hinge region of human IgG1. Drug-induced seropositivity was defined as a post-baseline titer higher than Baseline, or any post-baseline positivity if Baseline value was missing.

Time frame: For participants not entering OL: All measurements starting after Day MP-1 (including follow-up visits). For participants entering OL: From first measurement after Day MP-1 to Day MP-365 (Day OL-1).

Population: All subjects with at least one post-baseline immunogenicity measurement during the study period were included in the immunogenicity data set. Positive was defined as positive post-baseline IP-1 and with a titer value greater than the baseline titer value. Participants with missing baseline titer were assumed negative at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced AntibodiesCTLA4/Possibly Ig8 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced AntibodiesTotal8 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced AntibodiesIg and/or Ig Junction0 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced AntibodiesCTLA4/Possibly Ig17 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced AntibodiesTotal20 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced AntibodiesIg and/or Ig Junction3 participants
Secondary

MP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation

AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.

Time frame: Day MP-1 through Day MP-365

Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationSAEs7 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationRelated SAEs2 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs39 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs Leading to Discontinuation1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDeaths1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationSAEs Leading to Discontinuation1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationRelated AEs12 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationSAEs Leading to Discontinuation1 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationDeaths0 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs36 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationSAEs4 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationRelated SAEs2 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs Leading to Discontinuation3 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationRelated AEs13 participants
Secondary

MP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest

AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs, including all infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections; autoimmune disorders; neoplasms; acute infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 1 hour of start of infusion) and peri-infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 24 hours of the start of infusion).

Time frame: Day MP-1 through Day MP-365

Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestOpportunistic Infections-pneumonia herpes viral1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestAutoimmune Disorders-Total2 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestOpportunistic Infections-Total1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestAutoimmune Disorders-erythema nodosum1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestMalignancies-Total0 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestAutoimmune Disorders-pemphigoid1 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestSerious Infections5 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestAcute Infusional AEs2 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestMalignancies-breast cancer0 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestPeri-infusional AEs3 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestInfections and Infestations39 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestPeri-infusional AEs2 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestInfections and Infestations36 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestSerious Infections2 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestOpportunistic Infections-Total0 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestOpportunistic Infections-pneumonia herpes viral0 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestMalignancies-Total1 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestMalignancies-breast cancer1 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestAutoimmune Disorders-Total0 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestAutoimmune Disorders-erythema nodosum0 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestAutoimmune Disorders-pemphigoid0 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special InterestAcute Infusional AEs1 participants
Secondary

MP; Number of Participants With Baseline Oral Corticosteroid Use Who Have Discontinued Corticosteroids and Achieved Clinical Remission by Month 12

Baseline corticosteroids equivalent of ≤30 mg prednisone daily. The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater frequency or severity. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.

Time frame: Day MP-365 (Month 12)

Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary endpoint analyses for corticosteroid sparing were not conducted for the MP as planned.

Secondary

MP; Number of Participants With Baseline Oral Corticosteroid Use Who Have Discontinued Corticosteroids for 90 Consecutive Days and Achieved Clinical Remission by Month 12

Baseline corticosteroids equivalent of ≤30 mg prednisone daily. The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater frequency or severity. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.

Time frame: Day MP-365 (Month 12)

Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary endpoint analyses for corticosteroid sparing were not conducted for the MP as planned.

Secondary

MP; Number of Participants With Clinical Mucosal Healing at Month 12 Among Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-TNF Therapy (Infliximab)

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance = inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.

Time frame: Month 12 (Day MP-365)

Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary subgroup analyses of mucosal healing in subjects who have had an inadequate response and/or intolerance to anti-TNF therapy was not conducted for the MP as planned.

Secondary

MP; Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Month 12 Among Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-TNF Therapy (Infliximab)

The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance =inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.

Time frame: Month 12 (Day MP-365)

Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary subgroup analyses of clinical remission in subjects who have had an inadequate response and/or intolerance to anti-TNF therapy was not conducted for the MP as planned.

Secondary

MP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Month 12 Among Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-TNF Therapy (Infliximab)

The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance=inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.

Time frame: Month 12 (Day MP-365)

Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary subgroup analyses of clinical response in subjects who have had an inadequate response and/or intolerance to anti-TNF therapy was not conducted for the MP as planned.

Secondary

MP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities

Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): \<65 mg/dL/ \>220 mg/dL; fasting serum Glu: \<0.8 x LLN/ \>1.5 x ULN; total protein: \< 0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; albumin:\<0.9 x LLN; uric acid: \>1.5 x ULN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells \[RBCs\], White Blood Cells \[WBCs\]): Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when pre-dose=1. Use ≥4 when pre-dose=2 or 3

Time frame: Day IP-85 through Day MP-365

Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Glu; n=45, n=383 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine blood; n=58, n=583 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine protein; n=58, n=584 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh leukocyte esterase; n=23, n=182 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow protein; n=64, n=610 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine RBC; n=24, n=174 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine Glu; n=58, n=582 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine WBC; n=29, n=218 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Glu; n=45, n=380 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine WBC; n=29, n=2110 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Glu; n=45, n=382 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Glu; n=45, n=383 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow protein; n=64, n=611 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine protein; n=58, n=581 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine Glu; n=58, n=581 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine blood; n=58, n=587 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh leukocyte esterase; n=23, n=185 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine RBC; n=24, n=174 participants
Secondary

MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities

High=greater than ULN, Low=lower than LLN. LLN/ULN= HGB: \>3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: \<0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: \<0.75 x BL; PLT: \<0.67 x LLN/\>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.25 x ULN; neutrophils+bands: \<1.0 x 10\^3 c/uL; eosinophils: \>0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL; monocytes: \>2000 mm3; lymphocytes: \<0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL/ \>7.50 x 10\^3 c/uL; GGT: \>2 x ULN; Bilirubin: \>2 x ULN; BUN: \>2 x BL; Na: \<0.95 x LLN/ \>1.05 x ULN; K: \<0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; Ca: \<0.8 x LLN/\>1.2 x ULN

Time frame: Day IP-85 through Day MP-365

Population: The As Treated analysis population was used for all safety summaries and was defined to include all participants who received at least one infusion of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh leukocytes; n=64, n=602 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine RBC; n=24, n=174 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow HGB; n=64, n=611 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow hematocrit; n=64, n=603 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow erythrocytes; n=64, n=611 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh PLT; n= 64, n=610 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow leukocytes; n=64, n=602 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow neutrophils + bands; n=64, n=601 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh eosinophils; n=64, n=602 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh monocytes; n=64, n=601 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow lymphocytes; n=64, n=607 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh lymphocytes; n=64, n=601 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh GGT; n=64, n=623 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh bilirubin, n=64, n=611 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh BUN; n=57, n=594 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Na; n=64, n=620 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow K; n=64, n=621 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Ca; n=64, n=611 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Glu; n=45, n=380 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Glu; n=45, n=383 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow protein; n=64, n=610 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine protein; n=58, n=584 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine Glu; n=58, n=582 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine blood; n=58, n=583 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh leukocyte esterase; n=23, n=182 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine WBC; n=29, n=218 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh bilirubin, n=64, n=610 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow protein; n=64, n=611 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh BUN; n=57, n=593 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow HGB; n=64, n=612 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine WBC; n=29, n=2110 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow hematocrit; n=64, n=602 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Na; n=64, n=621 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow erythrocytes; n=64, n=612 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine protein; n=58, n=581 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh PLT; n= 64, n=611 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow K; n=64, n=621 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow leukocytes; n=64, n=600 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh leukocyte esterase; n=23, n=185 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh leukocytes; n=64, n=600 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow neutrophils + bands; n=64, n=600 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Ca; n=64, n=610 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh eosinophils; n=64, n=603 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine Glu; n=58, n=581 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh monocytes; n=64, n=600 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow Glu; n=45, n=382 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesLow lymphocytes; n=64, n=606 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine RBC; n=24, n=174 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh lymphocytes; n=64, n=600 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh Glu; n=45, n=383 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh GGT; n=64, n=622 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory AbnormalitiesHigh urine blood; n=58, n=587 participants
Secondary

MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Endoscopic Subscores Indicating Mucosal Healing (≤1 Point) at Month 12

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 point

Time frame: Month 12 (Day MP-365)

Population: All participants in the ITT Population were included in the efficacy analyses. Participants with missing Mayo score were defined as not having achieved clinical response, remission, or mucosal healing.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Mayo Endoscopic Subscores Indicating Mucosal Healing (≤1 Point) at Month 1211 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgMP; Number of Participants With Mayo Endoscopic Subscores Indicating Mucosal Healing (≤1 Point) at Month 1210 participants
Secondary

MP; Number of Participants With Mayo PGA Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Month 12

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute PGA subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.

Time frame: Day MP-365 (Month 12)

Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary endpoint analysis to determine the percentage of participants with PGA subscores indicating mild disease (≤1) was not conducted for the MP as planned.

Secondary

MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Month 12

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.

Time frame: Day MP-365 (Month 12)

Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary endpoint analysis to determine the percentage of participants with rectal subscores indicating mild disease (≤1) was not conducted for the MP as planned.

Secondary

MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Month 12

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute stool frequency subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.

Time frame: Day MP-365 (Month 12)

Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary endpoint analysis to determine the percentage of participants with stool frequency subscores indicating mild disease (≤1) was not conducted for the MP as planned.

Secondary

MP; Number of Participants With Physical Examination Findings

Complete physical examination was obtained at the Screening Visit, Day MP-365, and OL Final Visit/Early Termination visits. Interim physical examinations were performed at other study visits. Interim physical exam were not as comprehensive as the initial full examination but did note any changes in the participant's condition since the last assessment and did not preclude examination of any of the body systems as clinically indicated. Participants were observed for AEs and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature).

Time frame: Day IP-85 through Day MP-365

Population: As the results of this study were presented in a synoptic report, physical examination evaluations were not summarized. Laboratory abnormalities and vital signs were collected and summarized.

Secondary

OL; Number of Participants Using Corticosteroids During OL

Participants taking oral corticosteroids (equivalent of ≤ 30 mg prednisone daily) must have met minimum treatment duration at entry into IP and had stable dose for ≥2 weeks prior to entry into the IP.

Time frame: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729

Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary subgroup analyses of corticosteroid use was not conducted for the OL as planned.

Secondary

OL; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies

A electrochemiluminescent immunoassay screened sera for drug-specific antibodies, immunocompetition was used to identify specific anti-Abatacept reactivity. CTLA4 and Possibly Ig category=reactivity against extracellular domain of human CTLA4, constant regions of human IgG1, or both (CTLA4Ig; Abatacept molecule). Ig and/or Junction category=reactivity against constant regions and/or hinge region of human IgG1. Drug-induced seropositivity was defined as a post-baseline titer higher than Baseline, or any post-baseline positivity if Baseline value was missing.

Time frame: For participants receiving OL medication, all measurements starting after Day OL-1 (including follow-up visits and at 56 and 85 days after last dose)

Population: All subjects with at least one post-baseline immunogenicity measurement during the study period were included in the immunogenicity data set. Positive was defined as positive post-baseline IP-1 and with a titer value greater than the baseline titer value. Participants with missing baseline titer were assumed negative at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced AntibodiesTotal66 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced AntibodiesCTLA4/Possibly Ig59 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced AntibodiesIg and/or Ig Junction11 participants
Secondary

OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Over Time

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.

Time frame: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729

Population: All participants who received at least 1 infusion of open-label study medication at any time were included in the efficacy analyses of the OL. Number of Participants Analyzed=all participants in OL; n=number of evaluable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Over TimeDay OL-365 (n=163)18 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Over TimeDay OL-729 (n=4)0 participants
Secondary

OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Response or Clinical Remission Upon Retreatment With Abatacept Among Those Who Received Abatacept in the IP or MP Period

The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. Clinical remission = Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point. Change from Baseline= post-Baseline - Baseline value.

Time frame: Last Study Visit (Day OL-729)

Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary subgroup analyses of clinical efficacy upon retreatment with abatacept among participants who received study drug during the IP or MP was not conducted for the OL as planned.

Secondary

OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Response Over Time

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.

Time frame: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729

Population: All participants who received at least 1 infusion of open-label study medication at any time were included in the efficacy analyses of the OL. Number of Participants Analyzed=all participants in OL; n=number of evaluable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Clinical Response Over TimeDay OL-365 (n=163)44 participants
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Clinical Response Over TimeDay OL-729 (n=4)0 participants
Secondary

OL; Number of Participants With Mayo Endoscopic Subscores Indicating Mucosal Healing (≤1 Point) During OL

The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 point

Time frame: Open-Label Period (Day OL-1 through Day OL-729)

Population: Due to the early termination of the study after preliminary IP1C results were reviewed and the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, the secondary subgroup analyses of mucosal healing was not conducted for the OL as planned.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction Period Cohort 1 (IP1C)-ABA 30/~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Mayo Endoscopic Subscores Indicating Mucosal Healing (≤1 Point) During OL0 participants
IP1C-ABA ~10 mg/kgOL; Number of Participants With Mayo Endoscopic Subscores Indicating Mucosal Healing (≤1 Point) During OL0 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026