Skip to content

Ofatumumab With Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide in B-CLL Patients

An Open-labeled, Randomized, Two-dose, Parallel Group Trial of Ofatumumab, a Fully Human Monoclonal Anti-CD20 Antibody, in Combination With Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide, in Patients With Previously Untreated B-cell CLL

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00410163
Acronym
BIFROST
Enrollment
61
Registered
2006-12-12
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2014-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic

Keywords

B-cell, cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Ofatumumab

Brief summary

To investigate the safety and efficacy of two dose regimes of ofatumumab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with B-CLL

Interventions

DRUGOfatumumab 500mg

Ofatumumab 500mg or should be diluted into 1000mL pyrogenefree saline and administered as an IV infusion.Duration of infusion will be approximately 6½ hours.Infusions should be given every 4 weeks until a total of 6 infusions has been given.

DRUGOfatumumab 1000mg

Ofatumumab 1000mg or should be diluted into 1000mL pyrogenefree saline and administered as an IV infusion.Duration of infusion will be approximately 6½ hours.Infusions should be given every 4 weeks until a total of 6 infusions has been given.

DRUGFludarabine

Fludarabine (25 mg/m2) should be administered as an IV infusion daily, Days 2 through 4 of Course 1, and Days 1 through 3 of Courses 2 through 6, every 4 weeks for 6 courses

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m2) should be administered as an IV infusion daily, Days 2 through 4 of Course 1, and Days 1 through 3 of Courses 2 through 6, every 4 weeks for 6 courses.

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with active B-CLL and with an indication for treatment 2. Age ≥ 18 years 3. Following receipt of verbal and written information about the study, the patient must provide signed informed consent before any study related activity is carried out

Exclusion criteria

1. Any previous treatment for B-CLL or any other treatments that can be considered active against B-CLL 2. Glucocorticoid unless given in doses ≤ 10 mg /day for other indications than B-CLL (e.g. asthma) 3. Known transformation of B-CLL 4. Known CNS involvement of B-CLL 5. Past or current malignancy, except for: 1. Cervical carcinoma Stage 1B or less 2. Non-invasive basal cell and squamous cell skin carcinoma 3. Malignant melanoma with a complete response of a duration of \> 10 years 4. Other cancer diagnoses with a complete response of a duration of \> 5 years 6. Chronic or current infectious disease requiring systemic treatment 7. Clinically significant cardiac disease 8. Significant concurrent, uncontrolled medical condition 9. History of significant cerebrovascular disease 10. Known HIV positive 11. Positive serology for hepatitis B, unless due to vaccination 12. Leukapheresis, except as a safety measure before chemotherapy 13. ECOG Performance Status of 3 or 4 14. Patients who at the time of inclusion are not expected to be able to complete the ofatumumab-FC regimen 15. Patients who have received treatment with any non-marketed drug substance or experimental therapy within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 16. Current participation in any other interventional clinical study 17. Patients known or suspected of not being able to comply with a study protocol (e.g. due to alcoholism, drug dependency or psychological disorder) 18. Breast feeding women or women with a positive pregnancy test at Visit 1 19. Women of childbearing potential not willing to use adequate contraception for up to one year after last dose of ofatumumab. Adequate contraception is defined as hormonal birth control or intrauterine device. For patients in the USA the use of a double barrier method is also considered adequate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants (Par.) With Complete Remission (CR), Measured From Start of Treatment Until 3 Months After Last InfusionStart of treatment (Day 1 of Week 0) until 3 months after start of last infusion (up to Week 32)Par. were evaluated for response by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IRC) in accordance with the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group (NCI-WG) 1996 guideline. Par. with Complete Remission (CR) were classified as complete responders. As per NCI-WG, CR requires all of the following criteria for a period of \>=2 months: absence of lymphadenopathy (all lymph nodes \<1.0 centimeters), no hepatomegaly/splenomegaly, absence of constitutional symptoms, lymphocytes \<=4.0\*10\^9/liter (L), neutrophil leukocytes \>=1.5\*10\^9/L, platelets \>100\*10\^9/L, and hemoglobin \>11 grams/deciliter.
Number of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-respondersFrom start of treatment (Day 1 of Week 0) until 3 months after start of last infusion (up to Week 32)Par. were evaluated by an IRC in accordance with NCI-WG 1996 guideline. Responders: CR, Nodular Partial Remission (nPR, same as CR, but persistent bone marrow nodules), and Partial Remission (PR, \>=50% decrease in lymphocytes from pretreatment baseline (BL) value, \>=50% reduction in lymphadenopathy, \>=50% reduction of liver/spleen and neutrophils \>= 1.5\*10\^9/L or platelets \>100\*10\^9/L or hemoglobin \>11 g/dL (or 50% improvement over BL for neutrophils, platelets, hemoglobin); non-responders: Stable Disease (SD, did not achieve CR/PR, and no PD), Progressive Disease (PD), or Not Evaluable (NE).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Next Anti-chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Therapy or DeathFrom time of randomization to first administration of next anti-CLL therapy other than ofatumumab or death, assessed over 5 yearsTime to next anti-CLL (anti-lymphoma) therapy was defined as the time from randomization until the time of first administration of the next anti-lymphoma therapy other than ofatumumab or death. For participants who were lost to follow-up, the time was censored at the date of the last attended visit at which the endpoint was assessed.
Median Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Baseline Visit 2 (Week [Wk] 0); Visits 9 (Wk 4), 21 (Wk 12), 25 (Wk 16), 29 (Wk 20), 33 (Month [M] 1 after start of last infusion [LI]), 34 (M 3 after start of LI), 35 (M 6 after start of LI), 36 (M 9 after start of LI), and 37 (M 12 after start of LTumor size was measured by physical examination of palpable abnormal lymph nodes. Percent change from Baseline (Visit 2, Week 0) = (value at indicated visits minus value at Visit 2 divided by value at Visit 2) \* 100. Visits 33, 34, 35, 36, and 37 are measured in the number of months from the start of the last infusion. The start of the last infusion could have occurred up to Week 20.
Median Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningBaseline Visit 2 (Week [Wk] 0); Visits 15 (Wk 8), 21 (Wk 12), 25 (Wk 16), 29 (Wk 20), 33 (Month [M] 1 after start of last infusion [LI]), 34 (M 3 after start of LI)Malignant B cells (CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+) were measured in peripheral blood samples by flow cytometry. Percent change from Screening (Visit 1, Week -2) = (value at indicated visits minus value at Visit 1 divided by value at Visit 1) \* 100. Visits 33 and 34 are measured in the number of months from the start of the last infusion. The start of the last infusion could have occurred up to Week 20.
Number of Participants Who Experienced Any Adverse Event From First Treatment (Visit 2) to Visit 43 (Month 60)From first treatment (Visit 2) up to Visit 43 (Month 60)An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A list of AEs experienced in the study at a frequency threshold of 5% can be found in the AE section.
Number of Participants With Positive Human Anti-human Anti Bodies (HAHA) at Visits 1, 21, 35, and 39Visits 1 (Screening, Visit -2), 21 (Week 12), 35 (Month 6), and 39 (Month 18)HAHA are indicators of immunogenicity to ofatumumab. Blood samples were drawn from participants at Visits 1, 21, 35, and 39 for analysis of HAHA. Analysis of HAHA was done in batches.
Number of Participants Who Reported Myelosuppression (Anemia, Leukopenia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)From first treatment (Visit 2) up to Visit 43 (Month 60)Myelosuppression is one of the expected AEs for FC treatment and is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. The number of participants with myelosuppression was assessed from laboratory measurements with Grades 3(severe)-4 (life-threatening/disabling) (1, mild; 2, moderate; 5, death) according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0. The CTCAE is issued by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and is the standard classification used for the severity grading scale for AEs in cancer therapy clinical studies.
Percent Change From Screening (Visit 1) in Complement (CH50) Levels at Visit 9 (Week 4)Visit 1 (Week -2) and Visit 9 (Week 4)Blood samples were drawn from participants at Visits 1 and 9 for analysis of complement (CH50) levels. Analysis of CH50 was done in batches, and CH50 levels were measured two hours after the end of study medication infusion. Percent change from Screening (Visit 1, Week -2) = (value at Visit 9 minus value at Visit 1 divided by value at Visit 1) \* 100.
Duration of ResponseFrom time of initial response to disease progression or death, whichever came first, assessed over 2 yearsThe duration of response was defined as the time from the initial response (the first visit at which response was observed) to progression or death. For participants who were lost to follow-up, duration of response was censored at the date of the last attended visit at which the endpoint was assessed.
Ctrough and Cmax at the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)Cmax is defined as the maximum concentration of drug in plasma samples. Ctrough is defined as the trough plasma concentration (measured concentration at the end of a dosing interval \[taken directly before next administration\]). No drug is present before the first infusion; therefore, there are no Ctrough results for the first infusion.
AUC(0-inf) and AUC(0-672) After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)AUC is defined as the area under the ofatumumab concentration-time curve as a measure of drug exposure. AUC(0-672) is AUC from start of infusion to 672 hours after start of infusion; AUC(0-inf) is AUC from start of infusion extrapolated to infinity.
t1/2 After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)t1/2 is defined as terminal half-life and is the time required for the amount of drug in the body to decrease by half.
CL After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)CL is the clearance of drug from plasma, which is defined as the volume of plasma from which the drug is cleared per unit time.
Vss After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)Vss is defined as the volume of distribution at steady state of ofatumumab.
Number of Participants With Progression or DeathFrom time of randomization to first documented evidence of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first, assessed over 2 yearsDisease progression is characterized by at least one of the following, per the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: a \>=50% increase in the sum of the products of at least two lymph nodes on two consecutive determinations 2 weeks apart (at least one node must be \>=2 centimeters); or the appearance of new palpable lymph nodes; or a \>=50% increase in liver and/or spleen size (measurement below the costal margin); or the appearance of palpable hepatomegaly or splenomegaly not previously present; or a \>=50% increase in the numbers of circulating lymphocytes to at least 5.0 \* 10\^9/Liter; or transformation to a more aggressive histology (e.g., Richter's syndrome or prolymphocytic leukemia with \>55% prolymphocytes). For participants who were lost to follow-up, PFS was censored at the date of the last attended visit at which the endpoint was assessed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS.
Number of Participants Classified as Responders Having CR Who Tested Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)From start of treatment (Day 1 of Week 0) until 3 months after start of last infusion (up to course 6 or Week 32)MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment when the participant has achieved CR. For all participants who achieved CR, the follow-up bone marrow sample was tested for malignant B cells (CD5+CD19+) to determine if there was any MRD.
Progression-Free SurvivalFrom time of randomization to first documented evidence of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first, assessed over 2 yearsProgression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization until the first radiologically or clinically documented evidence of progression or death due to any cause, if sooner. For participants who were lost to follow-up, PFS was censored at the date of the last attended visit at which the endpoint was assessed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS.

Countries

United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants received up to 6 courses (22 weeks) of treatment. After treatment, participants were evaluated for up to 18 months in a follow-up (FU) period and then entered an extended FU phase (up to Month 60). The overall study period reported is from 09 January 2007 to 05 June 2013, when all phases of the study were completed.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FC
Ofatumumab iv infusion initiated at 300 mg for course 1, followed by dose of 500 mg for courses 2-6 in combination with fludarabine iv (25 mg/m\^2 daily on Days 1-3) and cyclophosphamide iv (250 mg/m\^2 daily on Days 1-3) administered every 4 weeks for a total of 6 courses
31
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FC
Ofatumumab iv infusion initiated at 300 mg for course 1, followed by dose of 1000 mg for courses 2-6 in combination with fludarabine iv (25 mg/m\^2 daily on Days 1-3) and cyclophosphamide iv (250 mg/m\^2 daily on Days 1-3) administered every 4 weeks for a total of 6 courses
30
Total61

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Extended Follow-up (FU) Phase (2-5 YearsDeath11
Extended Follow-up (FU) Phase (2-5 YearsLost to Follow-up31
Extended Follow-up (FU) Phase (2-5 YearsMedical Reasons10
Extended Follow-up (FU) Phase (2-5 YearsNew Anti-CLL Treatment48
Extended Follow-up (FU) Phase (2-5 YearsSecondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia10
Treatment and Follow-up Phase (2 Years)Adverse Event42
Treatment and Follow-up Phase (2 Years)Death11
Treatment and Follow-up Phase (2 Years)Investigator Decision01
Treatment and Follow-up Phase (2 Years)Lack of Efficacy04
Treatment and Follow-up Phase (2 Years)Participant Had Bone Marrow Transplant10
Treatment and Follow-up Phase (2 Years)Participant Had No Response21
Treatment and Follow-up Phase (2 Years)Participant Had Stable Disease10
Treatment and Follow-up Phase (2 Years)Participant Received New Therapy11
Treatment and Follow-up Phase (2 Years)Withdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOfatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FCTotal
Age, Continuous56.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
56.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
56.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
31 participants29 participants60 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants7 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants23 Participants43 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
31 / 3130 / 300 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
17 / 3123 / 307 / 315 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-responders

Par. were evaluated by an IRC in accordance with NCI-WG 1996 guideline. Responders: CR, Nodular Partial Remission (nPR, same as CR, but persistent bone marrow nodules), and Partial Remission (PR, \>=50% decrease in lymphocytes from pretreatment baseline (BL) value, \>=50% reduction in lymphadenopathy, \>=50% reduction of liver/spleen and neutrophils \>= 1.5\*10\^9/L or platelets \>100\*10\^9/L or hemoglobin \>11 g/dL (or 50% improvement over BL for neutrophils, platelets, hemoglobin); non-responders: Stable Disease (SD, did not achieve CR/PR, and no PD), Progressive Disease (PD), or Not Evaluable (NE).

Time frame: From start of treatment (Day 1 of Week 0) until 3 months after start of last infusion (up to Week 32)

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-respondersAll responders24 participants
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-respondersResponders, CR10 participants
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-respondersResponders, nPR1 participants
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-respondersResponders, PR13 participants
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-respondersAll Non-responders7 participants
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-respondersNon-responders, SD3 participants
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-respondersNon-responders, PD2 participants
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-respondersNon-responders, NE2 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-respondersNon-responders, NE1 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-respondersAll responders22 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-respondersAll Non-responders8 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-respondersResponders, CR15 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-respondersNon-responders, PD5 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-respondersResponders, nPR1 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-respondersNon-responders, SD2 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-respondersResponders, PR6 participants
Primary

Number of Participants (Par.) With Complete Remission (CR), Measured From Start of Treatment Until 3 Months After Last Infusion

Par. were evaluated for response by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IRC) in accordance with the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group (NCI-WG) 1996 guideline. Par. with Complete Remission (CR) were classified as complete responders. As per NCI-WG, CR requires all of the following criteria for a period of \>=2 months: absence of lymphadenopathy (all lymph nodes \<1.0 centimeters), no hepatomegaly/splenomegaly, absence of constitutional symptoms, lymphocytes \<=4.0\*10\^9/liter (L), neutrophil leukocytes \>=1.5\*10\^9/L, platelets \>100\*10\^9/L, and hemoglobin \>11 grams/deciliter.

Time frame: Start of treatment (Day 1 of Week 0) until 3 months after start of last infusion (up to Week 32)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants who had been exposed to study drug irrespective of their compliance to the planned course of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants (Par.) With Complete Remission (CR), Measured From Start of Treatment Until 3 Months After Last Infusion10 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants (Par.) With Complete Remission (CR), Measured From Start of Treatment Until 3 Months After Last Infusion15 participants
Secondary

AUC(0-inf) and AUC(0-672) After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)

AUC is defined as the area under the ofatumumab concentration-time curve as a measure of drug exposure. AUC(0-672) is AUC from start of infusion to 672 hours after start of infusion; AUC(0-inf) is AUC from start of infusion extrapolated to infinity.

Time frame: Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)

Population: FAS. Data were provided for the number of participants attending each visit for whom the parameter could be calculated. Participants withdrawn during the study were not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCAUC(0-inf) and AUC(0-672) After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)First infusion, AUC(0-inf), n=24, 262453 Milligrams * hour per liter (mg.h/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 1.28
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCAUC(0-inf) and AUC(0-672) After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)First infusion, AUC(0-672), n=24, 262452 Milligrams * hour per liter (mg.h/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 1.28
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCAUC(0-inf) and AUC(0-672) After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Sixth infusion, AUC(0-inf), n=16, 16145236 Milligrams * hour per liter (mg.h/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.54
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCAUC(0-inf) and AUC(0-672) After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Sixth infusion, AUC(0-672), n=20, 1974728 Milligrams * hour per liter (mg.h/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.39
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCAUC(0-inf) and AUC(0-672) After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Sixth infusion, AUC(0-672), n=20, 19149019 Milligrams * hour per liter (mg.h/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.75
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCAUC(0-inf) and AUC(0-672) After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)First infusion, AUC(0-inf), n=24, 261915 Milligrams * hour per liter (mg.h/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.74
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCAUC(0-inf) and AUC(0-672) After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Sixth infusion, AUC(0-inf), n=16, 16397577 Milligrams * hour per liter (mg.h/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.35
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCAUC(0-inf) and AUC(0-672) After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)First infusion, AUC(0-672), n=24, 261915 Milligrams * hour per liter (mg.h/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.74
Secondary

CL After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)

CL is the clearance of drug from plasma, which is defined as the volume of plasma from which the drug is cleared per unit time.

Time frame: Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)

Population: FAS. Data were provided for the number of participants attending each visit for whom the parameter could be calculated. Participants withdrawn during the study were not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCCL After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)First infusion, CL, n=24, 26122 Milliliters per hour (mL/h)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 1.28
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCCL After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Sixth infusion, CL, n=20, 196.7 Milliliters per hour (mL/h)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.39
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCCL After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)First infusion, CL, n=24, 26157 Milliliters per hour (mL/h)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.74
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCCL After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Sixth infusion, CL, n=20, 196.7 Milliliters per hour (mL/h)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.75
Secondary

Ctrough and Cmax at the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)

Cmax is defined as the maximum concentration of drug in plasma samples. Ctrough is defined as the trough plasma concentration (measured concentration at the end of a dosing interval \[taken directly before next administration\]). No drug is present before the first infusion; therefore, there are no Ctrough results for the first infusion.

Time frame: Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)

Population: FAS. Data were provided for the number of participants attending each visit. Participants withdrawn during the study were not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCCtrough and Cmax at the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)First infusion, Cmax, n=31, 2967.5 Milligrams per liter (mg/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.47
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCCtrough and Cmax at the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Sixth infusion, Cmax, n=22, 19201 Milligrams per liter (mg/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.3
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCCtrough and Cmax at the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Sixth infusion, Ctrough, n=22, 1919.9 Milligrams per liter (mg/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 12.69
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCCtrough and Cmax at the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)First infusion, Cmax, n=31, 2957.2 Milligrams per liter (mg/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.47
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCCtrough and Cmax at the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Sixth infusion, Cmax, n=22, 19427 Milligrams per liter (mg/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.34
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCCtrough and Cmax at the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Sixth infusion, Ctrough, n=22, 1962.2 Milligrams per liter (mg/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 10.36
Secondary

Duration of Response

The duration of response was defined as the time from the initial response (the first visit at which response was observed) to progression or death. For participants who were lost to follow-up, duration of response was censored at the date of the last attended visit at which the endpoint was assessed.

Time frame: From time of initial response to disease progression or death, whichever came first, assessed over 2 years

Population: FAS. Only those participants classified as responders were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCDuration of ResponseNA months
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCDuration of ResponseNA months
Secondary

Median Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to Screening

Malignant B cells (CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+) were measured in peripheral blood samples by flow cytometry. Percent change from Screening (Visit 1, Week -2) = (value at indicated visits minus value at Visit 1 divided by value at Visit 1) \* 100. Visits 33 and 34 are measured in the number of months from the start of the last infusion. The start of the last infusion could have occurred up to Week 20.

Time frame: Baseline Visit 2 (Week [Wk] 0); Visits 15 (Wk 8), 21 (Wk 12), 25 (Wk 16), 29 (Wk 20), 33 (Month [M] 1 after start of last infusion [LI]), 34 (M 3 after start of LI)

Population: FAS. Data were provided for the number of participants attending each visit. Participants withdrawn during the study were not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD20+ cells, Visit 15 (Wk 8), n=25, 26-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD19+ cells, Visit 25 (Wk16), n=23, 21-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD20+ cells, Visit 21 (Wk 12), n=24, 24-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD19+ cells, Visit 29 (Wk 20), n=22, 19-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD20+ cells, Visit 25 (Wk16), n=23, 21-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD19+ cells, Visit 33 (Wk 24), n=21, 24-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD20+ cells, Visit 29 (Wk 20), n=22, 19-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD19+ cells, Visit 21 (Wk 12), n=24, 24-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD20+ cells, Visit 33 (Wk 24), n=21, 24-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD19+ cells, Visit 34 (Wk 32), n=20, 22-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD20+ cells, Visit 34 (Wk 32), n=20, 22-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD19+ cells, Visit 15 (Wk 8), n=25, 26-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD20+ cells, Visit 34 (Wk 32), n=20, 22-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD19+ cells, Visit 15 (Wk 8), n=25, 26-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD19+ cells, Visit 21 (Wk 12), n=24, 24-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD19+ cells, Visit 29 (Wk 20), n=22, 19-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD19+ cells, Visit 33 (Wk 24), n=21, 24-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD19+ cells, Visit 34 (Wk 32), n=20, 22-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD20+ cells, Visit 15 (Wk 8), n=25, 26-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD20+ cells, Visit 21 (Wk 12), n=24, 24-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD20+ cells, Visit 25 (Wk16), n=23, 21-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD20+ cells, Visit 29 (Wk 20), n=22, 19-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD20+ cells, Visit 33 (Wk 24), n=21, 24-100.00 percent change in cells
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to ScreeningCD5+CD19+ cells, Visit 25 (Wk16), n=23, 21-100.00 percent change in cells
Secondary

Median Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37

Tumor size was measured by physical examination of palpable abnormal lymph nodes. Percent change from Baseline (Visit 2, Week 0) = (value at indicated visits minus value at Visit 2 divided by value at Visit 2) \* 100. Visits 33, 34, 35, 36, and 37 are measured in the number of months from the start of the last infusion. The start of the last infusion could have occurred up to Week 20.

Time frame: Baseline Visit 2 (Week [Wk] 0); Visits 9 (Wk 4), 21 (Wk 12), 25 (Wk 16), 29 (Wk 20), 33 (Month [M] 1 after start of last infusion [LI]), 34 (M 3 after start of LI), 35 (M 6 after start of LI), 36 (M 9 after start of LI), and 37 (M 12 after start of L

Population: FAS. Data were provided for the number of participants attending each visit. Participants withdrawn during the study were not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Visit 21 (Week 12), n=24, 23-100.00 percent change in tumor size
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Visit 34 (Month 3), n=22, 23-100.00 percent change in tumor size
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Visit 29 (Week 20), n=22, 16-100.00 percent change in tumor size
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Visit 35 (Month 6), n=19, 22-100.00 percent change in tumor size
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Visit 25 (Week 16), n=23, 20-100.00 percent change in tumor size
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Visit 36 (Month 9), n=20, 22-100.00 percent change in tumor size
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Visit 33 (Month 1), n=21, 24-100.00 percent change in tumor size
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Visit 37 (Month 12), n=20, 18-100.00 percent change in tumor size
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Visit 9 (Week 4), n=29, 28-75.00 percent change in tumor size
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Visit 37 (Month 12), n=20, 18-100.00 percent change in tumor size
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Visit 9 (Week 4), n=29, 28-70.90 percent change in tumor size
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Visit 21 (Week 12), n=24, 23-100.00 percent change in tumor size
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Visit 25 (Week 16), n=23, 20-100.00 percent change in tumor size
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Visit 29 (Week 20), n=22, 16-100.00 percent change in tumor size
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Visit 33 (Month 1), n=21, 24-100.00 percent change in tumor size
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Visit 34 (Month 3), n=22, 23-100.00 percent change in tumor size
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Visit 35 (Month 6), n=19, 22-100.00 percent change in tumor size
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37Visit 36 (Month 9), n=20, 22-100.00 percent change in tumor size
Secondary

Number of Participants Classified as Responders Having CR Who Tested Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)

MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment when the participant has achieved CR. For all participants who achieved CR, the follow-up bone marrow sample was tested for malignant B cells (CD5+CD19+) to determine if there was any MRD.

Time frame: From start of treatment (Day 1 of Week 0) until 3 months after start of last infusion (up to course 6 or Week 32)

Population: FAS. Only participants with CR at Visit 34 were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants Classified as Responders Having CR Who Tested Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)2 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants Classified as Responders Having CR Who Tested Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)6 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Experienced Any Adverse Event From First Treatment (Visit 2) to Visit 43 (Month 60)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A list of AEs experienced in the study at a frequency threshold of 5% can be found in the AE section.

Time frame: From first treatment (Visit 2) up to Visit 43 (Month 60)

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants Who Experienced Any Adverse Event From First Treatment (Visit 2) to Visit 43 (Month 60)31 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants Who Experienced Any Adverse Event From First Treatment (Visit 2) to Visit 43 (Month 60)30 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Reported Myelosuppression (Anemia, Leukopenia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)

Myelosuppression is one of the expected AEs for FC treatment and is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. The number of participants with myelosuppression was assessed from laboratory measurements with Grades 3(severe)-4 (life-threatening/disabling) (1, mild; 2, moderate; 5, death) according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0. The CTCAE is issued by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and is the standard classification used for the severity grading scale for AEs in cancer therapy clinical studies.

Time frame: From first treatment (Visit 2) up to Visit 43 (Month 60)

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants Who Reported Myelosuppression (Anemia, Leukopenia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)Anemia6 participants
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants Who Reported Myelosuppression (Anemia, Leukopenia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)Leukopenia23 participants
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants Who Reported Myelosuppression (Anemia, Leukopenia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)Neutropenia29 participants
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants Who Reported Myelosuppression (Anemia, Leukopenia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)Thrombocytopenia4 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants Who Reported Myelosuppression (Anemia, Leukopenia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)Thrombocytopenia8 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants Who Reported Myelosuppression (Anemia, Leukopenia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)Anemia8 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants Who Reported Myelosuppression (Anemia, Leukopenia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)Neutropenia26 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants Who Reported Myelosuppression (Anemia, Leukopenia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)Leukopenia22 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Positive Human Anti-human Anti Bodies (HAHA) at Visits 1, 21, 35, and 39

HAHA are indicators of immunogenicity to ofatumumab. Blood samples were drawn from participants at Visits 1, 21, 35, and 39 for analysis of HAHA. Analysis of HAHA was done in batches.

Time frame: Visits 1 (Screening, Visit -2), 21 (Week 12), 35 (Month 6), and 39 (Month 18)

Population: FAS. Data were provided for the number of participants attending each visit. Participants withdrawn during the study were not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants With Positive Human Anti-human Anti Bodies (HAHA) at Visits 1, 21, 35, and 39Visit 1 (Week -2), n=31, 300 participants
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants With Positive Human Anti-human Anti Bodies (HAHA) at Visits 1, 21, 35, and 39Visit 21 (Week 12), n=24, 240 participants
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants With Positive Human Anti-human Anti Bodies (HAHA) at Visits 1, 21, 35, and 39Visit 35 (Month 6), n=19, 220 participants
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants With Positive Human Anti-human Anti Bodies (HAHA) at Visits 1, 21, 35, and 39Visit 39 (Month 18), n=14, 130 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants With Positive Human Anti-human Anti Bodies (HAHA) at Visits 1, 21, 35, and 39Visit 39 (Month 18), n=14, 130 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants With Positive Human Anti-human Anti Bodies (HAHA) at Visits 1, 21, 35, and 39Visit 1 (Week -2), n=31, 300 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants With Positive Human Anti-human Anti Bodies (HAHA) at Visits 1, 21, 35, and 39Visit 35 (Month 6), n=19, 220 participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants With Positive Human Anti-human Anti Bodies (HAHA) at Visits 1, 21, 35, and 39Visit 21 (Week 12), n=24, 240 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Progression or Death

Disease progression is characterized by at least one of the following, per the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: a \>=50% increase in the sum of the products of at least two lymph nodes on two consecutive determinations 2 weeks apart (at least one node must be \>=2 centimeters); or the appearance of new palpable lymph nodes; or a \>=50% increase in liver and/or spleen size (measurement below the costal margin); or the appearance of palpable hepatomegaly or splenomegaly not previously present; or a \>=50% increase in the numbers of circulating lymphocytes to at least 5.0 \* 10\^9/Liter; or transformation to a more aggressive histology (e.g., Richter's syndrome or prolymphocytic leukemia with \>55% prolymphocytes). For participants who were lost to follow-up, PFS was censored at the date of the last attended visit at which the endpoint was assessed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS.

Time frame: From time of randomization to first documented evidence of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first, assessed over 2 years

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCNumber of Participants With Progression or Death3 Participants
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCNumber of Participants With Progression or Death7 Participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Screening (Visit 1) in Complement (CH50) Levels at Visit 9 (Week 4)

Blood samples were drawn from participants at Visits 1 and 9 for analysis of complement (CH50) levels. Analysis of CH50 was done in batches, and CH50 levels were measured two hours after the end of study medication infusion. Percent change from Screening (Visit 1, Week -2) = (value at Visit 9 minus value at Visit 1 divided by value at Visit 1) \* 100.

Time frame: Visit 1 (Week -2) and Visit 9 (Week 4)

Population: FAS. Data were provided for the number of participants attending Visit 9. Participants withdrawn during the study were not analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCPercent Change From Screening (Visit 1) in Complement (CH50) Levels at Visit 9 (Week 4)0 Percent change in complement levels
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCPercent Change From Screening (Visit 1) in Complement (CH50) Levels at Visit 9 (Week 4)0 Percent change in complement levels
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization until the first radiologically or clinically documented evidence of progression or death due to any cause, if sooner. For participants who were lost to follow-up, PFS was censored at the date of the last attended visit at which the endpoint was assessed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS.

Time frame: From time of randomization to first documented evidence of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first, assessed over 2 years

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCProgression-Free SurvivalNA months
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCProgression-Free Survival23.5 months
Secondary

t1/2 After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)

t1/2 is defined as terminal half-life and is the time required for the amount of drug in the body to decrease by half.

Time frame: Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)

Population: FAS. Data were provided for the number of participants attending each visit for whom the parameter could be calculated. Participants withdrawn during the study were not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCt1/2 After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)First infusion, t1/2, n=24, 2619.4 hoursGeometric Coefficient of Variation 1.13
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCt1/2 After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Sixth infusion, t1/2, n=16, 16551 hoursGeometric Coefficient of Variation 0.31
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCt1/2 After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)First infusion, t1/2, n=24, 2618.8 hoursGeometric Coefficient of Variation 0.62
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCt1/2 After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Sixth infusion, t1/2, n=16, 16746 hoursGeometric Coefficient of Variation 0.3
Secondary

Time to Next Anti-chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Therapy or Death

Time to next anti-CLL (anti-lymphoma) therapy was defined as the time from randomization until the time of first administration of the next anti-lymphoma therapy other than ofatumumab or death. For participants who were lost to follow-up, the time was censored at the date of the last attended visit at which the endpoint was assessed.

Time frame: From time of randomization to first administration of next anti-CLL therapy other than ofatumumab or death, assessed over 5 years

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCTime to Next Anti-chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Therapy or Death33.4 months
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCTime to Next Anti-chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Therapy or Death33.3 months
Secondary

Vss After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)

Vss is defined as the volume of distribution at steady state of ofatumumab.

Time frame: Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)

Population: FAS. Data were provided for the number of participants attending each visit for whom the parameter could be calculated. Participants withdrawn during the study were not analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCVss After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)First infusion, Vss, n=24, 263.88 litersGeometric Coefficient of Variation 0.37
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCVss After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Sixth infusion, Vss, n=16, 165.15 litersGeometric Coefficient of Variation 0.27
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCVss After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)First infusion, Vss, n=24, 264.57 litersGeometric Coefficient of Variation 0.3
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCVss After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)Sixth infusion, Vss, n=16, 165.77 litersGeometric Coefficient of Variation 0.38

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 29, 2026