Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of ULTRASE® MT20 in Participants With Cystic Fibrosis (CF) and Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency (PI)

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Ultrase® MT20 to Placebo for the Correction of Steatorrhea in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis (CF)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00408317
Enrollment
36
Registered
2006-12-06
Start date
2006-11-30
Completion date
2007-04-30
Last updated
2017-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cystic Fibrosis, Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency

Keywords

Cystic Fibrosis, Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency, Ultrase® MT20

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of Ultrase® MT20 compared to placebo for the correction of fat and protein malabsorption in participants with cystic fibrosis (CF) and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). This study is sponsored by Aptalis Pharma (formerly Axcan).

Detailed description

This is a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, two-period cross-over, placebo-controlled study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of Ultrase® MT20 to placebo in participants with CF and pancreatic insufficiency. The study consists of a screening period (up to 11 days) and two treatment periods (6-7 days). During screening period participants will be treated with open-label Ultrase® MT18 or MT20. Each treatment period will be preceded by a stabilization period (4 days) and the two treatment periods are separated by a break period (3-6 days). A safety follow-up visit will be performed 7-10 days after discharge from the last treatment period.

Interventions

Ultrase® MT 20 capsules containing enteric-coated minitablets orally daily at a dose stabilized during the first stabilization period (4 days), as per investigator's discretion, for 6 to 7 days in either first intervention period or second intervention period.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo matched to Ultrase® MT 20 capsules orally daily for 6 to 7 days in either first intervention period or second intervention period.

Sponsors

Forest Laboratories
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants or their legally authorized representative must understand the nature of the study and sign an informed consent or assent form along with a parental form * Participants must have a confirmed diagnosis of CF based on 1 or more clinical features consistent with the CF phenotype, and one of the following: * A genotype with 2 identifiable mutations consistent with CF * A sweat chloride test greater than 60 millimole per liter (mmol/L) by quantitative pilocarpine iontophoresis * Participants must have PI as demonstrated by a fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) concentration less than 100 microgram per gram (mcg/g) of stools (ScheBo test) and must require pancreatic enzyme supplementation * Participants must be clinically stable as evidenced by medical and medication history, baseline physical examination including vital signs and laboratory analyses * Participants must be 7 years and older * Participants must have an adequate nutritional status based on the following body mass index (BMI): * Participants 7 to 20 years old must have a BMI greater than or equal to fifth percentile * Female participants greater than 20 years old must have a BMI greater than or equal to 16 * Male participants greater 20 years old must have a BMI greater than or equal to 16.5 * Participants must be on an optimal clinical dose of pancreatic enzymes (Ultrase® MT18 or MT20 or other pancreatic enzymes preparations including Ultrase® MT12) prior to entry in the study, and must tolerate this medication in the opinion of the investigator * Participants must be able to swallow capsules and must be able to eat a high fat diet calculated as 2 gram (± 15%) fat per kilogram body weight per day * Participants must be, in the opinion of the investigator, able and willing to complete this study * Female participants must be premenarcheal, surgically sterile or postmenopausal for at least 12 consecutive months. Otherwise, the women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must not be pregnant and must have practiced an acceptable method of contraception for at least one month prior to the study entry

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with a known contraindication, sensitivity or hypersensitivity to Ultrase or any porcine protein * Participants with a known allergy to the food drug and cosmetic (FD&C) Blue No. 2 dye indicator (stool marker) * Participants not willing to stop the prohibited medications or products at study entry and throughout the study * Participants who are using narcotics * Participants who are using bowel stimulants and/or laxatives on a regular basis * Participants with acute pancreatitis or acute exacerbation of chronic pancreatic disease * Participants with an acute pulmonary infection * Participants with a history of bowel resection * Participants suffering from any dysmotility disorders * Participants with chronic or severe abdominal pain * Participants receiving enteral tube feeding and not willing to stop during the course of the study * Participants known to have a significant medical disease that would compromise their welfare or confound the study results * Participants with a history of or a current diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension * Participants who have a condition known to increase fecal fat loss including celiac's disease, biliary cancer, biliary stricture, cholelithiasis, Crohn's disease, pancreas cancer, radiation enteritis, tropical sprue, Whipple's disease, lactose intolerance, pseudomembranous colitis * Participants with a current diagnosis or a history of complete distal intestinal obstruction syndrome (DIOS) in the past 6 months; or, participants who had 2 or more episodes of DIOS in the past year * Participants with poorly controlled diabetes to the investigator's opinion * Female participants who are pregnant or lactating * Participants who received an investigational drug within 30 days prior to entry into the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Coefficient of Fat Absorption (CFA)Day 3 to Day 7 in first intervention period and second intervention periodPercent (%) CFA was calculated as (\[fat intake - fat excretion\]/fat intake)\*100, determined by the stools collected during the 72-hour period which could extend to 96 hours during both intervention periods. Mean CFA percent was calculated for 72-hour/96-hour period during Day 3 to Day 7 in the first and second intervention periods.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Coefficient of Nitrogen Absorption (CNA)Day 3 to Day 7 in first intervention period and second intervention periodPercent (%) CNA was calculated as \[(nitrogen intake-nitrogen excretion)/nitrogen intake\]\*100, determined by the stools collected during the 72-hour period which could extend to 96 hours during both intervention periods. Nitrogen intake was calculated as protein intake/6.25. Mean percent CNA was calculated for 72-hour/96-hour period during Day 3 to Day 7 in the first and second intervention periods.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Bowel MovementsDay 3 on first intervention period and second intervention periodNumber of bowel movements of each participant was calculated from frequency of stools by the participant per day. Mean daily number of bowel movements on Day 3 for the first treatment period and second treatment period was summarized.
Percentage of Stool Categorized by ConsistencyDay 4 on first intervention period and second intervention periodStool consistency was categorized as hard, formed/normal, soft or watery stool. Percentage of stools of a specific consistency of each participant was calculated as the number of stools with a specific consistency relative to the total number of stools during the collection period. Mean percentage of stool with specific consistency on Day 4 for the first treatment period and second treatment period period for total participants was summarized.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants with cystic fibrosis (CF) and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) were recruited from centers with CF specialists.

Pre-assignment details

Out of 36 participants who entered the screening period (11 days), and treated with Ultrase® MT20, 31 were randomized to first intervention period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Entire Study Population
Includes all participants who received Ultrase® MT20 first and placebo first.
31
Total31

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
First Intervention PeriodAdverse Event01
Second Intervention PeriodAdverse Event20
Second Intervention PeriodProtocol Violation01
Second Intervention PeriodWithdrawal of consent01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEntire Study Population
Age, Continuous19.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 3027 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 301 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Coefficient of Fat Absorption (CFA)

Percent (%) CFA was calculated as (\[fat intake - fat excretion\]/fat intake)\*100, determined by the stools collected during the 72-hour period which could extend to 96 hours during both intervention periods. Mean CFA percent was calculated for 72-hour/96-hour period during Day 3 to Day 7 in the first and second intervention periods.

Time frame: Day 3 to Day 7 in first intervention period and second intervention period

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ultrase® MT20Percent Coefficient of Fat Absorption (CFA)88.55 Percent CFAStandard Deviation 4.94
PlaceboPercent Coefficient of Fat Absorption (CFA)55.61 Percent CFAStandard Deviation 25.1
Comparison: P-values are from a semi-parametric mixed model on ranked CFA% values including sequence, period, and treatment group as fixed effects; participant identification (ID) as random effect.p-value: <0.0001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percent Coefficient of Nitrogen Absorption (CNA)

Percent (%) CNA was calculated as \[(nitrogen intake-nitrogen excretion)/nitrogen intake\]\*100, determined by the stools collected during the 72-hour period which could extend to 96 hours during both intervention periods. Nitrogen intake was calculated as protein intake/6.25. Mean percent CNA was calculated for 72-hour/96-hour period during Day 3 to Day 7 in the first and second intervention periods.

Time frame: Day 3 to Day 7 in first intervention period and second intervention period

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ultrase® MT20Percent Coefficient of Nitrogen Absorption (CNA)84.05 Percent CNAStandard Deviation 7.24
PlaceboPercent Coefficient of Nitrogen Absorption (CNA)58.78 Percent CNAStandard Deviation 20.57
Comparison: P-values are from a semi-parametric mixed model on ranked CNA% values including sequence, period, and treatment group as fixed effects, and participant ID as random effect.p-value: <0.0001Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Number of Bowel Movements

Number of bowel movements of each participant was calculated from frequency of stools by the participant per day. Mean daily number of bowel movements on Day 3 for the first treatment period and second treatment period was summarized.

Time frame: Day 3 on first intervention period and second intervention period

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ultrase® MT20Number of Bowel Movements1.5 bowel movementsStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboNumber of Bowel Movements3.1 bowel movementsStandard Deviation 1.8
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Stool Categorized by Consistency

Stool consistency was categorized as hard, formed/normal, soft or watery stool. Percentage of stools of a specific consistency of each participant was calculated as the number of stools with a specific consistency relative to the total number of stools during the collection period. Mean percentage of stool with specific consistency on Day 4 for the first treatment period and second treatment period period for total participants was summarized.

Time frame: Day 4 on first intervention period and second intervention period

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ultrase® MT20Percentage of Stool Categorized by ConsistencyHard Stools11.31 percentage of stoolsStandard Deviation 27.98
Ultrase® MT20Percentage of Stool Categorized by ConsistencyFormed/Normal Stools76.19 percentage of stoolsStandard Deviation 39.13
Ultrase® MT20Percentage of Stool Categorized by ConsistencySoft Stools12.50 percentage of stoolsStandard Deviation 29.27
Ultrase® MT20Percentage of Stool Categorized by ConsistencyWatery Stools0 percentage of stoolsStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboPercentage of Stool Categorized by ConsistencyWatery Stools3.99 percentage of stoolsStandard Deviation 13.65
PlaceboPercentage of Stool Categorized by ConsistencyHard Stools3.57 percentage of stoolsStandard Deviation 18.9
PlaceboPercentage of Stool Categorized by ConsistencySoft Stools66.73 percentage of stoolsStandard Deviation 45.08
PlaceboPercentage of Stool Categorized by ConsistencyFormed/Normal Stools25.71 percentage of stoolsStandard Deviation 43.84

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026