Skip to content

Pregabalin In Partial Seizures (PREPS): An Open-Label, Multicenter Add On Therapy Trial

Pregabalin In Partial Seizures (PREPS): An Open-Label, Multicenter Add On Therapy Trial. A Phase IV Open-Label Trial Using 150,300, 600 mg/Day Of Pregabalin

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00407797
Acronym
PREPS MEXICO
Enrollment
136
Registered
2006-12-05
Start date
2007-03-31
Completion date
2009-08-31
Last updated
2021-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Partial Seizures

Keywords

Lyrica, Epilepsies - Partial

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical improvement by partial seizures reduction, safety and tolerability of subjects having partial epilepsy related to the adjunction of pregabalin BID (75 to 300mg day titration, BID) to existing standard AED (Antiepileptic drugs).

Detailed description

This study was terminated on 17 March 2009 due to delayed enrollment. The decision to terminate the trial was not based on any safety concerns, but rather on timelines and the difficulty in enrolling patients in this open label, single group study.

Interventions

DRUGPregabalin

150 to 600 mg/day during 21 weeks

Sponsors

Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or Female who are diagnosed of partial seizure (simple partial, complex partial, partial seizure secondarily generalized) as defined in the international league of epilepsy classification of seizure.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients having a treatable cause of seizure, currently receiving vigabatrin, having a progressive neurological or systemic disorder.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in 28 Day Partial Seizure Rate During Treatment Observation PhaseWeek 9 to Week 21 or End of Treatment (early termination)28-day seizure rate (at observation period \[obs\]) = \[(number of seizures obs ) divided by (duration of period based on observed last dosing date and Visit 3 \[Week 9\] date)\] \* 28. Percent change = \[(28-day seizure rate obs minus 28-day seizure rate at baseline \[b\]) divided by 28-day seizure rate b\] \* 100. Negative values indicate a decrease in seizure frequency and positive values reflect an increase in seizure frequency.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in 28-Day Partial Seizure Frequency at Week 21Week 21 or End of Treatment (early termination)Percent change from Baseline = \[(28-day seizure rate at 21 weeks minus 28-day seizure rate at baseline \[b\]) divided by (28-day seizure rate b) \* 100. Negative values indicate a decrease in seizure frequency, positive values reflect an increase in seizure frequency.
Percent Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency in Participants Who Had <=6 Seizures and >6 Seizures During the Baseline PeriodWeek 9 to Week 21 or End of Treatment (early termination)Negative values indicate a decrease in seizure frequency; positive values reflect an increase in seizure frequency.
Percent of Seizure- Free Participants During the Treatment Observation PeriodWeek 9 to Week 21 or Early Termination (end of treatment)Seizure-free = no seizures during observation period (100 percent reduction in seizures from baseline).
Percent of Seizure Free Participants During the Last 4 Weeks of the Treatment Observation PeriodWeek 17 to Week 21 (or Last 4 Weeks of Treatment after Week 9)Seizure-free = no seizures during last 4 weeks of observation period (100 percent reduction in seizures from baseline).
Percent of Participants With >=75% Reduction in Seizure Frequency (28-day Seizure Rate) Between Baseline and Final 4 Weeks of the Treatment Observation PeriodWeek 17 through Week 21 (or Last 4 Weeks of Treatment after Week 9)
Response Ratio (RR)Week 9 to Week 21 or End of Treatment (early termination)Response ratio (RR) = comparison between baseline 28-seizure frequency with the 12 week observation phase. RR = \[(28-day seizure rate in observation period \[obs\] minus 28-day seizure rate at baseline \[b\] ) divided by (28-day seizure rate obs plus 28-day seizure rate b)\] \* 100. Range: -100 to 100; negative values for the RR indicate reductions in seizures.
Treatment Satisfaction: Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC)Week 21, LOCFPatient General Impression to Change (PGIC): participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status since beginning study medication on a 7-point scale; range: 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Not done = participant did not complete the PGIC.
Change From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS)Week 21, LOCFParticipant rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity; 9-item overall sleep problems index and 7 subscales. Sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath, somnolence, and adequacy subscale scores (s) rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time); transformed s; total range (r): 0 to 100; higher s = greater intensity of attribute; negative values (v) = reduction from baseline (b), positive v = increase from b. Sleep Quantity score r: 0-24 hours. Higher s = greater quantity of sleep. Change = (MOS score at observation period minus MOS score at b) divided by MOS score b.
Change From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS): Optimal Sleep SubscaleWeek 21, LOCFOptimal Sleep subscale of the MOS subject rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Optimal Sleep (1 of 7 subscales) was derived from sleep quantity: average hours of sleep each night during the past week. Number of subjects with response: YES=1 (optimal sleep: quantity of sleep was 7 or 8 hours per night) or No= 0 (no optimal sleep). Negative value indicates a decrease in attribute; positive value indicates an increase in attribute. Change = (MOS score at observation period minus MOS score at baseline \[b\]) divided by MOS score b.
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Week 21, LOCFParticipant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales: HADS-A assesses generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D: state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale has 7 items; range: 0 (no anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score = greater severity of symptoms. Negative value = reduction from baseline (b), positive value = increase from b. Change = (HADS score at observation period minus HADS score at b) divided by HADS score b.
Percent of Participants With >=50% Reduction in Seizure Frequency (28-day Seizure Rate) Between Baseline and Final 4 Weeks of the Treatment Observation PeriodWeek 17 to Week 21 (or Last 4 Weeks of Treatment after Week 9)

Countries

Mexico

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 152 subjects were screened and 136 subjects were assigned to study treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pregabalin
150 mg per day as two doses (75 mg twice daily; BID), increased to 600 mg per day (300 mg BID) as needed based on response and tolerability
136
Total136

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event6
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyOther7
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPregabalin
28 day seizure frequency in Subjects with <= 6 and > 6 seizures during Baseline Period
<=6 seizures
2 seizures
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
28 day seizure frequency in Subjects with <= 6 and > 6 seizures during Baseline Period
> 6 seizures
12 seizures
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.2
28-Day Seizure Rate7.8 seizure rate
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Age, Customized
18 - 44 years
107 participants
Age, Customized
45 - 64 years
25 participants
Age, Customized
>= 65 years
4 participants
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Anxiety Total Score
8.8 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Depression Total Score
7.3 score on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale
9-Item Sleep Problems Index
33.4 scores on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.8
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale
Awaken Short of Breath
26.0 scores on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.8
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale
Optimal Sleep
0.5 scores on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale
Quantity of Sleep
7.9 scores on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale
Sleep Adequacy
64.6 scores on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.1
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale
Sleep Disturbance
32.9 scores on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.9
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale
Snoring
40.1 scores on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.4
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale
Somnolence
39.2 scores on scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
76 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
60 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
91 / 136
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 136

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in 28 Day Partial Seizure Rate During Treatment Observation Phase

28-day seizure rate (at observation period \[obs\]) = \[(number of seizures obs ) divided by (duration of period based on observed last dosing date and Visit 3 \[Week 9\] date)\] \* 28. Percent change = \[(28-day seizure rate obs minus 28-day seizure rate at baseline \[b\]) divided by 28-day seizure rate b\] \* 100. Negative values indicate a decrease in seizure frequency and positive values reflect an increase in seizure frequency.

Time frame: Week 9 to Week 21 or End of Treatment (early termination)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all subjects who received at least 1 dose of assigned treatment, had valid baseline seizure data, and had at least 1 subsequent rating of seizure frequency (modified intent to treat population). N=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinPercent Change From Baseline in 28 Day Partial Seizure Rate During Treatment Observation Phase-51.2 percent changeStandard Deviation 45.2
Comparison: Percent change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

Participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales: HADS-A assesses generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D: state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale has 7 items; range: 0 (no anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score = greater severity of symptoms. Negative value = reduction from baseline (b), positive value = increase from b. Change = (HADS score at observation period minus HADS score at b) divided by HADS score b.

Time frame: Week 21, LOCF

Population: FAS. LOCF = Last Observation Carried Forward.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Week 21: Anxiety-1.4 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)LOCF: Anxiety-1.4 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Week 21: Depression-0.8 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)LOCF: Depression-0.7 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Comparison: Anxiety: Week 21. Change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Anxiety: LOCF. Change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Depression: Week 21. Change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: 0.0799t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Depression: LOCF. Change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: 0.0846t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS)

Participant rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity; 9-item overall sleep problems index and 7 subscales. Sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath, somnolence, and adequacy subscale scores (s) rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time); transformed s; total range (r): 0 to 100; higher s = greater intensity of attribute; negative values (v) = reduction from baseline (b), positive v = increase from b. Sleep Quantity score r: 0-24 hours. Higher s = greater quantity of sleep. Change = (MOS score at observation period minus MOS score at b) divided by MOS score b.

Time frame: Week 21, LOCF

Population: FAS. LOCF = Last Observation Carried Forward.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS)Week 21: Sleep Disturbance-3.8 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 20.9
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS)LOCF: Sleep Disturbance-4.0 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 21.1
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS)Week 21: Snoring1.4 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 35.4
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS)Week 21: 9-Item Overall Sleep Problem Index-2.2 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 16.6
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS)LOCF: Snoring2.2 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 34.3
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS)Week 21: Awaken Short of Breath0.7 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 32.4
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS)LOCF: Awaken Short of Breath0.3 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 30.9
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS)Week 21: Adequacy4.2 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 28
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS)LOCF: Adequacy4.0 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 26.9
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS)Week 21: Somnolence0.4 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 28.3
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS)LOCF: Somnolence-0.8 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 28.2
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS)LOCF: 9-Item Overall Sleep Problem Index-2.5 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS)Week 21: Sleep Quantity0.4 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS)LOCF: Sleep Quantity0.4 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Comparison: Week 21: Sleep Disturbance. Change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: 0.0552t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: LOCF: Sleep Disturbance. Change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: 0.035t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 21: Snoring. Change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: 0.6743t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: LOCF: Snoring. Change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: 0.4736t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 21: Awaken Short of Breath. Change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: 0.8173t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: LOCF: Awaken Short of Breath. Change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: 0.9092t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 21: Sleep Adequacy. Change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: 0.1091t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: LOCF: Sleep Adequacy. Change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: 0.0944t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 21: Somnolence. Change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: 0.8928t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: LOCF: Somnolence. Change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: 0.7669t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 21: 9-Item Overall Sleep Problems Index. Change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: 0.1698t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: LOCF: 9-Item Overall Sleep Problem Index. Change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: 0.0898t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Week 21: Quantity of Sleep. Change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: 0.0465t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: LOCF: Quantity of Sleep. Change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: 0.0316t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS): Optimal Sleep Subscale

Optimal Sleep subscale of the MOS subject rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Optimal Sleep (1 of 7 subscales) was derived from sleep quantity: average hours of sleep each night during the past week. Number of subjects with response: YES=1 (optimal sleep: quantity of sleep was 7 or 8 hours per night) or No= 0 (no optimal sleep). Negative value indicates a decrease in attribute; positive value indicates an increase in attribute. Change = (MOS score at observation period minus MOS score at baseline \[b\]) divided by MOS score b.

Time frame: Week 21, LOCF

Population: FAS. LOCF=Last Observation Carried Forward.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS): Optimal Sleep SubscaleWeek 210.1 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Sleep Interference: Medical Outcome Sleep Scale (MOS): Optimal Sleep SubscaleLOCF0.1 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Comparison: Week 21; change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: 0.2187t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: LOCF; change from baseline evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: 0.1905t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in 28-Day Partial Seizure Frequency at Week 21

Percent change from Baseline = \[(28-day seizure rate at 21 weeks minus 28-day seizure rate at baseline \[b\]) divided by (28-day seizure rate b) \* 100. Negative values indicate a decrease in seizure frequency, positive values reflect an increase in seizure frequency.

Time frame: Week 21 or End of Treatment (early termination)

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinPercent Change From Baseline in 28-Day Partial Seizure Frequency at Week 21-36.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 55.8
Comparison: Percent change evaluated by a one-sample two-sided t-test comparing the difference to zero.p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency in Participants Who Had <=6 Seizures and >6 Seizures During the Baseline Period

Negative values indicate a decrease in seizure frequency; positive values reflect an increase in seizure frequency.

Time frame: Week 9 to Week 21 or End of Treatment (early termination)

Population: FAS. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinPercent Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency in Participants Who Had <=6 Seizures and >6 Seizures During the Baseline Period<= 6 seizures at Baseline (n=50)-57.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 44.9
PregabalinPercent Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency in Participants Who Had <=6 Seizures and >6 Seizures During the Baseline Period> 6 seizures at Baseline (n=71)-46.5 percent changeStandard Deviation 45.1
Comparison: Participants with \<= 6 seizures during Baseline period.p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Participants with \> 6 seizures during Baseline Period.p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Percent of Participants With >=50% Reduction in Seizure Frequency (28-day Seizure Rate) Between Baseline and Final 4 Weeks of the Treatment Observation Period

Time frame: Week 17 to Week 21 (or Last 4 Weeks of Treatment after Week 9)

Population: FAS. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinPercent of Participants With >=50% Reduction in Seizure Frequency (28-day Seizure Rate) Between Baseline and Final 4 Weeks of the Treatment Observation Period63.6 percent of participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With >=75% Reduction in Seizure Frequency (28-day Seizure Rate) Between Baseline and Final 4 Weeks of the Treatment Observation Period

Time frame: Week 17 through Week 21 (or Last 4 Weeks of Treatment after Week 9)

Population: FAS. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinPercent of Participants With >=75% Reduction in Seizure Frequency (28-day Seizure Rate) Between Baseline and Final 4 Weeks of the Treatment Observation Period48.8 percent of participants
Secondary

Percent of Seizure Free Participants During the Last 4 Weeks of the Treatment Observation Period

Seizure-free = no seizures during last 4 weeks of observation period (100 percent reduction in seizures from baseline).

Time frame: Week 17 to Week 21 (or Last 4 Weeks of Treatment after Week 9)

Population: FAS. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinPercent of Seizure Free Participants During the Last 4 Weeks of the Treatment Observation Period40.5 percent of participants
Secondary

Percent of Seizure- Free Participants During the Treatment Observation Period

Seizure-free = no seizures during observation period (100 percent reduction in seizures from baseline).

Time frame: Week 9 to Week 21 or Early Termination (end of treatment)

Population: FAS. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinPercent of Seizure- Free Participants During the Treatment Observation Period20.7 percent of participants
Secondary

Response Ratio (RR)

Response ratio (RR) = comparison between baseline 28-seizure frequency with the 12 week observation phase. RR = \[(28-day seizure rate in observation period \[obs\] minus 28-day seizure rate at baseline \[b\] ) divided by (28-day seizure rate obs plus 28-day seizure rate b)\] \* 100. Range: -100 to 100; negative values for the RR indicate reductions in seizures.

Time frame: Week 9 to Week 21 or End of Treatment (early termination)

Population: FAS. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinResponse Ratio (RR)-45.1 ratioStandard Deviation 37.9
p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Treatment Satisfaction: Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC)

Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC): participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status since beginning study medication on a 7-point scale; range: 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Not done = participant did not complete the PGIC.

Time frame: Week 21, LOCF

Population: FAS. LOCF = Last Observation Carried Forward.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinTreatment Satisfaction: Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC)Week 21: Much Worse1.7 percent of participants
PregabalinTreatment Satisfaction: Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC)Week 21: Very Much Worse0.9 percent of participants
PregabalinTreatment Satisfaction: Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC)Week 21: Not Done2.6 percent of participants
PregabalinTreatment Satisfaction: Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC)LOCF: Very Much Improved20.7 percent of participants
PregabalinTreatment Satisfaction: Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC)LOCF: Much Improved51.1 percent of participants
PregabalinTreatment Satisfaction: Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC)LOCF: Minimally Improved12.6 percent of participants
PregabalinTreatment Satisfaction: Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC)LOCF: No Change4.4 percent of participants
PregabalinTreatment Satisfaction: Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC)LOCF: Minimally Worse1.5 percent of participants
PregabalinTreatment Satisfaction: Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC)LOCF: Much Worse1.5 percent of participants
PregabalinTreatment Satisfaction: Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC)LOCF: Very Much Worse0.7 percent of participants
PregabalinTreatment Satisfaction: Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC)LOCF: Not Done7.4 percent of participants
PregabalinTreatment Satisfaction: Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC)Week 21: Very Much Improved22.4 percent of participants
PregabalinTreatment Satisfaction: Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC)Week 21: Much Improved52.6 percent of participants
PregabalinTreatment Satisfaction: Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC)Week 21: Minimally Improved13.8 percent of participants
PregabalinTreatment Satisfaction: Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC)Week 21: No Change4.3 percent of participants
PregabalinTreatment Satisfaction: Patient General Impression to Change (PGIC)Week 21: Minimally Worse1.7 percent of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026