Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implants

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety & Efficacy of Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide (0.59 or 2.1 mg) Implant in Subjects With Non-Infectious Uveitis Affecting the Posterior Segment of the Eye

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00407082
Enrollment
278
Registered
2006-12-04
Start date
2000-12-31
Completion date
2005-09-30
Last updated
2011-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Noninfectious Posterior Uveitis

Brief summary

This is a multi-center, randomized, double-masked, controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fluocinolone acetonide (FA) intravitreal implants for the management of subjects with non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye. An additional objective is to compare the safety and efficacy of two doses of fluocinolone acetonide.

Interventions

Fluocinolone acetonide ocular implant 0.59mg

Fluocinolone acetonide ocular implant 2.1mg

Sponsors

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males or non-pregnant females at least 6 years of age who had been diagnosed and treated for recurrent, non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of one or both eyes for at least 1 year prior to the start of the study, and had 'quiet' eyes at surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Coexisting medical or ocular conditions that would interfere with the study results

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Recurrence of uveitis before and after implantation.34 weeks pre-implantation; 34 weeks, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years post-implantation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Post-implantation time to recurrence of uveitis within patient comparison of implanted vs fellow eyes.34 weeks, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years post-implantation
The need for adjunctive uveitis treatment for the study eye, within patient comparison (pre- versus post-implantation)34 weeks, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years post-implantation
Reduction in the area of cystoid macular edema (CME) within patient comparison of responding eyes (implant vs fellow eyes)34 weeks, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years post-implantation
Post-implantation rate of uveitis recurrence, within patient comparison of implanted vs fellow eyes.34 weeks, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years post-implantation
Visual acuity, within patient comparison of responding eyes (implant vs fellow eyes)34 weeks, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years post-implantation
Time to recurrence, between treatment group comparison34 weeks, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years post-implantation
Post implantation uveitis rate, between treatment group comparison34 weeks, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years post-implantation
Results of QOL surveys pre- versus post-implantation34 weeks, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years post-implantation

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026