Skip to content

A Study to Compare MPR With MP in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Subjects 65 Years Old or Older.

A Phase III, Multicentre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Arm Parallel Group Study To Determine The Efficacy And Safety Of Lenalidomde (Revlimid®) In Combination With Melphalan And Prednisone Versus Placebo Plus Melphalan And Prednisone In Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Are 65 Years Of Age Or Older

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00405756
Enrollment
459
Registered
2006-11-30
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2017-01-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma, Celgene, CC-5013, Revlimid, Lenalidomide, Melphalan, Prednisone, Elderly

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether lenalidomide is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma who are 65 years of age or older.

Detailed description

The three phases for the study as originally defined and as represented in the results of 11 May 2010 are: Double-blind Treatment Phase: Induction Melphalan/prednisone and lenalidomide 10 mg (MPR) (2 treatment arms), or melphalan/prednisone and placebo (MPp) (1 treatment arm) for up to 9 cycles. If disease progression, subjects have the option to enter into the Open-Label Extension Phase. There is also an option to enter into the Follow-Up Phase. If the disease has not progressed, subject can continue on blinded therapy into Maintenance. Double-blind Treatment Phase: Maintenance One MPR treatment arm (MPR+R) will continue taking lenalidomide 10 mg in Maintenance. The other MPR treatment arm (MPR+p) will take placebo in Maintenance. The MP p treatment arm will take placebo in Maintenance (MPp+p). If disease progression, subjects have the option to enter the Open-Label Extension Phase to obtain treatment with lenalidomide, or to enter into the Follow-up Phase. Open-label Extension Phase: Treatment consists of oral lenalidomide (up to 25 mg) with or without dexamethasone until disease progression or treatment is discontinued for any reason until all study subjects are followed for at least 5 years from the date of randomization or have died. Subjects who discontinue from the Open-Label Extension Phase prior to completing a total of 5 years in the study will enter the Follow-up Phase. Follow-up Phase: Subjects are followed for overall survival and subsequent anti-myeloma treatment regimens until all subjects in this study are followed for at least 5 years from randomization or have died. The pre-planned interim analysis for the Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) showed that the difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between treatment arms MPR+R and MPp+p (the defined primary comparative analysis for this study) surpassed the pre-specified O'Brien-Fleming boundary for superiority. The IDMC recommended the release of this information to the sponsor and also recommended that all patient and physician study participants receive information concerning the full findings of the MM-015 interim analysis. Therefore, due to these recommendations from the IDMC, treatment-arm codes were sent to the clinical trial centers to unblind the treatment arms of their study subjects once the amended protocol was reviewed and approved by the respective country Health Authorities and Ethics Committees. Subject participation in the MM-015 study continued after unblinding to obtain long-term data for all study endpoints, including overall survival. When the study was unblinded, subjects still on protocol therapy had completed the Double-Blind Induction, and were on monotherapy in Double-Blind Maintenance. Subjects in arm MPR+R continued their monotherapy on lenalidomide. Subjects in arms MPR+p and MPp+p discontinued their placebo monotherapy and went into an observation period in which no antimyeloma therapy was taken. If disease progressed for any subject, the investigator had the option of entering the subject in Open Label Extension Phase to receive lenalidomide therapy (up to 25 mg daily) or the Follow-up Phase. All subjects were to be followed for at least 5 years from the start of the study.

Interventions

DRUGLenalidomide: Double-blind Induction

Double-blind Induction: the starting lenalidomide oral dosing regimen was 10 mg once daily on Days 1 through 21 of each 28 day cycle for up to 9 cycles. Dose was reduced if needed due to dose-limiting toxicity.

DRUGMelphalan

Double-blind Induction: the starting melphalan oral dosing regimen in all 3 treatment arms was 0.18 mg/kg daily on Days 1 through 4 of each 28-day cycle for up to 9 cycles. Dose was reduced if needed due to dose-limiting toxicity.

DRUGPrednisone

Double-blind induction: the starting prednisone oral dosing regimen in all 3 treatment arms was 2 mg/kg daily on Days 1 through 4 of each 28-day cycle for up to 9 cycles. Dose was reduced if needed due to dose-limiting toxicity.

DRUGAspirin

Double-blind induction: low-dose aspirin 75 mg to 100 mg daily for all treatment arms. Double-blind maintenance: at the investigator's discretion

DRUGPlacebo

Double-blind induction: participants in treatment arm MPp+p received placebo once daily on Days 1 through 21 of each 28-day cycle for up to 9 cycles. Double-blind maintenance: participants in treatment arms MPR+p and MPp+p received placebo once daily on Days 1 through 21 of each 28-day cycle from cycle 10 to disease progression.

DRUGLenalidomide: Double-blind Maintenance

Single-agent oral lenalidomide 10 mg once daily on Days 1 through 21 of each 28-day cycle from cycle 10 to disease progression.

DRUGLenalidomide: Open-label

Any study participant who had progressive disease had the option of open-label lenalidomide up to 25 mg daily on Days 1 through 21 of each 28-day cycle.

Sponsors

Celgene Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Must understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form 2. Age greater than or equal to 65 years at the time of signing the informed consent 3. Newly diagnosed with symptomatic multiple myeloma as defined by the 3 criteria below: MM diagnostic criteria (all of next 3 required) 1. Monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow greater than or equal to 10% and/or presence of a biopsy-proven plasmacytoma 2. Monoclonal protein present in the serum and/or urine 3. Myeloma-related organ dysfunction (at least one of the following) \[C\] Calcium elevation in the blood (serum calcium \>10.5mg/dl or upper limit of normal) \[R\] Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \>2mg/dl) \[A\] Anemia (hemoglobin \<10g/dl or 2g \< normal) \[B\] Lytic bone lesions or osteoporosis AND have measurable disease as defined by the following; IgG multiple myeloma: Serum monoclonal paraprotein (M-protein) level greater than or equal to 1.0 g/dL or urine M-protein level greater than or equal to 200 mg/24 hours IgA multiple myeloma: Serum M-protein level greater than or equal to 0.5 g/dL or urine M-protein level greater than or equal to 200 mg/24 hours IgD multiple myeloma: Serum M-protein level greater than or equal to 0.05 g/dL or urine M-protein level greater than or equal to 200 mg/24 hours Light chain multiple myeloma: Serum M-protein level greater than or equal to 1.0 g/dL or urine M-protein level greater than or equal to 200 mg/24 hours IgM multiple myeloma (IgM M-protein plus lytic bone disease documented by skeletal survey plain films): Serum M-protein level greater than or equal to 1.0g/dL or urine M-protein level greater than or equal to 200mg/24hours 4. Karnofsky performance status greater than or equal to 60%. 5. Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements. 6. Women of Childbearing potential (WCBP) must: a. Have a negative medically supervised pregnancy test prior to the start of study therapy. She must agree to ongoing pregnancy testing during the course of the study, and after end of study therapy. This applies even if the subject practices and continues sexual abstinence. b Either commit to continued abstinence from heterosexual intercourse (which must be reviewed on a monthly basis) or agree to use, and be able to comply with, effective contraception without interruption, 28 days prior to starting study drug, during the study therapy (including dose interruptions), and for 28 days after discontinuation of study therapy. 7. Males Subjects must: 1. Agree to use a condom during sexual contact with a WCBP, even if they have had a vasectomy, throughout study drug therapy, during any dose interruption and after the cessation of study therapy. 2. Agree to not donate semen during study drug therapy and for a period after end of study drug therapy. 8. All subjects must 1. Have an understanding that the study drug could have potential teratogenic risk. 2. Agree to abstain from donating blood while taking study drug therapy and following discontinuation of study drug therapy. 3. Agree not to share study medication with another person. 4. All patients must be counseled about pregnancy precautions and risks of fetal exposure. Female Subjects: Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) with regular cycles must agree to have pregnancy tests weekly for the first 28 days of study participation and then every 28 days while on study, at study discontinuation, and at day 28 following discontinuation from the study. If menstrual cycles are irregular, the pregnancy testing must occur weekly for the first 28 days and then every 14 days while on study, at study discontinuation, and at days 14 and 28 following discontinuation from the study. In addition to the required pregnancy testing, the Investigator must confirm with FCBP that she is continuing to use two reliable methods of birth control at each visit. Counseling about pregnancy precautions and the potential risks of fetal exposure must be conducted at a minimum of every 28 days. During counseling, subjects must be reminded to not share study drug and to not donate blood. Pregnancy testing and counseling must be performed if a subject misses her period or if her pregnancy test or her menstrual bleeding is abnormal. Study drug treatment must be discontinued during this evaluation. Females must agree to abstain from breastfeeding during study participation and for at least 28 days after the discontinuation from the study. Male Subjects: Counseling about the requirement for latex condom use during sexual contact with females of childbearing potential and the potential risks of fetal exposure must be conducted at a minimum of every 28 days. During counseling, subjects must be reminded to not share study drug and to not donate blood, sperm, or semen. If pregnancy or a positive pregnancy test does occur in a study subject or the partner of a study subject during study participation, study drug must be immediately discontinued.

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous treatment with antimyeloma therapy (does not include radiotherapy, bisphosphonates, or a single short course of steroid \[i.e., less than or equal to the equivalent of dexamethasone 40 mg/day for 4 days; such a short course of steroid treatment must not have been given within 28 days \[4 weeks\] of randomization\]). 2. Any serious medical condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at an unacceptable risk if he or she participates in this study or confounds experimental the ability to interpret data from the study. 3. Pregnant or lactating females. 4. Radiotherapy within 14 days (2 weeks) of randomization. 5. Plasmapheresis within 28 days (4 weeks) of randomization. 6. Any of the following laboratory abnormalities: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \< 1,500 cells/mL (1.5\*10\^9/L) Platelet count \< 75,000 cells/uL (75\*10\^9/L) for subjects in whom \< 50% of bone marrow nucleated cells are plasma cells; but platelet count \<30,000/uL for subjects in whom \>= 50% of bone marrow nucleated cells are plasma cells Haemoglobin \< 8.0 g/dL (80 g/L) Serum creatinine \> 2.5 mg/dL (221 µmol/L) Serum aspartate aminotransferase (SGOT/AST) or alanine aminotransferase (SGPT/ALT) \> 3.0 times upper limit of normal (ULN) 7. Prior history of malignancies, other than multiple myeloma, unless the subject has been free of the disease for greater than or equal to 3 years. Exceptions include the following: Basal cell carcinoma of the skin Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin Carcinoma in situ of the cervix Carcinoma in situ of the breast Incidental histologic finding of prostate cancer (TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours (TNM) stage of T1a or T1b) 8. Neuropathy of \>= grade 2 severity. 9. Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity or active infectious hepatitis, type A, B or C.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kaplan Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on the Response Assessment by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)up to 165 weeksData as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. PFS was calculated as the time from randomization to the earlier of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) as determined by the CAC, or death on study due to any cause. PD was based on the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation/International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry/Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant Registry \[EBMT/IBMTR/ABMTR\] criteria. PD criteria includes increasing monoclonal paraprotein levels, bone marrow findings, worsening lytic bone disease, progressively enlarging extramedullary plasmacytomas, or hypercalcemia.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kaplan Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS)up to 177 weeksData as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time between randomization and death. Participants who died, regardless of the cause of death, were considered to have had an event. Participants who were lost to follow-up prior to the end of the trial, or who were withdrawn from the trial, were censored at the time of last contact. Participants who were still being treated were censored at the last available date available, or clinical cut-off date, if it was earlier.
Kaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Progression (TTP) Based on the Response Assessment by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)up to 165 weeksData as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. TTP was the time between randomization and disease progression as determined by the CAC. PD was based on the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation/International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry/Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant Registry \[EBMT/IBMTR/ABMTR\] criteria. PD criteria includes increasing monoclonal paraprotein levels, bone marrow findings, worsening lytic bone disease, progressively enlarging extramedullary plasmacytomas, or hypercalcemia.
Number of Participants in Disease Response Categories Representing Their Best Response During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodUp to 165 weeksData as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. Best response was determined by the Central Assessment Committee (CAC) based on the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria: Complete Response (CR)-absence of serum and urine monoclonal paraprotein for 6 weeks, plus no increase in size or number of bone lesions, plus other factors); Partial Response (PR)-not all CR criteria, plus \>=50% reduction in serum monoclonal paraprotein plus others; Stable Disease (SD)- not PR or PD; Progressive Disease (PD)- reappearance of monoclonal paraprotein, bone lesions, other; Not Evaluable (NE).
Time to First ResponseUp to 66 weeksData as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. Time to first response was defined as the time from start of treatment until first response as assessed by the Central Assessment Committee (CMC) based on European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria.
Kaplan Meier Estimates for Duration of Response as Determined by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)Up to 149 weeksData as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. Duration of myeloma response was defined as the time from the initial response date to the earlier of progressive disease (PD) as determined by the CAC or death on study. PD was based on the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation/International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry/Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant Registry \[EBMT/IBMTR/ABMTR\] criteria. PD criteria includes increasing monoclonal paraprotein levels, bone marrow findings, worsening lytic bone disease, progressively enlarging extramedullary plasmacytomas, or hypercalcemia.
Kaplan Meier Estimates for Time to Next Antimyeloma TherapyUp to 168 weeksData as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. Time to the next antimyeloma therapy was defined as time from randomization to the start of another non-protocol antimyeloma therapy. Participants who do not receive another anti-myeloma therapy were censored at the last assessment or follow-up visit known to have received no new therapy.
Summary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment PeriodUp to 169 weeks (Double-blind therapy period plus 4 weeks)Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. Participant counts in different categories of TEAEs during the double-blind treatment period. A TEAE is as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first treatment of any study drug, and within 30 days after the last dose of the last study drug. Severity grades according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE) on a 1-5 scale: Grade 1= Mild AE, Grade 2= Moderate AE, Grade 3= Severe AE, Grade 4= Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5=Death related to AE. Dose reduction includes reduction with or without interruption.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLC-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the quality of life in cancer patients. EORTC QLQ-C30 includes functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), global health status, symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and other (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea, financial difficulties). Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); two used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score = better quality of life.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of physical functioning.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Role Functioning ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of role functioning.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Emotional Functioning ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score = better level of emotional functioning.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Congitive Functioning ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score = better level of cognitive functioning.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score = better level of social functioning.
Kaplan Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (PFS) From Start of Maintenance Therapy Period Based on the Response Assessment by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)Approximately week 37 (start of cycle 10) to week 165Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. PFS calculated from the start of the Maintenance period to the earlier of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) as determined by the CAC, or death on study due to any cause. PD was based on the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation/International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry/Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant Registry \[EBMT/IBMTR/ABMTR\] criteria. PD criteria includes increasing monoclonal paraprotein levels, bone marrow findings, worsening lytic bone disease, progressively enlarging extramedullary plasmacytomas, or hypercalcemia.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Nausea and Vomiting ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the nausea/vomiting scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pain ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the pain scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Dyspnoea ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the dyspnoea scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Insomnia ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the insomnia scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Appetite Loss ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the appetite loss scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Constipation ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the constipation scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Diarrhoea ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the diarrhea scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Financial Difficulties ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a problem scale like the financial problems scale = higher level of financial problems.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. EORTC QLQ-MY20 includes four scales: disease symptoms, treatment side-effects, future perspective, and body image. Questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for the disease symptoms scale = higher level of symptomatology.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Side Effects of Treatment ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. Questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for the side effects scale = higher level of symptomatology.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Future Perspective ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. Questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale. For the future perspective scale, higher score = better perspective of the future.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Body Image ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. Questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale. For the body image scale, higher scores = better body image.
Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue ScaleBaseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the fatigue scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Data represents a May 11, 2010 data cut-off. The study is ongoing.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 606 subjects screened for this study, 147 failed screening. Reasons for screen failures included: laboratory values not met (45 subjects); diagnostic criteria for measurable multiple myeloma not met (30 subjects); other inclusion/exclusion criteria not met (30 subjects); subject withdrawal of consent (14 subjects); and other (28 subjects).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MPR+R
Double-blind induction therapy with melphalan/prednisone and lenalidomide 10 mg (MPR) for up to 9 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with single-agent lenalidomide (R) 10mg from cycle 10 to disease progression. Optional open-label extension therapy with lenalidomide up to 25 mg for participants with progressive disease.
152
MPR+p
Double-blind induction therapy with melphalan/prednisone and lenalidomide 10mg (MPR) for up to 9 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with placebo (p) from cycle 10 to disease progression. Optional open-label extension therapy with lenalidomide up to 25 mg for participants with progressive disease.
153
MPp+p
Double-blind induction therapy with melphalan/prednisone and placebo (MPp) for up to 9 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with placebo (p) from cycle 10 to disease progression. Optional open-label extension therapy with lenalidomide up to 25 mg for participants with progressive disease.
154
Total459

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Double-blind TreatmentAdverse Event312712
Double-blind TreatmentDeath444
Double-blind TreatmentDisease Progression4781102
Double-blind TreatmentLack of Efficacy142
Double-blind TreatmentLost to Follow-up100
Double-blind TreatmentOngoing in Double-blind Treatment452418
Double-blind TreatmentOther744
Double-blind TreatmentProtocol Violation102
Double-blind TreatmentWithdrawal by Subject15910
Follow-upDeath213124
Follow-upLost to Follow-up284
Follow-upOngoing in Follow-up Period525160
Open-label ExtensionAdverse Event137
Open-label ExtensionDeath124
Open-label ExtensionDisease Progression82326
Open-label ExtensionOngoing in Open Label Period71525
Open-label ExtensionOther017
Open-label ExtensionWithdrawal by Subject233

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMPp+pTotalMPR+RMPR+p
Age, Continuous72.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.26
72.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.25
72.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.33
72.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
Age, Customized
<=75 years
116 participants348 participants116 participants116 participants
Age, Customized
>75 years
38 participants111 participants36 participants37 participants
Albumin
<= 35 g/L
72 participants205 participants63 participants70 participants
Albumin
>35 g/L
81 participants250 participants87 participants82 participants
Albumin
Missing
1 participants4 participants2 participants1 participants
Beta2 Microglobulin
<=5.5 mg/L
87 participants239 participants77 participants75 participants
Beta2 Microglobulin
>5.5 mg/L
67 participants219 participants74 participants78 participants
Beta2 Microglobulin
Missing
0 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants
C-reactive Protein
<=4 mg/L
89 participants267 participants84 participants94 participants
C-reactive Protein
>4 mg/L
64 participants185 participants65 participants56 participants
C-reactive Protein
Missing
1 participants7 participants3 participants3 participants
Creatinine clearance
<60 ml/min
76 participants223 participants78 participants69 participants
Creatinine clearance
>=60 ml/min
77 participants232 participants72 participants83 participants
Creatinine clearance
Missing
1 participants4 participants2 participants1 participants
Diastolic Blood Pressure78.8 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
78.2 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.98
78.5 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.53
77.4 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.99
Gender
Female
79 Participants231 Participants81 Participants71 Participants
Gender
Male
75 Participants228 Participants71 Participants82 Participants
Height165.7 centimeter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.79
165.3 centimeter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.63
164.8 centimeter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.81
165.3 centimeter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.33
International Staging System (ISS)
Stage I
28 participants88 participants28 participants32 participants
International Staging System (ISS)
Stage II
48 participants145 participants50 participants47 participants
International Staging System (ISS)
Stage III
78 participants226 participants74 participants74 participants
Karnofsky Performance Scale84.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.46
82.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.74
81.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.95
82.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.71
Multiple Myeloma Subtype
Immunoglobulin A (IgA)
33 participants110 participants39 participants38 participants
Multiple Myeloma Subtype
Missing
5 participants13 participants5 participants3 participants
Multiple Myeloma Subtype
Other
116 participants336 participants108 participants112 participants
Plasma Cells in the Bone Marrow37.9 percentage of plasma cells
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.65
39.0 percentage of plasma cells
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.45
39.8 percentage of plasma cells
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.79
39.3 percentage of plasma cells
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.01
Pulse76.3 beats per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
76.5 beats per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.36
76.0 beats per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.77
77.3 beats per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian / Pacific Islander
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
0 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
1 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 participants4 participants0 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
151 participants453 participants151 participants151 participants
Systolic Blood Pressure136.4 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.13
135.3 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.83
133.9 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.71
135.5 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.6
Temperature36.5 degrees centigrade
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
36.5 degrees centigrade
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
36.5 degrees centigrade
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.41
36.5 degrees centigrade
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.38
Weight72.1 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2
72.5 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.28
73.5 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.77
72.0 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.79

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
149 / 150151 / 152152 / 153
serious
Total, serious adverse events
66 / 15062 / 15256 / 153

Outcome results

Primary

Kaplan Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on the Response Assessment by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. PFS was calculated as the time from randomization to the earlier of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) as determined by the CAC, or death on study due to any cause. PD was based on the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation/International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry/Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant Registry \[EBMT/IBMTR/ABMTR\] criteria. PD criteria includes increasing monoclonal paraprotein levels, bone marrow findings, worsening lytic bone disease, progressively enlarging extramedullary plasmacytomas, or hypercalcemia.

Time frame: up to 165 weeks

Population: Intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MPR+RKaplan Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on the Response Assessment by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)136.1 weeks
MPR+pKaplan Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on the Response Assessment by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)62.1 weeks
MPp+pKaplan Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on the Response Assessment by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)56.1 weeks
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.278, 0.56]Log Rank
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.347, 0.702]Log Rank
p-value: 0.13495% CI: [0.589, 1.075]Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. EORTC QLQ-MY20 includes four scales: disease symptoms, treatment side-effects, future perspective, and body image. Questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for the disease symptoms scale = higher level of symptomatology.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=72,73,82)-7.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.91
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=85,91,95)-7.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=113,121,127)-8.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.56
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=96,109,112)-9.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.64
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=62,51,62)-10.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.87
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=85,91,95)-7.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.85
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=113,121,127)-8.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.13
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=96,109,112)-9.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.25
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=72,73,82)-8.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.9
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=62,51,62)-5.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.79
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=62,51,62)-3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.67
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=72,73,82)-6.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.84
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=113,121,127)-5.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.83
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=85,91,95)-5.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.79
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=96,109,112)-6.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.81
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Body Image Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. Questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale. For the body image scale, higher scores = better body image.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Body Image ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=68,72,79)1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.01
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Body Image ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=79,83,94)7.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.32
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Body Image ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=110,117,119)2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.36
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Body Image ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=88,104,108)3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.32
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Body Image ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=59,52,61)3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.58
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Body Image ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=79,83,94)-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 43.69
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Body Image ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=110,117,119)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.27
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Body Image ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=88,104,108)2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.94
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Body Image ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=68,72,79)-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 44.23
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Body Image ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=59,52,61)6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 41.25
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Body Image ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=59,52,61)2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.08
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Body Image ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=68,72,79)5.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.51
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Body Image ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=110,117,119)4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.65
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Body Image ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=79,83,94)3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.72
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Body Image ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=88,104,108)5.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.78
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Future Perspective Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. Questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale. For the future perspective scale, higher score = better perspective of the future.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Future Perspective ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=71,73,81)17.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.15
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Future Perspective ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=83,88,97)17.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.84
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Future Perspective ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=112,121,124)4.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.74
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Future Perspective ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=93,108,112)14.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.45
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Future Perspective ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=62,52,62)18.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.3
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Future Perspective ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=83,88,97)6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.4
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Future Perspective ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=112,121,124)4.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.56
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Future Perspective ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=93,108,112)7.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.86
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Future Perspective ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=71,73,81)6.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.78
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Future Perspective ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=62,52,62)7.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.49
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Future Perspective ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=62,52,62)14.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.62
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Future Perspective ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=71,73,81)11.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.67
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Future Perspective ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=112,121,124)7.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.38
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Future Perspective ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=83,88,97)14.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.73
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Future Perspective ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=93,108,112)9.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.62
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Side Effects of Treatment Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma. Questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for the side effects scale = higher level of symptomatology.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Side Effects of Treatment ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=72,72,81)-3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.61
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Side Effects of Treatment ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=85,89,94)-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.46
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Side Effects of Treatment ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=113,120,125)1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.37
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Side Effects of Treatment ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=95,108,111)0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.22
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Side Effects of Treatment ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=62,50,61)-2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.95
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Side Effects of Treatment ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=85,89,94)0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.99
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Side Effects of Treatment ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=113,120,125)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.28
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Side Effects of Treatment ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=95,108,111)-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.27
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Side Effects of Treatment ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=72,72,81)-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.59
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Side Effects of Treatment ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=62,50,61)-2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.16
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Side Effects of Treatment ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=62,50,61)-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.23
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Side Effects of Treatment ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=72,72,81)0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Side Effects of Treatment ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=113,120,125)0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.67
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Side Effects of Treatment ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=85,89,94)0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.61
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13, 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) In Side Effects of Treatment ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=95,108,111)1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.94
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLC-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the quality of life in cancer patients. EORTC QLQ-C30 includes functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), global health status, symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and other (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea, financial difficulties). Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); two used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score = better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=70,70,82)7.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.32
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=84,86,96)12.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.33
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=114,121,125)2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.13
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=96,108,110)8.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.95
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=61,50,62)10.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.28
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=84,86,96)8.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.7
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=114,121,125)5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.86
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=96,108,110)8.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.48
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=70,70,82)8.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.02
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=61,50,62)7.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.29
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=61,50,62)8.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.11
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=70,70,82)5.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=114,121,125)6.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.41
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=84,86,96)6.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.6
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=96,108,110)4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.92
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Appetite Loss Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the appetite loss scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Appetite Loss ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=75,72,83)-6.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.23
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Appetite Loss ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,93,96)-5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.15
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Appetite Loss ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=119,125,130)1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.54
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Appetite Loss ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=99,111,111)-3.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.64
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Appetite Loss ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,52,63)-7.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.01
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Appetite Loss ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,93,96)-5.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.2
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Appetite Loss ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=119,125,130)1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.73
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Appetite Loss ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=99,111,111)-5.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.75
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Appetite Loss ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=75,72,83)-8.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.13
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Appetite Loss ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,52,63)-16.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.24
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Appetite Loss ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,52,63)-6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.62
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Appetite Loss ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=75,72,83)-4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.15
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Appetite Loss ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=119,125,130)-5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.96
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Appetite Loss ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,93,96)-8.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.32
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Appetite Loss ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=99,111,111)-5.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.66
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Congitive Functioning Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score = better level of cognitive functioning.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Congitive Functioning ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=73,73,83)-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.34
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Congitive Functioning ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,92,97)1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.64
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Congitive Functioning ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=115,125,128)0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.51
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Congitive Functioning ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=98,111,113)2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.31
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Congitive Functioning ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=63,52,63)0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.29
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Congitive Functioning ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,92,97)-4.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.89
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Congitive Functioning ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=115,125,128)-2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.33
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Congitive Functioning ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=98,111,113)0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.33
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Congitive Functioning ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=73,73,83)-3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.78
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Congitive Functioning ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=63,52,63)-3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.48
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Congitive Functioning ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=63,52,63)-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.13
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Congitive Functioning ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=73,73,83)-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.69
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Congitive Functioning ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=115,125,128)1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.68
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Congitive Functioning ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,92,97)-2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.65
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Congitive Functioning ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=98,111,113)0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.42
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Constipation Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the constipation scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Constipation ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=73,73,81)-5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.27
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Constipation ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=86,93,97)-5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.88
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Constipation ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=114,124,128)-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.31
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Constipation ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=96,111,112)-3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.35
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Constipation ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=63,51,62)-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.36
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Constipation ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=86,93,97)-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.43
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Constipation ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=114,124,128)4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.86
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Constipation ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=96,111,112)0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.14
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Constipation ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=73,73,81)-2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.74
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Constipation ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=63,51,62)-5.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.82
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Constipation ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=63,51,62)-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.44
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Constipation ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=73,73,81)-3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.16
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Constipation ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=114,124,128)-4.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.45
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Constipation ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=86,93,97)-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.95
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Constipation ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=96,111,112)-2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.05
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Diarrhoea Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the diarrhea scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Diarrhoea ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=73,73,80)5.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.43
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Diarrhoea ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,92,95)1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.98
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Diarrhoea ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=115,125,124)2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.85
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Diarrhoea ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=98,109,112)3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.54
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Diarrhoea ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=63,52,61)10.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.83
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Diarrhoea ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,92,95)1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.91
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Diarrhoea ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=115,125,124)1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.06
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Diarrhoea ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=98,109,112)-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.09
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Diarrhoea ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=73,73,80)-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.78
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Diarrhoea ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=63,52,61)1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.75
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Diarrhoea ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=63,52,61)0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.74
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Diarrhoea ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=73,73,80)0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.35
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Diarrhoea ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=115,125,124)3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.65
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Diarrhoea ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,92,95)-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.19
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Diarrhoea ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=98,109,112)0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.13
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Dyspnoea Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the dyspnoea scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Dyspnoea ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=73,73,81)-5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.26
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Dyspnoea ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=86,93,96)-4.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.6
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Dyspnoea ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=117,126,126)-2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.74
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Dyspnoea ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=100,110,110)-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.18
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Dyspnoea ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=62,53,62)-3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.39
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Dyspnoea ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=86,93,96)-4.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.87
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Dyspnoea ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=117,126,126)-6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.04
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Dyspnoea ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=100,110,110)-8.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.07
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Dyspnoea ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=73,73,81)-2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.6
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Dyspnoea ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=62,53,62)-6.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.07
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Dyspnoea ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=62,53,62)1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.92
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Dyspnoea ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=73,73,81)-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.35
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Dyspnoea ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=117,126,126)-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.48
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Dyspnoea ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=86,93,96)3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.07
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Dyspnoea ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=100,110,110)2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.82
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Emotional Functioning Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score = better level of emotional functioning.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Emotional Functioning ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=73,73,83)8.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.59
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Emotional Functioning ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=86,92,97)9.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.28
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Emotional Functioning ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=115,125,128)4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Emotional Functioning ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=98,111,112)8.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.94
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Emotional Functioning ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=63,52,63)9.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.23
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Emotional Functioning ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=86,92,97)1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.07
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Emotional Functioning ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=115,125,128)2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.59
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Emotional Functioning ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=98,111,112)4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.38
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Emotional Functioning ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=73,73,83)1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.78
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Emotional Functioning ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=63,52,63)-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.57
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Emotional Functioning ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=63,52,63)6.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.72
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Emotional Functioning ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=73,73,83)6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.78
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Emotional Functioning ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=115,125,128)6.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.75
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Emotional Functioning ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=86,92,97)4.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.05
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Emotional Functioning ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=98,111,112)5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.56
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the fatigue scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=74,74,82)-7.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.08
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,95,95)-7.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.31
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=120,127,129)-3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.61
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=100,112,110)-7.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,53,62)-10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.86
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,95,95)-7.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.78
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=120,127,129)-5.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.08
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=100,112,110)-9.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.97
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=74,74,82)-10.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.33
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,53,62)-9.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.77
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,53,62)-4.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.34
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=74,74,82)-7.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.29
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=120,127,129)-5.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.33
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,95,95)-6.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.31
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=100,112,110)-5.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.32
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Financial Difficulties Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a problem scale like the financial problems scale = higher level of financial problems.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Financial Difficulties ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=70,72,83)4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.45
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Financial Difficulties ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=84,92,97)6.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.44
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Financial Difficulties ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=111,123,125)2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.91
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Financial Difficulties ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=94,111,112)2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.85
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Financial Difficulties ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=61,52,63)1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.58
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Financial Difficulties ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=84,92,97)0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.81
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Financial Difficulties ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=111,123,125)-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.06
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Financial Difficulties ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=94,111,112)-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.07
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Financial Difficulties ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=70,72,83)-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.8
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Financial Difficulties ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=61,52,63)-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.24
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Financial Difficulties ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=61,52,63)-5.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.06
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Financial Difficulties ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=70,72,83)-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.75
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Financial Difficulties ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=111,123,125)-2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.93
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Financial Difficulties ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=84,92,97)-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.47
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Financial Difficulties ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=94,111,112)-2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Insomnia Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the insomnia scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Insomnia ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=75,73,83)-4.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.86
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Insomnia ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,94,96)-5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.99
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Insomnia ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=118,124,128)2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.56
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Insomnia ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=100,109,111)-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.76
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Insomnia ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,53,63)-4.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.46
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Insomnia ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,94,96)-2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.04
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Insomnia ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=118,124,128)-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.77
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Insomnia ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=100,109,111)-6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.02
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Insomnia ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=75,73,83)0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.38
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Insomnia ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,53,63)-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.36
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Insomnia ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,53,63)-3.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.18
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Insomnia ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=75,73,83)-6.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.8
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Insomnia ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=118,124,128)-5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.77
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Insomnia ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,94,96)-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.58
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Insomnia ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=100,109,111)-5.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.06
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Nausea and Vomiting Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the nausea/vomiting scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Nausea and Vomiting ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=75,72,83)0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.55
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Nausea and Vomiting ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,95,97)1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.75
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Nausea and Vomiting ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=120,127,130)3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Nausea and Vomiting ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=99,112,112)0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.57
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Nausea and Vomiting ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,52,62)1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.9
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Nausea and Vomiting ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,95,97)-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Nausea and Vomiting ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=120,127,130)-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.14
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Nausea and Vomiting ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=99,112,112)-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.94
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Nausea and Vomiting ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=75,72,83)-3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.65
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Nausea and Vomiting ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,52,62)-4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.65
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Nausea and Vomiting ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,52,62)-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.21
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Nausea and Vomiting ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=75,72,83)-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.48
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Nausea and Vomiting ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=120,127,130)-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.36
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Nausea and Vomiting ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,95,97)0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.23
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Nausea and Vomiting ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=99,112,112)0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.73
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pain Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for a symptom scale like the pain scale = higher level of symptomatology/problems.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pain ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=74,74,83)-13.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.48
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pain ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=88,95,97)-17.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.78
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pain ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=120,127,129)-14.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.76
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pain ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=100,112,113)-17.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.18
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pain ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,53,63)-20.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.92
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pain ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=88,95,97)-15.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.3
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pain ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=120,127,129)-13.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.6
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pain ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=100,112,113)-16.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.45
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pain ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=74,74,83)-14.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.28
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pain ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,53,63)-11.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pain ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,53,63)-12.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.96
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pain ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=74,74,83)-12.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.46
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pain ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=120,127,129)-13.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.32
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pain ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=88,95,97)-9.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.71
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Pain ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=100,112,113)-11.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.49
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of physical functioning.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=75,74,83)8.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.04
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=88,95,96)8.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.75
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=120,127,130)1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.72
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=100,112,112)8.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.71
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,53,63)10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=88,95,96)8.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.62
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=120,127,130)3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.64
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=100,112,112)8.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.54
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=75,74,83)9.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.39
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,53,63)7.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.66
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,53,63)1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.3
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=75,74,83)3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.3
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=120,127,130)4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.68
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=88,95,96)5.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.42
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=100,112,112)2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Role Functioning Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of role functioning.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Role Functioning ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=74,74,82)9.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.36
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Role Functioning ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=86,95,95)9.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.76
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Role Functioning ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=119,127,130)1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.18
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Role Functioning ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=99,112,113)5.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.57
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Role Functioning ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,53,63)12.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.09
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Role Functioning ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=86,95,95)7.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.29
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Role Functioning ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=119,127,130)3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.75
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Role Functioning ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=99,112,113)8.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.42
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Role Functioning ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=74,74,82)11.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.42
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Role Functioning ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,53,63)8.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.22
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Role Functioning ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=64,53,63)7.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.93
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Role Functioning ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=74,74,82)5.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.68
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Role Functioning ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=119,127,130)7.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.34
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Role Functioning ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=86,95,95)5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.29
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Role Functioning ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=99,112,113)6.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.16
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning Scale

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score = better level of social functioning.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Months 4, 7, 10, 13, 16

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=72,73,83)11.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.91
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,92,97)10.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.27
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=115,125,127)5.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.05
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=98,111,112)8.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.87
MPR+RChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=63,52,63)13.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.35
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,92,97)4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.87
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=115,125,127)0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.6
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=98,111,112)4.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.48
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=72,73,83)7.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.8
MPR+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=63,52,63)6.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.79
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning ScaleCycle 16 - approximately Month 16 (n=63,52,63)9.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.66
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning ScaleCycle 13 - approximately Month 13 (n=72,73,83)6.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.63
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning ScaleCycle 4 - approximately Month 4 (n=115,125,127)6.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.78
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning ScaleCycle 10 - approximately Month 10 (n=87,92,97)4.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.22
MPp+pChange From Baseline to Cycles 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning ScaleCycle 7 - approximately Month 7 (n=98,111,112)6.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.57
Secondary

Kaplan Meier Estimates for Duration of Response as Determined by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. Duration of myeloma response was defined as the time from the initial response date to the earlier of progressive disease (PD) as determined by the CAC or death on study. PD was based on the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation/International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry/Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant Registry \[EBMT/IBMTR/ABMTR\] criteria. PD criteria includes increasing monoclonal paraprotein levels, bone marrow findings, worsening lytic bone disease, progressively enlarging extramedullary plasmacytomas, or hypercalcemia.

Time frame: Up to 149 weeks

Population: Population: Participants who achieved a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MPR+RKaplan Meier Estimates for Duration of Response as Determined by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)121.6 weeks
MPR+pKaplan Meier Estimates for Duration of Response as Determined by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)56.1 weeks
MPp+pKaplan Meier Estimates for Duration of Response as Determined by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)55.4 weeks
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.228, 0.531]Log Rank
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.281, 0.623]Log Rank
p-value: 0.30295% CI: [0.571, 1.191]Log Rank
Secondary

Kaplan Meier Estimates for Time to Next Antimyeloma Therapy

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. Time to the next antimyeloma therapy was defined as time from randomization to the start of another non-protocol antimyeloma therapy. Participants who do not receive another anti-myeloma therapy were censored at the last assessment or follow-up visit known to have received no new therapy.

Time frame: Up to 168 weeks

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MPR+RKaplan Meier Estimates for Time to Next Antimyeloma Therapy128.9 weeks
MPR+pKaplan Meier Estimates for Time to Next Antimyeloma Therapy66.1 weeks
MPp+pKaplan Meier Estimates for Time to Next Antimyeloma Therapy66.3 weeks
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.296, 0.553]Log Rank
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.363, 0.688]Log Rank
p-value: 0.16995% CI: [0.63, 1.085]Log Rank
Secondary

Kaplan Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS)

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time between randomization and death. Participants who died, regardless of the cause of death, were considered to have had an event. Participants who were lost to follow-up prior to the end of the trial, or who were withdrawn from the trial, were censored at the time of last contact. Participants who were still being treated were censored at the last available date available, or clinical cut-off date, if it was earlier.

Time frame: up to 177 weeks

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MPR+RKaplan Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS)NA weeks
MPR+pKaplan Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS)NA weeks
MPp+pKaplan Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS)NA weeks
Secondary

Kaplan Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (PFS) From Start of Maintenance Therapy Period Based on the Response Assessment by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. PFS calculated from the start of the Maintenance period to the earlier of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) as determined by the CAC, or death on study due to any cause. PD was based on the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation/International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry/Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant Registry \[EBMT/IBMTR/ABMTR\] criteria. PD criteria includes increasing monoclonal paraprotein levels, bone marrow findings, worsening lytic bone disease, progressively enlarging extramedullary plasmacytomas, or hypercalcemia.

Time frame: Approximately week 37 (start of cycle 10) to week 165

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) population of participants in Arms MPR+R and MPR+p who entered maintenance within the Double-blind Treatment Period

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MPR+RKaplan Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (PFS) From Start of Maintenance Therapy Period Based on the Response Assessment by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)112.0 weeks
MPR+pKaplan Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (PFS) From Start of Maintenance Therapy Period Based on the Response Assessment by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)32.3 weeks
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.214, 0.541]Log Rank
Secondary

Kaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Progression (TTP) Based on the Response Assessment by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. TTP was the time between randomization and disease progression as determined by the CAC. PD was based on the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation/International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry/Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant Registry \[EBMT/IBMTR/ABMTR\] criteria. PD criteria includes increasing monoclonal paraprotein levels, bone marrow findings, worsening lytic bone disease, progressively enlarging extramedullary plasmacytomas, or hypercalcemia.

Time frame: up to 165 weeks

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MPR+RKaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Progression (TTP) Based on the Response Assessment by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)148.1 weeks
MPR+pKaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Progression (TTP) Based on the Response Assessment by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)62.7 weeks
MPp+pKaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Progression (TTP) Based on the Response Assessment by the Central Adjudication Committee (CAC)61.3 weeks
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.231, 0.493]Log Rank
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.284, 0.603]Log Rank
p-value: 0.22395% CI: [0.606, 1.125]Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Participants in Disease Response Categories Representing Their Best Response During the Double-blind Treatment Period

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. Best response was determined by the Central Assessment Committee (CAC) based on the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria: Complete Response (CR)-absence of serum and urine monoclonal paraprotein for 6 weeks, plus no increase in size or number of bone lesions, plus other factors); Partial Response (PR)-not all CR criteria, plus \>=50% reduction in serum monoclonal paraprotein plus others; Stable Disease (SD)- not PR or PD; Progressive Disease (PD)- reappearance of monoclonal paraprotein, bone lesions, other; Not Evaluable (NE).

Time frame: Up to 165 weeks

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MPR+RNumber of Participants in Disease Response Categories Representing Their Best Response During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodProgressive disease (PD)0 participants
MPR+RNumber of Participants in Disease Response Categories Representing Their Best Response During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodStable disease (SD)28 participants
MPR+RNumber of Participants in Disease Response Categories Representing Their Best Response During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodComplete response (CR)15 participants
MPR+RNumber of Participants in Disease Response Categories Representing Their Best Response During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodPartial response (PR)102 participants
MPR+RNumber of Participants in Disease Response Categories Representing Their Best Response During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodResponse not evaluable (NE)7 participants
MPR+pNumber of Participants in Disease Response Categories Representing Their Best Response During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodStable disease (SD)40 participants
MPR+pNumber of Participants in Disease Response Categories Representing Their Best Response During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodComplete response (CR)5 participants
MPR+pNumber of Participants in Disease Response Categories Representing Their Best Response During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodPartial response (PR)99 participants
MPR+pNumber of Participants in Disease Response Categories Representing Their Best Response During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodProgressive disease (PD)2 participants
MPR+pNumber of Participants in Disease Response Categories Representing Their Best Response During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodResponse not evaluable (NE)7 participants
MPp+pNumber of Participants in Disease Response Categories Representing Their Best Response During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodResponse not evaluable (NE)7 participants
MPp+pNumber of Participants in Disease Response Categories Representing Their Best Response During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodProgressive disease (PD)0 participants
MPp+pNumber of Participants in Disease Response Categories Representing Their Best Response During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodComplete response (CR)5 participants
MPp+pNumber of Participants in Disease Response Categories Representing Their Best Response During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodStable disease (SD)70 participants
MPp+pNumber of Participants in Disease Response Categories Representing Their Best Response During the Double-blind Treatment PeriodPartial response (PR)72 participants
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.009Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.003Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Based on dichotomized response: 1) CR or PR 2) SD or PD or NEp-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.04, 5.47]Fisher Exact
Comparison: Based on dichotomized response: 1) CR or PR 2) SD or PD or NEp-value: 0.09695% CI: [0.95, 2.62]Fisher Exact
Comparison: Based on dichotomized response: 1) CR or PR 2) SD or PD or NEp-value: 0.00295% CI: [1.33, 3.37]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Summary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. Participant counts in different categories of TEAEs during the double-blind treatment period. A TEAE is as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first treatment of any study drug, and within 30 days after the last dose of the last study drug. Severity grades according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE) on a 1-5 scale: Grade 1= Mild AE, Grade 2= Moderate AE, Grade 3= Severe AE, Grade 4= Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5=Death related to AE. Dose reduction includes reduction with or without interruption.

Time frame: Up to 169 weeks (Double-blind therapy period plus 4 weeks)

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 serious AE (SAE)66 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Lenalidomide/Placebo withdrawal26 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 Grade 3-4 AE related to Prednisone32 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Prednisone dose interruption28 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 adverse event (AE)150 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 Grade 5 AE related to Lenalidomide/Placebo3 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Prednisone dose reduction15 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 SAE related to Prednisone19 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 Grade 5 AE related to Melphalan3 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE related to Lenaldomide/Placebo148 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 SAE related to Melphalan27 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 Grade 5 AE related to Prednisone1 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Melphalan dose interruption5 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 SAE related to Lenalidomide/Placebo38 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Melphalan dose reduction47 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE related to Melphalan140 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 CTCAE grade 5 AE7 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Lenalidomide/Plac dose reduction71 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1AE related to Prednisone87 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 CTCAE grade 3-4 AE137 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Prednisone withdrawal20 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 Grade 3-4 AE related to Lenaldomide/Placebo128 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Lenalidomide/Plac dose interrupt92 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Melphalan withdrawal20 participants
MPR+RSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 Grade 3-4 AE related to Melphalan118 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 SAE related to Prednisone16 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 adverse event (AE)151 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 CTCAE grade 3-4 AE129 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 CTCAE grade 5 AE6 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 serious AE (SAE)62 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE related to Lenaldomide/Placebo145 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE related to Melphalan134 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1AE related to Prednisone94 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 Grade 3-4 AE related to Lenaldomide/Placebo117 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 Grade 3-4 AE related to Melphalan110 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 Grade 3-4 AE related to Prednisone29 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 Grade 5 AE related to Lenalidomide/Placebo2 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 Grade 5 AE related to Melphalan1 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 Grade 5 AE related to Prednisone1 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 SAE related to Lenalidomide/Placebo32 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 SAE related to Melphalan24 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Lenalidomide/Placebo withdrawal24 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Melphalan withdrawal19 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Prednisone withdrawal19 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Lenalidomide/Plac dose reduction70 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Melphalan dose reduction58 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Prednisone dose reduction7 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Lenalidomide/Plac dose interrupt82 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Melphalan dose interruption1 participants
MPR+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Prednisone dose interruption39 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Lenalidomide/Placebo withdrawal14 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 Grade 3-4 AE related to Lenaldomide/Placebo68 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 adverse event (AE)153 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Melphalan withdrawal10 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1AE related to Prednisone93 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Lenalidomide/Plac dose interrupt51 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Prednisone withdrawal10 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE related to Melphalan126 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 CTCAE grade 3-4 AE107 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Lenalidomide/Plac dose reduction26 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE related to Lenaldomide/Placebo131 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Prednisone dose interruption15 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Melphalan dose reduction21 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 serious AE (SAE)56 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 Grade 5 AE related to Prednisone1 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Melphalan dose interruption0 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 SAE related to Lenalidomide/Placebo11 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 Grade 5 AE related to Melphalan3 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 AE leading to Prednisone dose reduction5 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 SAE related to Melphalan11 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 Grade 5 AE related to Lenalidomide/Placebo2 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 Grade 3-4 AE related to Prednisone22 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 SAE related to Prednisone5 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 Grade 3-4 AE related to Melphalan62 participants
MPp+pSummary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period>=1 CTCAE grade 5 AE7 participants
Secondary

Time to First Response

Data as of 11 May 2010 cutoff. Time to first response was defined as the time from start of treatment until first response as assessed by the Central Assessment Committee (CMC) based on European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria.

Time frame: Up to 66 weeks

Population: Participants who had a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MPR+RTime to First Response10.0 weeksStandard Deviation 7.4
MPR+pTime to First Response9.3 weeksStandard Deviation 6.55
MPp+pTime to First Response16.2 weeksStandard Deviation 11.59

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026