Skip to content

Randomized Intervention for Children With Vesicoureteral Reflux (RIVUR)

Randomized Intervention for Children With Vesicoureteral Reflux (RIVUR)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00405704
Acronym
RIVUR
Enrollment
607
Registered
2006-11-30
Start date
2007-05-31
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2020-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Tract Infections, Vesicoureteral Reflux

Keywords

Vesicoureteral Reflux, Urinary Tract Infections, Renal Scarring, Antibiotic Resistance, Controlled Clinical Trial, Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole, Children

Brief summary

In this 2-year, multisite, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 607 children with vesicoureteral reflux that was diagnosed after a first or second febrile or symptomatic urinary tract infecton, we evaluated the efficacy of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) prophylaxis in preventing recurrences (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes were renal scarring, treatment failure (a composite of recurrences and scarring), and antimicrobial resistance.

Detailed description

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was designed to determine whether daily antimicrobial prophylaxis is superior to placebo in preventing recurrence of urinary tract infection (UTI) in children with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Eligibility criteria are described elsewhere. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment for 2 years with daily antimicrobial prophylaxis (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) or placebo. The study was designed to recruit 600 children (approximately 300 in each treatment group). The protocol encouraged prompt evaluation of children with UTI symptoms and early therapy of culture-proven UTIs. It was expected that approximately 10% of children will have to discontinue study medication due to allergic reactions. Assuming a 20% placebo event rate and 10% non-compliance rate, the study has 83% power to detect an absolute 10% event rate in the antimicrobial prophylaxis group. If the placebo event rate is instead 25%, power is 97% to detect an absolute 10% event rate in the treated group, even if non-compliance is as high as 15%. The primary analysis is intention-to-treat with missing outcome data analyzed as UTI. In addition to collecting follow-up data on urinary tract infections, renal scarring and antimicrobial resistance, quality of life, compliance, safety parameters, utilization of health resources, and change in VUR were assessed periodically throughout the study.

Interventions

DRUGTrimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole

Cherry-flavored liquid suspension with 3 mg of trimethoprim plus 15 mg sulfamethoxazole per kilogram of body weight, taken once daily.

DRUGPlacebo

Cherry flavored liquid suspension matched to active comparator.

Sponsors

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Months to 71 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age at randomization: at least 2 months, but less than 6 years of age. Note that children as young as 1 month were screened for the study. * Diagnosed first or second febrile or symptomatic UTI within 112 days prior to randomization * Presence of Grade I- IV VUR based on radiographic voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) performed within 112 days of diagnosis of index UTI. * Appropriately treated index febrile or symptomatic UTI

Exclusion criteria

* Index UTI diagnosis more than 112 days prior to randomization * History of more than two UTIs prior to randomization * For patients less than 6 months of age at randomization, gestational age less than 34 weeks * Co-morbid urologic anomalies * Hydronephrosis, SFU Grade 4 * Ureterocele * Urethral valve * Solitary kidney * Profoundly decreased renal size unilaterally on ultrasound (based on 2 standard deviations below the mean for age and length) performed within 112 days after diagnosis of index UTI * Multicystic dysplastic kidney * Neurogenic bladder * Pelvic kidney or fused kidney * Known sulfa allergy, inadequate renal or hepatic function, Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency or other conditions that are contraindications for use of TMP-SMZ * History of other renal injury/disease * Unable to complete the study protocol * Congenital or acquired immunodeficiency * Underlying anomalies or chronic diseases that could potentially interfere with response to therapy such as chronic gastrointestinal conditions (i.e., malabsorption, inflammatory bowel disease), liver or kidney failure, or malignancy. * Complex cardiac disease as defined in the Manual of Procedures. * Any known syndromes associated with VUR or bladder dysfunction * Index UTI not successfully treated * Unlikely to complete follow-up * Family history of anaphylactic reaction to sulfa medications

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Recurrent Febrile or Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infection During 2-year Follow-up2 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Outcome Renal Scarring2 yearsRenal scarring was defined as a decreased uptake of tracer that was associated with loss of contours or the presence of cortical thinning. Outcome dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scan was performed at 2 years after enrollment or 3-4 months after the child had met treatment failure criteria.
Severe Renal Scarring on Outcome Scan2 yearsSevere renal scarring was defined as scarring in more than 4 of 12 segments in at least one kidney or global atrophy characterized by diffusely scarred and shrunken kidney. Outcome DMSA scan performed at 2 years after enrollment or 3-4 months after the child had met treatment failure criteria.
New Renal Scarring on Outcome Scan2 yearsNew renal scarring was defined as scarring on the outcome renal scan with technetium -99m-labeled dimercaptosuccinic acid that was not present at baseline. Outcome DMSA scan performed at 2 years after enrollment or 3-4 months after the child had met treatment failure criteria.
Recurrent Febrile or Symptomatic UTI With Any Resistant Pathogen2 years
Presence of E.Coli Resistant to Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) (Based on Rectal Swab)2 years
Recurrent Febrile or Symptomatic UTI With Resistant E. Coli2 years
Treatment Failure Composite2 yearsTreatment failure was defined as the occurrence of two febrile urinary tract infections (UTIs), one febrile UTI and three symptomatic UTIs, four symptomatic UTIs, or new or worsening renal scarring on an interim scan (e.g,, the 12-month visit); renal scans from the 2-year visit are NOT considered in the treatment failure criteria.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole: Cherry-flavored liquid suspension with 3 mg of trimethoprim plus 15 mg sulfamethoxazole per kilogram of body weight, taken once daily.
302
Placebo
Placebo: Cherry flavored liquid suspension matched to active comparator.
305
Total607

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTrimethoprim-SulfamethoxazolePlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous12 months12 months12 months
Region of Enrollment
United States
302 participants305 participants607 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
277 Participants281 Participants558 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants24 Participants49 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
79 / 302105 / 305
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3020 / 305

Outcome results

Primary

Recurrent Febrile or Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infection During 2-year Follow-up

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Trimethoprim-SulfamethoxazoleRecurrent Febrile or Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infection During 2-year Follow-up39 participants
PlaceboRecurrent Febrile or Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infection During 2-year Follow-up72 participants
p-value: <0.001Log Rank
Secondary

New Renal Scarring on Outcome Scan

New renal scarring was defined as scarring on the outcome renal scan with technetium -99m-labeled dimercaptosuccinic acid that was not present at baseline. Outcome DMSA scan performed at 2 years after enrollment or 3-4 months after the child had met treatment failure criteria.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The analysis population excluded 82 subjects in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group and 78 subjects in the placebo group who did not have an outcome dimercaptosuccinic acid scan.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Trimethoprim-SulfamethoxazoleNew Renal Scarring on Outcome Scan18 participants
PlaceboNew Renal Scarring on Outcome Scan19 participants
p-value: 0.94Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Outcome Renal Scarring

Renal scarring was defined as a decreased uptake of tracer that was associated with loss of contours or the presence of cortical thinning. Outcome dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scan was performed at 2 years after enrollment or 3-4 months after the child had met treatment failure criteria.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The analysis population excluded 75 subjects in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group and 70 subjects in the placebo group who did not have an outcome dimercaptosuccinic acid scan.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Trimethoprim-SulfamethoxazoleOutcome Renal Scarring27 participants
PlaceboOutcome Renal Scarring24 participants
p-value: 0.55Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Presence of E.Coli Resistant to Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) (Based on Rectal Swab)

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The analysis population excluded 99 subjects in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group and 95 subjects in the placebo group who did not have stool analyzed at the outcome visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Trimethoprim-SulfamethoxazolePresence of E.Coli Resistant to Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) (Based on Rectal Swab)56 participants
PlaceboPresence of E.Coli Resistant to Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) (Based on Rectal Swab)41 participants
p-value: 0.065Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Recurrent Febrile or Symptomatic UTI With Any Resistant Pathogen

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The analysis population is restricted to the 38 subjects in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) group and 69 subjects in the placebo group who had a recurrent UTI with an organism for which sensitivity to TMP-SMZ was assessed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Trimethoprim-SulfamethoxazoleRecurrent Febrile or Symptomatic UTI With Any Resistant Pathogen26 participants
PlaceboRecurrent Febrile or Symptomatic UTI With Any Resistant Pathogen17 participants
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Recurrent Febrile or Symptomatic UTI With Resistant E. Coli

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The analysis population is restricted to the 30 subjects in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) group and 57 subjects in the placebo group who had a recurrent UTI with E. coli for which sensitivity to TMP-SMZ was assessed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Trimethoprim-SulfamethoxazoleRecurrent Febrile or Symptomatic UTI With Resistant E. Coli19 participants
PlaceboRecurrent Febrile or Symptomatic UTI With Resistant E. Coli11 participants
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Severe Renal Scarring on Outcome Scan

Severe renal scarring was defined as scarring in more than 4 of 12 segments in at least one kidney or global atrophy characterized by diffusely scarred and shrunken kidney. Outcome DMSA scan performed at 2 years after enrollment or 3-4 months after the child had met treatment failure criteria.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: The analysis population excluded 75 subjects in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group and 70 subjects in the placebo group who did not have an outcome dimercaptosuccinic acid scan.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Trimethoprim-SulfamethoxazoleSevere Renal Scarring on Outcome Scan9 participants
PlaceboSevere Renal Scarring on Outcome Scan6 participants
p-value: 0.37Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Treatment Failure Composite

Treatment failure was defined as the occurrence of two febrile urinary tract infections (UTIs), one febrile UTI and three symptomatic UTIs, four symptomatic UTIs, or new or worsening renal scarring on an interim scan (e.g,, the 12-month visit); renal scans from the 2-year visit are NOT considered in the treatment failure criteria.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Trimethoprim-SulfamethoxazoleTreatment Failure Composite14 participants
PlaceboTreatment Failure Composite27 participants
p-value: 0.04Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026