Skip to content

The Glucosamine-study: The Effect of Glucosamine in Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain

Phase 4 Study of Glucosamine Sulphate in the Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain Patients With Degenerative Lumbar MRI Findings

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00404079
Enrollment
250
Registered
2006-11-27
Start date
2006-12-31
Completion date
2010-11-30
Last updated
2011-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Chronic low back pain

Brief summary

Low back pain (LBP) is the most frequent cause of sick leave and disability pension, and degenerative and osteoarthritic (OA) changes is a significant cause of pain and disability. Some indications exist for symptomatic and possible cartilage-structurmodifying effect on knee- and hip-osteoarthritis with glucosamine sulphate (GS). The OA process in the lumbar spine is most likely to OA processes in knees and hips, hence GS could have comparable symptomatic and structural effect on lumbar OA. Study hypothesis: No difference in treatment effect exists between oral intake of GS- or placebo-capsules for patients' with chronic low back pain measured with Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Interventions

Oral intake of 1500 mg glucosamine sulfate(from Pharma Nord) daily for 6 months

DRUGPlacebo

Oral intake of 3 placebo capsules (similiar looking to the glucosamine sulfate capsules)daily for 6 months

Sponsors

Stiftelsen Helse og Rehabilitering
CollaboratorOTHER
Ullevaal University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Low back pain for more than 6 months * Patient older than 25 years old * MRI findings comparable with lumbar degenerative/osteoarthritic changes.

Exclusion criteria

* Spinal stenosis with neurological deficits * Spinal prolapse with neurological deficits * Rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, * Old lumbar fractures * Chronic pain syndromes (e.g. fibromyalgia) * Psychosocial status not suitable for participation * Pregnancy * Breastfeeding * Allergic to shellfish

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire1 yearThe primary outcome was scores on the Norwegian version of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). RMDQ is a widely used back-specific, self-administered measure of pain-related disability. Greater levels of disability give higher numbers on a 24-point scale. RMDQ has content and construct validity and internal consistency. It is also reproducible and sensitive to change over time for LBP patients. A 3-point reduction in the total RMDQ was a priori classified as a response to treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Visual Analogue Scale1 year
EuroQol-5D1 year

Countries

Norway

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The trial was conducted at Oslo University Hospital Outpatient Clinic. Recruitment occurred between December 2006 and July 2008 in Oslo Norway, mostly via referrals by general practitioners, physiotherapists, and chiropractors.

Pre-assignment details

Trial participation required no wash out, run-in or transtion phase. Patients were excluded if they fulfilled any of the exclusion criteria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Glucosamine Sulphate
The glucosamine sulphate (1500 mg) was taken daily and oral in capsule forms for 6 months
125
Placebo
Placebo was taken daily and orally in capsule forms for 6 months
125
Total250

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to follow up, adverse event etc2220

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGlucosamine SulphatePlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants10 Participants22 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
113 Participants115 Participants228 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Norway
125 participants125 participants250 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
54 Participants67 Participants121 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
71 Participants58 Participants129 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1250 / 125
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1250 / 125

Outcome results

Primary

Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

The primary outcome was scores on the Norwegian version of Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). RMDQ is a widely used back-specific, self-administered measure of pain-related disability. Greater levels of disability give higher numbers on a 24-point scale. RMDQ has content and construct validity and internal consistency. It is also reproducible and sensitive to change over time for LBP patients. A 3-point reduction in the total RMDQ was a priori classified as a response to treatment.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: The number of participants for analysis followed the intention to treat principle. Imputation was performed with mulitple imputation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboRoland Morris Disability Questionnaire9 units on a scale (0-24)Standard Deviation 4
Glucosamine SulphateRoland Morris Disability Questionnaire9 units on a scale (0-24)Standard Deviation 4
Comparison: Null hypothesis was glucosamine sulfate is not superior to placebo to reduce pain and disability associated with chronic low back pain. Power calculation was based on a 3 point difference between the groups with the primary outcome. Data was analysed with linear mixed modelsp-value: 0.05Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

EuroQol-5D

Time frame: 1 year

Secondary

Visual Analogue Scale

Time frame: 1 year

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026