Skip to content

Sequential Therapy Versus Triple Therapy for Helicobacter Pylori Eradication: a Placebo-controlled Trial

Sequential Therapy Versus Triple Therapy for Helicobacter Pylori Eradication: a Placebo-controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00403364
Enrollment
300
Registered
2006-11-23
Start date
2003-07-31
Completion date
2006-02-28
Last updated
2021-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Helicobacter Pylori Infection

Keywords

Helicobacter pylori infection, Treatment, Double blind placebo controlled trial

Brief summary

To assess if a sequential treatment regimen better eradicates H. pylori than does a triple drug regimen in adults with dyspepsia or peptic ulcer disease.

Detailed description

Background: Antimicrobial resistance has decreased eradication rates for H. pylori worldwide. Objective: To assess if a sequential treatment regimen better eradicates H. pylori than does a triple drug regimen in adults with dyspepsia or peptic ulcer disease. Design: Placebo-controlled trial. Setting: Two Italian Hospitals between September 2003 and April 2006. Patients: 300 dyspeptic or peptic ulcer patients Measurements: 13C urea breath test, upper endoscopy, histology, rapid urease test, bacterial culture, and antibiotic resistance assessment. Intervention: 10-day sequential regimen (pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1 g plus placebo for the first 5 days, followed by pantoprazole 40 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 500 mg for the remaining 5 days) in 150 patients or standard 10-day therapy (pantoprazole 40 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and amoxicillin 1 g) in 150 patients. All drugs were given twice daily. Results: There were 295 patients (Intent to treat) of whom 91% (95% CI: 86.5-95.7) had successful eradication with sequential therapy compared to 78% (95% CI: 71.2-84.5) for standard therapy (difference: 13.3%; 95%). The sequential therapy was significantly more effective in patients with clarithromycin resistant strains (88.9% patients vs. 28.6%; P = 0.0034). The incidence of major and minor side effects did not differ between therapy groups (17% vs. 17%). Limitations: Follow-up was incomplete in 4.6% and 2.7% patients in sequential and standard therapy, respectively. The higher efficacy of sequential regimen should be confirmed outside Italy. Conclusions: Sequential therapy is superior to conventional therapy for the eradication of H. pylori and it is significantly more effective in patients harbouring clarithromycin resistant strains. The incidence side effects did not differ between therapy groups.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo amoxicillin pantoprazole clarithromycin tinidazole

Sponsors

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Helicobacter pylori infected patients \> 18 years

Exclusion criteria

* previous H. pylori eradication treatment; * Use of proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists, bismuth preparations and antibiotics in the previous 4 weeks; * Concomitant anticoagulant or ketoconazole use, due to the potential of interaction with the study medications; * Zollinger-Ellison syndrome; * Previous surgery of the esophagus and/or upper gastrointestinal tract (with the exception of appendectomy, polypectomy and cholecystectomy); * Severe or unstable cardiovascular, pulmonary, or endocrine disease; clinically significant renal or hepatic disease or dysfunction; hematological disorder; any other clinically significant medical condition that could increase the risk to the study participants; malignant disease of any kind during the previous 5 years except for successfully treated skin (basal or squamous cell) cancer or Barrett esophagus with high grade dysplasia; * Drug or medication abuse within the past year; * Severe psychiatric or neurological disorders; * Pregnant or nursing women sexually active women of child bearing potential who were not willing to practice medically acceptable contraception (oral contraceptives; inject able/implantable or mechanical devices as well as vasectomy of the sexual partner) for the entire duration of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
13C urea breath test, upper endoscopy, histology, rapid urease test assessment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
bacterial culture, and antibiotic resistance assessment

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 7, 2026