Skip to content

Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation

Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00400972
Enrollment
70
Registered
2006-11-17
Start date
2006-11-30
Completion date
2007-09-30
Last updated
2021-10-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasal Intubation

Keywords

GlideScope, videolaryngoscopy, intubation, nasal, nasotracheal, laryngoscopy, anesthesia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether nasal intubation assisted by GlideScope videolaryngoscopy is faster, easier, and less traumatic than nasal intubation with conventional direct laryngoscopy.

Interventions

Sponsors

London Health Sciences Centre
CollaboratorOTHER
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* any patient who is at least 18 years old * patient requires nasal intubation for surgical indications * operator has performed at least 10 prior GlideScope intubations (oral or nasal)

Exclusion criteria

* cervical spine abnormalities * known difficult airway * requires rapid sequence induction * any other patient in whom the attending anesthesiologist believes usage of the GlideScope is contraindicated

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
time to intubation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
ease of intubation (VAS)
incidence of trauma
number of failures
severity of patient sore throat on post-operative day 1

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026