Skip to content

Client Centred 'Tune-ups': do They Enhance Community Reintegration After Stroke?

Client Centred 'Tune-ups': do They Enhance Community Reintegration and Mobility in Stroke Survivors?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00400712
Enrollment
103
Registered
2006-11-17
Start date
2006-12-31
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2016-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

mobility, strength, balance, function, reintegration, community

Brief summary

Once discharged from hospital many stroke survivors deteriorate medically, physically and in their mobility function and many report their level of function and quality of life to be poor 12 months after inpatient rehabilitation. There is an identified need for follow-up examinations of community dwelling stroke survivors to monitor changes in function and it has been suggested that maintenance therapy could curtail declines in function. The purpose of this trial is to determine whether brief periods of intense client-centered rehabilitation therapy (tune-ups) provided at 6 month intervals can alter the natural progression of impairment (physical capacity), function and community reintegration following stroke.

Detailed description

The extent to which impairment (physical capacity) and function influence community reintegration is unclear. One of the challenges is that physical parameters change over time as does the person's awareness and perception of what activities are important to be able to engage in at the community level. Interventions have led to gains in physical capacity, function and community reintegration, but the benefits have been shown to dissipate within three to six months. It has been suggested that maintenance therapy (tune-ups) for stroke survivors post-discharge could prevent or curtail decline in function of aging stroke survivors and enhance quality of life and well being; constructs that relate strongly to community reintegration. This study will determine whether tune-ups can alter the time course and magnitude of changes in physical capacity and function and their influence on community reintegration. Stroke survivors discharged from rehabilitation will be followed for a 15 month period with laboratory or home assessments conducted at 3 month intervals. Assessors will be blind to whether the subject is receiving a tune up. Evaluations conducted after the tune-up at 9 months and 12 months post-discharge will allow us to determine if the tune-up effectively reduced physical impairment, improved function and resulted in better community reintegration compared to control.

Interventions

two weeks intensive physical rehabilitation

Sponsors

Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario
CollaboratorOTHER
Queen's University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* first major unilateral hemispheric stroke, * english speaking, * adequate verbal communication, * discharged home or residential care

Exclusion criteria

* serious comorbidities (eg. cancer, mobility limiting arthritis, leg amputation)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO)baseline and 1 yearThe SIPSO is a 10-item measure developed specifically for stroke that includes a Physical Integration Subscale relating to activities and daily living and a Social Integration subscale relating to social adaptation. Each item is assessed on an ordinal scale from 0 (cannot perform the task or activity/completely dissatisfied) to 4 (no difficultly/completely satisfied) such that the minimum score is 0 and the maximum for each subscale is 20 and the maximum total score is 40 (sum of subscales). The total score reflects reintegration.
Subjective Index of Social Integration (Subscale of SIPSO)baseline and one yearsee Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO) above
Subjective Index of Physical Integration (Subscale of SIPSO)baseline and one yearsee 'Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO) above

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mobility Functionbaseline and 1 yearTimed up and go - participants stand from a seated position on a chair with armrests, walk 3 meters, turn and return to a seated position (measured in seconds)
Health-related Quality of Life - Mentalbaseline and one yearThe SF-36 contains 36 questions pertaining to 8 health-related domains (physical and social function, emotional and physical limitation (role-emotional/role-physical), mental health, vitality, bodily pain, and general health). The derivation of the Mental component summary (MCS) score takes into account the mental health domains (social function, role-emotional and mental health) and scores self-reported mental health on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 is the lowest rating of mental health and 100, the highest.
Physical Capacitybaseline and 12 months6 minute walk test (6MWT). Subjects were instructed to walk as far as possible over 6 minutes with rests as needed and the distance traveled was recorded.
Health-related Quality of Life - Physicalbaseline and one yearThe SF-36 contains 36 questions pertaining to 8 health-related domains (physical and social function, emotional and physical limitation (role-emotional/role-physical), mental health, vitality, bodily pain, and general health). The derivation of the Physical component summary (PCS) score takes into account the physical health domains (physical function, role-physical and bodily pain) and scores self-reported physical health on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 is the lowest rating of physical health and 100, the highest or best.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control
natural progression post-stroke
52
Intervention
two weeks of goal directed intensive physical rehabilitation therapy at 6 months (and one year) physical rehabilitation: two weeks intensive physical rehabilitation
51
Total103

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision54
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1112

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalInterventionControl
Admission Functional Independence98.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.7
100.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.1
96.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.4
Age, Continuous62.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
62.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
62.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
Balance ability46.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
47.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
45.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
living setting pre-stroke
other
2 participants1 participants1 participants
living setting pre-stroke
private home
101 participants50 participants51 participants
mental status (MMSE)28 points
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
28 points
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
28 points
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
paretic side
left hemiparesis
66 participants29 participants37 participants
paretic side
right hemiparesis
37 participants22 participants15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
49 Participants27 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
54 Participants24 Participants30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 520 / 51
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 520 / 51

Outcome results

Primary

Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO)

The SIPSO is a 10-item measure developed specifically for stroke that includes a Physical Integration Subscale relating to activities and daily living and a Social Integration subscale relating to social adaptation. Each item is assessed on an ordinal scale from 0 (cannot perform the task or activity/completely dissatisfied) to 4 (no difficultly/completely satisfied) such that the minimum score is 0 and the maximum for each subscale is 20 and the maximum total score is 40 (sum of subscales). The total score reflects reintegration.

Time frame: baseline and 1 year

Population: those who completed 1 year testing

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlSubjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO)baseline26.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
ControlSubjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO)one year29.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
InterventionSubjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO)baseline26.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
InterventionSubjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO)one year30.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
p-value: 0.44ANCOVA
Primary

Subjective Index of Physical Integration (Subscale of SIPSO)

see 'Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO) above

Time frame: baseline and one year

Population: those who completed 1 year testing

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlSubjective Index of Physical Integration (Subscale of SIPSO)Baseline12.9 points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
ControlSubjective Index of Physical Integration (Subscale of SIPSO)One year15.2 points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
InterventionSubjective Index of Physical Integration (Subscale of SIPSO)Baseline12.8 points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
InterventionSubjective Index of Physical Integration (Subscale of SIPSO)One year15.4 points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
p-value: 0.78ANCOVA
Primary

Subjective Index of Social Integration (Subscale of SIPSO)

see Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO) above

Time frame: baseline and one year

Population: those who completed 1 year testing

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlSubjective Index of Social Integration (Subscale of SIPSO)Baseline13.8 points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
ControlSubjective Index of Social Integration (Subscale of SIPSO)One year14.4 points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
InterventionSubjective Index of Social Integration (Subscale of SIPSO)Baseline14.0 points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
InterventionSubjective Index of Social Integration (Subscale of SIPSO)One year14.7 points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
p-value: 0.66ANCOVA
Secondary

Health-related Quality of Life - Mental

The SF-36 contains 36 questions pertaining to 8 health-related domains (physical and social function, emotional and physical limitation (role-emotional/role-physical), mental health, vitality, bodily pain, and general health). The derivation of the Mental component summary (MCS) score takes into account the mental health domains (social function, role-emotional and mental health) and scores self-reported mental health on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 is the lowest rating of mental health and 100, the highest.

Time frame: baseline and one year

Population: those enrolled at 1 year (primary endpoint)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlHealth-related Quality of Life - MentalBaseline48.0 pointsStandard Deviation 2
ControlHealth-related Quality of Life - MentalOne year52.8 pointsStandard Deviation 1.3
InterventionHealth-related Quality of Life - MentalBaseline49.3 pointsStandard Deviation 1.6
InterventionHealth-related Quality of Life - MentalOne year51.2 pointsStandard Deviation 1.4
p-value: 0.6ANCOVA
Secondary

Health-related Quality of Life - Physical

The SF-36 contains 36 questions pertaining to 8 health-related domains (physical and social function, emotional and physical limitation (role-emotional/role-physical), mental health, vitality, bodily pain, and general health). The derivation of the Physical component summary (PCS) score takes into account the physical health domains (physical function, role-physical and bodily pain) and scores self-reported physical health on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 is the lowest rating of physical health and 100, the highest or best.

Time frame: baseline and one year

Population: those enrolled at primary endpoint (one year)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlHealth-related Quality of Life - PhysicalBaseline35.7 pointsStandard Deviation 1.2
ControlHealth-related Quality of Life - PhysicalOne year42.0 pointsStandard Deviation 1.1
InterventionHealth-related Quality of Life - PhysicalBaseline36.4 pointsStandard Deviation 1.3
InterventionHealth-related Quality of Life - PhysicalOne year40.3 pointsStandard Deviation 1.2
p-value: 0.72ANCOVA
Secondary

Mobility Function

Timed up and go - participants stand from a seated position on a chair with armrests, walk 3 meters, turn and return to a seated position (measured in seconds)

Time frame: baseline and 1 year

Population: those still enrolled at primary endpoint (one year)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlMobility FunctionBaseline23.1 secondsStandard Deviation 3.4
ControlMobility FunctionOne year18.7 secondsStandard Deviation 2
InterventionMobility FunctionBaseline19.9 secondsStandard Deviation 3.4
InterventionMobility FunctionOne year19.7 secondsStandard Deviation 2
p-value: 0.83ANCOVA
Secondary

Physical Capacity

6 minute walk test (6MWT). Subjects were instructed to walk as far as possible over 6 minutes with rests as needed and the distance traveled was recorded.

Time frame: baseline and 12 months

Population: all those enrolled at primary endpoint - 1 year

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlPhysical CapacityBaseline258.9 metersStandard Deviation 23.9
ControlPhysical CapacityOne year332.0 metersStandard Deviation 19.2
InterventionPhysical CapacityBaseline285.1 metersStandard Deviation 25.1
InterventionPhysical CapacityOne year338.1 metersStandard Deviation 20.2
Comparison: ANCOVA - comparing absolute measures and including baseline as co-variatep-value: 0.45ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026