Skip to content

Evaluation of Safety and Activity of Celaderm in Healing Venous Leg Ulcers

An Initial Evaluation Of The Safety And Activity Of Celaderm(TM) Treatment Regimens In Healing Venous Leg Ulcers

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00399308
Enrollment
40
Registered
2006-11-14
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2008-04-30
Last updated
2021-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leg Ulcer, Varicose Ulcer

Keywords

wound, leg, venous, chronic, wound healing

Brief summary

This pilot study was designed to test the safety of Celaderm(TM) in treating venous leg ulcers and to give preliminary information about the efficacy of two different Celaderm(TM) dosing regimens.

Detailed description

Celaderm(TM) weekly for four weeks or biweekly for four treatments combined with Profore(R) compression vs. Profore(R) compression alone.

Interventions

DEVICECeladerm (Frozen Cultured Epidermal Allograft)

Four biweekly applications of Celaderm plus compression therapy

DEVICEControl (compression bandaging)

Multi-layer compression bandaging

Sponsors

Shire
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* venous ulcer \> 1 month and \< 12 months in duration; 2 to 20 sq cm in surface area; not infected * confirmatory venous ultrasound showing prior DVT and concurrent venous reflux * ankle-brachial index 0.80 or greater

Exclusion criteria

* cutaneous malignancy * recent treatment with corticosteroids or chemotherapeutic agents * wound exposed bone, tendon or neurovascular structure * wound infected and requiring antibiotics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Efficacy: Cumulative Proportion of Patients Completely Healed by the End of the Treatment Period, as Judged by the Investigator's Direct Observation.12 weeksThe primary efficacy observation was the proportion of wounds that achieved complete wound closure after 12 weeks of active treatment (i.e. of of Week 15 including screening/wash-in phase.)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary Efficacy: Proportion of Patients Achieving 90% Re-epithelialization After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment.12 WeeksRe-epithelialization was judged by the Medical Monitor based upon computerized planimetry of serial wound photographs.
Secondary Efficacy: Durability of Wound Closure Through 12 Weeks After the End of the Treatment Period.Variable - minimum of 12 weeks of follow-up.The proportion of patients who had a recurrence of the study ulcer during follow-up after achieving wound closure during the active treatment period.
Secondary Efficacy: Cumulative Proportion of Patients Completely Healed by the End of the Follow-up Period (24 Weeks).24 weeksThe proportion of patients achieving wound closure by the end of the study follow-up period, 90 days after the end of the active treatment period.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

An enrollment of 55 patients was planned to produce an expected yield of approximately 45 evaluable patients at up to nine study centers.

Pre-assignment details

72 patients were consented in this study. Eighteen failed screening: eight had HbA1c \> 7%; six failed wound size criteria; one was positive for HIV; one had a normal venous ultrasound; and two withdrew consent. Of the remaining 54 patients, 14 were not randomized: 11 healed \> 50% during screening; one had a severe AE; and two more withdrew.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group I - Weekly Celaderm
Weekly topical applications of Celaderm, up to a maximum of four (4) applications, in combination with Adaptic and Profore four-layer compression dressing
13
Group II - Bi-weekly Celaderm
Bi-weekly topical applications of Celaderm, up to a maximum of four (4) applications, in combination with Adaptic and Profore four-layer compression dressing
15
Group III - Control
Adaptic and Profore four-layer compression dressing
12
Total40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup II - Bi-weekly CeladermGroup III - ControlGroup I - Weekly CeladermTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants3 Participants7 Participants11 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
14 Participants9 Participants6 Participants29 Participants
Age, Continuous60.40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.75
64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.85
67.54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.65
65.28 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 Participants12 Participants13 Participants40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants4 Participants3 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants8 Participants10 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 132 / 152 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 132 / 155 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Primary Efficacy: Cumulative Proportion of Patients Completely Healed by the End of the Treatment Period, as Judged by the Investigator's Direct Observation.

The primary efficacy observation was the proportion of wounds that achieved complete wound closure after 12 weeks of active treatment (i.e. of of Week 15 including screening/wash-in phase.)

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Intent-to-Treat population (i.e. all subjects randomized to treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group I - Weekly CeladermPrimary Efficacy: Cumulative Proportion of Patients Completely Healed by the End of the Treatment Period, as Judged by the Investigator's Direct Observation.1 participants
Group II - Bi-weekly CeladermPrimary Efficacy: Cumulative Proportion of Patients Completely Healed by the End of the Treatment Period, as Judged by the Investigator's Direct Observation.4 participants
Group III - ControlPrimary Efficacy: Cumulative Proportion of Patients Completely Healed by the End of the Treatment Period, as Judged by the Investigator's Direct Observation.3 participants
Secondary

Secondary Efficacy: Cumulative Proportion of Patients Completely Healed by the End of the Follow-up Period (24 Weeks).

The proportion of patients achieving wound closure by the end of the study follow-up period, 90 days after the end of the active treatment period.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Intent-to-Treat population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group I - Weekly CeladermSecondary Efficacy: Cumulative Proportion of Patients Completely Healed by the End of the Follow-up Period (24 Weeks).3 participants
Group II - Bi-weekly CeladermSecondary Efficacy: Cumulative Proportion of Patients Completely Healed by the End of the Follow-up Period (24 Weeks).7 participants
Group III - ControlSecondary Efficacy: Cumulative Proportion of Patients Completely Healed by the End of the Follow-up Period (24 Weeks).5 participants
Secondary

Secondary Efficacy: Durability of Wound Closure Through 12 Weeks After the End of the Treatment Period.

The proportion of patients who had a recurrence of the study ulcer during follow-up after achieving wound closure during the active treatment period.

Time frame: Variable - minimum of 12 weeks of follow-up.

Population: Intent-to-treat population achieving primary outcome

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group I - Weekly CeladermSecondary Efficacy: Durability of Wound Closure Through 12 Weeks After the End of the Treatment Period.0 participants
Group II - Bi-weekly CeladermSecondary Efficacy: Durability of Wound Closure Through 12 Weeks After the End of the Treatment Period.1 participants
Group III - ControlSecondary Efficacy: Durability of Wound Closure Through 12 Weeks After the End of the Treatment Period.0 participants
Secondary

Secondary Efficacy: Proportion of Patients Achieving 90% Re-epithelialization After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment.

Re-epithelialization was judged by the Medical Monitor based upon computerized planimetry of serial wound photographs.

Time frame: 12 Weeks

Population: Intent-to-Treat population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group I - Weekly CeladermSecondary Efficacy: Proportion of Patients Achieving 90% Re-epithelialization After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment.1 participants
Group II - Bi-weekly CeladermSecondary Efficacy: Proportion of Patients Achieving 90% Re-epithelialization After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment.5 participants
Group III - ControlSecondary Efficacy: Proportion of Patients Achieving 90% Re-epithelialization After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment.3 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026