Skip to content

Effect of Chromium Picolinate on Insulin Sensitivity in Type 2 Diabetes

Chromium and Insulin Action

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00398853
Enrollment
100
Registered
2006-11-14
Start date
2003-10-31
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2016-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

insulin, glucose, chromium

Brief summary

The effect of Chromium to improve glucose levels in diabetes is controversial. The hypothesis of the study was to evaluate the effect of supplementing the diet of individuals with Type 2 diabetes with chromium picolinate and assessing the effect of the supplementation on insulin sensitivity as assessed with hyperinsulinemic clamps

Detailed description

Detailed Description: The primary clinical strategy to improve metabolic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes consists of lifestyle modification combined with pharmacologic intervention. However, alternative strategies, e.g. nutritional supplementation with over-the-counter agents, are extensively practiced by a large number of patients and are frequently undertaken without first informing the medical provider. Unfortunately, considerable controversy exists regarding use of dietary supplements in subjects with diabetes because efficacy data for many of the supplements consists of only uncontrolled studies and anecdotal reports. As such, there is a paucity of data in humans in regard to the effect of most commercially available supplements to improve metabolic abnormalities. One supplement that has attracted considerable clinical interest is chromium (Cr). However, routine use of Cr in subjects with diabetes is not currently recommended. In part, the controversy surrounding Cr supplementation stems from the lack of definitive randomized trials, the lack of gold standard techniques to assess glucose metabolism in the studies reported, the use of differing doses and formulation , and the study of heterogeneous study populations. As such, conflicting data has been reported that has contributed greatly to the confusion among healthcare providers concerning Cr supplementation. In order to provide a comprehensive clinical evaluation of Cr, we conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in subjects with Type 2 diabetes. Individuals had baseline measures consisting of oral glucose tolerance testing, body fat and adiposity assessed, and then used established techniques to assess insulin sensitivity with hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps. Individuals were evaluated for 6 months at which time repeat testing was done.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTchromium picolinate 1000 mcg daily vs placebo

chromium picolinate 1000 mcg daily vs placebo

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo

Sponsors

Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Type 2 diabetes * On no meds to alter glucose metabolism * age greater than 25 years old * Fasting glucose greater than 125 mg/dl at screening

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects on insulin * Sujbects on meds that alter glucose metabolism * Use of glitazones * C0-existing disorders in major organ systems such as heart, kidneys, liver

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Insulin Sensitivity as assessed with hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clampsat study enpoints

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
glucose controlat study endpoints
body weight and fat distribution, myocellular and intrahepatic lipid content as assessed with MRS scansat study endpoints

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026