Skip to content

Prevention of Hip Fractures With Soft and Hard Hip Protectors

Compliance With and Effect of Soft and Hard Hip Protectors in Norwegian Nursing Homes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00397410
Enrollment
1236
Registered
2006-11-09
Start date
2005-05-31
Completion date
2007-12-31
Last updated
2012-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Fractures, Prevention

Keywords

hip protectors, uptake and adherence, Nursing home residents, efficacy, prevention

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compliance with and effect of soft and hard hip protectors in Norwegian nursing homes.

Detailed description

Hip fractures are a major cause of disability and functional limitation. Hip protectors have shown to have the potential to lower the risk of a fracture by reducing the impact on the hip region during falls, but low uptake and adherence have been a problem. Changing the hip protector's design might give a higher uptake and adherence. The aim of this study is to compare uptake, adherence and effect of soft and hard hip protectors in Norwegian nursing homes. Because a soft hip protector seems to be more comfortable, we expect a higher uptake and adherence with the soft hip protector, specially when it comes to 24 hour use. If the soft hip protector has the same protective quality as the hard hip protector, the soft hip protector will be a better alternative than the hard one. This cluster randomized study is performed in 18 Norwegian nursing homes in 2 municipalities. The study started May 15. 2006 and will end November 30. 2006. All permanent residents are invited to participate in the study either as a user of hip protector or as a non user.

Interventions

DEVICEHip protectors

Sponsors

Oslo University College
CollaboratorOTHER
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* all permanent residents in the the participating nursing homes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Uptake and adherence with soft and hard hip protectors
Effect of soft and hard hip protectors in protected and unprotected falls

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026