Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Circadin® 2 mg in the Treatment of Primary Insomnia Patients

A Double-blind, Parallel Group, Randomised, Placebo Controlled Study of Efficacy and Safety of Circadin® 2 mg in the Treatment of Insomnia Patients With Low Endogenous Melatonin

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00397189
Enrollment
930
Registered
2006-11-08
Start date
2006-10-31
Completion date
2009-04-30
Last updated
2018-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Insomnia

Keywords

Primary insomnia as defined by DSM IV criteria

Brief summary

This is a randomised, placebo controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of a 3 week treatment period with Circadin® 2 mg in shortening sleep latency in patients with primary insomnia aged 18-80 with melatonin deficiency.

Detailed description

Studies throughout the world have shown that insomnia is a common complaint that occurs in 10-50% of the population depending on age, sex and country. Among the wide variety of available treatments of sleep disturbances, the most commonly prescribed hypnotics are the benzodiazepines (BZD) and non-BZD hypnotics. However, these hypnotics were often associated with rebound, dependency, tolerance, higher risk of falls mainly in the elderly population, anterograde memory disturbances and increased risk for motor accidents the next day. In response to the unmet clinical need for a safe and efficacious alternative treatment for primary insomnia, that in addition to treating quantitative sleep problems, would improve sleep quality and daytime functioning, a clinical development program on melatonin for the treatment of primary insomnia was initiated. This study is conducted using a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled parallel group design, after a single-blind placebo period. Primary insomnia patients aged 18-80 will be screened for entry into the study. After the initial 3 weeks double-blind treatment period, patients will be given the option to enter a six-month double-blind continuation study. Primary parameter is sleep latency, secondary parameter is sleep maintenance. Exploratory parameters are total sleep time, sleep quality, morning alertness and quality of life.

Interventions

Prolonged release melatonin 2 mg

placebo circadin tablets

Sponsors

Neurim Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female and aged 18-80 years. * Are willing to take a 6-SMT level evaluation test. * Suffering from primary insomnia according to DSM-IV. criteria (307.42 primary insomnia, Appendix 24.3) . * Sleep latency of at least 20 minutes. * Have not been using benzodiazepines (BZD) and non-BZD hypnotics for the past 2 weeks or more. * Have not been using psychotropic treatments for the past 3 months or more. * Are stabilized on non-psychotropic treatments for more than 1 month. * Are willing to sign a written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Use of benzodiazepines or other hypnotics (including psychotropic treatments) during the study and preceding two weeks. * Alcohol intake more than 30 g of pure alcohol per day and any intake after lunch-time. * Pharmacological immunosuppression. * Participation in a clinical trial with any investigational agent within two months prior to study enrollment. * According to DSM IV, subjects belonging to the following groups are excluded: 780.59 (breathing related sleep disorder); 307.45 (circadian rhythm sleep disorder); 307.47 (dyssomnia not otherwise specified); 780.xx (sleep disorder due to general medical condition). * Severe neurological, psychiatric disorders (especially psychosis, anxiety and depression) and alcoholism. * Other serious diseases that could interfere with patient assessment. * Pregnant or breast feeding women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Change From Baseline in Subjective Sleep Latency.Baseline and 3 weeksSleep latency (SL) after 3 weeks of treatment was assessed by Patient Daily Sleep Diary (National sleep foundation sleep diary). The patients reported subjectively of their SL. The Sleep Diary question 3 (SL) was summarised at baseline (end of the two-week run-in period) and after three weeks double-blind treatment (actual and change from baseline) for each treatment group using descriptive statistics. At each visit, the mean of the seven days prior to the visit were used. For each treatment group, the mean score at visit 3 was compared, adjusting for the visit 2 score. An ANCOVA model was used. Lower score indicates reduction in sleep latency and thus considered improvement

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Change From Baseline in Subjective Sleep Maintenance.3 weeksSleep maintenance as measured by number of awakening (NOA) after 3 weeks of treatment was assessed by Patient Daily Sleep Diary (National sleep foundation sleep diary). The patients reported subjectively of their NOA. The Sleep Diary question 4 (NOA) was summarized at baseline (end of the two-week run-in period) and after three weeks double-blind treatment (actual and change from baseline) for each treatment group using descriptive statistics. At each visit, the mean of the seven days prior to the visit were used. For each treatment group, the mean score at visit 3 was compared, adjusting for the visit 2 score. An ANCOVA model was used. Lower score indicates less awakenings and thus considered improvement.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The first patient entered the study on 24 October 2006 and the last patient completed the study (safety follow up) on 2 December 2008 (last patient completed the last visit on 24 October 2008).

Pre-assignment details

930 patients were enrolled into the study and entered the run-in period; 139 of these patients were discontinued during the run-in period. The main reasons for discontinuation from the run-in were unwillingness to continue and ineligible to continue. Treatment periods were 3 weeks double-blind (DB) (1:1) and extension period 26 weeks DB (3:1)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Circadin
Prolonged release melatonin 2 mg. Tablets should be taken 1-2 hours before going to bed.
360
Placebo
Identical tablets to Circadin. Tablets should be taken 1-2 hours before going to bed.
362
Total722

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
3 Weeks PeriodAdverse Event32
3 Weeks PeriodLost to Follow-up54
3 Weeks PeriodOther02
3 Weeks PeriodPhysician Decision02
3 Weeks PeriodProtocol Violation03
3 Weeks PeriodWithdrawal by Subject139

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboCircadinTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
144 Participants137 Participants281 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
218 Participants223 Participants441 Participants
Age, Continuous61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
61.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
362 participants360 participants722 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
244 Participants253 Participants497 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
118 Participants107 Participants225 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
32 / 39442 / 395
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 3943 / 395

Outcome results

Primary

The Change From Baseline in Subjective Sleep Latency.

Sleep latency (SL) after 3 weeks of treatment was assessed by Patient Daily Sleep Diary (National sleep foundation sleep diary). The patients reported subjectively of their SL. The Sleep Diary question 3 (SL) was summarised at baseline (end of the two-week run-in period) and after three weeks double-blind treatment (actual and change from baseline) for each treatment group using descriptive statistics. At each visit, the mean of the seven days prior to the visit were used. For each treatment group, the mean score at visit 3 was compared, adjusting for the visit 2 score. An ANCOVA model was used. Lower score indicates reduction in sleep latency and thus considered improvement

Time frame: Baseline and 3 weeks

Population: Pre-planned analysis on ITT population age 65-80

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CircadinThe Change From Baseline in Subjective Sleep Latency.-19.1 minutesStandard Deviation 47.3
PlaceboThe Change From Baseline in Subjective Sleep Latency.-1.7 minutesStandard Deviation 47.8
Comparison: The analysis was a comparison of sleep latency as measured by the sleep diary at Visit 3 in the ITT 65-80 population, using a linear regression model with terms for treatment (Circadin® 2mg vs. Placebo) and baseline sleep latency.p-value: <0.0595% CI: [-25.3, -6]ANCOVA
Secondary

The Change From Baseline in Subjective Sleep Maintenance.

Sleep maintenance as measured by number of awakening (NOA) after 3 weeks of treatment was assessed by Patient Daily Sleep Diary (National sleep foundation sleep diary). The patients reported subjectively of their NOA. The Sleep Diary question 4 (NOA) was summarized at baseline (end of the two-week run-in period) and after three weeks double-blind treatment (actual and change from baseline) for each treatment group using descriptive statistics. At each visit, the mean of the seven days prior to the visit were used. For each treatment group, the mean score at visit 3 was compared, adjusting for the visit 2 score. An ANCOVA model was used. Lower score indicates less awakenings and thus considered improvement.

Time frame: 3 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
CircadinThe Change From Baseline in Subjective Sleep Maintenance.-0.24 Awakenings
PlaceboThe Change From Baseline in Subjective Sleep Maintenance.-0.09 Awakenings

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 30, 2026