Hypertension
Conditions
Keywords
hypertension, valsartan, atenolol, hydrochlorothiazide, microcirculation, arterial compliance, pulse wave analysis
Brief summary
This study evaluated the effect of valsartan on small vessel blood flow in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension in direct comparison to atenolol and hydrochlorothiazide.
Interventions
100 mg tablets orally once a day (od) in the morning.
12.5 or 25 mg tablets orally once a day (od) in the morning.
80 mg, 160 mg, or 320 mg tablets orally once a day in the morning
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Caucasian; male or female outpatients and age between 40-65 years of age, inclusive. * At Visit 2 all patients must have a mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msSBP) of ≥ 90 mmHg and \< 110 mmHg.
Exclusion criteria
* If a single reading for arterial hypertension in msSBP \> 180 mmHg or msDBP \> 110 mmHg at any visit after randomization. * Inability to discontinue all prior antihypertensive medications safely for a period of 2 weeks prior to randomization. * Known history of hypotensive symptoms or orthostatic hypotension. * Concomitant use of statins or statin intake during the four weeks prior to Visit 1. * Known Keith-Wagener grade III or IV hypertensive retinopathy. * A history of heart failure (NYHA II-IV).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at Acetylcholine (ACH) Injected Sites Compared to NaCl Injected Sites | At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43) | 10 µl of acetylcholine (ACH) at 3 concentrations (10-7, 10-8, 10-9 M) was injected intra-dermally at 3 sites on the forearms. NaCl was injected at 2 sites on the forearms. Microcirculation was measured using laser doppler velocimetry before and 12 times in the 30 minutes following injection. The mean difference of the 12 post-injection measurements to the pre-injection measurement was calculated. Means for the 3 ACH and the 2 NaCl sites were calculated and compared. Microcirculation was measured in perfusion units which is an arbitrary measure specific to each laser doppler scanner. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at Acetylcholine (ACH) Plus L-NMMA Injected Sites Compared to NaCl Injected Sites | At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43) | 10 µl of acetylcholine (ACH) at 3 concentrations (10-7, 10-8, 10-9 M) plus 10 µl L-NMMA (10-6 M) was injected intra-dermally at 3 sites on the forearms. NaCl was injected at 2 sites. Microcirculation was measured using laser doppler velocimetry before and 12 times in the 30 minutes following injection. The mean difference of the 12 post-injection measurements to the pre-injection measurement was calculated. Means for the 3 ACH and the 2 NaCl sites were calculated and compared. Microcirculation was measured in perfusion units which is an arbitrary measure specific to each laser doppler scanner. |
| Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at a Sodium Nitroprusside Injected Site Compared to NaCl Injected Sites | At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43) | 10 µl of sodium nitroprusside at a concentration of 10-7 M was injected intra-dermally at 1 site on the forearms. NaCl was injected at 2 sites on the forearms. Microcirculation was measured using laser doppler velocimetry before and 12 times in the 30 minutes following injection. The mean difference of the 12 post-injection measurements to the pre-injection measurement was calculated. A mean for the 2 NaCl sites was calculated and compared to the sodium nitroprusside mean. Microcirculation was measured in perfusion units which is an arbitrary measure specific to each laser doppler scanner. |
| Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at NaCl Injected Sites | At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43) | 10 µl of NaCl was injected intra-dermally at 2 sites on the forearms. Microcirculation was measured using laser doppler velocimetry before and 12 times in the 30 minutes following injection. The mean difference of the 12 post-injection measurements to the pre-injection measurement was calculated. A mean for the 2 NaCl sites was calculated. Microcirculation was measured in perfusion units which is an arbitrary measure specific to each laser doppler scanner. |
| Arterial Pressure Waveform Augmentation Index at the End of Treatment | At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43) | Using applanation tonometry, the arterial pulse form measured at the wrist was analyzed using computerized pulse wave analysis. The arterial pressure waveform has two components; the first is the forward traveling wave when the left ventricle contracts and the second is the reflected wave returning from the periphery. The augmentation index is the ratio of the first and second systolic peaks and is used as a surrogate measure of arterial stiffness. |
| Arterial Pressure Waveform Pulse Wave Velocity at the End of Treatment | At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43) | Using applanation tonometry, the arterial pulse form measured at the wrist was analyzed using computerized pulse wave analysis. The arterial pressure waveform has two components; the first is the forward traveling wave when the left ventricle contracts and the second is the reflected wave returning from the periphery. Pulse wave velocity is the speed of the forward traveling wave and can be used as a measure of arterial stiffness since the more rigid the wall of the artery, the faster the wave moves. |
Countries
Germany, Switzerland
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Entire Study Population Includes patients that received valsartan followed by atenolol + hydrochlorothiazide and patients that received atenolol + hydrochlorothiazide followed by valsartan. | 30 |
| Total | 30 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Treatment Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 2 |
| Second Treatment Period | Adverse Event | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Entire Study Population |
|---|---|
| Age Continuous | 52.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 11 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 19 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 16 / 28 | 12 / 30 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 28 | 1 / 30 |
Outcome results
Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at Acetylcholine (ACH) Injected Sites Compared to NaCl Injected Sites
10 µl of acetylcholine (ACH) at 3 concentrations (10-7, 10-8, 10-9 M) was injected intra-dermally at 3 sites on the forearms. NaCl was injected at 2 sites on the forearms. Microcirculation was measured using laser doppler velocimetry before and 12 times in the 30 minutes following injection. The mean difference of the 12 post-injection measurements to the pre-injection measurement was calculated. Means for the 3 ACH and the 2 NaCl sites were calculated and compared. Microcirculation was measured in perfusion units which is an arbitrary measure specific to each laser doppler scanner.
Time frame: At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients with at least one valid post-baseline primary efficacy measurement in both treatment periods.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valsartan | Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at Acetylcholine (ACH) Injected Sites Compared to NaCl Injected Sites | 61.21 Perfusion units | Standard Deviation 38.11 |
| Atenolol + Hydrochlorothiazide | Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at Acetylcholine (ACH) Injected Sites Compared to NaCl Injected Sites | 61.04 Perfusion units | Standard Deviation 49.16 |
Arterial Pressure Waveform Augmentation Index at the End of Treatment
Using applanation tonometry, the arterial pulse form measured at the wrist was analyzed using computerized pulse wave analysis. The arterial pressure waveform has two components; the first is the forward traveling wave when the left ventricle contracts and the second is the reflected wave returning from the periphery. The augmentation index is the ratio of the first and second systolic peaks and is used as a surrogate measure of arterial stiffness.
Time frame: At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients with at least one valid post-baseline primary efficacy measurement in both treatment periods.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valsartan | Arterial Pressure Waveform Augmentation Index at the End of Treatment | 139.05 Ratio | Standard Deviation 20.64 |
| Atenolol + Hydrochlorothiazide | Arterial Pressure Waveform Augmentation Index at the End of Treatment | 144.51 Ratio | Standard Deviation 21.97 |
Arterial Pressure Waveform Pulse Wave Velocity at the End of Treatment
Using applanation tonometry, the arterial pulse form measured at the wrist was analyzed using computerized pulse wave analysis. The arterial pressure waveform has two components; the first is the forward traveling wave when the left ventricle contracts and the second is the reflected wave returning from the periphery. Pulse wave velocity is the speed of the forward traveling wave and can be used as a measure of arterial stiffness since the more rigid the wall of the artery, the faster the wave moves.
Time frame: At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients with at least one valid post-baseline primary efficacy measurement in both treatment periods.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valsartan | Arterial Pressure Waveform Pulse Wave Velocity at the End of Treatment | 8.07 Meters per second | Standard Deviation 1.28 |
| Atenolol + Hydrochlorothiazide | Arterial Pressure Waveform Pulse Wave Velocity at the End of Treatment | 7.60 Meters per second | Standard Deviation 1.18 |
Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at Acetylcholine (ACH) Plus L-NMMA Injected Sites Compared to NaCl Injected Sites
10 µl of acetylcholine (ACH) at 3 concentrations (10-7, 10-8, 10-9 M) plus 10 µl L-NMMA (10-6 M) was injected intra-dermally at 3 sites on the forearms. NaCl was injected at 2 sites. Microcirculation was measured using laser doppler velocimetry before and 12 times in the 30 minutes following injection. The mean difference of the 12 post-injection measurements to the pre-injection measurement was calculated. Means for the 3 ACH and the 2 NaCl sites were calculated and compared. Microcirculation was measured in perfusion units which is an arbitrary measure specific to each laser doppler scanner.
Time frame: At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients with at least one valid post-baseline primary efficacy measurement in both treatment periods.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valsartan | Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at Acetylcholine (ACH) Plus L-NMMA Injected Sites Compared to NaCl Injected Sites | -9.11 Perfusion units | Standard Deviation 22.19 |
| Atenolol + Hydrochlorothiazide | Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at Acetylcholine (ACH) Plus L-NMMA Injected Sites Compared to NaCl Injected Sites | -5.60 Perfusion units | Standard Deviation 40.47 |
Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at a Sodium Nitroprusside Injected Site Compared to NaCl Injected Sites
10 µl of sodium nitroprusside at a concentration of 10-7 M was injected intra-dermally at 1 site on the forearms. NaCl was injected at 2 sites on the forearms. Microcirculation was measured using laser doppler velocimetry before and 12 times in the 30 minutes following injection. The mean difference of the 12 post-injection measurements to the pre-injection measurement was calculated. A mean for the 2 NaCl sites was calculated and compared to the sodium nitroprusside mean. Microcirculation was measured in perfusion units which is an arbitrary measure specific to each laser doppler scanner.
Time frame: At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients with at least one valid post-baseline primary efficacy measurement in both treatment periods.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valsartan | Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at a Sodium Nitroprusside Injected Site Compared to NaCl Injected Sites | 120.65 Perfusion units | Standard Deviation 74.52 |
| Atenolol + Hydrochlorothiazide | Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at a Sodium Nitroprusside Injected Site Compared to NaCl Injected Sites | 128.14 Perfusion units | Standard Deviation 63.79 |
Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at NaCl Injected Sites
10 µl of NaCl was injected intra-dermally at 2 sites on the forearms. Microcirculation was measured using laser doppler velocimetry before and 12 times in the 30 minutes following injection. The mean difference of the 12 post-injection measurements to the pre-injection measurement was calculated. A mean for the 2 NaCl sites was calculated. Microcirculation was measured in perfusion units which is an arbitrary measure specific to each laser doppler scanner.
Time frame: At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients with at least one valid post-baseline primary efficacy measurement in both treatment periods.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valsartan | Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at NaCl Injected Sites | 44.78 Perfusion units | Standard Deviation 47.53 |
| Atenolol + Hydrochlorothiazide | Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at NaCl Injected Sites | 50.96 Perfusion units | Standard Deviation 67.88 |