Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Valsartan vs Atenolol and Hydrochlorothiazide Combination on Blood Flow in Hypertensive Patients

A Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Cross-over Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of a 20 Week Treatment of Valsartan 320 mg Versus Atenolol 100 mg in Combination With Hydrochlorothiazide on Microcirculation in Hypertensive Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00396656
Enrollment
30
Registered
2006-11-07
Start date
2005-12-31
Completion date
2007-12-31
Last updated
2011-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension

Keywords

hypertension, valsartan, atenolol, hydrochlorothiazide, microcirculation, arterial compliance, pulse wave analysis

Brief summary

This study evaluated the effect of valsartan on small vessel blood flow in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension in direct comparison to atenolol and hydrochlorothiazide.

Interventions

DRUGAtenolol

100 mg tablets orally once a day (od) in the morning.

DRUGHydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ))

12.5 or 25 mg tablets orally once a day (od) in the morning.

DRUGValsartan

80 mg, 160 mg, or 320 mg tablets orally once a day in the morning

Sponsors

Novartis
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Caucasian; male or female outpatients and age between 40-65 years of age, inclusive. * At Visit 2 all patients must have a mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msSBP) of ≥ 90 mmHg and \< 110 mmHg.

Exclusion criteria

* If a single reading for arterial hypertension in msSBP \> 180 mmHg or msDBP \> 110 mmHg at any visit after randomization. * Inability to discontinue all prior antihypertensive medications safely for a period of 2 weeks prior to randomization. * Known history of hypotensive symptoms or orthostatic hypotension. * Concomitant use of statins or statin intake during the four weeks prior to Visit 1. * Known Keith-Wagener grade III or IV hypertensive retinopathy. * A history of heart failure (NYHA II-IV).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at Acetylcholine (ACH) Injected Sites Compared to NaCl Injected SitesAt end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)10 µl of acetylcholine (ACH) at 3 concentrations (10-7, 10-8, 10-9 M) was injected intra-dermally at 3 sites on the forearms. NaCl was injected at 2 sites on the forearms. Microcirculation was measured using laser doppler velocimetry before and 12 times in the 30 minutes following injection. The mean difference of the 12 post-injection measurements to the pre-injection measurement was calculated. Means for the 3 ACH and the 2 NaCl sites were calculated and compared. Microcirculation was measured in perfusion units which is an arbitrary measure specific to each laser doppler scanner.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at Acetylcholine (ACH) Plus L-NMMA Injected Sites Compared to NaCl Injected SitesAt end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)10 µl of acetylcholine (ACH) at 3 concentrations (10-7, 10-8, 10-9 M) plus 10 µl L-NMMA (10-6 M) was injected intra-dermally at 3 sites on the forearms. NaCl was injected at 2 sites. Microcirculation was measured using laser doppler velocimetry before and 12 times in the 30 minutes following injection. The mean difference of the 12 post-injection measurements to the pre-injection measurement was calculated. Means for the 3 ACH and the 2 NaCl sites were calculated and compared. Microcirculation was measured in perfusion units which is an arbitrary measure specific to each laser doppler scanner.
Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at a Sodium Nitroprusside Injected Site Compared to NaCl Injected SitesAt end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)10 µl of sodium nitroprusside at a concentration of 10-7 M was injected intra-dermally at 1 site on the forearms. NaCl was injected at 2 sites on the forearms. Microcirculation was measured using laser doppler velocimetry before and 12 times in the 30 minutes following injection. The mean difference of the 12 post-injection measurements to the pre-injection measurement was calculated. A mean for the 2 NaCl sites was calculated and compared to the sodium nitroprusside mean. Microcirculation was measured in perfusion units which is an arbitrary measure specific to each laser doppler scanner.
Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at NaCl Injected SitesAt end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)10 µl of NaCl was injected intra-dermally at 2 sites on the forearms. Microcirculation was measured using laser doppler velocimetry before and 12 times in the 30 minutes following injection. The mean difference of the 12 post-injection measurements to the pre-injection measurement was calculated. A mean for the 2 NaCl sites was calculated. Microcirculation was measured in perfusion units which is an arbitrary measure specific to each laser doppler scanner.
Arterial Pressure Waveform Augmentation Index at the End of TreatmentAt end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)Using applanation tonometry, the arterial pulse form measured at the wrist was analyzed using computerized pulse wave analysis. The arterial pressure waveform has two components; the first is the forward traveling wave when the left ventricle contracts and the second is the reflected wave returning from the periphery. The augmentation index is the ratio of the first and second systolic peaks and is used as a surrogate measure of arterial stiffness.
Arterial Pressure Waveform Pulse Wave Velocity at the End of TreatmentAt end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)Using applanation tonometry, the arterial pulse form measured at the wrist was analyzed using computerized pulse wave analysis. The arterial pressure waveform has two components; the first is the forward traveling wave when the left ventricle contracts and the second is the reflected wave returning from the periphery. Pulse wave velocity is the speed of the forward traveling wave and can be used as a measure of arterial stiffness since the more rigid the wall of the artery, the faster the wave moves.

Countries

Germany, Switzerland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Entire Study Population
Includes patients that received valsartan followed by atenolol + hydrochlorothiazide and patients that received atenolol + hydrochlorothiazide followed by valsartan.
30
Total30

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
First Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject02
Second Treatment PeriodAdverse Event01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEntire Study Population
Age Continuous52.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 2812 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 281 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at Acetylcholine (ACH) Injected Sites Compared to NaCl Injected Sites

10 µl of acetylcholine (ACH) at 3 concentrations (10-7, 10-8, 10-9 M) was injected intra-dermally at 3 sites on the forearms. NaCl was injected at 2 sites on the forearms. Microcirculation was measured using laser doppler velocimetry before and 12 times in the 30 minutes following injection. The mean difference of the 12 post-injection measurements to the pre-injection measurement was calculated. Means for the 3 ACH and the 2 NaCl sites were calculated and compared. Microcirculation was measured in perfusion units which is an arbitrary measure specific to each laser doppler scanner.

Time frame: At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients with at least one valid post-baseline primary efficacy measurement in both treatment periods.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ValsartanDifference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at Acetylcholine (ACH) Injected Sites Compared to NaCl Injected Sites61.21 Perfusion unitsStandard Deviation 38.11
Atenolol + HydrochlorothiazideDifference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at Acetylcholine (ACH) Injected Sites Compared to NaCl Injected Sites61.04 Perfusion unitsStandard Deviation 49.16
Secondary

Arterial Pressure Waveform Augmentation Index at the End of Treatment

Using applanation tonometry, the arterial pulse form measured at the wrist was analyzed using computerized pulse wave analysis. The arterial pressure waveform has two components; the first is the forward traveling wave when the left ventricle contracts and the second is the reflected wave returning from the periphery. The augmentation index is the ratio of the first and second systolic peaks and is used as a surrogate measure of arterial stiffness.

Time frame: At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients with at least one valid post-baseline primary efficacy measurement in both treatment periods.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ValsartanArterial Pressure Waveform Augmentation Index at the End of Treatment139.05 RatioStandard Deviation 20.64
Atenolol + HydrochlorothiazideArterial Pressure Waveform Augmentation Index at the End of Treatment144.51 RatioStandard Deviation 21.97
Secondary

Arterial Pressure Waveform Pulse Wave Velocity at the End of Treatment

Using applanation tonometry, the arterial pulse form measured at the wrist was analyzed using computerized pulse wave analysis. The arterial pressure waveform has two components; the first is the forward traveling wave when the left ventricle contracts and the second is the reflected wave returning from the periphery. Pulse wave velocity is the speed of the forward traveling wave and can be used as a measure of arterial stiffness since the more rigid the wall of the artery, the faster the wave moves.

Time frame: At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients with at least one valid post-baseline primary efficacy measurement in both treatment periods.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ValsartanArterial Pressure Waveform Pulse Wave Velocity at the End of Treatment8.07 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 1.28
Atenolol + HydrochlorothiazideArterial Pressure Waveform Pulse Wave Velocity at the End of Treatment7.60 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 1.18
Secondary

Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at Acetylcholine (ACH) Plus L-NMMA Injected Sites Compared to NaCl Injected Sites

10 µl of acetylcholine (ACH) at 3 concentrations (10-7, 10-8, 10-9 M) plus 10 µl L-NMMA (10-6 M) was injected intra-dermally at 3 sites on the forearms. NaCl was injected at 2 sites. Microcirculation was measured using laser doppler velocimetry before and 12 times in the 30 minutes following injection. The mean difference of the 12 post-injection measurements to the pre-injection measurement was calculated. Means for the 3 ACH and the 2 NaCl sites were calculated and compared. Microcirculation was measured in perfusion units which is an arbitrary measure specific to each laser doppler scanner.

Time frame: At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients with at least one valid post-baseline primary efficacy measurement in both treatment periods.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ValsartanDifference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at Acetylcholine (ACH) Plus L-NMMA Injected Sites Compared to NaCl Injected Sites-9.11 Perfusion unitsStandard Deviation 22.19
Atenolol + HydrochlorothiazideDifference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at Acetylcholine (ACH) Plus L-NMMA Injected Sites Compared to NaCl Injected Sites-5.60 Perfusion unitsStandard Deviation 40.47
Secondary

Difference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at a Sodium Nitroprusside Injected Site Compared to NaCl Injected Sites

10 µl of sodium nitroprusside at a concentration of 10-7 M was injected intra-dermally at 1 site on the forearms. NaCl was injected at 2 sites on the forearms. Microcirculation was measured using laser doppler velocimetry before and 12 times in the 30 minutes following injection. The mean difference of the 12 post-injection measurements to the pre-injection measurement was calculated. A mean for the 2 NaCl sites was calculated and compared to the sodium nitroprusside mean. Microcirculation was measured in perfusion units which is an arbitrary measure specific to each laser doppler scanner.

Time frame: At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients with at least one valid post-baseline primary efficacy measurement in both treatment periods.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ValsartanDifference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at a Sodium Nitroprusside Injected Site Compared to NaCl Injected Sites120.65 Perfusion unitsStandard Deviation 74.52
Atenolol + HydrochlorothiazideDifference in Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at a Sodium Nitroprusside Injected Site Compared to NaCl Injected Sites128.14 Perfusion unitsStandard Deviation 63.79
Secondary

Mean Post-treatment Microcirculation at NaCl Injected Sites

10 µl of NaCl was injected intra-dermally at 2 sites on the forearms. Microcirculation was measured using laser doppler velocimetry before and 12 times in the 30 minutes following injection. The mean difference of the 12 post-injection measurements to the pre-injection measurement was calculated. A mean for the 2 NaCl sites was calculated. Microcirculation was measured in perfusion units which is an arbitrary measure specific to each laser doppler scanner.

Time frame: At end of each treatment period (Week 21 and Week 43)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients with at least one valid post-baseline primary efficacy measurement in both treatment periods.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ValsartanMean Post-treatment Microcirculation at NaCl Injected Sites44.78 Perfusion unitsStandard Deviation 47.53
Atenolol + HydrochlorothiazideMean Post-treatment Microcirculation at NaCl Injected Sites50.96 Perfusion unitsStandard Deviation 67.88

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026