Skip to content

Tailored Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Tailored Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Based on Genetic Markers

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00396487
Enrollment
1
Registered
2006-11-07
Start date
2006-11-30
Completion date
2008-02-29
Last updated
2015-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

Metastatic colorectal cancer, tailored treatment, genetic markers, gene polymorphism, chemotherapy

Brief summary

To compare the response rate of single agent chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer given as standard treatment versus tailored treatment in a randomised phase III trial.

Detailed description

The TS and MTHFR polymorphism has been investigated in a new study based on analysis of normal tissue. The results indicated that protein with a 3/3 TS polymorphism or a MTHFR T polymorphism had a significantly higher response rate and a longer time to progression than the other groups when treated with bolus 5-FU. Capecitabine is metabolised to 5-FU through a number of enzymatic steps. It is the first rationally designed drug that is based upon the high concentration of thymidine phosphorylase (TP) in many human tumors compared to normal tissue. TP is the last step in the conversion of capecitabine to 5-FU and seems to be the limiting factor for the activation. Capecitabine may to some extent mimic continues 5-FU infusion as opposed to bolus 5-FU. A number of small investigations have indicated that patients with 2R/2R TS polymorphism have a higher response rate than heterozygous patients. The TS and MTHFR polymorphism analysis can easily be performed on sputum, which means an easy collection and sending of the samples. At present single agent chemotherapy is based on three drugs (5-FU, capecitabine, and Irinotecan) with almost the same overall activity. It seems rational to investigate if improvement can be obtained by tailoring the treatment according to gene polymorphism.

Interventions

DRUGCapecitabine, Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil+Calciumfolinat

Sponsors

Vejle Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Metastatic colorectal cancer * Histopathological verification of the primary tumor * Measurable disease according to RESIST criteria * Single agent chemotherapy indicated * Performance status \>=2 * Age \>= 60 years * Life expectancy \> 3 months * Adequate liver and kidney function as evaluated by bilirubin \<= 3 times of normal upper limit, ALAT \<= 3 times upper normal limit (\<= 5 times upper normal limit in case of liver metastases), serum creatinine \<= 1.5 times normal upper limit. * ANC \>=1.5 x 109/l and platelets \>= 100 x 109/l * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with CNS metastases * Other malignant disease within the last 5 years except for non-melanoma skin cancer and carcinoma in situ of cervix uteri * Previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease * Adjuvant chemotherapy \< 6 months before inclusion * Patients with previous major toxic or allergic reaction to the protocol drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary end point is
Response according to RECIST criteria.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end points are
Progression free survival
Overall survival
Toxicity

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026