Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of Denosumab in Patients With Recurrent or Unresectable Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

An Open-Label, Multi-Center, Phase 2 Safety and Efficacy Study of Denosumab (AMG 162) in Subjects With Recurrent or Unresectable Giant Cell Tumor (GCT) of Bone

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00396279
Enrollment
37
Registered
2006-11-06
Start date
2006-07-10
Completion date
2011-02-01
Last updated
2022-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

GCT, Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

Keywords

Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

Brief summary

To determine how safe and effective denosumab is in treating patients with giant cell tumor of bone.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALDenosumab

Administered by subcutaneous injection

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTCalcium/Vitamin D

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults, 18 years and older * Histologically confirmed and measurable giant cell tumor (GCT) * Recurrent GCT confirmed by radiology or unresectable GCT * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2

Exclusion criteria

* Pateints for whom surgery to the affected limb/area is planned within 27 days after receiving 1st dose of denosumab * Radiation to affected region within 28 days before enrollment to study * Known diagnosis of osteosarcoma or brown tumor of bone * Known history of second malignancy within the past 5 years, except for basal cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ * Concurrent treatment with bisphosphonates, calcitonin, or interferon. Other criteria also apply.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Giant Cell Tumor ResponseFrom enrollment until 25 weeksA treatment response was defined for participants with tissue samples obtained and measured by histopathology as: • at least 90% elimination of giant cells relative to Baseline, or • complete elimination of giant cells in cases where giant cells represent \< 5% of tumor cells. A response was defined for participants who have only radiographs (histopathology not available) as lack of progression of the target lesion at week 25 by radiographic measurements compared with Baseline. For participants with both a core biopsy and resected tissue obtained, the sample closest to week 25 was used in the analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineBaseline and Weeks 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, and 81Urinary N-telopeptide (of type 1 collagen) corrected for urine creatinine (uNTX/Cr) is a bone turnover marker used to measure the activity of denosumab. Percent change from Baseline in uNTX/Cr was measured over time.
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Baseline and Weeks 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, and 81Serum C-terminus peptide (of type 1 collagen; CTX1) is a bone turnover marker used to measure the activity of denosumab. Percent change from Baseline in CTX was measured over time.
Serum Denosumab Trough ConcentrationsBlood samples were collected on Days 1 (baseline), 8, 15 and Weeks 5 (Day 29), 9, 13, 25, and 49.Serum concentrations of denosumab were measured by a validated conventional sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)From the first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date of April 7 2008; a maximum of 18 monthsAn adverse event is defined as an undesirable medical occurrence (e.g., sign, symptom, or diagnosis) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined by regulatory authorities as one that • is fatal • is life threatening (places the participant at immediate risk of death) • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • is a congenital anomaly/birth defect • other significant medical hazard. The severity of adverse events was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, version 3.0) based on the following general guideline: Grade 1: Mild AE Grade 2: Moderate AE Grade 3: Severe AE Grade 4: Life-threatening or disabling AE Grade 5: Death related to AE. AEs were assessed by the Investigator for relatedness to study drug.
Number of Participants With Anti-Denosumab AntibodiesFrom enrollment until the data cut-off date of April 7 2008; a maximum time of 18 months.Validated immunoassays were used to test for the presence of anti-denosumab antibodies throughout the study.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First patient enrolled 10 July 2006; Last patient enrolled 25 January 2008. Results data are reported as of the data cut-off date of 07 April 2008.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Denosumab
Participants received denosumab 120 mg once every 4 weeks (Q4W), with an additional 120 mg dose on Days 8 and 15 of the first month of treatment. All participants were instructed to take daily supplements of at least 500 mg of calcium and 400 IU of vitamin D. Participants were to continue to receive denosumab until one of the following occurred: complete tumor resection, disease progression without clinical benefit, or decision by the participant to discontinue for any reason.
37
Total37

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDisease progression2
Overall StudyOngoing in study26
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDenosumab
Age, Continuous33.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
0 - Fully Active
13 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
1 - Restricted but ambulatory
21 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
2 - Ambulatory but unable to work
1 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
3 - Limited selfcare, confined to bed >50% daytime
0 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
4 - Completely disabled
0 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Missing
2 participants
Giant Cell Tumor Disease Type
Primary unresectable
13 participants
Giant Cell Tumor Disease Type
Recurrent resectable
6 participants
Giant Cell Tumor Disease Type
Recurrent unresectable
18 participants
Location of target lesion
Dorsal vertebrae
1 participants
Location of target lesion
Lower extremities
8 participants
Location of target lesion
Missing
1 participants
Location of target lesion
Pelvic region
1 participants
Location of target lesion
Pelvis
9 participants
Location of target lesion
Pulmonary disease
9 participants
Location of target lesion
Spine
3 participants
Location of target lesion
Upper extremities
5 participants
Percent of giant cells in tumor on pre-treatment biopsy28.7 percentage of giant cells in tumor
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or Caucasian
27 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
25 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Giant Cell Tumor Response

A treatment response was defined for participants with tissue samples obtained and measured by histopathology as: • at least 90% elimination of giant cells relative to Baseline, or • complete elimination of giant cells in cases where giant cells represent \< 5% of tumor cells. A response was defined for participants who have only radiographs (histopathology not available) as lack of progression of the target lesion at week 25 by radiographic measurements compared with Baseline. For participants with both a core biopsy and resected tissue obtained, the sample closest to week 25 was used in the analysis.

Time frame: From enrollment until 25 weeks

Population: The efficacy analysis set included participants with a Baseline histology assessment and at least 1 postdose histology assessment from weeks 5-25; or a Baseline radiology assessment and at least 1 postdose radiology assessment from weeks 5-25. Evaluable participants had to be on study for at least 28 days after administration of the first dose.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DenosumabPercentage of Participants With Giant Cell Tumor Response85.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An adverse event is defined as an undesirable medical occurrence (e.g., sign, symptom, or diagnosis) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined by regulatory authorities as one that • is fatal • is life threatening (places the participant at immediate risk of death) • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • is a congenital anomaly/birth defect • other significant medical hazard. The severity of adverse events was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, version 3.0) based on the following general guideline: Grade 1: Mild AE Grade 2: Moderate AE Grade 3: Severe AE Grade 4: Life-threatening or disabling AE Grade 5: Death related to AE. AEs were assessed by the Investigator for relatedness to study drug.

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date of April 7 2008; a maximum of 18 months

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of denosumab.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DenosumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious AE5 participants
DenosumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE33 participants
DenosumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Fatal AE1 participants
DenosumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)AE leading to study discontinuation2 participants
DenosumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)AE leading to study drug discontinuation3 participants
DenosumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)CTCAE Grade 3, 4, or 55 participants
DenosumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any AE related to study drug10 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-Denosumab Antibodies

Validated immunoassays were used to test for the presence of anti-denosumab antibodies throughout the study.

Time frame: From enrollment until the data cut-off date of April 7 2008; a maximum time of 18 months.

Population: Participants who received at least 1 dose of denosumab and had at least 1 anti-denosumab antibody sample.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DenosumabNumber of Participants With Anti-Denosumab Antibodies0 participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)

Serum C-terminus peptide (of type 1 collagen; CTX1) is a bone turnover marker used to measure the activity of denosumab. Percent change from Baseline in CTX was measured over time.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, and 81

Population: Efficacy Analysis Set with available data at each time point (n).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 5 (n=33)-78.9 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 45 (n=8)-79.6 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 49 (n=7)-82.0 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 53 (N=8)-87.3 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 69 (n=4)-84.2 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 73 (n=2)-81.9 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 77 (n=2)-84.2 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 9 (n=33)-79.8 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 13 (n=31)-80.4 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 17 (n=28)-82.6 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 21 (n=26)-82.0 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 25 (n=24)-79.5 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 29 (n=21)-82.8 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 33 (n=16)-74.8 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 37 (n=14)-82.4 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 41 (n=10)-86.1 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 57 (n=6)-86.2 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 61 (n=4)-84.9 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 65 (n=3)-83.5 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Serum C-terminus Peptide (of Type 1 Collagen)Week 81 (n=2)-84.9 percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine Creatinine

Urinary N-telopeptide (of type 1 collagen) corrected for urine creatinine (uNTX/Cr) is a bone turnover marker used to measure the activity of denosumab. Percent change from Baseline in uNTX/Cr was measured over time.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 73, 77, and 81

Population: Efficacy Analysis Set with available data at each time point (n).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 33 (n=15)-35.0 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 53 (N=8)-49.0 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 57 (n=6)-65.1 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 61 (n=3)-59.2 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 65 (n=3)-69.2 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 5 (n=30)-70.9 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 9 (n=29)-77.0 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 13 (n=27)-60.0 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 17 (n=26)-59.5 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 21 (n=24)-64.5 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 25 (n=20)-56.4 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 29 (n=21)-52.8 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 37 (n=13)-71.1 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 41 (n=11)-57.3 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 45 (n=8)-59.1 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 49 (n=7)-59.0 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 69 (n=4)-64.2 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 73 (n=1)-47.5 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 77 (n=2)-76.8 percent change
DenosumabPercent Change From Baseline in Urinary N-telopeptide Corrected for Urine CreatinineWeek 81 (n=2)-13.3 percent change
Secondary

Serum Denosumab Trough Concentrations

Serum concentrations of denosumab were measured by a validated conventional sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Time frame: Blood samples were collected on Days 1 (baseline), 8, 15 and Weeks 5 (Day 29), 9, 13, 25, and 49.

Population: The pharmacokinetics analysis set included participants who received at least 1 dose of denosumab and for whom at least 1 serum denosumab trough concentration was available. 'n' indicates the number of participants with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DenosumabSerum Denosumab Trough ConcentrationsDay 29 (n=33)36400 ng/mLStandard Deviation 20600
DenosumabSerum Denosumab Trough ConcentrationsWeek 9 (n=32)27500 ng/mLStandard Deviation 17300
DenosumabSerum Denosumab Trough ConcentrationsWeek 13 (n=25)23300 ng/mLStandard Deviation 12400
DenosumabSerum Denosumab Trough ConcentrationsWeek 25 (n=23)19900 ng/mLStandard Deviation 9700
DenosumabSerum Denosumab Trough ConcentrationsWeek 49 (n=9)21400 ng/mLStandard Deviation 8900
DenosumabSerum Denosumab Trough ConcentrationsDay 1 (n=32)NA ng/mL
DenosumabSerum Denosumab Trough ConcentrationsDay 8 (n=32)19000 ng/mLStandard Deviation 24100
DenosumabSerum Denosumab Trough ConcentrationsDay 15 (n=28)31600 ng/mLStandard Deviation 27300

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026