Skip to content

Effects of PTH Replacement on Bone in Hypoparathyroidism

Effects of PTH Replacement on Bone in Hypoparathyroidism

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00395538
Enrollment
46
Registered
2006-11-03
Start date
2006-10-30
Completion date
2017-10-04
Last updated
2019-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

DiGeorge Syndrome, Hypoparathyroidism

Keywords

Parathyroid, Bone Biopsy, Calcium-Sensing Receptor, Bone Density, Bone Turnover, Hypoparathyroidism

Brief summary

Hypoparathyroidism is a rare condition associated with a low level of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the blood. Hypoparathyroidism can be genetic and show up in childhood, or it can occur later in life. If it occurs later, it is usually due to damage or removal of the parathyroid glands during neck surgery. PTH helps control the amount of calcium in blood, kidneys, and bones. Low levels of calcium in the blood can cause a person to feel sick. It can cause cramping or tingling in the hands, feet, or other parts of the body. A very low blood calcium can cause fainting or seizures. The standard treatment for hypoparathyroidism is a form of vitamin D (calcitriol) and calcium supplements. Keeping normal blood levels of calcium can be difficult. Sometimes there is too much calcium in the urine even if the calcium levels in the blood are low. High calcium in the kidneys and urine can cause problems such as calcium deposits in the kidney (nephrocalcinosis) or kidney stones. High levels of calcium in the kidney may keep the kidney from functioning normally. Treatment with PTH will replace the hormone you are missing. Your disease may be better controlled on PTH than on calcium and calcitriol. Researchers at the NIH have conducted prior studies to establish synthetic human parathyroid hormone 1-34 (HPTH) as a treatment for hypoparathyroidism. Other studies have shown that PTH may improve calcium levels in blood and urine. The primary purpose of this research study is to evaluate the effects of synthetic human parathyroid hormone 1-34 (HPTH) replacement therapy on bone in adults and teenagers with hypoparathyroidism. The study takes 5 (Omega) years to complete and requires 12 inpatient visits to the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center in Bethesda, MD. The first visit will help the study team decide whether you are eligible. This visit will last 2 to 3 days. After taking calcium and calcitriol for 1 - 7 months you will return to the NIH Clinical Center for the baseline visit. The baseline visit is the visit that you will start your PTH; you will also undergo a bone biopsy during the visit. The baseline visit may last 7 to 10 days. You will then take PTH twice a day for 5 years. You will be asked to return to the NIH clinical center every 6 months for 10 follow-up visits. During one of the follow-up visits, you will have a second bone biopsy taken from the other hip. That second biopsy will be done after 1 year, 2 years, or 4 years of taking PTH; the researchers will assign the timing of the second biopsy randomly. You will be asked to go to your local laboratory for blood and urine tests between each follow up visit. At first the blood tests will occur at least once a week. Later, you will need to go to your local laboratory for blood tests at least once a month and urine tests once every 3 months. The local laboratory visits and follow-up visits at the NIH Clinical Center will help the study team determine whether the HPTH treatment is controlling your hypoparathyroidism.

Detailed description

Objectives The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the skeletal effects of hormone replacement therapy with HPTH in hypoparathyroidism. Study Population This study will enroll up to 69 subjects with physician-diagnosed hypoparathyroidism.\<TAB\> Design This study will treat hypoparathyroid individuals with synthetic human PTH 1-34 (HPTH) for up to 5 years, periodically assessing skeletal changes through biochemical markers and iliac-crest bone biopsies, which will allow for ultrastructural, cellular, and molecular analyses. With respect to HPTH treatment, this study is a single group, within-subjects, repeated measures treatment trial. With respect to all bone biopsy analyses, the design is a parallel group design with each subject allocated to one of the 3 biopsy follow-up times: 1, 2 or 4 years after initiation of HPTH therapy. Post-baseline biopsy timing will be randomly assigned (1:1.2:1.4, respectively) to each subject, stratified by gender and by menopausal status, when relevant. Changes from baseline (time 0) to 1, 2 and 4-years will be compared. Subjects who were on conventional therapy in the former version of the protocol will also be randomized into the new study design. In contrast to new subjects, whose biopsy is performed at the end of the conventional care run-in period, the pre-conventional care biopsy will be used as the baseline for the those subjects entering the new design after having been on conventional care in the older protocol. Because it is not known with certainty what effects duration of time on conventional therapy will have on biopsy results, randomization will also be stratified on status of prior study participation. The subjects who were on HPTH therapy at the time of the protocol redesign are followed as a separate group under this protocol. Outcome Measures Primary: Changes in static and dynamic bone histomorphometry after 1 year, 2 years, and 4 years of HPTH therapy. Primary outcome measurements include: * Mineralized perimeter * Bone formation rate * Cortical width * Cortical area * Osteoid width * Osteoid perimeter * Mineral apposition rate Secondary: Changes in bone mineralization density distribution at 1, 2 and 4 years of HPTH therapy. The specific outcomes that will be measured include: * Spectral calcium-mean * Calcium-peak * Calcium-width Changes from baseline will be assessed in the following outcomes: * Biochemical markers of bone metabolism: osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, collagen cross-linked N-telopeptide. * Serum and urine calcium; 1,25-OH2-Vitamin D * Bone density assessed by DXA and quantitative CT * Nephrocalcinosis by ultrasound and CT * Fatigue Symptom Inventory * 6-Minute Walk Test * SF-36 Health Survey Tertiary: Changes in blood chemistries and FGF23, renal mineral handling, and PTH sensitivity with the initiation of HPTH, which include: * Serum albumin, calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, sodium, potassium, chloride, Total CO2, creatinine, glucose, urea nitrogen, and FGF23 * Urine cAMP, creatinine, phosphorus, calcium, and pH

Interventions

Given twice daily by subcutaneous

Sponsors

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* INCLUSION CRITERIA: 1. Age eligibility at screening: 1. Premenopausal women: aged 18 to 45 years, 2. Postmenopausal women: aged greater than or equal to 53 years to 70 years and 5 years since last menses. For women without a uterus, subjects must have a clinical history of menopause for at least 5 years and an FSH greater than 30 U/L. 3. Men: aged 18 to 70 years, 2. Physician-diagnosed hypoparathyroidism of at least 1-year duration, confirmed by medical record review. The investigators will confirm the diagnosis during the screening visit at which time the subject must have an intact PTH \< 30 pg/mL.

Exclusion criteria

1. Moderate to severe hepatic disease defined as hepatic transaminases (ALT and AST) \> 2 times the upper limit of normal 2. Severe renal insufficiency defined as a calculated GFR \< 25 mL/min/1.73 m(2), using the CKD-EPI equation(15). 3. Allergy or intolerance to tetracycline antibiotics 4. Pregnant or lactating or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study. (Women who are able to get pregnant must agree to use an effective form of birth control while in this study.). 5. Perimenopausal defined by no menses for 6 months to 5 years and an FSH \> 20 U/L at the screening and/or baseline visits.. 6. Chronic diseases that might affect mineral metabolism such as diabetes, celiac disease, Crohn s disease, Cushing s syndrome, or adrenal insufficiency 7. Concurrent treatment with doses of thyroid hormone intended to suppress thyroid stimulating hormone below the assay s detection limit or persistent thyroid cancer 8. History of a skeletal disease unrelated to hypoparathyroidism, such as osteoporosis or low bone density (defined as a DXA Z-Score \< -2 in all subjects or T-score \< -2 in subjects greater than or equal to 20 year old), osteosarcoma, Paget s disease, alkaline phosphatase \> 1.5 times the upper limit of normal, or metastatic bone disease 9. History of retinoblastoma or Li-Fraumeni syndrome 10. History of treatment with bisphosphonates, calcitonin, tamoxifen, selective-estrogen receptor modulators, or directed skeletal irradiation 11. Use of oral or intravenous corticosteroids or estrogen replacement therapy for more than 3 weeks within the last 6 months 12. Use of depot medroxyprogesterone for contraception within the past 12 months 13. Chronic inadequate biochemical control with conventional therapy and/or calcium infusion dependent 14. Seizure disorder requiring antiepileptic medications 15. Treatment with PTH for more than 2 weeks continuously at any time, prior to study entry 16. Any cognitive impairment that limits the subject s ability to comply, independently or through the assistance of a legally authorized representative, with protocol procedures. 17. Open epiphyses as determined by an X-ray of the hand and wrist in subjects \< 21 years of age.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Bone Biopsy Cancellous Bone Volume (Cn.BV/TV)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, so the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.BV/TV is one of 8 primary endpoints measured from the bone biopsy. The changes in Cn.BV/TV outcome between two time-points are being reported. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes.
Change in Total Number of Cortical Pores Per mm^2 (Ct.Po.N)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, so the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ct.Po.N is a bone biopsy measure that assess the amount of holes in the cortical bone within a predetermined area of cortical bone. The changes in Cn.BV/TV outcome between two time-points are being reported. Cortical bone with a higher number of holes may be at greater risk of fracture. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Cancellous Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Cn.BFR/BS)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.BFR/BS, measured from the bone biopsy, is the cancellous bone formation rate per unit of bone surface where cancellous refers to the spongy structure of the bone. The changes in Cn.BFR/BS between two time-points are being reported. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes.
Change in Cancellous Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based)(Cn.MS/BS)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesFollowing their baseline bone biopsy, 5, 5, and 2 participants were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at years 1, 2, and 4 after the start of HPTH therapy, respectively. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced in size due to withdrawal and the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.MS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the cancellous bone surface that is actively forming bone. The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Cn.MS/BS between two time-points are being reported.
Change in Endocortical Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Ec.BFR/BS)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. However, because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.BFR/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate of new bone formation per day on the inner cortical (endocortical) surface in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ec.BFR/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Endocortical Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based) (Ec.MS/BS)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.MS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the endocortical bone surface that is actively forming bone. The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Ec.MS/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Intracortical Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Ic.BFR/BS)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. However, because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.BFR/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate of new bone formation between the two cortical surfaces (intracortical) in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ic.BFR/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Intracortical Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based) (Ic.MS/BS)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.MS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the intracortical bone surface that is actively forming bone. The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Ic.MS/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Cancellous Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Cn.OS/BS)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.OS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the cancellous bone surface that contains unmineralized bone (osteoid). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Cn.OS/BS between two time-points are being reported.
Change in Cancellous Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Cn.ES/BS)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.ES/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the cancellous bone surface that contains unmineralized bone (osteoid). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Cn.ES/BS between two time-points are being reported.
Change in Cancellous Adjusted Apposition Rate (Cn.AjAR)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.AjAR is measured from the bone biopsy. Cn.AjAR represents the Cn.MAR averaged over the entire osteoid surface.The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Cn.AjAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Endocortical Osteoid Thickness (Ec.O.Th)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.O.Th is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the thickness of the unmineralized bone (osteoid) on the inner side of the cortex(endocortical). The changes in Cn.AjAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Endocortical Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Ec.MAR)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose.Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.MAR is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate mineral is being laid down per day on the inner cortical (endocortical) surface in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ec.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Endocortical Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Ec.OS/BS)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.OS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate mineral is being laid down per day on the inner cortical (endocortical) surface in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ec.OS/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Endocortical Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Ec.ES/BS)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4- year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.ES/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the endocortical bone surface that is resorbed (eroded). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Ec.ES/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Endocortical Adjusted Apposition Rate (Ec.AjAR)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.AjAR is measured from the bone biopsy. Ec.AjAR represents the endocortical mineral apposition rate (Ec.MAR) averaged over the entire osteoid surface. This is another histomorphometric way to evaluate the rate at which bone is laid down on the inner cortical surface per day. The changes in Ec.AjAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Intracortical Osteoid Thickness (Ic.O.Th)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.O.Th is one of 21 secondary endpoints measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the thickness of the unmineralized bone (osteoid) within the middle of the cortex (intracortical). The changes in Ic.O.Th between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Intracortical Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Ic.MAR)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.MAR is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate mineral is being laid down per day within the middle of the cortex (intracortical) surface in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Intracortical Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Ic.OS/BS)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.OS/BS measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the intracortical bone surface that is not mineralized (osteoid). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in OS/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Intracortical Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Ic.ES/BS)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.ES/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of bone surface within the middle of the cortex that is resorbed (eroded). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Ic.ES/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Intracortical Adjusted Apposition Rate (Ic.AjAR)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.AjAR is one of 21 secondary endpoints measured from the bone biopsy. Ic.AjAR represents the intracortical mineral apposition rate (Ic.MAR) averaged over the the entire osteoid surface. This is another histomorphometric way to evaluate the rate at which bone is laid down within the middle of the cortex per day. The changes in Ic.AjAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline values)
Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesBaseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean is a measure of mean bone calcium content of the bone cortex 1 based on the mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesBaseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak is a measure of the most frequent calcium content of the bone cortex 1 based on the bone mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Width From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesBaseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low is a measure of the area of low bone cortex 1 mineralization based on the mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesBaseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low is a measure of the area of low bone cortex 1 mineralization based on the mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesBaseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High is a measure of the area of high bone cortex 1 mineralization based on the mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Raw 1/3 Radius Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA.Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit The 1/3 Radius BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA.
Raw AP Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXABaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)The DXA BMD were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The AP Spine BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA.
Raw Femoral Neck Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXABaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Femoral BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA.
Raw Lateral Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXABaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)The DXA BMD were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Lateral Spine BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA .
Raw Total Hip Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXABaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Total Hip BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA.
Raw Whole Body Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXABaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Whole Body BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA.
Serum CalciumBaseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)Serum Calcium concentration
Serum OsteocalcinBaseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)Serum Osteocalcin concentration
Serum PhosphorusBaseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)Serum Phosphorus concentration
Perceived Interference (PI) of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)Perceived interference is measured using seven separate items that assess the degree to which fatigue in the past week was judged to interfere with general level of activity, ability to bathe and dress, normal work activity, ability to concentrate, relations with others, enjoyment of life, and mood. The interference ratings were summed to yield a total interference score ranging from 0 (no perceived interference due to fatigue) to 70 (maximum possible perceived interference due to fatigue).
Average Severity Score of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)Severity is measured using four separate items of the FSI questionnaire that assesses how the participant felt on their most, least, and average fatigue days in the past week as well as current fatigue. Participants score their level of fatigue for each item on an 11-point scale (0=not at all fatigued, 10=as fatigued as I could be). An average is taken of sum of these 4 scores. The average severity score can range from 0 to 10. A higher average severity score indicates that the participant is experiencing more severe fatigue.
Composite Severity Score of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)Severity is measured using four separate items of the FSI questionnaire that assesses how the participant felt on their most, least, and average fatigue days in the past week as well as current fatigue. Participants score their level of fatigue for each item on an 11-point scale (0=not at all fatigued, 10=as fatigued as I could be). The composite severity score reflects the sum of these 4 scores. The composite severity scores can range from 0 to 40. A higher composite severity scores indicates that the participant is experiencing more severe fatigue.
Total Distance Walked During a 6-minute WalkBaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)The total distance a participant was able to walk during a 6-minute walk
SF36 Bodily Pain DomainBaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)The Bodily Pain (BP) domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The BP domain scores indicate to what extent a participant's bodily pain hinders their performance of daily activities.
SF36 Emotional Role Limitations DomainBaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)Emotional Role Limitations (RE) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The RE Domain score assesses the extent to which the emotional condition of the participant, e.g. feeling depressed or anxious, limits his/her daily functioning and ability to perform roles, such as in cutting down on the amount of time spent on work or other activities and accomplishing less than he/she would like to.
SF36 General Health DomainBaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)General Health (GH) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The GH domain score assesses a participant's perception of their general health in terms of concepts such as excellent, very good, good, fair or poor, getting ill easier than other people, and just as healthy as anyone he/she knows.
SF36 Mental Health DomainBaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)Mental Health (MH) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The MH domain assesses the extent to which the participant is, among other things, feeling full of pep, is happy, is feeling calm and peaceful, is very nervous, or is feeling worn out and tired.
SF36 Physical Function DomainBaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)Physical Function (PF) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The PF domain assesses the extent to which the participant's perceptions of his/her ability to perform vigorous and moderate physical activities are influenced by his/her physical condition.
24 Hour Urine NTX TelopeptideBaseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)Urine was collected over 24 hours and the total NTX Telopeptide measured
SF36 Physical Role Limitations DomainBaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)Physical Role Limitations (RP) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The RP Domain assesses the extent to which a participant's' performance of his/her roles in daily activities is impeded by his/her physical state of health.
SF36 Social Function DomainBaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)Social Function (SF) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical components: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental components: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool is used to calculate each of the eight domain scores. The scoring tool transforms the score into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. SF36 domain scores are scaled to have a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. The SF Domain assesses the level of a participant's social activities and interaction with significant others such as family members, friends, neighbours and other social relations. Lower scores indicate more disability; higher scores indicate less disability with respect to social function.
SF36 Vitality DomainBaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)Vitality (VT) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. SF36 domain scores are scaled to have a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores reflect a better quality of life.The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical components: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental components: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool is used to calculate the eight domain scores. The scoring tool transforms the score into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. SF36 domain scores are scaled to have a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The VT Domain assesses the participant's experience of feeling energetic and full of pep, or worn out and tired.
Serum Alkaline PhosphataseBaseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)Serum Alkaline Phosphatase concentration
Number of Participants With Nephrolithiasis/NephrocalcinosisBaseline, 12-Month Visit, 24-Month Visit, 36-Month Visit, 48-Month Visit, and 60-Month VisitParticipants had ultrasound and CT imaging of the kidney were performed yearly. The rates of new, stable, and progressing nephrocalcinosis and nephrolithiasis (NCNL) were recorded.
Primary Bone Biopsy Measures Adjusted for HPTH DoseBaseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesThe 8 primary bone biopsy measures were to be adjusted HPTH dose by fitting the primary bone biopsy model with both linear and quadratic dose covariates added to the model. However, the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. To add additional linear and quadratic dose covariates to the statistical model with an already small sample sizes would highly risk over-parameterizing the model. Thus no new analysis was performed.
Sensitivity Analyses of Female Menopause Status in the Primary Bone Biopsy Efficacy ModelsBaseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesAs a sensitivity analysis, the 8 primary bone biopsy measures were to be adjusted for female menopausal status, by fitting the primary bone biopsy model with a menopausal status covariate added to the model. However, the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. Furthermore, 3 males would need to be removed from the model leaving 4, 3, 2 participants with bone biopsies with an additional degree of freedom consumed for the menopausal status covariate. Thus, the planned mixed models analysis was not performed since with such small samples sizes random fluctuations in the data could give misleading erroneous results.
Z-score of 1/3 Radius Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA.Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit The 1/3 Radius BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes.
Z-score of AP Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXABaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visitsThe DXA BMD were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The AP Spine BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes.
Z-score of Femoral Neck Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXABaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visitsThe DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Femoral BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes.
Z-score of Lateral Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXABaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visitsThe DXA BMD were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Lateral Spine BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA . The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes.
Z-score of Total Hip Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXABaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visitsThe DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Total Hip BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes.
Change in Trabecular Thickness (Tb.Th)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Tb.Th is measured from the bone biopsy. Tb.Th is the mean thickness of trabeculae, assessed using direct 3D methods. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Tb.Th between two time-points are being reported.
Z-score of Whole Body Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXABaseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visitsThe DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Whole Body BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes.
Change in Trabecular Number (Tb.N)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Tb.N is measured from the bone biopsy. Tb.N is the measure of the average number of trabeculae per unit length. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Tb.N between two time-points are being reported.
Change in Trabecular Separation (Tb.Sp)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Tb.Sp is measured from the bone biopsy. Tb.Sp is the mean distance between trabeculae, assessed using direct 3D methods. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Tb.Sp between two time-points are being reported.
Change in Average Thickness of Inner and Outer Cortices (Ct.Th)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ct.Th, measured from the bone biopsy, is the average thickness of the inner and outer cortices. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Ct.Th between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Total Area of Inner and Outer Cortices (Ct.Ar)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ct.AR is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure defines the area of the outer cortex and inner cortex within a predefined section of cortical bone. The changes in Ct.Ar between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Total Area of Cortical Porosity (Ct.Po.Ar)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesFollowing their baseline bone biopsy, 5, 5, and 2 participants were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at years 1, 2, and 4 after the start of HPTH therapy, respectively. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced in size due to withdrawal and the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ct.Po.Ar is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure defines the area of the cortical bone with holes within a predefined section of cortical bone. The changes in Tb.Sp between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).
Change in Cancellous Osteoid Thickness (Cn.O.Th)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.O.Th measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the thickness of the unmineralized bone (osteoid) in a predefined region of cancellous bone. The changes in Cn.O.Th between two time-points are being reported.
Change in Cancellous Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Cn.MAR)Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsiesParticipants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.MAR is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate mineral is being laid down per day in a predefined region of the cancellous bone. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Cn.MAR between two time-points are being reported.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Individuals with hypoparathyroidism were enrolled at the NIH clinical center, beginning in October 2006. The protocol was redesigned and amended in February 2010. Some of the previously enrolled participants were re-enrolled in the new study. New participants were also enrolled on the new study through October 2014.

Pre-assignment details

All participants were put on conventional care therapy for 2-6 months prior to HPTH therapy. Previously enrolled participants had their baseline bone biopsy prior to the study's conventional care period. Newly enrolled participants had their baseline bone biopsy performed at the started of HPTH therapy.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1 (HPTH on Old Study) and Received HPTH on New Study
Cohort 1 was treated with HPTH therapy on original protocol. Cohort 1 participants who consented to the new protocol and were treated with HPTH on the new protocol were followed for safety outcomes only. The Safety population of Cohort 1 consisted of 7 participants.
7
Cohort 2 (CC on Old Study) and Treated With HPTH on New Study
Cohort 2 consists of participants previously treated with conventional care (CC) throughout the original protocol. Cohort 2 participants who received at least one dose of HPTH on the new protocol were included in safety population. Cohort 2 safety population includes 5 participants.
5
Cohort 3 (Newly Enrolled) and Treated With HPTH on New Study
Cohort 3 consists of new participants (i.e. not previously enrolled) that consented to the revised protocol. The Cohort 3 safety population includes 19 subjects who received any HPTH on the new study.
19
Total31

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event102
Overall StudyDid not re-consent to revised protocol1100
Overall StudyDXA or QCT z-score or t-score<-2020
Overall StudyFailed screening004
Overall StudyFDA partial hold on PTH0011
Overall StudyNon-compliance with study protocol010
Overall StudyPartial recovery of parathyroid function001
Overall StudyParticipant elected to discontinue001
Overall StudyPregnancy100
Overall StudyPTH resistance001
Overall StudySwitch to Natpara003

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalCohort 1 (HPTH on Old Study) and Received HPTH on New StudyCohort 2 (CC on Old Study) and Treated With HPTH on New StudyCohort 3 (Newly Enrolled) and Treated With HPTH on New Study
Age, Customized
Age
20-29 years
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
< 20 years
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
30-39 years
8 Participants1 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
40-49 years
13 Participants3 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
50-59 years
6 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
BMI29.31 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.266
29.71 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.232
29.14 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.31
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
31 Participants7 Participants5 Participants19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Height168.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.89
160.8 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.93
171.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.67
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
30 Participants7 Participants5 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants6 Participants3 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Weight79.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.56
72.2 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.39
74.9 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.92
82.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.01

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
28 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Bone Biopsy Cancellous Bone Volume (Cn.BV/TV)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, so the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.BV/TV is one of 8 primary endpoints measured from the bone biopsy. The changes in Cn.BV/TV outcome between two time-points are being reported. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Bone Biopsy Cancellous Bone Volume (Cn.BV/TV)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline3.05 z-scoreStandard Error 1.095
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Bone Biopsy Cancellous Bone Volume (Cn.BV/TV)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline3.69 z-scoreStandard Error 0.94
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Bone Biopsy Cancellous Bone Volume (Cn.BV/TV)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 10.64 z-scoreStandard Error 1.379
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.BV/TV at biopsy baseline, year 1, 2 \& 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, covariate for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2. No bone biopsy baseline covariate was included because it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.015Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.BV/TV at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included because it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.002Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with: Cn.BV/TV change from baseline at biopsy year 1 or years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year, and baseline Cn.BV/TV, as model covariates; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay of 30 to 31 months from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered to stabilize variance) was added as a covariate to the model for Cohort 2 only (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable).p-value: 0.649Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change in Cancellous Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Cn.BFR/BS)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.BFR/BS, measured from the bone biopsy, is the cancellous bone formation rate per unit of bone surface where cancellous refers to the spongy structure of the bone. The changes in Cn.BFR/BS between two time-points are being reported. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Cn.BFR/BS)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline4.25 z-scoreStandard Error 1.42
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Cn.BFR/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline5.75 z-scoreStandard Error 1.251
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Cn.BFR/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 11.50 z-scoreStandard Error 1.647
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.BFR/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.009Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.BFR/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.BFR/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.374Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change in Cancellous Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based)(Cn.MS/BS)

Following their baseline bone biopsy, 5, 5, and 2 participants were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at years 1, 2, and 4 after the start of HPTH therapy, respectively. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced in size due to withdrawal and the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.MS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the cancellous bone surface that is actively forming bone. The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Cn.MS/BS between two time-points are being reported.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based)(Cn.MS/BS)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline14.63 percentage of predefined area of boneStandard Error 3.996
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based)(Cn.MS/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline21.47 percentage of predefined area of boneStandard Error 3.489
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based)(Cn.MS/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 16.85 percentage of predefined area of boneStandard Error 4.774
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.MS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.002Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.MS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.MS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.168Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change in Endocortical Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Ec.BFR/BS)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. However, because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.BFR/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate of new bone formation per day on the inner cortical (endocortical) surface in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ec.BFR/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Ec.BFR/BS)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline0.12 um^2/um/dStandard Error 0.063
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Ec.BFR/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline0.22 um^2/um/dStandard Error 0.055
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Ec.BFR/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 10.10 um^2/um/dStandard Error 0.072
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.BFR/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.083Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.BFR/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.BFR/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.164Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change in Endocortical Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based) (Ec.MS/BS)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.MS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the endocortical bone surface that is actively forming bone. The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Ec.MS/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. This will only include participants from cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based) (Ec.MS/BS)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline18.39 percentage of regional interestStandard Error 7.748
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based) (Ec.MS/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline30.94 percentage of regional interestStandard Error 6.757
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based) (Ec.MS/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 112.55 percentage of regional interestStandard Error 8.944
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.MS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.031Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.MS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.MS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.178Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change in Intracortical Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Ic.BFR/BS)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. However, because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.BFR/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate of new bone formation between the two cortical surfaces (intracortical) in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ic.BFR/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Ic.BFR/BS)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline0.18 um^2/um/dStandard Error 0.045
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Ic.BFR/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline0.10 um^2/um/dStandard Error 0.04
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Ic.BFR/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1-0.07 um^2/um/dStandard Error 0.052
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.BFR/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.BFR/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.022Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.BFR/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.172Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change in Intracortical Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based) (Ic.MS/BS)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.MS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the intracortical bone surface that is actively forming bone. The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Ic.MS/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based) (Ic.MS/BS)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline24.75 percentage of regional interestStandard Error 6
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based) (Ic.MS/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline14.36 percentage of regional interestStandard Error 5.208
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based) (Ic.MS/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1-10.4 percentage of regional interestStandard Error 6.999
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.MS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.MS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.018Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.MS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.155Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change in Total Number of Cortical Pores Per mm^2 (Ct.Po.N)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, so the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ct.Po.N is a bone biopsy measure that assess the amount of holes in the cortical bone within a predetermined area of cortical bone. The changes in Cn.BV/TV outcome between two time-points are being reported. Cortical bone with a higher number of holes may be at greater risk of fracture. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Total Number of Cortical Pores Per mm^2 (Ct.Po.N)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline1.12 cortical pores/mm^2Standard Error 1.214
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Total Number of Cortical Pores Per mm^2 (Ct.Po.N)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline1.86 cortical pores/mm^2Standard Error 1.149
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Total Number of Cortical Pores Per mm^2 (Ct.Po.N)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 10.74 cortical pores/mm^2Standard Error 1.175
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ct.Po.N at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.371Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with: Ct.Po.N change from baseline at biopsy year 1 or years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year, and baseline Ct.Po.N, as model covariates; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay of 30 to 31 months from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered to stabilize variance) was added as a covariate to the model for Cohort 2 only (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable).p-value: 0.129Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ct.Po.N at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.538Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

24 Hour Urine NTX Telopeptide

Urine was collected over 24 hours and the total NTX Telopeptide measured

Time frame: Baseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) Combined24 Hour Urine NTX TelopeptideBaseline visit21.35 nmol Bone Collagen Equiv/mmol CreatinineStandard Error 6.117
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) Combined24 Hour Urine NTX TelopeptideLast visit on HPTH prior to weaning305.1 nmol Bone Collagen Equiv/mmol CreatinineStandard Error 60.885
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) Combined24 Hour Urine NTX TelopeptidePost-HPTH follow-up visit29.89 nmol Bone Collagen Equiv/mmol CreatinineStandard Error 14.758
Secondary

Average Severity Score of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)

Severity is measured using four separate items of the FSI questionnaire that assesses how the participant felt on their most, least, and average fatigue days in the past week as well as current fatigue. Participants score their level of fatigue for each item on an 11-point scale (0=not at all fatigued, 10=as fatigued as I could be). An average is taken of sum of these 4 scores. The average severity score can range from 0 to 10. A higher average severity score indicates that the participant is experiencing more severe fatigue.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedAverage Severity Score of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)Baseline visit4.16 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.398
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedAverage Severity Score of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)Six-month visit after start of HPTH3.53 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.356
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedAverage Severity Score of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)Last visit on HPTH prior to weaning3.63 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.427
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedAverage Severity Score of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)Post-HPTH follow-up visit4.03 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.638
Secondary

Change in Average Thickness of Inner and Outer Cortices (Ct.Th)

Participants (Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ct.Th, measured from the bone biopsy, is the average thickness of the inner and outer cortices. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Ct.Th between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Average Thickness of Inner and Outer Cortices (Ct.Th)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline2.02 z-scoreStandard Error 0.916
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Average Thickness of Inner and Outer Cortices (Ct.Th)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline0.78 z-scoreStandard Error 0.771
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Average Thickness of Inner and Outer Cortices (Ct.Th)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1-1.25 z-scoreStandard Error 1.092
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ct.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.043Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ct.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.334Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with: Ct.Th change from baseline at biopsy year 1 or years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year, and baseline Ct.Th, as model covariates; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay of 30 to 31 months from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered to stabilize variance) was added as a covariate to the model for Cohort 2 only (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable).p-value: 0.269Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Cancellous Adjusted Apposition Rate (Cn.AjAR)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.AjAR is measured from the bone biopsy. Cn.AjAR represents the Cn.MAR averaged over the entire osteoid surface.The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Cn.AjAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Adjusted Apposition Rate (Cn.AjAR)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline3.10 z-scoreStandard Error 0.824
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Adjusted Apposition Rate (Cn.AjAR)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline1.89 z-scoreStandard Error 0.722
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Adjusted Apposition Rate (Cn.AjAR)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1-1.21 z-scoreStandard Error 0.972
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.AjAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.002Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.AjAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.022Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.AjAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.228Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Cancellous Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Cn.MAR)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.MAR is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate mineral is being laid down per day in a predefined region of the cancellous bone. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Cn.MAR between two time-points are being reported.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Cn.MAR)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline3.21 z-scoreStandard Error 1.002
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Cn.MAR)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline3.07 z-scoreStandard Error 0.885
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Cn.MAR)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1-0.14 z-scoreStandard Error 1.151
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.MAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.006Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.MAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.004Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.MAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.904Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Cancellous Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Cn.ES/BS)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.ES/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the cancellous bone surface that contains unmineralized bone (osteoid). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Cn.ES/BS between two time-points are being reported.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Cn.ES/BS)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline6.55 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 1.648
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Cn.ES/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline10.30 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 1.543
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Cn.ES/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 13.75 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 1.415
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.ES/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.ES/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.ES/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.02Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Cancellous Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Cn.OS/BS)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.OS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the cancellous bone surface that contains unmineralized bone (osteoid). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Cn.OS/BS between two time-points are being reported.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Cn.OS/BS)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline12.70 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 3.407
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Cn.OS/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline24.34 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 2.971
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Cn.OS/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 111.64 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 4.084
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.OS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.002Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.OS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.OS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.01Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Cancellous Osteoid Thickness (Cn.O.Th)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.O.Th measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the thickness of the unmineralized bone (osteoid) in a predefined region of cancellous bone. The changes in Cn.O.Th between two time-points are being reported.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Osteoid Thickness (Cn.O.Th)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline1.99 umStandard Error 0.553
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Osteoid Thickness (Cn.O.Th)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline2.29 umStandard Error 0.472
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cancellous Osteoid Thickness (Cn.O.Th)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 10.30 umStandard Error 0.704
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.O.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.003Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.O.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Cn.O.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.68Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-Biopsies

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High is a measure of the area of high bone cortex 1 mineralization based on the mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesYear 1 - Baseline Biopsy-0.40 Percentage of the region of interestStandard Error 4.052
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesYears 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline Biopsy-3.54 Percentage of the region of interestStandard Error 3.592
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesYears 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 Biopsy-3.14 Percentage of the region of interestStandard Error 4.049
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.922Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.342Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.449Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-Biopsies

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low is a measure of the area of low bone cortex 1 mineralization based on the mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesYear 1 - Baseline Biopsy4.95 Percentage of the region of interestStandard Error 2.172
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesYears 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline Biopsy7.51 Percentage of the region of interestStandard Error 3.245
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesYears 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 Biopsy2.55 Percentage of the region of interestStandard Error 4.088
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.082Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.057Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.547Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-Biopsies

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean is a measure of mean bone calcium content of the bone cortex 1 based on the mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesYear 1 - Baseline Biopsy-0.98 Percentage of the region of interestStandard Error 0.357
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesYears 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline Biopsy-1.15 Percentage of the region of interestStandard Error 0.633
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesYears 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 Biopsy-0.16 Percentage of the region of interestStandard Error 0.525
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.02Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.11Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.764Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-Biopsies

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak is a measure of the most frequent calcium content of the bone cortex 1 based on the bone mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesYear 1 Biopsy - Baseline Biopsy-0.47 Percentage of the region of interestStandard Error 0.365
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesYears 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline Biopsy-0.96 Percentage of the region of interestStandard Error 0.673
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesYears 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 Biopsy-0.49 Percentage of the region of interestStandard Error 0.588
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.227Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.194Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.434Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Width From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-Biopsies

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low is a measure of the area of low bone cortex 1 mineralization based on the mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Width From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesYear 1 - Baseline Biopsy1.24 Percentage of the region of interestStandard Error 0.343
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Width From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesYears 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline Biopsy1.13 Percentage of the region of interestStandard Error 0.302
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Width From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-BiopsiesYears 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 Biopsy-0.11 Percentage of the region of interestStandard Error 0.415
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Width as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.003Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Width as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.002Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Width as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.787Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Endocortical Adjusted Apposition Rate (Ec.AjAR)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.AjAR is measured from the bone biopsy. Ec.AjAR represents the endocortical mineral apposition rate (Ec.MAR) averaged over the entire osteoid surface. This is another histomorphometric way to evaluate the rate at which bone is laid down on the inner cortical surface per day. The changes in Ec.AjAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Adjusted Apposition Rate (Ec.AjAR)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline0.50 um/dStandard Error 0.109
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Adjusted Apposition Rate (Ec.AjAR)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline0.49 um/dStandard Error 0.088
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Adjusted Apposition Rate (Ec.AjAR)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1-0.00 um/dStandard Error 0.135
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.AjAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.AjAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.AjAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.974Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Endocortical Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Ec.MAR)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose.Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.MAR is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate mineral is being laid down per day on the inner cortical (endocortical) surface in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ec.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Ec.MAR)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline0.41 um/dStandard Error 0.115
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Ec.MAR)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline0.46 um/dStandard Error 0.104
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Ec.MAR)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 10.05 um/dStandard Error 0.126
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.MAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.003Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.MAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.MAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.712Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Endocortical Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Ec.ES/BS)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4- year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.ES/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the endocortical bone surface that is resorbed (eroded). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Ec.ES/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Ec.ES/BS)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline5.95 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 3.27
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Ec.ES/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline9.29 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 3.063
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Ec.ES/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 13.34 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 3.288
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.ES/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.088Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.ES/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.009Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.ES/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.325Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Endocortical Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Ec.OS/BS)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.OS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate mineral is being laid down per day on the inner cortical (endocortical) surface in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ec.OS/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Ec.OS/BS)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline13.43 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 5.606
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Ec.OS/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline24.56 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 4.872
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Ec.OS/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 111.13 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 6.491
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.OS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.029Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.OS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.OS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.104Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Endocortical Osteoid Thickness (Ec.O.Th)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.O.Th is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the thickness of the unmineralized bone (osteoid) on the inner side of the cortex(endocortical). The changes in Cn.AjAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Osteoid Thickness (Ec.O.Th)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline2.15 umStandard Error 0.628
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Osteoid Thickness (Ec.O.Th)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline1.84 umStandard Error 0.552
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Endocortical Osteoid Thickness (Ec.O.Th)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1-0.31 umStandard Error 0.718
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.O.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.004Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.O.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.006Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ec.O.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.67Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Intracortical Adjusted Apposition Rate (Ic.AjAR)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.AjAR is one of 21 secondary endpoints measured from the bone biopsy. Ic.AjAR represents the intracortical mineral apposition rate (Ic.MAR) averaged over the the entire osteoid surface. This is another histomorphometric way to evaluate the rate at which bone is laid down within the middle of the cortex per day. The changes in Ic.AjAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline values)

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Adjusted Apposition Rate (Ic.AjAR)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline0.16 um/dStandard Error 0.349
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Adjusted Apposition Rate (Ic.AjAR)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline-0.18 um/dStandard Error 0.318
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Adjusted Apposition Rate (Ic.AjAR)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1-0.34 um/dStandard Error 0.345
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.AjAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.651Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.AjAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.58Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.AjAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.338Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Intracortical Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Ic.MAR)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.MAR is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate mineral is being laid down per day within the middle of the cortex (intracortical) surface in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Ic.MAR)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline0.23 um/dStandard Error 0.174
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Ic.MAR)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline0.12 um/dStandard Error 0.161
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Ic.MAR)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1-0.12 um/dStandard Error 0.185
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.MAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.202Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.MAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.486Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.MAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.535Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Intracortical Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Ic.ES/BS)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.ES/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of bone surface within the middle of the cortex that is resorbed (eroded). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Ic.ES/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Ic.ES/BS)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline6.79 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 1.84
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Ic.ES/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline7.40 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 1.5
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Ic.ES/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 10.61 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 2.239
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.ES/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.002Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.ES/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.ES/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.789Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Intracortical Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Ic.OS/BS)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.OS/BS measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the intracortical bone surface that is not mineralized (osteoid). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in OS/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Ic.OS/BS)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline18.39 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 4.284
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Ic.OS/BS)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline13.17 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 3.54
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Ic.OS/BS)Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 Biopsy-5.22 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 5.181
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.OS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.OS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.003Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.OS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.328Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Intracortical Osteoid Thickness (Ic.O.Th)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.O.Th is one of 21 secondary endpoints measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the thickness of the unmineralized bone (osteoid) within the middle of the cortex (intracortical). The changes in Ic.O.Th between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Osteoid Thickness (Ic.O.Th)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline2.39 umStandard Error 0.687
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Osteoid Thickness (Ic.O.Th)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline1.48 umStandard Error 0.564
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Intracortical Osteoid Thickness (Ic.O.Th)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1-0.91 umStandard Error 0.833
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.O.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.004Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.O.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.023Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ic.O.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.288Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Total Area of Cortical Porosity (Ct.Po.Ar)

Following their baseline bone biopsy, 5, 5, and 2 participants were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at years 1, 2, and 4 after the start of HPTH therapy, respectively. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced in size due to withdrawal and the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ct.Po.Ar is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure defines the area of the cortical bone with holes within a predefined section of cortical bone. The changes in Tb.Sp between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. This will only include participants from cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Total Area of Cortical Porosity (Ct.Po.Ar)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline3.41 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 2.337
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Total Area of Cortical Porosity (Ct.Po.Ar)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline0.26 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 1.911
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Total Area of Cortical Porosity (Ct.Po.Ar)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1-3.15 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 2.837
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ct.Po.Ar at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.166Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ct.Po.Ar at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.895Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ct.Po.Ar at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.282Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Trabecular Number (Tb.N)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Tb.N is measured from the bone biopsy. Tb.N is the measure of the average number of trabeculae per unit length. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Tb.N between two time-points are being reported.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Trabecular Number (Tb.N)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline3.62 z-scoreStandard Error 1.382
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Trabecular Number (Tb.N)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline3.30 z-scoreStandard Error 1.221
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Trabecular Number (Tb.N)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1-0.32 z-scoreStandard Error 1.586
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with: Tb.N change from baseline at biopsy year 1 or years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year, and baseline Tb.N, as model covariates; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay of 30 to 31 months from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered to stabilize variance) was added as a covariate to the model for Cohort 2 only (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable).p-value: 0.019Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with: Tb.N change from baseline at biopsy year 1 or years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year, and baseline Tb.N, as model covariates; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay of 30 to 31 months from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered to stabilize variance) was added as a covariate to the model for Cohort 2 only (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable).p-value: 0.017Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis was performed with: Tb.N change from baseline at biopsy year 1 or years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year, and baseline Tb.N, as model covariates; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay of 30 to 31 months from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered to stabilize variance) was added as a covariate to the model for Cohort 2 only (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable).p-value: 0.843Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Trabecular Separation (Tb.Sp)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Tb.Sp is measured from the bone biopsy. Tb.Sp is the mean distance between trabeculae, assessed using direct 3D methods. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Tb.Sp between two time-points are being reported.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Trabecular Separation (Tb.Sp)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline-2.28 z-scoreStandard Error 0.803
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Trabecular Separation (Tb.Sp)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline-1.76 z-scoreStandard Error 0.693
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Trabecular Separation (Tb.Sp)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 10.52 z-scoreStandard Error 0.997
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Tb.Sp at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.013Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Tb.Sp at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.025Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Tb.Sp at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.608Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Trabecular Thickness (Tb.Th)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Tb.Th is measured from the bone biopsy. Tb.Th is the mean thickness of trabeculae, assessed using direct 3D methods. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Tb.Th between two time-points are being reported.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Trabecular Thickness (Tb.Th)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline-0.28 z-scoreStandard Error 0.779
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Trabecular Thickness (Tb.Th)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline0.05 z-scoreStandard Error 0.675
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedChange in Trabecular Thickness (Tb.Th)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 10.33 z-scoreStandard Error 0.95
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Tb.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.72Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Tb.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.944Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Tb.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.73Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Composite Severity Score of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)

Severity is measured using four separate items of the FSI questionnaire that assesses how the participant felt on their most, least, and average fatigue days in the past week as well as current fatigue. Participants score their level of fatigue for each item on an 11-point scale (0=not at all fatigued, 10=as fatigued as I could be). The composite severity score reflects the sum of these 4 scores. The composite severity scores can range from 0 to 40. A higher composite severity scores indicates that the participant is experiencing more severe fatigue.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedComposite Severity Score of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)Baseline visit15.4 Composite score from the FSIStandard Error 1.56
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedComposite Severity Score of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)Six-month visit after start of HPTH14.1 Composite score from the FSIStandard Error 1.43
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedComposite Severity Score of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)Last visit on HPTH prior to weaning14.6 Composite score from the FSIStandard Error 1.69
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedComposite Severity Score of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)Post-HPTH follow-up visit16.1 Composite score from the FSIStandard Error 2.55
Secondary

Number of Participants With Nephrolithiasis/Nephrocalcinosis

Participants had ultrasound and CT imaging of the kidney were performed yearly. The rates of new, stable, and progressing nephrocalcinosis and nephrolithiasis (NCNL) were recorded.

Time frame: Baseline, 12-Month Visit, 24-Month Visit, 36-Month Visit, 48-Month Visit, and 60-Month Visit

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedNumber of Participants With Nephrolithiasis/NephrocalcinosisNew/progressing NCNL on HPTH therapy10 Participants
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedNumber of Participants With Nephrolithiasis/NephrocalcinosisNo detectable NCNL at any time during study5 Participants
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedNumber of Participants With Nephrolithiasis/NephrocalcinosisBaseline NCNL that remains stable on HPTH therapy7 Participants
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedNumber of Participants With Nephrolithiasis/NephrocalcinosisNCNL that resolved on HPTH therapy2 Participants
Secondary

Perceived Interference (PI) of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)

Perceived interference is measured using seven separate items that assess the degree to which fatigue in the past week was judged to interfere with general level of activity, ability to bathe and dress, normal work activity, ability to concentrate, relations with others, enjoyment of life, and mood. The interference ratings were summed to yield a total interference score ranging from 0 (no perceived interference due to fatigue) to 70 (maximum possible perceived interference due to fatigue).

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedPerceived Interference (PI) of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)Baseline visit18.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.4
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedPerceived Interference (PI) of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)Six-month visit after start of HPTH15.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.2
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedPerceived Interference (PI) of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)Last visit on HPTH prior to weaning15.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.74
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedPerceived Interference (PI) of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)Post-HPTH follow-up visit19.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.45
Secondary

Primary Bone Biopsy Measures Adjusted for HPTH Dose

The 8 primary bone biopsy measures were to be adjusted HPTH dose by fitting the primary bone biopsy model with both linear and quadratic dose covariates added to the model. However, the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. To add additional linear and quadratic dose covariates to the statistical model with an already small sample sizes would highly risk over-parameterizing the model. Thus no new analysis was performed.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

Secondary

Raw 1/3 Radius Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA.

The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit The 1/3 Radius BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw 1/3 Radius Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA.Raw BMD at Baseline0.746 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0138
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw 1/3 Radius Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA.Raw BMD at 6 months0.741 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0149
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw 1/3 Radius Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA.Raw BMD at last HPTH visit0.731 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0258
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw 1/3 Radius Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA.Raw BMD at Follow-up0.716 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0181
Secondary

Raw AP Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA

The DXA BMD were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The AP Spine BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw AP Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at Baseline1.175 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0253
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw AP Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at 6 months1.139 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0228
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw AP Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at last HPTH visit1.178 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0427
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw AP Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at Follow-up1.250 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0362
Secondary

Raw Femoral Neck Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA

The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Femoral BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw Femoral Neck Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at Baseline0.909 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0234
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw Femoral Neck Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at 6 months0.881 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0233
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw Femoral Neck Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at last HPTH visit0.935 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0328
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw Femoral Neck Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at Follow-up0.925 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0339
Secondary

Raw Lateral Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA

The DXA BMD were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Lateral Spine BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA .

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw Lateral Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at Baseline0.916 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0179
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw Lateral Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at 6 months0.918 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0215
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw Lateral Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at last HPTH visit1.032 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0404
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw Lateral Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at Follow-up1.094 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0676
Secondary

Raw Total Hip Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA

The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Total Hip BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw Total Hip Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at Baseline1.043 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0246
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw Total Hip Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at 6 months1.010 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0238
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw Total Hip Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at last HPTH visit1.043 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0301
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw Total Hip Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at Follow-up1.045 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0279
Secondary

Raw Whole Body Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA

The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Whole Body BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw Whole Body Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at Baseline1.248 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0162
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw Whole Body Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at 6 months1.230 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0198
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw Whole Body Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at last HPTH visit1.193 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0213
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedRaw Whole Body Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXARaw BMD at Follow-up1.228 g/cm^2Standard Error 0.0241
Secondary

Sensitivity Analyses of Female Menopause Status in the Primary Bone Biopsy Efficacy Models

As a sensitivity analysis, the 8 primary bone biopsy measures were to be adjusted for female menopausal status, by fitting the primary bone biopsy model with a menopausal status covariate added to the model. However, the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. Furthermore, 3 males would need to be removed from the model leaving 4, 3, 2 participants with bone biopsies with an additional degree of freedom consumed for the menopausal status covariate. Thus, the planned mixed models analysis was not performed since with such small samples sizes random fluctuations in the data could give misleading erroneous results.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

Secondary

Serum Alkaline Phosphatase

Serum Alkaline Phosphatase concentration

Time frame: Baseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSerum Alkaline PhosphataseBaseline visit9.92 ug/LStandard Error 1.017
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSerum Alkaline PhosphataseLast visit on HPTH prior to weaning33.34 ug/LStandard Error 5.148
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSerum Alkaline PhosphatasePost-HPTH follow-up visit12.69 ug/LStandard Error 3.254
Secondary

Serum Calcium

Serum Calcium concentration

Time frame: Baseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSerum CalciumBaseline visit2.02 Mmol/LStandard Error 0.035
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSerum CalciumLast visit on HPTH prior to weaning2.06 Mmol/LStandard Error 0.028
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSerum CalciumPost-HPTH follow-up visit2.02 Mmol/LStandard Error 0.041
Secondary

Serum Osteocalcin

Serum Osteocalcin concentration

Time frame: Baseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSerum OsteocalcinBaseline visit14.86 ng/mLStandard Error 0.877
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSerum OsteocalcinLast visit on HPTH prior to weaning164.6 ng/mLStandard Error 28.39
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSerum OsteocalcinPost-HPTH follow-up visit49.15 ng/mLStandard Error 22.412
Secondary

Serum Phosphorus

Serum Phosphorus concentration

Time frame: Baseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSerum PhosphorusBaseline visit4.74 mg/dLStandard Error 0.118
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSerum PhosphorusLast visit on HPTH prior to weaning4.62 mg/dLStandard Error 0.108
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSerum PhosphorusPost-HPTH follow-up visit4.59 mg/dLStandard Error 0.145
Secondary

SF36 Bodily Pain Domain

The Bodily Pain (BP) domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The BP domain scores indicate to what extent a participant's bodily pain hinders their performance of daily activities.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Bodily Pain DomainSix-month visit after start of HPTH49.53 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.705
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Bodily Pain DomainBaseline visit48.97 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.749
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Bodily Pain DomainLast visit on HPTH prior to weaning47.52 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.628
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Bodily Pain DomainPost-HPTH follow-up visit47.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.709
Secondary

SF36 Emotional Role Limitations Domain

Emotional Role Limitations (RE) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The RE Domain score assesses the extent to which the emotional condition of the participant, e.g. feeling depressed or anxious, limits his/her daily functioning and ability to perform roles, such as in cutting down on the amount of time spent on work or other activities and accomplishing less than he/she would like to.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Emotional Role Limitations DomainBaseline visit48.27 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.31
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Emotional Role Limitations DomainSix-month visit after start of HPTH51.34 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.852
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Emotional Role Limitations DomainLast visit on HPTH prior to weaning51.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.539
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Emotional Role Limitations DomainPost-HPTH follow-up visit47.24 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.04
Secondary

SF36 General Health Domain

General Health (GH) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The GH domain score assesses a participant's perception of their general health in terms of concepts such as excellent, very good, good, fair or poor, getting ill easier than other people, and just as healthy as anyone he/she knows.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 General Health DomainBaseline visit43.80 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.907
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 General Health DomainSix-month visit after start of HPTH48.11 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.801
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 General Health DomainLast visit on HPTH prior to weaning45.25 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.976
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 General Health DomainPost-HPTH follow-up visit42.45 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.578
Secondary

SF36 Mental Health Domain

Mental Health (MH) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The MH domain assesses the extent to which the participant is, among other things, feeling full of pep, is happy, is feeling calm and peaceful, is very nervous, or is feeling worn out and tired.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Mental Health DomainLast visit on HPTH prior to weaning49.30 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.029
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Mental Health DomainPost-HPTH follow-up visit47.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.793
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Mental Health DomainBaseline visit47.07 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.12
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Mental Health DomainSix-month visit after start of HPTH49.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.736
Secondary

SF36 Physical Function Domain

Physical Function (PF) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The PF domain assesses the extent to which the participant's perceptions of his/her ability to perform vigorous and moderate physical activities are influenced by his/her physical condition.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Physical Function DomainBaseline visit49.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.479
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Physical Function DomainSix-month visit after start of HPTH51.07 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.265
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Physical Function DomainLast visit on HPTH prior to weaning48.97 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.807
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Physical Function DomainPost-HPTH follow-up visit47.91 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.333
Secondary

SF36 Physical Role Limitations Domain

Physical Role Limitations (RP) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The RP Domain assesses the extent to which a participant's' performance of his/her roles in daily activities is impeded by his/her physical state of health.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Physical Role Limitations DomainBaseline visit44.10 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.085
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Physical Role Limitations DomainSix-month visit after start of HPTH45.73 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.206
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Physical Role Limitations DomainLast visit on HPTH prior to weaning48.49 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.699
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Physical Role Limitations DomainPost-HPTH follow-up visit45.56 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.938
Secondary

SF36 Social Function Domain

Social Function (SF) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical components: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental components: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool is used to calculate each of the eight domain scores. The scoring tool transforms the score into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. SF36 domain scores are scaled to have a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. The SF Domain assesses the level of a participant's social activities and interaction with significant others such as family members, friends, neighbours and other social relations. Lower scores indicate more disability; higher scores indicate less disability with respect to social function.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Social Function DomainBaseline visit46.40 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.562
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Social Function DomainSix-month visit after start of HPTH48.67 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.178
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Social Function DomainLast visit on HPTH prior to weaning49.12 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.048
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Social Function DomainPost-HPTH follow-up visit42.00 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.782
Secondary

SF36 Vitality Domain

Vitality (VT) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. SF36 domain scores are scaled to have a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores reflect a better quality of life.The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical components: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental components: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool is used to calculate the eight domain scores. The scoring tool transforms the score into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. SF36 domain scores are scaled to have a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The VT Domain assesses the participant's experience of feeling energetic and full of pep, or worn out and tired.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Vitality DomainBaseline visit43.37 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.347
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Vitality DomainSix-month visit after start of HPTH46.89 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.09
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Vitality DomainLast visit on HPTH prior to weaning48.45 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.284
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedSF36 Vitality DomainPost-HPTH follow-up visit44.98 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.457
Secondary

Total Area of Inner and Outer Cortices (Ct.Ar)

Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ct.AR is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure defines the area of the outer cortex and inner cortex within a predefined section of cortical bone. The changes in Ct.Ar between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures).

Time frame: Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies

Population: The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedTotal Area of Inner and Outer Cortices (Ct.Ar)Biopsy Year 1 - Baseline6.56 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 6.905
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedTotal Area of Inner and Outer Cortices (Ct.Ar)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Baseline1.93 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 6.128
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedTotal Area of Inner and Outer Cortices (Ct.Ar)Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1-4.64 percentage of region of interestStandard Error 8.006
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ct.Ar at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.358Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ct.Ar at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.76Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Mixed models analysis: Ct.Ar at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model.p-value: 0.57Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Total Distance Walked During a 6-minute Walk

The total distance a participant was able to walk during a 6-minute walk

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedTotal Distance Walked During a 6-minute WalkBaseline visit606.3 Distance in metersStandard Error 19.5
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedTotal Distance Walked During a 6-minute WalkSix-month visit after start of HPTH608.0 Distance in metersStandard Error 18.83
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedTotal Distance Walked During a 6-minute WalkLast visit on HPTH prior to weaning567.2 Distance in metersStandard Error 23.16
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedTotal Distance Walked During a 6-minute WalkPost-HPTH follow-up visit604.5 Distance in metersStandard Error 26.67
Secondary

Z-score of 1/3 Radius Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA.

The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit The 1/3 Radius BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH)

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of 1/3 Radius Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA.Z-score BMD at Baseline0.89 z-scoreStandard Error 0.197
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of 1/3 Radius Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA.Z-score BMD at 6 months0.82 z-scoreStandard Error 0.19
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of 1/3 Radius Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA.Z-score BMD at last HPTH visit0.26 z-scoreStandard Error 0.273
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of 1/3 Radius Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA.Z-score BMD at Follow-up0.50 z-scoreStandard Error 0.276
Secondary

Z-score of AP Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA

The DXA BMD were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The AP Spine BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visits

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of AP Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at Baseline1.46 z-scoreStandard Error 0.221
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of AP Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at 6 months1.15 z-scoreStandard Error 0.207
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of AP Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at last HPTH visit1.24 z-scoreStandard Error 0.279
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of AP Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at Follow-up2.30 z-scoreStandard Error 0.306
Secondary

Z-score of Femoral Neck Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA

The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Femoral BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visits

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of Femoral Neck Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at Baseline0.85 z-scoreStandard Error 0.192
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of Femoral Neck Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at 6 months0.59 z-scoreStandard Error 0.186
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of Femoral Neck Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at last HPTH visit0.99 z-scoreStandard Error 0.229
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of Femoral Neck Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at Follow-up1.10 z-scoreStandard Error 0.249
Secondary

Z-score of Lateral Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA

The DXA BMD were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Lateral Spine BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA . The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visits

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of Lateral Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at Baseline2.16 z-scoreStandard Error 0.215
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of Lateral Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at 6 months2.22 z-scoreStandard Error 0.223
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of Lateral Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at last HPTH visit3.87 z-scoreStandard Error 0.483
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of Lateral Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at Follow-up4.72 z-scoreStandard Error 0.737
Secondary

Z-score of Total Hip Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA

The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Total Hip BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visits

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of Total Hip Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at Baseline0.85 z-scoreStandard Error 0.161
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of Total Hip Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at 6 months0.66 z-scoreStandard Error 0.165
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of Total Hip Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at last HPTH visit0.89 z-scoreStandard Error 0.212
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of Total Hip Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at Follow-up1.01 z-scoreStandard Error 0.172
Secondary

Z-score of Whole Body Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA

The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Whole Body BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visits

Population: Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of Whole Body Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at Baseline1.59 z-scoreStandard Error 0.193
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of Whole Body Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at 6 months1.32 z-scoreStandard Error 0.18
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of Whole Body Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at last HPTH visit0.66 z-scoreStandard Error 0.172
Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) CombinedZ-score of Whole Body Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXAZ-score BMD at Follow-up1.12 z-scoreStandard Error 0.173

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026