Skip to content

Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Prehospital Resuscitation Using an Impedance Valve

Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Prehospital Resuscitation Using an Impedance Valve and Early Versus Delayed Analysis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00394706
Enrollment
11738
Registered
2006-11-01
Start date
2007-06-30
Completion date
2010-07-31
Last updated
2018-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Arrest

Keywords

cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to look at two different treatments during a cardiac arrest that occurs outside of the hospital and whether either or both treatments will increase the number of people who live to hospital discharge. A cardiac arrest is when the heart stops pumping blood to the body.

Detailed description

The first treatment involves using a device called the Impedance Threshold Device (ITD). The ITD is a small hard plastic device about the size of a fist that is attached to the face mask or airway tube used during CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation). The ITD provides increased blood flow back to the heart during chest compressions until the heart starts beating on its own again. The other treatment involves the amount of CPR given before the emergency medical services (EMS) providers first look at the heart rhythm to determine if a shock is needed. A person would receive either about 30 seconds of chest compressions or about 3 minutes of compressions before checking the heart rhythm. Giving some compressions before checking the heart rhythm increases the blood being circulated to the body. Researchers do not know how many compressions before the rhythm check are necessary to save more lives. Depending on the circumstances of the cardiac arrest a person may receive only one of these treatments or both of these treatments. The purpose of the research study is to determine if more people live when either the real ITD is used or if additional CPR is given before looking at the heart rhythm the first time. This study is being conducted in 9 different areas throughout the United States and Canada by the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC). About 15,000 patients will be enrolled in this research study.

Interventions

Use of Impedance Threshold Device (ITD)

DEVICESham ITD

Sham ITD

OTHERAnalyze early

Upon EMS arrival at the scene of a non-traumatic cardiac arrest, an assessment of the cardiac rhythm is done to determine whether a defibrillatory shock is required.

OTHERAnalyze later

Upon EMS arrival at the scene of a non-traumatic cardiac arrest, three minutes of CPR is given prior to the assessment of the cardiac rhythm to determine whether a defibrillatory shock is required.

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Defence Research and Development Canada
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
American Heart Association
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Washington
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All persons of local age of consent or older who suffer non-traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest outside of the hospital in the study communities with defibrillation and/or delivery of chest compressions provided by emergency medical service (EMS) providers dispatched to the scene and do not meet any of the

Exclusion criteria

.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival to Hospital Discharge With Satisfactory Function (Modified Rankin Scale [MRS] of Less Than or Equal to 3).Hospital discharge or death prior to dischargeThe modified Rankin Score (mRS) measures the ability of patients to function independently. The scale goes from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). Subjects with a mRS scores of three or less (i.e. better) at the time of hospital discharge were considered to have a positive outcome, resulting in a binary measure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival to Hospital DischargeSurvival to hospital discharge or death before discharge
Modified Rankin Score at 6 Months After Hospital Discharge6 months post hospital dischargeThe modified Rankin Score (mRS) measures the ability of patients to function independently. The scale goes from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death).
Adult Lifestyle and Function Version of Mini-Mental Status Exam at 6 Months6 months post hospital dischargeThe adult lifestyle and function interview (ALFI) version of the mini-mental status exam (MMSE) measures neurological status. The ALFI-MMSE has 23 items. It is scored from 0 to 22, with lower scores interpreted as being worse.
Health Utilities Index III Score and Geriatric Depression Scale Score 6 Months6 months post hospital dischargeThe Health Utilities Index Mark 3 system was used to evaluate generic health related quality of life (HRQL). The interview-administered version of HUI3 requires completion of a maximum of 39 questions. The HUI3 consists of eight attributes of general health (vision, hearing, speech, mobility, dexterity, emotion, cognition, and pain) with five or six levels per attribute. For each respondent, health status is described as a vector that combines the levels of each attribute. This information is then converted into a utility score of HRQL on a scale from perfect health (1.0) to death (0).

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Clinical sites enrolled patients during a run-in period with the first patient enrolled on June 7, 2007. The run-in period ranged from from 2 to 6 months across the sites. The last patient was enrolled in the evaluable phase on November 6, 2009. All patients were enrolled in the pre-hospital EMS setting.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Analyze Early + ITD
Analyze early: upon EMS (emergency medical services) arrival at the scene of a non-traumatic cardiac arrest, the EMS providers assess the cardiac rhythm as soon as possible. Approximately thirty seconds of CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) may be done prior to an assessment of the cardiac rhythm to determine whether a defibrillatory shock is required. Use of ITD (Impedance Threshold Device) by EMS providers in the prehospital setting.
1,817
Analyze Early + Sham
Analyze early: upon EMS arrival at the scene of a non-traumatic cardiac arrest, the EMS providers assess the cardiac rhythm as soon as possible. Approximately thirty seconds of CPR may be done prior to an assessment of the cardiac rhythm to determine whether a defibrillatory shock is required. Use of a sham ITD by EMS providers in the pre-hospital setting.
1,861
Analyze Early, Not in ITD vs Sham
Analyze early. Upon EMS arrival at the scene of a non-traumatic cardiac arrest, the EMS providers assess the cardiac rhythm as soon as possible. Approximately thirty seconds of CPR may be done prior to an assessment of the cardiac rhythm to determine whether a defibrillatory shock is required. Neither an ITD nor sham device used.
1,621
Analyze Later + ITD
Analyze later: upon the EMS arrival at the scene of a non-traumatic cardiac arrest, three minutes of CPR is done prior to the assessment of the cardiac rhythm to determine whether a defibrillatory shock is required. Use of Impedance Threshold Device by EMS providers in the pre-hospital setting.
1,631
Analyze Later + Sham
Analyze later: upon the EMS arrival at the scene of a non-traumatic cardiac arrest, three minutes of CPR is done prior to the assessment of the cardiac rhythm to determine whether a defibrillatory shock is required. Use of a sham ITD by EMS providers in the pre-hospital setting.
1,633
Analyze Later, Not in ITD vs. Sham
Analyze later: upon the EMS arrival at the scene of a non-traumatic cardiac arrest, three minutes of CPR is done prior to the assessment of the cardiac rhythm to determine whether a defibrillatory shock is required. Neither an ITD nor sham device used.
1,379
Not in AEvAL, ITD Device
Upon the EMS arrival at the scene of a non-traumatic cardiac arrest, local policy determines the length of CPR done prior to the assessment of the cardiac rhythm to determine whether a defibrillatory shock is required. Impedance Threshold Device used by EMS providers in the pre-hospital setting.
929
Not in AEvAL, Sham
Upon the EMS arrival at the scene of a non-traumatic cardiac arrest, local policy determines the length of CPR done prior to the assessment of the cardiac rhythm to determine whether a defibrillatory shock is required. Sham ITD used by EMS providers in the pre-hospital setting.
851
Total11,722

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up22812520
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject20100210

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAnalyze Early + ShamAnalyze Early, Not in ITD vs ShamAnalyze Later + ITDAnalyze Later + ShamAnalyze Later, Not in ITD vs. ShamAnalyze Early + ITDNot in AEvAL, ITD DeviceNot in AEvAL, ShamTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants11 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1050 Participants932 Participants937 Participants954 Participants789 Participants1082 Participants547 Participants481 Participants6772 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
809 Participants687 Participants693 Participants675 Participants590 Participants734 Participants381 Participants370 Participants4939 Participants
Age, Continuous66.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4
66.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
67.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.6
67.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4
66.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.7
67.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3
67.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3
66.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.7
66.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.6
Region of Enrollment
Canada
1097 participants1210 participants940 participants935 participants979 participants1084 participants395 participants362 participants7002 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
764 participants411 participants691 participants698 participants400 participants733 participants534 participants489 participants4720 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
673 Participants605 Participants615 Participants578 Participants486 Participants609 Participants313 Participants303 Participants4182 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1188 Participants1016 Participants1016 Participants1055 Participants893 Participants1208 Participants616 Participants548 Participants7540 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2,3100 / 2,3210 / 2,0510 / 2,1560 / 2,1910 / 1,8390 / 1,3360 / 1,278
serious
Total, serious adverse events
154 / 2,310193 / 2,321122 / 2,051166 / 2,156174 / 2,191121 / 1,839181 / 1,336152 / 1,278

Outcome results

Primary

Survival to Hospital Discharge With Satisfactory Function (Modified Rankin Scale [MRS] of Less Than or Equal to 3).

The modified Rankin Score (mRS) measures the ability of patients to function independently. The scale goes from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). Subjects with a mRS scores of three or less (i.e. better) at the time of hospital discharge were considered to have a positive outcome, resulting in a binary measure.

Time frame: Hospital discharge or death prior to discharge

Population: Analyses of both interventions excluded subjects who suffered arrest secondary to drowning, strangulation, or electrocution; or for whom the primary outcome was unknown. Additionally, the ITD vs. Sham analysis excluded subjects who did not have the device applied, had study exclusions, or who had a response time of more than 15 minutes.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Analyze EarlySurvival to Hospital Discharge With Satisfactory Function (Modified Rankin Scale [MRS] of Less Than or Equal to 3).310 participants
Analyze LaterSurvival to Hospital Discharge With Satisfactory Function (Modified Rankin Scale [MRS] of Less Than or Equal to 3).273 participants
Active ITDSurvival to Hospital Discharge With Satisfactory Function (Modified Rankin Scale [MRS] of Less Than or Equal to 3).254 participants
Sham ITDSurvival to Hospital Discharge With Satisfactory Function (Modified Rankin Scale [MRS] of Less Than or Equal to 3).260 participants
Comparison: Comparison of the rates of MRS \<=3 in Analyze Early vs. Analyze Later arms using a linear mixed effect model with an identity link and random effects to account for the cluster randomization.p-value: 0.5995% CI: [-1.1, 0.7]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Comparison of the rates of MRS \<=3 in Active ITD and Sham treatment arms, adjusted for sequential monitoring.p-value: 0.7195% CI: [-1.1, 0.8]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Adult Lifestyle and Function Version of Mini-Mental Status Exam at 6 Months

The adult lifestyle and function interview (ALFI) version of the mini-mental status exam (MMSE) measures neurological status. The ALFI-MMSE has 23 items. It is scored from 0 to 22, with lower scores interpreted as being worse.

Time frame: 6 months post hospital discharge

Population: ITT population, survived to hospital discharge, consented to participate in the post-discharge substudy, and with at least one post-discharge assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Analyze EarlyAdult Lifestyle and Function Version of Mini-Mental Status Exam at 6 Months18.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Analyze LaterAdult Lifestyle and Function Version of Mini-Mental Status Exam at 6 Months18.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Active ITDAdult Lifestyle and Function Version of Mini-Mental Status Exam at 6 Months18.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Sham ITDAdult Lifestyle and Function Version of Mini-Mental Status Exam at 6 Months18.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Comparison: Linear regression was used to assess associations between post-discharge measures and treatment group comparisons with adjustment for baseline characteristics. Site was adjusted for to accommodate clustering of patients within sites. All regression analyses used robust standard errors to accommodate non-constant variances.95% CI: [-0.71, 0.83]
Comparison: Linear regression was used to assess associations between post-discharge measures and treatment group comparisons with adjustment for baseline characteristics. Site was adjusted for to accommodate clustering of patients within sites. All regression analyses used robust standard errors to accommodate non-constant variances.95% CI: [-1.61, 0.28]
Secondary

Health Utilities Index III Score and Geriatric Depression Scale Score 6 Months

The Health Utilities Index Mark 3 system was used to evaluate generic health related quality of life (HRQL). The interview-administered version of HUI3 requires completion of a maximum of 39 questions. The HUI3 consists of eight attributes of general health (vision, hearing, speech, mobility, dexterity, emotion, cognition, and pain) with five or six levels per attribute. For each respondent, health status is described as a vector that combines the levels of each attribute. This information is then converted into a utility score of HRQL on a scale from perfect health (1.0) to death (0).

Time frame: 6 months post hospital discharge

Population: ITT population, survived to hospital discharge, consented to participate in the post-discharge substudy, and with at least one post-discharge assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Analyze EarlyHealth Utilities Index III Score and Geriatric Depression Scale Score 6 Months0.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
Analyze LaterHealth Utilities Index III Score and Geriatric Depression Scale Score 6 Months0.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
Active ITDHealth Utilities Index III Score and Geriatric Depression Scale Score 6 Months0.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
Sham ITDHealth Utilities Index III Score and Geriatric Depression Scale Score 6 Months0.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Comparison: Linear regression was used to assess associations between post-discharge measures and treatment group comparisons with adjustment for baseline characteristics. Site was adjusted for to accommodate clustering of patients within sites. All regression analyses used robust standard errors to accommodate non-constant variances.95% CI: [-0.06, 0.05]
Comparison: Linear regression was used to assess associations between post-discharge measures and treatment group comparisons with adjustment for baseline characteristics. Site was adjusted for to accommodate clustering of patients within sites. All regression analyses used robust standard errors to accommodate non-constant variances.95% CI: [-0.08, 0.05]
Secondary

Modified Rankin Score at 6 Months After Hospital Discharge

The modified Rankin Score (mRS) measures the ability of patients to function independently. The scale goes from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death).

Time frame: 6 months post hospital discharge

Population: ITT population, survived to hospital discharge, consented to participate in the post-discharge substudy, and with at least one post-discharge assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Analyze EarlyModified Rankin Score at 6 Months After Hospital Discharge1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Analyze LaterModified Rankin Score at 6 Months After Hospital Discharge1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Active ITDModified Rankin Score at 6 Months After Hospital Discharge1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Sham ITDModified Rankin Score at 6 Months After Hospital Discharge1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Comparison: Linear regression was used to assess associations between post-discharge measures and treatment group comparisons with adjustment for baseline characteristics. Site was adjusted for to accommodate clustering of patients within sites. All regression analyses used robust standard errors to accommodate non-constant variances.95% CI: [-0.2, 0.34]
Comparison: Linear regression was used to assess associations between post-discharge measures and treatment group comparisons with adjustment for baseline characteristics. Site was adjusted for to accommodate clustering of patients within sites. All regression analyses used robust standard errors to accommodate non-constant variances.95% CI: [-0.17, 0.44]
Secondary

Survival to Hospital Discharge

Time frame: Survival to hospital discharge or death before discharge

Population: Analyses of both interventions excluded subjects who suffered arrest secondary to drowning, strangulation, or electrocution; or for whom the primary outcome was unknown. Additionally, the ITD vs. Sham analysis excluded subjects who did not have the device applied, had study exclusions, or who had a response time of more than 15 minutes.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Analyze EarlySurvival to Hospital Discharge427 participants
Analyze LaterSurvival to Hospital Discharge372 participants
Active ITDSurvival to Hospital Discharge357 participants
Sham ITDSurvival to Hospital Discharge355 participants
Comparison: Comparison of the rates of survival to hospital discharge in Analyze Early vs. Analyze Later arms using a generalized estimating equations model with an identity link, grouping on cluster.p-value: 0.9295% CI: [-1.2, 1.1]GEE
Comparison: Comparison of the rates of survival to hospital discharge in Active ITD and Sham treatment arms.p-value: 0.9995% CI: [-1.2, 1.1]t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026