Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Conditions
Keywords
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Procaterol, Tiotropium
Brief summary
Study compares the efficacy and safety of tiotropium + a beta agonist (procaterol) vs. tiotropium alone among patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Detailed description
This study aims to determine the efficacy and safety of tiotropium plus procaterol in comparison to tiotropium plus placebo in Filipino patients seen in Manila, with moderate COPD. After a 1-week wash-out period, 6-minute walk test, and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) will then be administered prior to a run-in period of 1 week wherein all patients will be started on tiotropium alone. The patients will then be randomly allocated to either of the two arms for a two-week treatment, followed by one week washout, and crossed-over to the other treatment for another two weeks. The procaterol or placebo dose is given 2 hrs after the tiotropium dose.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. GOLD criteria for moderate COPD (post-bronchodilator) * FEV1/FVC \< 70% * 50% ≤ FEV1 \< 80% predicted * With or without symptoms 2. Willing to undergo the treatment protocol with signed informed consent
Exclusion criteria
1. Exacerbation within 1 month prior to run-in period 2. Significant hypoxemia and/or desaturation at rest and during exercise. 3. Significant cardiac, renal, or other systemic disease 4. History of adverse reaction to any of the two test drugs (tiotropium and procaterol)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| [Efficacy] Improvement spirometry (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, 6 MWD, TDI) and SGRQ at 2 weeks | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| [Safety] HR (Heart Rate) and BP (Blood Pressure) | — |
| Incidence of adverse reactions and changes | — |
Countries
Philippines