Skip to content

Targeting INflammation Using SALsalate in Type 2 Diabetes (TINSAL-T2D)

Targeting Inflammation in Type 2 Diabetes: Clinical Trial Using Salsalate

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00392678
Acronym
TINSAL-T2D
Enrollment
277
Registered
2006-10-26
Start date
2006-10-31
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2019-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

Type 2 Diabetes, Inflammation, Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome

Brief summary

Growing evidence over recent years supports a potential role for low grade chronic inflammation in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. In this study we will determine whether salsalate, a member of the commonly used Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) class, is effective in lowering sugars in patients with type 2 diabetes. The study will determine whether salicylates represent a new pharmacological option for diabetes management. The study is conducted in two stages. The first stage is a dose ranging study, administering salsalate compared to placebo over three months. The primary objective of Stage 2 of the study is to evaluate the effects of salsalate on blood sugar control in diabetes; the tolerability of salsalate use in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D); and the effects of salsalate on measures of inflammation, the metabolic syndrome, and cardiac risk. The second stage is a second trial and posted under alternate registration.

Detailed description

The primary objective of the first stage of the TINSAL-T2D trial is to select a dose of salsalate that is both well-tolerated and demonstrates a trend toward improvement in glycemic control. The trial is a multicenter, single mask lead-in, double masked placebo controlled dose ranging study, comparing salsalte to placebo over 3 months.

Interventions

DRUGSalsalate

Placebo and Salsalate 3.0 g/d; 3.5 g/d; 4.0 g/d orally, divided

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo to Salsalate

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
Joslin Diabetes Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Type 2 diabetes on diet and exercise therapy or monotherapy with metformin, insulin secretagogue, or alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, or a low-dose combination of these at ≤ 50% maximal dose (see Appendix). Dosing is stable for 8 weeks prior to randomization. 2. FPG ≤ 225 mg/dL and HbA1c\>7% and ≤9.5% at screening 3. Age ≥18 and \<75 4. Women of childbearing potential agree to use an appropriate contraceptive method (hormonal, IUD, or diaphragm)

Exclusion criteria

1. Type 1 diabetes and/or history of ketoacidosis determined by medical history 2. History of severe diabetic neuropathy including autonomic neuropathy, gastroparesis or lower limb ulceration or amputation 3. History of long-term therapy with insulin (\>30 days) within the last year 4. Therapy with rosiglitazone (Avandia) or pioglitazone (Actos), or extendin-4 (Byetta), alone or in combination in the previous 6 months 5. Pregnancy or lactation 6. Patients requiring corticosteroids within 3 months or recurrent continuous oral corticosteroid treatment (more than 2 weeks) 7. Use of weight loss drugs \[e.g., Xenical (orlistat), Meridia (sibutramine), Acutrim (phenylpropanol-amine), or similar over-the-counter medications\] within 3 months of screening or intentional weight loss of ≥ 10 lbs in the previous 6 months 8. Surgery within 30 days prior to screening 9. Serum creatinine \>1.4 for women and \>1.5 for men or eGFR \<60 \[possible chronic kidney disease stage 3 or greater calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. 10. History of chronic liver disease including hepatitis B or C 11. History of peptic ulcer or endoscopy demonstrated gastritis 12. History of acquired immune deficiency syndrome or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 13. History of malignancy, except participants who have been disease-free for greater than 10 years, or whose only malignancy has been basal or squamous cell skin carcinoma 14. New York Heart Association Class III or IV cardiac status or hospitalization for congestive heart failure 15. History of unstable angina, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack or any revascularization within 6 months 16. Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as systolic blood pressure \>150 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure \>95 mmHg on three or more assessments on more than one day) 17. History of drug or alcohol abuse, or current weekly alcohol consumption \>10 units/week (1 unit = 1 beer, 1 glass of wine, 1 mixed cocktail containing 1 ounce of alcohol) 18. Hemoglobin \<12 g/dL (males), \<10 g/dL (females) at screening 19. Platelets \<100,000 cu mm at screening. 20. AST (SGOT) \>2.50 x ULN or ALT (SGPT) \>2.50 x ULN at screening 21. Total Bilirubin \>1.50 x ULN at screening 22. Triglycerides (TG) \>500 mg/dL at screening 23. Poor mental function or any other reason to expect patient difficulty in complying with the requirements of the study 24. Previous allergy to aspirin 25. Chronic or continuous use (daily for more than 7 days) of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within the preceding 2 months 26. Use of warfarin (Coumadin), clopidogrel (Plavix) or other anticoagulants 27. Use of probenecid (Benemid, Probalan), sulfinpyrazone (Anturane) or other uricosuric agents

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in HbA1c Baseline to End of Trial in TINSAL-T2D Stage 114 weekThe primary outcome for the TINSAL-T2D study is change in HbA1c level from baseline to week 14 (stage 1) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population with last observation carried forward.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline and Trends in Fasting Glucose Over Time14 week
Change in Lipids14 weekChange in lipids (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol \[LDL-C\], non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol \[non-HDL-C\], triglycerides \[TG\], total cholesterol \[TC\], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol \[HDL C\], TC/HDL-C ratio, and LDL-C/HDL-C ratio) LDL-C/HDL-C ratio not calculated
Change in HbA1c14 weekChange from baseline to either 14 or 26 weeks, or last HbA1c measurement prior to rescue therapy
Safety and Tolerability14 weeksSee adverse event module for details. Safety and tolerability of salsalate compared to placebo as assessed by adverse events.
Change in Insulin, C-peptide, Homeostasis Model [HOMA] IndexBaseline, week 14HOMA-IR was not calcuated due to potential confounding effect of salicylates to inhibit insulin clearance. Change in C-peptide from Baseline to Week 14 is in the data table below
Change From Baseline in 14-week Insulin, C-peptide, Homeostasis Model [HOMA] IndexBaseline, week 14HOMA-IR was not calcuated due to potential confounding effect of salicylates to inhibit insulin clearance. Change in insulin from Baseline to Week 14 in data table below.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

3 private practices and 14 universities. First patient recruited February 2007; last patient end of study visit, May 2008

Pre-assignment details

Screening, followed by 4-week single mask placebo lead-in. 277 participants signed screening consent. Some participants were ineligible, some withdrew consent, and some had treatment side effects during placebo lead-in.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
3 Gram
Salsalate 3.0 g daily, divided
27
3.5 Gram
Salsalate 3.5 g daily, divided
27
4 Gram
Salsalate 4.0 g daily, divided
27
Placebo
matched to active drug
27
Total108

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic3.5 Gram4 Gram3 GramPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
5 Participants3 Participants4 Participants5 Participants17 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
22 Participants24 Participants23 Participants22 Participants91 Participants
Age, Continuous56.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
55.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
55.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
55.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Region of Enrollment
United States
27 participants27 participants27 participants27 participants108 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants11 Participants13 Participants12 Participants45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants16 Participants14 Participants15 Participants63 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 270 / 270 / 270 / 27
other
Total, other adverse events
27 / 2727 / 2727 / 2725 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 272 / 270 / 271 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Change in HbA1c Baseline to End of Trial in TINSAL-T2D Stage 1

The primary outcome for the TINSAL-T2D study is change in HbA1c level from baseline to week 14 (stage 1) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population with last observation carried forward.

Time frame: 14 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
3.0 g/dChange in HbA1c Baseline to End of Trial in TINSAL-T2D Stage 1-0.36 % (units of HbA1c)
3.5 g/dChange in HbA1c Baseline to End of Trial in TINSAL-T2D Stage 1-0.34 % (units of HbA1c)
4.0 g/dChange in HbA1c Baseline to End of Trial in TINSAL-T2D Stage 1-0.49 % (units of HbA1c)
PlaceboChange in HbA1c Baseline to End of Trial in TINSAL-T2D Stage 1-0.01 % (units of HbA1c)
p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline and Trends in Fasting Glucose Over Time

Time frame: 14 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
3.0 g/dChange From Baseline and Trends in Fasting Glucose Over Time13 mg/dl
3.5 g/dChange From Baseline and Trends in Fasting Glucose Over Time-19 mg/dl
4.0 g/dChange From Baseline and Trends in Fasting Glucose Over Time-14 mg/dl
PlaceboChange From Baseline and Trends in Fasting Glucose Over Time-15 mg/dl
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 14-week Insulin, C-peptide, Homeostasis Model [HOMA] Index

HOMA-IR was not calcuated due to potential confounding effect of salicylates to inhibit insulin clearance. Change in insulin from Baseline to Week 14 in data table below.

Time frame: Baseline, week 14

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
3.0 g/dChange From Baseline in 14-week Insulin, C-peptide, Homeostasis Model [HOMA] Index-3.0 pmol/l
3.5 g/dChange From Baseline in 14-week Insulin, C-peptide, Homeostasis Model [HOMA] Index15 pmol/l
4.0 g/dChange From Baseline in 14-week Insulin, C-peptide, Homeostasis Model [HOMA] Index7.6 pmol/l
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 14-week Insulin, C-peptide, Homeostasis Model [HOMA] Index27 pmol/l
Secondary

Change in HbA1c

Change from baseline to either 14 or 26 weeks, or last HbA1c measurement prior to rescue therapy

Time frame: 14 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
3.0 g/dChange in HbA1c0 % HbA1c
3.5 g/dChange in HbA1c-0.4 % HbA1c
4.0 g/dChange in HbA1c-0.3 % HbA1c
PlaceboChange in HbA1c-0.5 % HbA1c
Secondary

Change in Insulin, C-peptide, Homeostasis Model [HOMA] Index

HOMA-IR was not calcuated due to potential confounding effect of salicylates to inhibit insulin clearance. Change in C-peptide from Baseline to Week 14 is in the data table below

Time frame: Baseline, week 14

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
3.0 g/dChange in Insulin, C-peptide, Homeostasis Model [HOMA] Index0.10 C-peptide in nmol/l
3.5 g/dChange in Insulin, C-peptide, Homeostasis Model [HOMA] Index-0.07 C-peptide in nmol/l
4.0 g/dChange in Insulin, C-peptide, Homeostasis Model [HOMA] Index-0.03 C-peptide in nmol/l
PlaceboChange in Insulin, C-peptide, Homeostasis Model [HOMA] Index0.03 C-peptide in nmol/l
Secondary

Change in Lipids

Change in lipids (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol \[LDL-C\], non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol \[non-HDL-C\], triglycerides \[TG\], total cholesterol \[TC\], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol \[HDL C\], TC/HDL-C ratio, and LDL-C/HDL-C ratio) LDL-C/HDL-C ratio not calculated

Time frame: 14 week

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
3.0 g/dChange in LipidsLDL0 mg/dl
3.0 g/dChange in LipidsCholesterol0 mg/dl
3.0 g/dChange in LipidsTG15 mg/dl
3.0 g/dChange in LipidsHDL0 mg/dl
3.0 g/dChange in LipidsTotal to HDL ratio0 mg/dl
3.5 g/dChange in LipidsLDL15 mg/dl
3.5 g/dChange in LipidsHDL3 mg/dl
3.5 g/dChange in LipidsTG-34 mg/dl
3.5 g/dChange in LipidsCholesterol8 mg/dl
3.5 g/dChange in LipidsTotal to HDL ratio0.1 mg/dl
4.0 g/dChange in LipidsTG-22 mg/dl
4.0 g/dChange in LipidsCholesterol-1 mg/dl
4.0 g/dChange in LipidsHDL1 mg/dl
4.0 g/dChange in LipidsLDL3 mg/dl
4.0 g/dChange in LipidsTotal to HDL ratio-0.1 mg/dl
PlaceboChange in LipidsTG-16 mg/dl
PlaceboChange in LipidsHDL2 mg/dl
PlaceboChange in LipidsCholesterol6 mg/dl
PlaceboChange in LipidsTotal to HDL ratio0.2 mg/dl
PlaceboChange in LipidsLDL8 mg/dl
Secondary

Safety and Tolerability

See adverse event module for details. Safety and tolerability of salsalate compared to placebo as assessed by adverse events.

Time frame: 14 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
3.0 g/dSafety and Tolerability17 participants
3.5 g/dSafety and Tolerability16 participants
4.0 g/dSafety and Tolerability16 participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability14 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026