Skip to content

Efficacy And Safety Of Azithromycin SR Compared With Minocycline In Acne

A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind-Double Dummy Study, To Evaluate Efficacy And Safety Of Treatment With Azithromycin, Microspheres, Oral Powder For Suspension, 2 G, In One Administration A Week, For 8 Weeks, Compared With Treatment With Minocycline Capsules, 100 Mg Die For 8 Weeks, In Outpatients With Moderate To Severe Inflammatory Acne.

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00392223
Enrollment
118
Registered
2006-10-25
Start date
2007-10-31
Completion date
2008-06-30
Last updated
2010-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acne Vulgaris

Brief summary

The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of azithromycin microspheres treatment in outpatients with moderate to severe inflammatory acne compared with first line treatment minocycline after 8 weeks of therapy

Detailed description

The study prematurely discontinued on the February 1, 2008 due to slow enrollment.It should be noted that safety concerns have not been seen in this study and have not factored into this decision.

Interventions

DRUGAzithromycin microspheres

Azithromycin microspheres, powder for oral suspension, 2 g a week, in unique administration PO, repeated weekly for 8 weeks and minocycline-placebo capsules daily for 8 weeks plus minocycline placebo

DRUGminocycline-placebo capsules

minocycline-placebo capsules daily for 8 weeks plus minocycline placebo

DRUGAzithromycin microspheres-placebo

Minocycline capsules, PO, 100 mg daily for 8 weeks and Azithromycin microspheres-placebo once a week for 8 weeks plus azithromycin placebo.

DRUGMinocycline capsules,

Capsules, PO, 100 mg daily for 8 weeks.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* male and female, \> 16 years of age, with diagnosis of acne papulo-pustular, moderate (19-30 GAGS score) to severe (31-33 GAGS score)

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy, gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease, specific systemic disease, hormonal contraceptives, isotretinoin, topic drugs for acne (except detergent allowed)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreBaseline, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT)GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi). Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: (Global) score at observation minus (global) score at baseline.
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT) in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score - Per Protocol PopulationBaseline, Week 8 EOTGAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi). Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: (Global) score at observation minus (global) score at baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreBaseline, Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOTGAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi. Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: mean at observation minus baseline.
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOTNumber of subjects by improvement category of GAGS score: Best improvement = reduction of GAGS score \>75% (pre-post evaluation); Good improvement = reduction score \> 50 - 75%; Moderate improvement : reduction score \> 25 - 50%; Light improvement : reduction score \> 0 - 25%; No change = reduction score = 0%; Worsening = increase score \> 0 %.
Change From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueBaseline, Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOTLeeds Grading technique: evaluates three sites (face, back, chest) on a 0 to 10 grading scale where 0 equals to no acne and 10 equals to most severe acne.

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Azithromycin
2 grams per week administered orally (PO) for 8 weeks (azithromycin microspheres, powder for oral suspension)
58
Minocycline
100 milligrams (mg) administered PO (oral) QD (every day) for 8 weeks (minocycline capsules)
60
Total118

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event54
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up14
Overall StudyProtocol Violation03
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAzithromycinMinocyclineTotal
Age, Customized
<18 years
10 participants17 participants27 participants
Age, Customized
Between 18 and 44 years
48 participants43 participants91 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants36 Participants71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants24 Participants47 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
29 / —21 / —
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 580 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT) in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score - Per Protocol Population

GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi). Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: (Global) score at observation minus (global) score at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 EOT

Population: Per Protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
AzithromycinChange From Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT) in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score - Per Protocol Population-9.35 score on scale
MinocyclineChange From Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT) in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score - Per Protocol Population-10.22 score on scale
95% CI: [-2.58, 0.84]
Primary

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score

GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi). Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: (Global) score at observation minus (global) score at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT)

Population: Full Analysis Set, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
AzithromycinChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score-8.69 score on scale
MinocyclineChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score-9.16 score on scale
95% CI: [-2.48, 1.54]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds Technique

Leeds Grading technique: evaluates three sites (face, back, chest) on a 0 to 10 grading scale where 0 equals to no acne and 10 equals to most severe acne.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOT

Population: Full Analysis Set. Where noted: LOCF = Last Observation Carried Forward technique was used. Number of subjects with analyzable data: n=azithromycin, minocycline (respectively).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
AzithromycinChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueFace Week 8 EOT (LOCF) (n=53,59)-2.5 score on scale
AzithromycinChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueChest Week 4 (n=50,56)-0.8 score on scale
AzithromycinChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueFace Week 8 EOT (n=52, 56)-2.5 score on scale
AzithromycinChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueChest Week 8 EOT (n=52,56)-1.5 score on scale
AzithromycinChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueBack Week 8 EOT (LOCF) (n=53,59)-1.5 score on scale
AzithromycinChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueChest Week 8 EOT (LOCF) (n=53,59)-1.5 score on scale
AzithromycinChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueChest 8 weeks after EOT (n=49,49)-1.5 score on scale
AzithromycinChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueFace 8 weeks after EOT (n=49,49)-3.0 score on scale
AzithromycinChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueBack Week 4 (n=50,56)-1.1 score on scale
AzithromycinChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueBack 8 weeks after EOT (n=49,49)-1.5 score on scale
AzithromycinChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueBack Week 8 EOT (n=52,56)-1.5 score on scale
AzithromycinChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueFace Week 4 (n=50, 56)-1.5 score on scale
MinocyclineChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueChest Week 8 EOT (LOCF) (n=53,59)-1.1 score on scale
MinocyclineChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueFace Week 4 (n=50, 56)-1.3 score on scale
MinocyclineChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueFace Week 8 EOT (n=52, 56)-2.4 score on scale
MinocyclineChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueFace Week 8 EOT (LOCF) (n=53,59)-2.3 score on scale
MinocyclineChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueFace 8 weeks after EOT (n=49,49)-2.9 score on scale
MinocyclineChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueBack Week 8 EOT (n=52,56)-1.4 score on scale
MinocyclineChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueBack Week 8 EOT (LOCF) (n=53,59)-1.4 score on scale
MinocyclineChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueBack 8 weeks after EOT (n=49,49)-2.0 score on scale
MinocyclineChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueChest Week 4 (n=50,56)-0.7 score on scale
MinocyclineChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueChest Week 8 EOT (n=52,56)-1.2 score on scale
MinocyclineChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueChest 8 weeks after EOT (n=49,49)-1.8 score on scale
MinocyclineChange From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds TechniqueBack Week 4 (n=50,56)-0.9 score on scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score

GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi. Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: mean at observation minus baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOT

Population: Full Analysis Set. Where noted: LOCF = Last Observation Carried Forward technique was used. Number of subjects with analyzable data: n=azithromycin, minocycline (respectively).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AzithromycinChange From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 4 (n=50,56)-7.0 score on scale95% Confidence Interval 7.05
AzithromycinChange From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT (End of Treatment) (n=52,56)-9.7 score on scale
AzithromycinChange From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT (LOCF) (n=53,59)-9.5 score on scale
AzithromycinChange From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score8 weeks after EOT (n=49,49)-11.1 score on scale
MinocyclineChange From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score8 weeks after EOT (n=49,49)-12.9 score on scale
MinocyclineChange From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 4 (n=50,56)-6.5 score on scale95% Confidence Interval 6.45
MinocyclineChange From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT (LOCF) (n=53,59)-9.8 score on scale
MinocyclineChange From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT (End of Treatment) (n=52,56)-10.2 score on scale
Secondary

Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score

Number of subjects by improvement category of GAGS score: Best improvement = reduction of GAGS score \>75% (pre-post evaluation); Good improvement = reduction score \> 50 - 75%; Moderate improvement : reduction score \> 25 - 50%; Light improvement : reduction score \> 0 - 25%; No change = reduction score = 0%; Worsening = increase score \> 0 %.

Time frame: Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOT

Population: Full Analysis Set. Where noted: LOCF = Last Observation Carried Forward technique was used.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 4 Best Improvement1 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 4 Good Improvement4 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 4 Moderate Improvement19 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 4 Light Improvement23 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 4 No Change2 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 4 Worsening1 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 4 Missing3 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT Best Improvement4 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT Moderate Improvement21 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT Light Improvement11 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT No Change2 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT Worsening3 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT Missing1 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT LOCF Best Improvement4 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT LOCF Good Improvement11 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT LOCF Moderate Improvement21 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT LOCF Light Improvement11 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT LOCF No Change3 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT LOCF Worsening3 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT LOCF Missing0 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score8 weeks after EOT Best Improvement7 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score8 weeks after EOT Good Improvement15 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score8 weeks after EOT Moderate Improvement13 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score8 weeks after EOT Light Improvement6 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score8 weeks after EOT Worsening5 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score8 weeks after EOT Missing4 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT Good Improvement11 participants
AzithromycinImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score8 weeks after EOT No Change3 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT LOCF Good Improvement16 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 4 Best Improvement1 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score8 weeks after EOT Missing10 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 4 Good Improvement2 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT LOCF Moderate Improvement20 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 4 Moderate Improvement25 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score8 weeks after EOT Moderate Improvement18 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 4 Light Improvement24 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT LOCF Light Improvement17 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 4 No Change2 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT Best Improvement3 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 4 Worsening2 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT LOCF No Change2 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 4 Missing3 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score8 weeks after EOT Light Improvement8 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT LOCF Worsening1 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT Moderate Improvement20 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score8 weeks after EOT No Change0 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT Light Improvement15 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT LOCF Missing0 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT No Change2 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score8 weeks after EOT Worsening0 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT Worsening0 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score8 weeks after EOT Best Improvement6 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT Missing3 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT Good Improvement16 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) ScoreWeek 8 EOT LOCF Best Improvement3 participants
MinocyclineImprovement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score8 weeks after EOT Good Improvement17 participants
Post Hoc

Number of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Acne

Global Acne Grading System score used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each based on area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi). Global score factored based on sum of local scores and se verity: 0=no acne, 1-18=mild, 19-30=moderate, 31-38=severe, \>39=very severe.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT)

Population: Full Analysis Set. Where noted: LOCF = Last Observation Carried Forward technique was used.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AzithromycinNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneBaseline Mild acne0 participants
AzithromycinNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneBaseline Severe acne3 participants
AzithromycinNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneBaseline Very severe acne1 participants
AzithromycinNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneBaseline Missing0 participants
AzithromycinNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneWeek 8 EOT (LOCF) Mild acne31 participants
AzithromycinNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneWeek 8 EOT (LOCF) Severe acne1 participants
AzithromycinNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneWeek 8 EOT (LOCF) Very severe acne0 participants
AzithromycinNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneWeek 8 EOT (LOCF) Missing2 participants
AzithromycinNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneBaseline Moderate acne49 participants
AzithromycinNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneWeek 8 EOT (LOCF) Moderate acne19 participants
MinocyclineNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneWeek 8 EOT (LOCF) Missing1 participants
MinocyclineNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneBaseline Mild acne1 participants
MinocyclineNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneWeek 8 EOT (LOCF) Severe acne0 participants
MinocyclineNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneBaseline Severe acne5 participants
MinocyclineNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneWeek 8 EOT (LOCF) Moderate acne16 participants
MinocyclineNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneBaseline Very severe acne1 participants
MinocyclineNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneWeek 8 EOT (LOCF) Very severe acne1 participants
MinocyclineNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneBaseline Missing0 participants
MinocyclineNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneBaseline Moderate acne52 participants
MinocyclineNumber of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe AcneWeek 8 EOT (LOCF) Mild acne41 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026