Skip to content

Polyglactin Sutures Versus Nylon Sutures for Suturing of Conjunctival Autograft in Pterygium Surgery: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Polyglactin Sutures Versus Nylon Sutures for Suturing of Conjunctival Autograft in Pterygium Surgery: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00391573
Enrollment
32
Registered
2006-10-24
Start date
2005-03-31
Completion date
2005-06-30
Last updated
2011-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pterygium

Brief summary

To compare the use of polyglactin sutures versus nylon sutures for conjunctival autograft suturing in pterygium surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPolyglactin sutures for suturing of conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery
PROCEDURENylon sutures for suturing of conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery

Sponsors

Hospital Authority, Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion criteria included patients with primary nasal pterygium, aged 18 years or older, and able to cooperate surgery under local anaesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with recurrent pterygium, scarred superior conjunctiva, previous surgery involving the superior bulbar conjunctiva, history of glaucoma, and cicatricial ocular surface disease were excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The difference in VAS score between the two groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Graft hyperemia, oedema and tarsal conjunctival papillary hypertrophy
Surgical complications
Pterygium recurrence

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026