Skip to content

Comparing Two Treatments for Ovarian Cancer: Standard Chemotherapy Plus Enzastaurin, or Placebo (Sugar Pill)

A Randomized, Phase 2, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Study With and Without Enzastaurin in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin as First-Line Treatment, Followed by Maintenance Treatment in Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00391118
Enrollment
153
Registered
2006-10-23
Start date
2006-11-30
Completion date
2012-07-31
Last updated
2020-10-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fallopian Tube Neoplasms, Ovarian Cancer, Peritoneal Neoplasm

Brief summary

Participants with ovarian cancer usually get the drugs carboplatin and paclitaxel as initial treatment. In many participants the tumor will shrink, or even disappear, after treatment with these drugs. But, unfortunately, the tumor will grow again in many participants. This trial will try to address the question: Can we delay the time till the tumor grows again by adding a 3rd drug to the standard therapy? To answer this question, participants will, by chance, either get the experimental drug enzastaurin or a dummy pill (placebo) during the chemotherapy and for up to 3 years after chemotherapy. Participants and physicians will not know if a participant gets enzastaurin or placebo (double-blinded trial). After a predefined time, the treatment will be uncovered, and the number of participants with tumor growth at a specific time point will be compared between the two treatments.

Interventions

DRUGenzastaurin
DRUGcarboplatin
DRUGpaclitaxel
DRUGplacebo

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants must have specific stages of disease, known as Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique (FIGO) stages IIB, IIC, III or IV * Organ functions (blood, renal, liver, cardiac) must meet specific requirements. * Participants who could become pregnant must take care not to become pregnant during the study participation and for 6 months after study discontinuation * Participants must give written consent for study participation.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants received any experimental drug within the last 30 days. * Participants received any prior chemotherapy or other drug therapy for the current disease. * Participants receive any other treatment for the cancer during study participation. * Participants are unable to discontinue concurrent administration of carbamazepine, phenobarbital, or phenytoin. * Participants are pregnant, breast feeding, or not using adequate contraceptive methods to prevent pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Randomization up to date of PD or death (up to 28.6 months)PFS was defined as time from date of randomization to first date of determined progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause. PD defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0) and Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) criteria. RECIST: ≥20% increase in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since treatment started or appearance of ≥ 1new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. GCIG: Cancer Antigen-125 (CA-125) serum ≥2 times upper limit of normal (ULN) for those in normal range or nadir for participants who never achieved normal range. Participants not known to have died and did not have PD were censored at last progression-free assessment. Those who received subsequent systemic anticancer therapy (after study drug discontinued) prior to determined PD or death, were censored at date of last progression-free disease assessment prior to post-discontinuation chemotherapy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) [Overall Response Rate (ORR)]Randomization to PD or death from any cause (up to 28.6 months)ORR was the percentage of participants with a CR or PR using RECIST v1.0 and CA-125 GCIG criteria. RECIST v1.0: CR was defined as the disappearance of all tumors. PR was defined ≥30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD or complete disappearance of target lesions, with persistence (but not worsening) of ≥1 nontarget lesions and appearance of no new lesions. GCIG: CA-125 serum ≥2 times above ULN for those in normal range or nadir for participants who never achieved normal range. ORR calculated as: (CR + PR) / (total number of participants qualified for tumor response analysis per arm) \* 100.
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With CR or PR or Stable Disease (SD) (Rate of Response)Randomization to PD or death from any cause (up to 28.6 months)Rate of response was defined using RECIST v1.0 and CA-125 GCIG criteria. RECIST v1.0: CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined ≥30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD or complete disappearance of target lesions, with persistence (but not worsening) of ≥1 nontarget lesions and appearance of no new lesions. SD was defined as small changes that did not meet the above criteria. PD was defined as having a ≥20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions. GCIG: CA-125 serum ≥2 times above ULN for those in normal range or nadir for participants who never achieved normal range. Rate of response calculated as: (CR + PR + SD)/(total number of participants qualified for tumor response analysis per arm) \*100.
Part 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)Randomization up to date of PD or death (up to 28.6 months)PE measured using Immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay, scored 0 (negative, no staining) to 3+ (brightest staining). IHC H-scores for protein biomarkers (PKCβ2, PTEN, pCREB, pGSK3b, pS6) calculated as: \[1\*(percentage of cells stained \[PCS\] as 1+)\]+\[2\*(PCS as 2+)\]+\[3\*(PCS as 3+)\]. High PE: ≥marker threshold value and Low PE: \<marker threshold value. PFS: date of randomization to PD or death. PD defined using RECIST v1.0 and GCIG criteria. RECIST: ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions taking as references smallest sum LD recorded since treatment started or appearance of ≥1 new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. GCIG: CA-125 serum ≥2 times ULN for those in normal range or nadir for those who never achieved normal range. Per protocol, Part 1 was not included as it is an open-label safety lead-in portion with PK characterization.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Other Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs) and the Number of Participants Who Died (To Compare the Safety of the 2 Treatments)Randomization up to 28.6 monthsClinically significant events were defined as SAEs and other non-serious AEs regardless of causality. A summary of SAEs and other non-serious AEs regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. The number of participants SAEs, other non-serious AEs, and those who died due to PD are included.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Carboplatin With and Without Enzastaurin for Part 1 of StudyCycle 1 Day 1 (carb) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (carb + enz); carb 0.25 hours (h) (prior to infusion), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 21h after start of infusion
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With PFS at 2 YearsRandomization to measured PD evaluated at 2 yearsPFS was defined as time from date of randomization to first date of determined PD or death from any cause. PD defined using RECIST v1.0 and GCIG criteria. RECIST v1.0: as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since treatment started or appearance of ≥1 new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. GCIG: CA-125 serum ≥2 times ULN for those in normal range or nadir (the lowest value of blood counts after chemotherapy) for participants who never achieved normal range. Participants not known to have died and did not have PD were censored at last progression-free assessment. Those who received subsequent systemic anticancer therapy (after study drug discontinued) prior to determined PD or death, were censored at date of last progression-free disease assessment prior to post-discontinuation chemotherapy.
PK: AUC From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) for Carboplatin With and Without Enzastaurin for Part 1 of StudyCycle 1 Day 1 (carb) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (carb + enz); carb at 0.25h (prior to infusion), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 21h after start of infusion
PK: AUC0-∞ for Paclitaxel With and Without Enzastaurin for Part 1 of StudyCycle 1 Day 1 (pac) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (pac + enz); pac at 1, 2, 3h (immediately after stopping infusion), 3.25, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 24, and 30h after start of infusion
PK: Cmax at Steady State (Cmax,ss) for Part 1 of StudyCycle 1 Day 21 (enz) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (carb + pac + enz) at pre-dose, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24h after the enz doseCmax,ss for enzastaurin, its metabolite LSN326020 (LY326020) and total analytes are reported.
PK: AUC During the Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCτ,ss) for Part 2 of StudyCycle 2 Day 1 (carb + pac + enz) at pre-dose, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24h after the enz doseAUCτ,ss for enzastaurin, its metabolite LSN326020 (LY326020), and total analytes are reported.
PK: Cmax for Paclitaxel With and Without Enzastaurin for Part 1 of StudyCycle 1 Day 1 (pac) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (pac + enz); pac 1, 2, 3h (immediately after stopping infusion), 3.25, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 24, and 30h after start of infusion

Countries

Belgium, Germany, Poland, Russia, Spain

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Part 1: Unblinded, single cohort safety lead-in of enzastaurin (enz) with paclitaxel (pac)/carboplatin (carb). Part 2: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial consisting of: Baseline, Chemotherapy (start of study drug to discontinuation of pac and carb), Maintenance (day chemotherapy ends to study completion), Follow-up (up to 3 years).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part 1 - Modified Regimen A
Enzastaurin: 1125 mg loading dose on Cycle 1 Day 4 then 500 mg oral tablet, QD, for six 21-day cycles on subsequent days of chemotherapy Carboplatin: AUC5, IV, q21 days, for six 21-day cycles of chemotherapy Paclitaxel: 175 mg/m², IV, q21 days, for six 21-day cycles of chemotherapy
11
Part 2 - Regimen A
Enzastaurin: 1125 mg loading dose then 500 mg oral tablet, QD, for up to six 21-day cycles on subsequent days of chemotherapy and maintenance therapy up to 2 years Carboplatin: AUC5, IV, q21 days, for up to six 21-day cycles of chemotherapy Paclitaxel: 175 mg/m², IV, q21 days, for up to six 21-day cycles of chemotherapy
69
Part 2 - Regimen B
Carboplatin: AUC5 IV, q21 days, for up to six 21-day cycles of chemotherapy Paclitaxel: 175 mg/m², IV, q21 days, for up to six 21-day cycles of chemotherapy Placebo: oral tablet, QD, of chemotherapy and maintenance therapy up to 2 years
73
Total153

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event3107
Overall StudyDeath010
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up023
Overall StudyPhysician Decision030
Overall StudyProgressive Disease72643
Overall StudyProtocol Entry Criteria Not Met031
Overall StudyProtocol Violation100
Overall StudySponsor Decision013
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject091

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart 1 - Modified Regimen APart 2 - Regimen APart 2 - Regimen BTotal
Age, Continuous52.4 years55.3 years53.4 years54.90 years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
11 Participants68 Participants72 Participants151 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
East Asian
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
West Asian (Indian sub-continent)
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
5 Participants14 Participants13 Participants32 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
6 Participants28 Participants25 Participants59 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
0 Participants7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
0 Participants17 Participants20 Participants37 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
0 Participants3 Participants8 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants69 Participants73 Participants153 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 1160 / 6756 / 72
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 1126 / 6720 / 72

Outcome results

Primary

Part 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as time from date of randomization to first date of determined progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause. PD defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0) and Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) criteria. RECIST: ≥20% increase in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since treatment started or appearance of ≥ 1new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. GCIG: Cancer Antigen-125 (CA-125) serum ≥2 times upper limit of normal (ULN) for those in normal range or nadir for participants who never achieved normal range. Participants not known to have died and did not have PD were censored at last progression-free assessment. Those who received subsequent systemic anticancer therapy (after study drug discontinued) prior to determined PD or death, were censored at date of last progression-free disease assessment prior to post-discontinuation chemotherapy.

Time frame: Randomization up to date of PD or death (up to 28.6 months)

Population: All randomized participants from Part 2 group. Participants censored for Part 2: Regimen A=38, Regimen B=35. Per protocol, Part 1 was not included as it is an open-label safety lead-in portion with PK characterization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)18.9 months
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)15.2 months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Other Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs) and the Number of Participants Who Died (To Compare the Safety of the 2 Treatments)

Clinically significant events were defined as SAEs and other non-serious AEs regardless of causality. A summary of SAEs and other non-serious AEs regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. The number of participants SAEs, other non-serious AEs, and those who died due to PD are included.

Time frame: Randomization up to 28.6 months

Population: All enrolled (Part 1) and all randomized (Part 2) participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug according to the treatment to which the participants were assigned.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 2 - Regimen ANumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Other Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs) and the Number of Participants Who Died (To Compare the Safety of the 2 Treatments)Died0 Participants
Part 2 - Regimen ANumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Other Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs) and the Number of Participants Who Died (To Compare the Safety of the 2 Treatments)SAEs7 Participants
Part 2 - Regimen ANumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Other Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs) and the Number of Participants Who Died (To Compare the Safety of the 2 Treatments)Non-Serious AEs11 Participants
Part 2 - Regimen BNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Other Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs) and the Number of Participants Who Died (To Compare the Safety of the 2 Treatments)Non-Serious AEs60 Participants
Part 2 - Regimen BNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Other Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs) and the Number of Participants Who Died (To Compare the Safety of the 2 Treatments)SAEs26 Participants
Part 2 - Regimen BNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Other Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs) and the Number of Participants Who Died (To Compare the Safety of the 2 Treatments)Died3 Participants
Part 2 - Regimen BNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Other Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs) and the Number of Participants Who Died (To Compare the Safety of the 2 Treatments)SAEs20 Participants
Part 2 - Regimen BNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Other Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs) and the Number of Participants Who Died (To Compare the Safety of the 2 Treatments)Died0 Participants
Part 2 - Regimen BNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Other Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs) and the Number of Participants Who Died (To Compare the Safety of the 2 Treatments)Non-Serious AEs56 Participants
Secondary

Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) [Overall Response Rate (ORR)]

ORR was the percentage of participants with a CR or PR using RECIST v1.0 and CA-125 GCIG criteria. RECIST v1.0: CR was defined as the disappearance of all tumors. PR was defined ≥30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD or complete disappearance of target lesions, with persistence (but not worsening) of ≥1 nontarget lesions and appearance of no new lesions. GCIG: CA-125 serum ≥2 times above ULN for those in normal range or nadir for participants who never achieved normal range. ORR calculated as: (CR + PR) / (total number of participants qualified for tumor response analysis per arm) \* 100.

Time frame: Randomization to PD or death from any cause (up to 28.6 months)

Population: All randomized participants from Part 2 group, who were evaluated for tumor response. Per protocol, Part 1 was not included as it is an open-label safety lead-in portion with PK characterization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) [Overall Response Rate (ORR)]42.9 percentage of participants
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) [Overall Response Rate (ORR)]38.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 2: Percentage of Participants With CR or PR or Stable Disease (SD) (Rate of Response)

Rate of response was defined using RECIST v1.0 and CA-125 GCIG criteria. RECIST v1.0: CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined ≥30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD or complete disappearance of target lesions, with persistence (but not worsening) of ≥1 nontarget lesions and appearance of no new lesions. SD was defined as small changes that did not meet the above criteria. PD was defined as having a ≥20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions. GCIG: CA-125 serum ≥2 times above ULN for those in normal range or nadir for participants who never achieved normal range. Rate of response calculated as: (CR + PR + SD)/(total number of participants qualified for tumor response analysis per arm) \*100.

Time frame: Randomization to PD or death from any cause (up to 28.6 months)

Population: All randomized participants from Part 2 group, who qualified for tumor response analysis. Per protocol, Part 1 was not included as it is an open-label safety lead-in portion with PK characterization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Percentage of Participants With CR or PR or Stable Disease (SD) (Rate of Response)CR7.1 percentage of participants
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Percentage of Participants With CR or PR or Stable Disease (SD) (Rate of Response)PR35.7 percentage of participants
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Percentage of Participants With CR or PR or Stable Disease (SD) (Rate of Response)SD42.9 percentage of participants
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Percentage of Participants With CR or PR or Stable Disease (SD) (Rate of Response)CR22.2 percentage of participants
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Percentage of Participants With CR or PR or Stable Disease (SD) (Rate of Response)PR16.7 percentage of participants
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Percentage of Participants With CR or PR or Stable Disease (SD) (Rate of Response)SD50.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 2: Percentage of Participants With PFS at 2 Years

PFS was defined as time from date of randomization to first date of determined PD or death from any cause. PD defined using RECIST v1.0 and GCIG criteria. RECIST v1.0: as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since treatment started or appearance of ≥1 new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. GCIG: CA-125 serum ≥2 times ULN for those in normal range or nadir (the lowest value of blood counts after chemotherapy) for participants who never achieved normal range. Participants not known to have died and did not have PD were censored at last progression-free assessment. Those who received subsequent systemic anticancer therapy (after study drug discontinued) prior to determined PD or death, were censored at date of last progression-free disease assessment prior to post-discontinuation chemotherapy.

Time frame: Randomization to measured PD evaluated at 2 years

Population: All randomized participants from Part 2 group. Participants censored for Part 2: Regimen A=38, Regimen B=35. Per protocol, Part 1 was not included as it is an open-label safety lead-in portion with PK characterization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Percentage of Participants With PFS at 2 Years35.2 percentage of participants
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Percentage of Participants With PFS at 2 Years28.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Part 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)

PE measured using Immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay, scored 0 (negative, no staining) to 3+ (brightest staining). IHC H-scores for protein biomarkers (PKCβ2, PTEN, pCREB, pGSK3b, pS6) calculated as: \[1\*(percentage of cells stained \[PCS\] as 1+)\]+\[2\*(PCS as 2+)\]+\[3\*(PCS as 3+)\]. High PE: ≥marker threshold value and Low PE: \<marker threshold value. PFS: date of randomization to PD or death. PD defined using RECIST v1.0 and GCIG criteria. RECIST: ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions taking as references smallest sum LD recorded since treatment started or appearance of ≥1 new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. GCIG: CA-125 serum ≥2 times ULN for those in normal range or nadir for those who never achieved normal range. Per protocol, Part 1 was not included as it is an open-label safety lead-in portion with PK characterization.

Time frame: Randomization up to date of PD or death (up to 28.6 months)

Population: All randomized participants (Pts) from Part 2 group. Pts censored: Regimens A/B (A/B)-High (H), Low (L) Expression: PKCβ2 Cytoplasm (Cyto) (H4/5,L26/22), PTEN Cyto (H24/24, L6/3), PTEN Membrane (H9/8, L21/19), PTEN Nucleus (H13/6, L17/21), pCREB Nucleus (H14/10, L16/17), pGSK3b Cyto (H7/3, L22/23), pS6 Cyto (H21/18, L9/9).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)pGSK3b Cytoplasm Low Expression (H<160)14.0 months
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)PKCβ2 Cytoplasm Low Expression (H<115)19.1 months
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)pS6 Cytoplasm High Expression (H≥105)19.6 months
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)pS6 Cytoplasm Low Expression (H<105)11.5 months
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)PTEN Cytoplasm High Expression (H≥50)18.9 months
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)PTEN Cytoplasm Low Expression (H<50)NA months
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)PTEN Membrane High Expression (H≥15)18.4 months
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)PTEN Membrane Low Expression (H<15)19.1 months
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)PTEN Nucleus High Expression (H≥12)NA months
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)PTEN Nucleus Low Expression (H<12)18.4 months
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)pCREB Nucleus High Expression (H≥217)19.6 months
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)pCREB Nucleus Low Expression (H<217)14.0 months
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)pGSK3b Cytoplasm High Expression (H≥160)NA months
Part 2 - Regimen APart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)PKCβ2 Cytoplasm High Expression (H≥115)18.9 months
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)PTEN Nucleus Low Expression (H<12)16.9 months
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)PKCβ2 Cytoplasm High Expression (H≥115)10.4 months
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)pCREB Nucleus Low Expression (H<217)18.2 months
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)PKCβ2 Cytoplasm Low Expression (H<115)18.2 months
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)PTEN Membrane High Expression (H≥15)NA months
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)pGSK3b Cytoplasm Low Expression (H<160)17.4 months
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)PTEN Membrane Low Expression (H<15)14.7 months
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)pS6 Cytoplasm High Expression (H≥105)18.0 months
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)pCREB Nucleus High Expression (H≥217)13.2 months
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)pS6 Cytoplasm Low Expression (H<105)17.4 months
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)PTEN Nucleus High Expression (H≥12)16.8 months
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)PTEN Cytoplasm High Expression (H≥50)18.2 months
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)pGSK3b Cytoplasm High Expression (H≥160)14.5 months
Part 2 - Regimen BPart 2: Translational Research: PFS Based on Protein Expression (PE) (To Assess Biological Markers in Tumors That Could Indicate Who Could Benefit From Enzastaurin Treatment)PTEN Cytoplasm Low Expression (H<50)10.4 months
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Carboplatin With and Without Enzastaurin for Part 1 of Study

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (carb) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (carb + enz); carb 0.25 hours (h) (prior to infusion), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 21h after start of infusion

Population: All enrolled participants with measurable Cmax in Part 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 2 - Regimen APharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Carboplatin With and Without Enzastaurin for Part 1 of StudyCycle 2 Day 110.8 micrograms/milliliter (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13
Part 2 - Regimen APharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Carboplatin With and Without Enzastaurin for Part 1 of StudyCycle 1 Day 111.1 micrograms/milliliter (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21
Secondary

PK: AUC0-∞ for Paclitaxel With and Without Enzastaurin for Part 1 of Study

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (pac) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (pac + enz); pac at 1, 2, 3h (immediately after stopping infusion), 3.25, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 24, and 30h after start of infusion

Population: All enrolled participants with measurable AUC0-∞ in Part 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 2 - Regimen APK: AUC0-∞ for Paclitaxel With and Without Enzastaurin for Part 1 of StudyCycle 1 Day 112000 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 24
Part 2 - Regimen APK: AUC0-∞ for Paclitaxel With and Without Enzastaurin for Part 1 of StudyCycle 2 Day 114400 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 23
Secondary

PK: AUC During the Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCτ,ss) for Part 2 of Study

AUCτ,ss for enzastaurin, its metabolite LSN326020 (LY326020), and total analytes are reported.

Time frame: Cycle 2 Day 1 (carb + pac + enz) at pre-dose, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24h after the enz dose

Population: All randomized participants with measurable AUCτ,ss in Part 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 2 - Regimen APK: AUC During the Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCτ,ss) for Part 2 of StudyEnzastaurin47100 nmol*h/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 95
Part 2 - Regimen APK: AUC During the Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCτ,ss) for Part 2 of StudyLSN32602055600 nmol*h/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 47
Part 2 - Regimen APK: AUC During the Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCτ,ss) for Part 2 of StudyTotal Analyte106000 nmol*h/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 63
Secondary

PK: AUC From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) for Carboplatin With and Without Enzastaurin for Part 1 of Study

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (carb) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (carb + enz); carb at 0.25h (prior to infusion), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 21h after start of infusion

Population: All enrolled participants with measurable AUC0-∞ in Part 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 2 - Regimen APK: AUC From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) for Carboplatin With and Without Enzastaurin for Part 1 of StudyCycle 1 Day 13.32 milligrams*minute/milliliter (mg*min/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 10
Part 2 - Regimen APK: AUC From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) for Carboplatin With and Without Enzastaurin for Part 1 of StudyCycle 2 Day 13.80 milligrams*minute/milliliter (mg*min/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16
Secondary

PK: Cmax at Steady State (Cmax,ss) for Part 1 of Study

Cmax,ss for enzastaurin, its metabolite LSN326020 (LY326020) and total analytes are reported.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 21 (enz) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (carb + pac + enz) at pre-dose, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24h after the enz dose

Population: All enrolled participants with measurable Cmax,ss in Part 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 2 - Regimen APK: Cmax at Steady State (Cmax,ss) for Part 1 of StudyEnzastaurin Cycle 1 Day 211230 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 110
Part 2 - Regimen APK: Cmax at Steady State (Cmax,ss) for Part 1 of StudyEnzastaurin Cycle 2 Day 1935 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 80
Part 2 - Regimen APK: Cmax at Steady State (Cmax,ss) for Part 1 of StudyLSN326020 Cycle 2 Day1814 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 30
Part 2 - Regimen APK: Cmax at Steady State (Cmax,ss) for Part 1 of StudyTotal Analyte Cycle 1 Day 212190 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 81
Part 2 - Regimen APK: Cmax at Steady State (Cmax,ss) for Part 1 of StudyTotal Analyte Cycle 2 Day 11640 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 57
Part 2 - Regimen APK: Cmax at Steady State (Cmax,ss) for Part 1 of StudyLSN326020 Cycle 1 Day 21890 nmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 58
Secondary

PK: Cmax for Paclitaxel With and Without Enzastaurin for Part 1 of Study

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (pac) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (pac + enz); pac 1, 2, 3h (immediately after stopping infusion), 3.25, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 24, and 30h after start of infusion

Population: All enrolled participants with measurable Cmax for pac in Part 1.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 2 - Regimen APK: Cmax for Paclitaxel With and Without Enzastaurin for Part 1 of StudyCycle 1 Day 13580 nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 43
Part 2 - Regimen APK: Cmax for Paclitaxel With and Without Enzastaurin for Part 1 of StudyCycle 2 Day 13670 nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026