Skip to content

Remifentanil Versus Morphine for Sedation of Premature Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Comparative Study of the Use of Remifentanil Versus Morphine for Sedation and Analgesia of Premature Neonates During Mechanical Ventilation in the Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00391105
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2006-10-23
Start date
2004-04-30
Completion date
2005-11-30
Last updated
2006-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Keywords

intubation, Sedation, Analgesia, preterm neonate, remifentanil, morphine, respiratory distress syndrome

Brief summary

In this randomised controlled study we intended to compared intubation conditions and the continuous infusion of remifentanil (n=10) and morphine (n=10) in mechanically ventilated premature neonates (28-34wk) regarding the time to be awake and, the time until extubation after interruption of the opioid administration.

Detailed description

Intubation and mechanical ventilation are majors component of intensive care for premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and is associated with physiologic, biochemical, and clinical responses indicating pain and stress in prematures. Although morphine is one of the most used drugs for premedication and for sedation and analgesia during mechanical ventilation in the treatment of RDS its pharmacological profile precludes several limitations mostly due to its much delayed onset of action what makes the drug not suitable as premedication and due to its prolonged duration of action mainly in prematures. Unlike morphine, remifentanil has an unique pharmacokinetic properties with a rapid onset of action and, a fast decrease in plasma concentration after interruption of administration due to a context-sensitive half-time of 3.2 minutes. So, it could be the ideal opioid for neonates who are especially sensitive to respiratory depression by opioids

Interventions

DRUGRemifentanil

Sponsors

Federal University of Minas Gerais
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Minutes to 28 Days
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Gestational age between 28 and 34 wk * Clinical and radiological features compatible with respiratory distress syndrome that required an elective tracheal intubation and surfactant therapy.

Exclusion criteria

* The presence of major congenital malformations * Birth weigh less than 1000g * Previous or concurrent use of opioid for any reason (cesarean section with general anaesthesia) * Hemodynamic instability before the indication of tracheal intubation * Refuse of the parents to enroll the neonate in the study protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intubation conditions using a four point scale
Decrease in time after interruption of sedation until the neonate be awake.
Decrease in time after interruption of sedation until the neonate be extubated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain and stress before and after intubation (NIPS and Comfort scores).
Pain and stress during continuous infusion of remifentanil versus morphine during mechanical ventilation for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (NIPS and Comfort scores).

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026