Skip to content

A Randomised, Comparing Fixed Doses of Pramipexole to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety in Patients With RLS.

A Randomised, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pramipexole at Fixed Doses of 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, and 0.75 mg in Patients With Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome for 6 Weeks, Followed by a 46-week Open-label Long-term Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00390689
Enrollment
154
Registered
2006-10-20
Start date
2006-10-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome

Brief summary

The objective of double blind phase in this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety at the fixed dose of 0.25 mg,0.5 mg and 0.75 mg pramipexole in RLS. The objective of open label phase in this trial is to investigate the long term safety and efficacy of pramipexole in RLS.

Interventions

DRUGPramipexole 0.125 mg tablet
DRUGPramipexole 0.5 mg tablet

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female patients between 20 and 80 years 2. Patients with a diagnosis of restless legs syndrome (RLS) according to the following diagnosis criteria of National institute of health (NIH)/International restless legs syndrome study group (IRLSSG): 1. An urge to move the legs, usually accompanied or caused by uncomfortable and unpleasant sensations in the legs. 2. The urge to move or unpleasant sensations begin or worsen during periods of rest or inactivity such as lying or sitting. 3. The urge to move or unpleasant sensations are partially or totally relieved by movement, such as walking or stretching, at least as long as the activity continues. 4. The urge to move or unpleasant sensations are worse in the evening or night than during the day or only occur in the evening or night. 3. Patients with a total score larger than 15 on the IRLS at Visit 2

Exclusion criteria

1. Premenopausal women who meet any of the following 1) to 3) 1) Patients who are pregnant or possibly pregnant 2) Patients who are lactating 3) Patients who wish to become pregnant during the study period 2. Patients who cannot take adequate contraceptive measures 3. Patients with a history of akathisia induced by neuroleptics 4. Patients with diabetes mellitus requiring insulin therapy 5. Patients who are judged to have microcytic anaemia by the investigator or sub-investigator 6. Patients with a history or signs of peripheral neuropathy, myelopathy, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease or other neurological diseases that may result in the occurrence of secondary RLS in the physical function tests or neurological tests 7. Patients with other sleep disorders such as abnormal behaviour during Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, narcolepsy and sleep apnoea syndrome (patients with an apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) exceeding 15 determined by polysomnography at the relevant trial site or those with loud snoring at least 5 nights/week and an experience of respiratory arrest during sleep or excessive daytime sleepiness)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Total Score at 6 WeeksWeek 6 - change from baselineThe International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) proposes classification of severity based on the total score on the IRLS (0-10, mild; 11-20, moderate; 21-30, severe; 31-40, very severe). A decrease in the score of the IRLS by 10 or more points corresponds to the improvement of severity by one rank and has clinical importance. Therefore, the primary endpoint in the double-blind period was set as a decrease by 10 or more points in the mean change on the total score of the IRLS from the baseline to Visit 5 (last observation day in the double-blind period) at all doses of 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, and 0.75 mg/day of pramipexole.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score at 6 WeeksWeek 6 - change from baselinePSQI developed to evaluate the quality of sleep is a self-recording questionnaire consisting of 18 questions focused on 7 factors such as sleep quality, sleep period time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, sleep difficulty, use of hypnotics, and hindrance to activities of daily living due to daytime sleepiness. Each score (0-3 points) in the respective factors was added to calculate the total score (0-21 points). Rating scale scored from 0 (best sleep) to 21 (worst sleep).
Change From Baseline in Japanese Version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS) Total Score at 6 WeeksWeek 6 - change from baselineESS is a self-recording scale used to evaluate sleepiness experienced in daily activities and it consists of 8 items focused on specific situations such as reading books and watching television. Each score (0-3 points) to 8 questions was added simply to calculate the total ESS score. A Japanese translation of the ESS (a provisional version provided by the Japanese Respiratory Society) used so far had not been prepared through the international scale development and validation process, but the version prepared through this process was published at the 31st meeting of the Japanese Society of Sleep Research. The questions in JESS had been discussed with the original author of the ESS and their measurement concepts had been confirmed. The JESS is the Japanese version of ESS prepared through the international scale development and validation process. Rating scale scored from 0 (no daytime sleep) to 24 (worst daytime sleep)
Clinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responderbaseline to week 6CGI is extensively used for risk-benefit evaluation (efficacy) of drug therapies. The CGI evaluates the severity and improvement in 7 ranks. It also evaluates the therapeutic effect and side effects in 4 ranks, separately. Rating scale from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients who were evaluated as 1(very much improved) or 2(much improved) by the investigator were considered responders.
Patient Global Impression (PGI) Responderbaseline to week 6PGI is used to evaluate a global impression by patients themselves in 7 ranks. Rating scale from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients where the patient evaluated himself/herself as 1(very much better) or 2(much better)were considered responders.
Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs (Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate in Both Supine and Standing Positions), ECG, Laboratory Tests - Double Blind Period.baseline to 6 weeks
Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label PeriodWeek 52 - change from baselineThe International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) proposes classification of severity based on the total score on the IRLS (0-10, mild; 11-20, moderate; 21-30, severe; 31-40, very severe).
IRLS Responderbaseline to week 6The percentage of patients with 50 % or more reduction of IRLS (The measure means the percentage of high responder on the trial medications)
Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label PeriodWeek 52 - change from baselinePSQI developed to evaluate the quality of sleep is a self-recording questionnaire consisting of 18 questions focused on 7 factors such as sleep quality, sleep period time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, sleep difficulty, use of hypnotics, and hindrance to activities of daily living due to daytime sleepiness. Each score (0-3 points) in the respective factors was added to calculate the total score (0-21 points). Rating scale scored from 0 (best sleep) to 21 (worst sleep).
Change From Baseline in Japanese Version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label PeriodWeek 52 - change from baselineESS is a self-recording scale used to evaluate sleepiness experienced in daily activities and it consists of 8 items focused on specific situations such as reading books and watching television. Each score (0-3 points) to 8 questions was added simply to calculate the total ESS score. A Japanese translation of the ESS (a provisional version provided by the Japanese Respiratory Society) used so far had not been prepared through the international scale development and validation process, but the version prepared through this process was published at the 31st meeting of the Japanese Society of Sleep Research. The questions in JESS had been discussed with the original author of the ESS and their measurement concepts had been confirmed. The JESS is the Japanese version of ESS prepared through the international scale development and validation process. Rating scale scored from 0 (no daytime sleep) to 24 (worst daytime sleep)
Clinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responder at 52 Weeks for Open-label Periodbaseline to week 52CGI is extensively used for risk-benefit evaluation (efficacy) of drug therapies. The CGI evaluates the severity and improvement in 7 ranks. It also evaluates the therapeutic effect and side effects in 4 ranks, separately. Rating scale from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients who were evaluated as 1(very much improved) or 2(much improved) by the investigator were considered responders.
Patient Global Impression (PGI) Responder at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Periodbaseline to week 52PGI is used to evaluate a global impression by patients themselves in 7 ranks. Rating scale from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients where the patient evaluated himself/herself as 1(very much better) or 2(much better)were considered responders.
Possible Augmentation in RLS Symptoms at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Periodbaseline to week 52Possible augmentation defined as persistence of a state in which RLS symptoms begin to occur 2 hours earlier than the usual time zone for 5 days or more a week
IRLS Responder for Open-label Periodbaseline to week 52The percentage of patients with 50 % or more reduction of IRLS (The measure means the percentage of high responder on the trial medications)

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pramipexole 0.25mg Group
Double-blind period: 0.25 mg randomised group Administration as follows: Week 1: 1 tablet of 0.125mg Pramipexole once daily Week 2: 2 tablets of 0.125mg Pramipexole once daily Week 3: 2 tablets of 0.125mg Pramipexole + 2 tablets of the matching placebo once daily Week 4-6: 2 tablets of 0.125mg Pramipexole + 4 tablets of the matching placebo once daily Open-label period: Administration of pramipexole was started at 0.25 mg/day at Week 6 (Visit 5, the last observation day in the double-blind period). Subsequently, the Patient Global Impression (PGI) and tolerability was assessed from Visit 6 and if required, the investigator or subinvestigator determined whether to increase the daily dose to 0.5 mg and then to 0.75 mg/day every two weeks. After checking the PGI and tolerability at each visit, the investigator or sub-investigator determined dose increase, maintenance or reduction. mode of administration.: Oral, once daily, 2-3 hours before bedtime
48
Pramipexole 0.5mg Group
Double-blind period: 0.5 mg randomised group Administration as follows: Week 1: 1 tablet of 0.125mg Pramipexole once daily Week 2: 2 tablets of 0.125mg Pramipexole once daily Week 3: 4 tablets of 0.125mg Pramipexole once daily Week 4-6: 4 tablets of 0.125mg Pramipexole + 2 tablets of the matching placebo once daily Open-label period: Administration of pramipexole was started at 0.25 mg/day at Week 6 (Visit 5, the last observation day in the double-blind period). Subsequently, the Patient Global Impression (PGI) and tolerability was assessed from Visit 6 and if required, the investigator or subinvestigator determined whether to increase the daily dose to 0.5 mg and then to 0.75 mg/day every two weeks. After checking the PGI and tolerability at each visit, the investigator or sub-investigator determined dose increase, maintenance or reduction. mode of administration.: Oral, once daily, 2-3 hours before bedtime
53
Pramipexole 0.75mg Group
Double-blind period: 0.75 mg randomised group Administration as follows: Week 1: 1 tablet of 0.125mg Pramipexole once daily Week 2: 2 tablets of 0.125mg Pramipexole once daily Week 3: 4 tablets of 0.125mg Pramipexole once daily Week 4-6: 6 tablets of 0.125mg Pramipexole once daily Open-label period: Administration of pramipexole was started at 0.25 mg/day at Week 6 (Visit 5, the last observation day in the double-blind period). Subsequently, the Patient Global Impression (PGI) and tolerability was assessed from Visit 6 and if required, the investigator or subinvestigator determined whether to increase the daily dose to 0.5 mg and then to 0.75 mg/day every two weeks. After checking the PGI and tolerability at each visit, the investigator or sub-investigator determined dose increase, maintenance or reduction. mode of administration.: Oral, once daily, 2-3 hours before bedtime
53
Total154

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event252
Overall StudyInvestigator's judgement200
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPramipexole 0.25mg GroupPramipexole 0.5mg GroupPramipexole 0.75mg GroupTotal
Age, Continuous52.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
52.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
54.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
53.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants27 Participants32 Participants89 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants26 Participants21 Participants65 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
32 / 4842 / 5342 / 535 / 858 / 14050 / 9729 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 482 / 530 / 531 / 85 / 1400 / 970 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Total Score at 6 Weeks

The International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) proposes classification of severity based on the total score on the IRLS (0-10, mild; 11-20, moderate; 21-30, severe; 31-40, very severe). A decrease in the score of the IRLS by 10 or more points corresponds to the improvement of severity by one rank and has clinical importance. Therefore, the primary endpoint in the double-blind period was set as a decrease by 10 or more points in the mean change on the total score of the IRLS from the baseline to Visit 5 (last observation day in the double-blind period) at all doses of 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, and 0.75 mg/day of pramipexole.

Time frame: Week 6 - change from baseline

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole 0.25mg GroupChange From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Total Score at 6 Weeks-12.3 Points on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
Pramipexole 0.5mg GroupChange From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Total Score at 6 Weeks-12.5 Points on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupChange From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Total Score at 6 Weeks-11.8 Points on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period

The International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) proposes classification of severity based on the total score on the IRLS (0-10, mild; 11-20, moderate; 21-30, severe; 31-40, very severe).

Time frame: Week 52 - change from baseline

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole 0.25mg GroupChange From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period-18.5 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
Pramipexole 0.5mg GroupChange From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period-17.3 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupChange From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period-18.3 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupChange From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period-14.8 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Japanese Version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period

ESS is a self-recording scale used to evaluate sleepiness experienced in daily activities and it consists of 8 items focused on specific situations such as reading books and watching television. Each score (0-3 points) to 8 questions was added simply to calculate the total ESS score. A Japanese translation of the ESS (a provisional version provided by the Japanese Respiratory Society) used so far had not been prepared through the international scale development and validation process, but the version prepared through this process was published at the 31st meeting of the Japanese Society of Sleep Research. The questions in JESS had been discussed with the original author of the ESS and their measurement concepts had been confirmed. The JESS is the Japanese version of ESS prepared through the international scale development and validation process. Rating scale scored from 0 (no daytime sleep) to 24 (worst daytime sleep)

Time frame: Week 52 - change from baseline

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole 0.25mg GroupChange From Baseline in Japanese Version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period-9.5 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Pramipexole 0.5mg GroupChange From Baseline in Japanese Version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period-3.8 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupChange From Baseline in Japanese Version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period-4.4 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupChange From Baseline in Japanese Version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period-2.6 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Japanese Version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS) Total Score at 6 Weeks

ESS is a self-recording scale used to evaluate sleepiness experienced in daily activities and it consists of 8 items focused on specific situations such as reading books and watching television. Each score (0-3 points) to 8 questions was added simply to calculate the total ESS score. A Japanese translation of the ESS (a provisional version provided by the Japanese Respiratory Society) used so far had not been prepared through the international scale development and validation process, but the version prepared through this process was published at the 31st meeting of the Japanese Society of Sleep Research. The questions in JESS had been discussed with the original author of the ESS and their measurement concepts had been confirmed. The JESS is the Japanese version of ESS prepared through the international scale development and validation process. Rating scale scored from 0 (no daytime sleep) to 24 (worst daytime sleep)

Time frame: Week 6 - change from baseline

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole 0.25mg GroupChange From Baseline in Japanese Version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS) Total Score at 6 Weeks-2.6 Points on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
Pramipexole 0.5mg GroupChange From Baseline in Japanese Version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS) Total Score at 6 Weeks-3.0 Points on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupChange From Baseline in Japanese Version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS) Total Score at 6 Weeks-2.3 Points on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period

PSQI developed to evaluate the quality of sleep is a self-recording questionnaire consisting of 18 questions focused on 7 factors such as sleep quality, sleep period time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, sleep difficulty, use of hypnotics, and hindrance to activities of daily living due to daytime sleepiness. Each score (0-3 points) in the respective factors was added to calculate the total score (0-21 points). Rating scale scored from 0 (best sleep) to 21 (worst sleep).

Time frame: Week 52 - change from baseline

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole 0.25mg GroupChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period-4.0 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Pramipexole 0.5mg GroupChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period-3.3 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period-3.3 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period-2.4 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score at 6 Weeks

PSQI developed to evaluate the quality of sleep is a self-recording questionnaire consisting of 18 questions focused on 7 factors such as sleep quality, sleep period time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, sleep difficulty, use of hypnotics, and hindrance to activities of daily living due to daytime sleepiness. Each score (0-3 points) in the respective factors was added to calculate the total score (0-21 points). Rating scale scored from 0 (best sleep) to 21 (worst sleep).

Time frame: Week 6 - change from baseline

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole 0.25mg GroupChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score at 6 Weeks-3.2 Points on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Pramipexole 0.5mg GroupChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score at 6 Weeks-3.2 Points on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupChange From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score at 6 Weeks-2.5 Points on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responder

CGI is extensively used for risk-benefit evaluation (efficacy) of drug therapies. The CGI evaluates the severity and improvement in 7 ranks. It also evaluates the therapeutic effect and side effects in 4 ranks, separately. Rating scale from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients who were evaluated as 1(very much improved) or 2(much improved) by the investigator were considered responders.

Time frame: baseline to week 6

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pramipexole 0.25mg GroupClinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responder77.1 Percentage of patients
Pramipexole 0.5mg GroupClinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responder75.5 Percentage of patients
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupClinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responder69.8 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responder at 52 Weeks for Open-label Period

CGI is extensively used for risk-benefit evaluation (efficacy) of drug therapies. The CGI evaluates the severity and improvement in 7 ranks. It also evaluates the therapeutic effect and side effects in 4 ranks, separately. Rating scale from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients who were evaluated as 1(very much improved) or 2(much improved) by the investigator were considered responders.

Time frame: baseline to week 52

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pramipexole 0.25mg GroupClinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responder at 52 Weeks for Open-label Period100.0 Percentage of patients
Pramipexole 0.5mg GroupClinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responder at 52 Weeks for Open-label Period95.0 Percentage of patients
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupClinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responder at 52 Weeks for Open-label Period98.0 Percentage of patients
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupClinical Global Impression Global Improvement (CGI-I) Responder at 52 Weeks for Open-label Period84.0 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs (Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate in Both Supine and Standing Positions), ECG, Laboratory Tests - Double Blind Period.

Time frame: baseline to 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pramipexole 0.25mg GroupClinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs (Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate in Both Supine and Standing Positions), ECG, Laboratory Tests - Double Blind Period.Blood pressure increased0 participants
Pramipexole 0.25mg GroupClinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs (Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate in Both Supine and Standing Positions), ECG, Laboratory Tests - Double Blind Period.Cardiovascular disorder0 participants
Pramipexole 0.5mg GroupClinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs (Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate in Both Supine and Standing Positions), ECG, Laboratory Tests - Double Blind Period.Blood pressure increased1 participants
Pramipexole 0.5mg GroupClinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs (Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate in Both Supine and Standing Positions), ECG, Laboratory Tests - Double Blind Period.Cardiovascular disorder0 participants
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupClinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs (Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate in Both Supine and Standing Positions), ECG, Laboratory Tests - Double Blind Period.Blood pressure increased0 participants
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupClinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs (Blood Pressure and Pulse Rate in Both Supine and Standing Positions), ECG, Laboratory Tests - Double Blind Period.Cardiovascular disorder1 participants
Secondary

IRLS Responder

The percentage of patients with 50 % or more reduction of IRLS (The measure means the percentage of high responder on the trial medications)

Time frame: baseline to week 6

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pramipexole 0.25mg GroupIRLS Responder60.4 Percentage of patients
Pramipexole 0.5mg GroupIRLS Responder58.5 Percentage of patients
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupIRLS Responder49.1 Percentage of patients
Secondary

IRLS Responder for Open-label Period

The percentage of patients with 50 % or more reduction of IRLS (The measure means the percentage of high responder on the trial medications)

Time frame: baseline to week 52

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pramipexole 0.25mg GroupIRLS Responder for Open-label Period100.0 Percentage of patients
Pramipexole 0.5mg GroupIRLS Responder for Open-label Period90.0 Percentage of patients
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupIRLS Responder for Open-label Period92.0 Percentage of patients
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupIRLS Responder for Open-label Period68.0 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Patient Global Impression (PGI) Responder

PGI is used to evaluate a global impression by patients themselves in 7 ranks. Rating scale from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients where the patient evaluated himself/herself as 1(very much better) or 2(much better)were considered responders.

Time frame: baseline to week 6

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pramipexole 0.25mg GroupPatient Global Impression (PGI) Responder72.9 Percentage of patients
Pramipexole 0.5mg GroupPatient Global Impression (PGI) Responder79.2 Percentage of patients
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupPatient Global Impression (PGI) Responder67.9 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Patient Global Impression (PGI) Responder at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period

PGI is used to evaluate a global impression by patients themselves in 7 ranks. Rating scale from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). The percentage of patients where the patient evaluated himself/herself as 1(very much better) or 2(much better)were considered responders.

Time frame: baseline to week 52

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pramipexole 0.25mg GroupPatient Global Impression (PGI) Responder at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period100.0 Percentage of patients
Pramipexole 0.5mg GroupPatient Global Impression (PGI) Responder at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period97.5 Percentage of patients
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupPatient Global Impression (PGI) Responder at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period94.0 Percentage of patients
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupPatient Global Impression (PGI) Responder at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period80.0 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Possible Augmentation in RLS Symptoms at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period

Possible augmentation defined as persistence of a state in which RLS symptoms begin to occur 2 hours earlier than the usual time zone for 5 days or more a week

Time frame: baseline to week 52

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pramipexole 0.25mg GroupPossible Augmentation in RLS Symptoms at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period0.0 Percentage of patients
Pramipexole 0.5mg GroupPossible Augmentation in RLS Symptoms at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period0.0 Percentage of patients
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupPossible Augmentation in RLS Symptoms at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period0.0 Percentage of patients
Pramipexole 0.75mg GroupPossible Augmentation in RLS Symptoms at 52 Weeks for Open-Label Period0.0 Percentage of patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026