Skip to content

Observational Data Collection of Surgical Outcomes in the Treatment of Vaginal Prolapse With AMS Products

The Prolapse Registry: An Observational Collection of Short- and Long-Term Patient Outcomes Following Use of AMS Surgical Devices for the Repair of Female Genital Prolapse

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00388947
Acronym
POWER1012
Enrollment
1543
Registered
2006-10-17
Start date
2006-09-30
Completion date
2010-05-31
Last updated
2016-08-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vaginal Prolapse

Keywords

vaginal prolapse, cystocele, rectocele, enterocele, apical prolapse, vaginal vault prolapse

Brief summary

This registry was observational (only collected information typically noted by the surgeon when their patients were routinely seen); there was no change to the care the patient received as a result of being part of the registry). Data collection focused on the surgical outcomes of AMS prolapse products.

Detailed description

The Prolapse Registry was an observational study of patients who were implanted with AMS devices for the surgical repair of female pelvic prolapse. The registry followed patients post-operatively for up to 2 years and collected demographic, clinical, surgical, safety, and patient outcomes data. The registry was a web-based system in which surgeons entered patient information with regard to their prolapse surgery. All information entered was de-identified (no names, no date of birth, no date of surgery, etc).

Interventions

DEVICEAMS Prolapse Product

AMS Apogee™ with IntePro (Synthetic) or InteXen (Biologic) Mesh implant for posterior wall pelvic organ prolapse AMS Straight-In™ with IntePro (Synthetic) Mesh implant for vaginal vault pelvic organ prolapse AMS Perigee™ with IntePro Mesh implant for anterior wall pelvic organ prolapse AMS Perigee™ with IntePro Mesh coated with PC AMS Elevate® Prolapse Repair System Family

Sponsors

ASTORA Women's Health
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female at least 21 years old * Has pelvic organ prolapse requiring surgical repair * Receives at least one of the AMS Prolapse Repair devices in the treatment of their pelvic organ prolapse

Exclusion criteria

* Is contraindicated for an AMS Prolapse Repair per the product's Instruction for Use.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Count of Patients With at Least One Adverse Event Related to Any AMS Prolapse Deviceup to 2-years post-implant

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prolapse Efficacy Success Rate24 monthsSuccess was defined as either (1) Baden-Walker grade 0 or 1 or (2) (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System) POP-Q stage 0 or 1. If a site reported both measurements, then the POP-Q score was used.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The first patient was registered in September 2006, The last patient data were entered in May 2010.

Pre-assignment details

Patients had to met all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
1 - Any AMS Prolapse Product
at least one AMS prolapse product was used
1,590
Total1,590

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation47

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic1 - Any AMS Prolapse Product
Age, Continuous
Age <89 years
62 participants
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1590 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
138 / 1,543
serious
Total, serious adverse events
71 / 1,543

Outcome results

Primary

Count of Patients With at Least One Adverse Event Related to Any AMS Prolapse Device

Time frame: up to 2-years post-implant

Population: All patients that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
1 - Any AMS Prolapse ProductCount of Patients With at Least One Adverse Event Related to Any AMS Prolapse Device194 participants
Secondary

Prolapse Efficacy Success Rate

Success was defined as either (1) Baden-Walker grade 0 or 1 or (2) (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System) POP-Q stage 0 or 1. If a site reported both measurements, then the POP-Q score was used.

Time frame: 24 months

Population: Patients returning for a visit between 19-24 months post-procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
1 - Any AMS Prolapse ProductProlapse Efficacy Success Rate81.6 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026