Skip to content

Efficacy of Dx-pH Probe in Diagnosing Extra-esophageal Reflux Disease

ADHERE Study: Application of Dx-pH Catheter for Extra-esophageal Reflux Evaluation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00388453
Acronym
ADHERE
Enrollment
47
Registered
2006-10-16
Start date
2006-10-31
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2017-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

GERD, Larynx Disease

Keywords

Healthy volunteers

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to establish the clinical application of a new device that records pH changes in the hypopharynx. The investigators also aim to compare the consistency of distal esophageal pH with hypopharyngeal pH using both the short and the long catheters in patients.

Detailed description

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been linked to many disorders and can be diagnosed through a variety of modalities utilizing 24 hour ambulatory pH monitoring which can register the duration, pattern and symptom correlation of distal esophageal acid exposure. This can be accomplished via a catheter probe connected from outside the body and placed through a nostril, advanced past the hypopharynx and down into the distal esophagus. Or, a small pH detector temporarily implanted in the distal esophagus during endoscopy can record reflux events. However, despite available technologies, there has long been a deficiency in detecting extra-esophageal reflux in the upper esophagus/ hypopharynx. This is of interest for gastroenterologists, otolaryngologists, and pulmonologists in the evaluation of extra-esophageal reflux as a potential culprit for asthma, chronic cough, laryngitis, globus, and non-cardiac chest pain. Until now, there has not been a device sensitive enough for accurately detecting extra-esophageal reflux (EERD) and clinicians have relied upon subjective response to empiric treatment with acid reducing medications to determine whether acid reflux was at the root of the symptoms. There are currently no well designed published studies with this device to assess its role in this group of difficult to treat patients.

Interventions

24 hour ph monitoring

PROCEDUREManometry

procedure to measure pH at the Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and Upper esophageal sphincter (UES)

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and female volunteers aged 18 to 65 years old. 2. Control group: No known history of GERD or EERD or prior PPI use. 3. GERD group: Patients with known history of GERD based on prior response to either histamine inhibitors (H2 blockers) or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and/or endoscopic esophagitis identified at endoscopy. 4. EERD group: Patients with chronic cough, asthma and laryngeal findings felt to be GERD related.

Exclusion criteria

1. Use of H2 blockers or PPIs within one week prior to and during the study for the GERD and EERD patients. No prior PPI use is allowed for the control population. 2. Use of antacids (Rolaids, Tums, Pepto-Bismol, etc.) within one day prior to or during the study. 3. Esophageal motility abnormalities (achalasia, esophageal spasm, severe dysphagia) 4. Expected non-compliance. 5. Positive history of ongoing alcohol or tobacco use and inability to refrain from using either during study duration (24 hours). 6. Recent nasal surgery or nasal obstruction. 7. Significant medical conditions that, in the investigator's judgment, would compromise the subject's health and safety (mental disability, psychiatric impairment, inability to read or comprehend the consent form) 8. Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Decrease in pH From Baseline to <424 hoursThe three study groups underwent dual pH measurements of the oropharyngeal as well as esophageal acid exposure employing the regular length probe for the oropharynx and the custom-designed long probe for the distal esophagus. The reason for the custom-designed esophageal measurement was to ensure that events noted in the oropharynx originated distally and were of gastric source. Measurements for the two locations were time synchronized to ensure accuracy. Calculations were based on length of time spent in upright and supine positions, and a combination of the two positions.
Decrease in pH From Baseline to <524 hoursThe three study groups underwent dual pH measurements of the oropharyngeal as well as esophageal acid exposure employing the regular length probe for the oropharynx and the custom-designed long probe for the distal esophagus. The reason for the custom-designed esophageal measurement was to ensure that events noted in the oropharynx originated distally and were of gastric source. Measurements for the two locations were time synchronized to ensure accuracy. Calculations were based on length of time spent in upright and supine positions, and a combination of the two positions. Reflux event was calculated for a drop in pH from baseline to either \<4, or \<5, or \<6 and each event had to last more than 5 seconds and could not be during the meals.
Decrease in pH From Baseline to <624 hoursThe three study groups underwent dual pH measurements of the oropharyngeal as well as esophageal acid exposure employing the regular length probe for the oropharynx and the custom-designed long probe for the distal esophagus. The reason for the custom-designed esophageal measurement was to ensure that events noted in the oropharynx originated distally and were of gastric source. Measurements for the two locations were time synchronized to ensure accuracy. Calculations were based on length of time spent in upright and supine positions, and a combination of the two positions. Reflux event was calculated for a drop in pH from baseline to either \<4, or \<5, or \<6 and each event had to last more than 5 seconds and could not be during the meals.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Reflux Events24 hoursReflux event was calculated for a drop in pH from baseline to \<6 and each event had to last more than 5 seconds and could not be during the meals.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Volunteers for all three groups were recruited from the Vanderbilt Medical Center

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Healthy Volunteers With no History of GERD or EERD or PPI Use
Healthy volunteers with no history of GERD or EERD or PPI use Dx-pH Probe: 24 hour ph monitoring Manometry: procedure to measure LES and UES
20
Volunteers With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disaese (GERD)
History of GERD symptoms (heartburn and/or regurgitation) at least once in a week in the past month and had an improvement of symptoms with PPI use and if they had erosive esophagitis by LA classification at endoscopy
17
Volunteers With Laryngopharangeal Reflux (LPR)
Suspected to have reflux-related laryngeal symptoms, including chronic cough, throat clearing,and hoarseness.
10
Total47

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHealthy Volunteers With no History of GERD or EERD or PPI UseVolunteers With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disaese (GERD)Volunteers With Laryngopharangeal Reflux (LPR)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants17 Participants9 Participants46 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants17 participants10 participants47 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants11 Participants6 Participants29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants6 Participants4 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 200 / 170 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 170 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Decrease in pH From Baseline to <4

The three study groups underwent dual pH measurements of the oropharyngeal as well as esophageal acid exposure employing the regular length probe for the oropharynx and the custom-designed long probe for the distal esophagus. The reason for the custom-designed esophageal measurement was to ensure that events noted in the oropharynx originated distally and were of gastric source. Measurements for the two locations were time synchronized to ensure accuracy. Calculations were based on length of time spent in upright and supine positions, and a combination of the two positions.

Time frame: 24 hours

Population: Calculations were based on length of time spent in upright and supine positions, and a combination of the two positions.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Healthy Volunteers With no History of GERD or EERD or PPI UseDecrease in pH From Baseline to <41.1 distal esophagus total % time pH <4
Volunteers With History of Gastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseDecrease in pH From Baseline to <43.2 distal esophagus total % time pH <4
Volunteers With Laryngopharangeal Reflux (LPR)Decrease in pH From Baseline to <43.8 distal esophagus total % time pH <4
p-value: 0.05Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Decrease in pH From Baseline to <5

The three study groups underwent dual pH measurements of the oropharyngeal as well as esophageal acid exposure employing the regular length probe for the oropharynx and the custom-designed long probe for the distal esophagus. The reason for the custom-designed esophageal measurement was to ensure that events noted in the oropharynx originated distally and were of gastric source. Measurements for the two locations were time synchronized to ensure accuracy. Calculations were based on length of time spent in upright and supine positions, and a combination of the two positions. Reflux event was calculated for a drop in pH from baseline to either \<4, or \<5, or \<6 and each event had to last more than 5 seconds and could not be during the meals.

Time frame: 24 hours

Population: Calculations were based on length of time spent in upright and supine positions, and a combination of the two positions. Reflux event was calculated for a drop in pH from baseline to either \<4, or \<5, or \<6 and each event had to last more than 5 seconds and could not be during the meals.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Healthy Volunteers With no History of GERD or EERD or PPI UseDecrease in pH From Baseline to <53.0 distal esophagus total % time pH <5
Volunteers With History of Gastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseDecrease in pH From Baseline to <56.5 distal esophagus total % time pH <5
Volunteers With Laryngopharangeal Reflux (LPR)Decrease in pH From Baseline to <513 distal esophagus total % time pH <5
Primary

Decrease in pH From Baseline to <6

The three study groups underwent dual pH measurements of the oropharyngeal as well as esophageal acid exposure employing the regular length probe for the oropharynx and the custom-designed long probe for the distal esophagus. The reason for the custom-designed esophageal measurement was to ensure that events noted in the oropharynx originated distally and were of gastric source. Measurements for the two locations were time synchronized to ensure accuracy. Calculations were based on length of time spent in upright and supine positions, and a combination of the two positions. Reflux event was calculated for a drop in pH from baseline to either \<4, or \<5, or \<6 and each event had to last more than 5 seconds and could not be during the meals.

Time frame: 24 hours

Population: Calculations were based on length of time spent in upright and supine positions, and a combination of the two positions. Reflux event was calculated for a drop in pH from baseline to either \<4, or \<5, or \<6 and each event had to last more than 5 seconds and could not be during the meals.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Healthy Volunteers With no History of GERD or EERD or PPI UseDecrease in pH From Baseline to <611 distal esophagus total % time pH <6
Volunteers With History of Gastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseDecrease in pH From Baseline to <629 distal esophagus total % time pH <6
Volunteers With Laryngopharangeal Reflux (LPR)Decrease in pH From Baseline to <631 distal esophagus total % time pH <6
Secondary

Number of Reflux Events

Reflux event was calculated for a drop in pH from baseline to \<6 and each event had to last more than 5 seconds and could not be during the meals.

Time frame: 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Healthy Volunteers With no History of GERD or EERD or PPI UseNumber of Reflux Events6.5 reflux events
Volunteers With History of Gastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseNumber of Reflux Events102 reflux events
Volunteers With Laryngopharangeal Reflux (LPR)Number of Reflux Events75 reflux events

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026