Skip to content

Extension Study to VEG105192 to Assess Pazopanib in Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer

An Open-label Extension Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Pazopanib in Subjects With Renal Cell Carcinoma Previously Enrolled on Protocol VEG105192

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00387764
Enrollment
80
Registered
2006-10-13
Start date
2006-09-30
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2014-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Renal Cell

Keywords

renal cell carcinoma, pazopanib, anti-angiogenic therapy, open label

Brief summary

This is an open-label, international, multi-center study designed to provide access to pazopanib for subjects who have been enrolled in the Phase III renal cell carcinoma study (VEG105192) and have progressed on placebo. Subjects will receive 800 mg pazopanib once daily. The study treatment will continue until subjects experience disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of pazopanib for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. The secondary objectives of the study are to assess response rate (defined as complete response or partial response), progression-free survival, and overall survival. Response rates will be collected per investigator assessment (no central review). Subjects will have a CT/MRI scan every 6 weeks until week 24 and every 12 weeks thereafter.

Interventions

DRUGpazopanib

800 mg daily dosing continously until progression

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Progressed from VEG105192 study treatment * Patient's VEG105192 was placebo * Baseline has good organ function

Exclusion criteria

* No brain metastasis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With a Change From Baseline to the Indicated Worst-case Post-Baseline Bazett's Heart Rate-corrected QT Interval (QTc) ValueFrom Baseline to investigational product discontinuation (up to 6.230 years)The QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the heart's electrical cycle. A lengthened QT interval can be a biomarker for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The QT interval corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula (QTcB) was calculated; the faster the heart rate, the shorter the QT interval. Electrocardiogram values (Bazett's QTc value) were summarized using the following reference ranges: \<450, 450 to 479, 480 to 499, 500 to 549, and \>550 milliseconds.
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (Serious and Non-serious) of the Indicated Severity, Per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE)From Baseline to Follow-up (up to 6.230 years)An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should be exercised in other situations. Adverse events were graded for severity according to the NCI CTCAE, version 3.0: Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3 (G3), severe; Grade 4 (G4), life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5, death.
Median Time on Investigational ProductFrom Baseline to investigational product discontinuation (up to 6.230 years)The time on investigational product (including dose interruptions) is defined as the difference between the date of the last dose of investigational product and the date of the first dose of investigational product plus one.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineFrom Baseline to investigational product discontinuation (up to 6.230 years)Clinical chemistry parameters were summarized according to NCI CTCAE, version 4.0: Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5, death. Data are presented for only those parameters for which an increase from Baseline occurred. Clinical chemistry parameters included: alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine amino transferase (ALT), aspartate amino transferase (AST), total bilirubin (TB), calcium (hypercalcemia and hypocalcemia), creatinine, glucose (hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia), potassium (hyperkalemia and hypokalemia), magnesium (hypermagnesemia and hypomagnesemia), sodium (hypernatremia and hyponatremia), and phosphate.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineFrom Baseline to investigational product discontinuation (up to 6.230 years)Hematology parameters were summarized according to NIH CTCAE, version 4.0. Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5, death. Data are presented for only those parameters for which an increase from Baseline occurred. Hematology parameters included: hemoglobin (anemia), lymphocytes (lymphocytopenia), neutrophils (neutropenia), platelets (thrombocytopenia), white blood cells (WBC \[leukopenia\]), and prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT \[INR\]). Participants with missing Baseline grades are assumed to have a Baseline grade of 0.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Any Time Post-BaselineFrom Baseline to investigational product discontinuation (up to 6.230 years)Blood pressure measurements included systolic blood pressure (SBP, millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\]) and diastolic BP (DBP). The number of participants with a post-Baseline shift from Baseline in blood pressure (\<90 mmHg, 90 to 139 mmHg, 140 to 169 mmHg, \>=170 mmHg) was assessed.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Shift in Heart Rate From Baseline at Any Time Post-BaselineFrom Baseline to investigational product discontinuation (up to 6.230 years)Heart rate is the measure of heart beats per minute (bpm). The number of participants with a post-Baseline shift from Baseline in heart rate of \<44 bpm, 44 to 100 bpm, 101 to 120 bpm, and \>120 bpm was assessed.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to Investigational ProductFrom Baseline to Follow-up (up to 6.230 years)An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. The investigator assessed relatedness between the AE and the investigational product.
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)From Baseline to Follow-up (up to 6.230 years)An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should be exercised in other situations.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With a Response of Confirmed CR+PR+6-month Stable Disease (SD)From the Baseline to Week 24/investigational product discontinuation (up to 1.65 years)The number of participants who achieved either a CR, a PR, or a best response of SD that occurred at least 6 months after screening per RECIST criteria was assessed. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD; and SD is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage in target lesions to qualify for PR, nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started and the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s), as assessed by the investigator. Confirmation of a CR/PR required a subsequent assessment of the same response or better at least 28 days after the original response. A confirmed response of SD required that the SD assessment occurred no earlier than 12 weeks after the screening scans.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Best Overall ResponseFrom the Baseline to Week 24/investigational product discontinuation (up to 3.460 years)The best overall response is defined as the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression (PD)/recurrence. Per RECIST: CR, the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; PR, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD; SD, neither sufficient shrinkage in target lesions to qualify for PR, nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started and the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s); PD, at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum of the LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Unknown/not evaluable is used for those participants who cannot be classified as achieving CR, PR, SD, or PD.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)From the first dose of study medication to the earliest date of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause (up to 3.460 years)PFS is defined as the interval between the date of the first dose of study medication and the date of disease progression as defined by the investigator or death due to any cause. RECIST was used to evaluate the measurability of tumor lesions, to determine target and non-target lesions at Baseline, and to evaluate tumor response or disease progression after study start. Per RECIST, PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum of the LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants who did not have disease progression or did not die were censored at the follow-up visit as either follow-up ended or follow-up ongoing. Participants who received non-study anti-cancer therapies before disease progression were treated as censored.
Overall Survival (OS)From the first dose of study medication to the earliest date of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause (up to 3.460 years)OS is defined as the interval between the date of the first dose of study medication to the date of death due to any cause. For participants who did not die, time to death was censored at the time of last contact. The last date of contact was defined as the maximum date of any visit date or the survival follow-up date.
Percentage of Participants Who Survived Until Month 12From the first dose of study medication to Month 12For participants who did not die, time to death was censored at the time of last contact. The last date of contact was defined as the maximum date of any visit date or the survival follow-up date.
Number of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)From Baseline to Week 24/investigational product discontinuation (up to 3.460 years)Overall tumor response is defined as the number of participants achieving either a confirmed complete or partial tumor response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). RECIST guidelines were used to evaluate the measurability of tumor lesions, to determine target and non-target lesions at Baseline, and to evaluate tumor response or disease progression after study start. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, and PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (LD) of target lesions, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD, as assessed by the investigator. Confirmation of a CR/PR required a subsequent assessment of the same response or better at least 28 days after the original response.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Brazil, Chile, China, Czechia, Estonia, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, New Zealand, Pakistan, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, South Korea, Tunisia, Ukraine, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pazopanib 800 mg
Participants received pazopanib 800 milligrams (mg) once daily.
80
Total80

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event12
Overall StudyDeath7
Overall StudyOther2
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1
Overall StudySponsor Terminated Study1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject8

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPazopanib 800 mg
Age, Continuous60.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.95
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Central/South Asian Heritage (HER)
2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Japanese/East Asian HER/South East Asian HER
10 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
68 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
61 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
72 / 80
serious
Total, serious adverse events
27 / 80

Outcome results

Primary

Median Time on Investigational Product

The time on investigational product (including dose interruptions) is defined as the difference between the date of the last dose of investigational product and the date of the first dose of investigational product plus one.

Time frame: From Baseline to investigational product discontinuation (up to 6.230 years)

Population: ATS Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pazopanib 800 mgMedian Time on Investigational Product9.7 Months
Primary

Number of Participants With a Change From Baseline to the Indicated Worst-case Post-Baseline Bazett's Heart Rate-corrected QT Interval (QTc) Value

The QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the heart's electrical cycle. A lengthened QT interval can be a biomarker for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The QT interval corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula (QTcB) was calculated; the faster the heart rate, the shorter the QT interval. Electrocardiogram values (Bazett's QTc value) were summarized using the following reference ranges: \<450, 450 to 479, 480 to 499, 500 to 549, and \>550 milliseconds.

Time frame: From Baseline to investigational product discontinuation (up to 6.230 years)

Population: ATS Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed; 3 participants did not have post-Baseline results.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline to the Indicated Worst-case Post-Baseline Bazett's Heart Rate-corrected QT Interval (QTc) ValueRemained or reduced to <45063 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline to the Indicated Worst-case Post-Baseline Bazett's Heart Rate-corrected QT Interval (QTc) ValueRemained at Baseline level of 450-4792 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline to the Indicated Worst-case Post-Baseline Bazett's Heart Rate-corrected QT Interval (QTc) ValueIncreased to 450-4798 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline to the Indicated Worst-case Post-Baseline Bazett's Heart Rate-corrected QT Interval (QTc) ValueIncreased to 480-4993 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With a Change From Baseline to the Indicated Worst-case Post-Baseline Bazett's Heart Rate-corrected QT Interval (QTc) ValueIncreased to >=5001 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to Investigational Product

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. The investigator assessed relatedness between the AE and the investigational product.

Time frame: From Baseline to Follow-up (up to 6.230 years)

Population: ATS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events Related to Investigational Product70 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should be exercised in other situations.

Time frame: From Baseline to Follow-up (up to 6.230 years)

Population: All Treated Participants (ATP) Population: all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of open-label investigational product

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Any AE78 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Any SAE27 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (Serious and Non-serious) of the Indicated Severity, Per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE)

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should be exercised in other situations. Adverse events were graded for severity according to the NCI CTCAE, version 3.0: Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3 (G3), severe; Grade 4 (G4), life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5, death.

Time frame: From Baseline to Follow-up (up to 6.230 years)

Population: ATP Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (Serious and Non-serious) of the Indicated Severity, Per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE)Grade 112 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (Serious and Non-serious) of the Indicated Severity, Per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE)Grade 233 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (Serious and Non-serious) of the Indicated Severity, Per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE)Grade 322 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (Serious and Non-serious) of the Indicated Severity, Per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE)Grade 47 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (Serious and Non-serious) of the Indicated Severity, Per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE)Grade 54 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Any Time Post-Baseline

Blood pressure measurements included systolic blood pressure (SBP, millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\]) and diastolic BP (DBP). The number of participants with a post-Baseline shift from Baseline in blood pressure (\<90 mmHg, 90 to 139 mmHg, 140 to 169 mmHg, \>=170 mmHg) was assessed.

Time frame: From Baseline to investigational product discontinuation (up to 6.230 years)

Population: ATS Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Any Time Post-BaselineSBP, <90 mmHg1 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Any Time Post-BaselineSBP, 90 to 139 mmHg29 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Any Time Post-BaselineSBP, 140 to 169 mmHg44 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Any Time Post-BaselineSBP, >=170 mmHg6 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Any Time Post-BaselineDBP, <90 mmHg1 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Any Time Post-BaselineDBP, 90 to 139 mmHg32 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Any Time Post-BaselineDBP, 140 to 169 mmHg46 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Any Time Post-BaselineDBP, >=170 mmHg1 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Shift in Heart Rate From Baseline at Any Time Post-Baseline

Heart rate is the measure of heart beats per minute (bpm). The number of participants with a post-Baseline shift from Baseline in heart rate of \<44 bpm, 44 to 100 bpm, 101 to 120 bpm, and \>120 bpm was assessed.

Time frame: From Baseline to investigational product discontinuation (up to 6.230 years)

Population: ATS Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift in Heart Rate From Baseline at Any Time Post-BaselineHeart rate <44 bpm0 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift in Heart Rate From Baseline at Any Time Post-BaselineHeart rate 44 to 100 bpm66 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift in Heart Rate From Baseline at Any Time Post-BaselineHeart rate 101 to 120 bpm12 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Shift in Heart Rate From Baseline at Any Time Post-BaselineHeart rate>120 bpm1 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline

Hematology parameters were summarized according to NIH CTCAE, version 4.0. Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5, death. Data are presented for only those parameters for which an increase from Baseline occurred. Hematology parameters included: hemoglobin (anemia), lymphocytes (lymphocytopenia), neutrophils (neutropenia), platelets (thrombocytopenia), white blood cells (WBC \[leukopenia\]), and prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT \[INR\]). Participants with missing Baseline grades are assumed to have a Baseline grade of 0.

Time frame: From Baseline to investigational product discontinuation (up to 6.230 years)

Population: ATS Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ATS Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHemoglobin, increas to Grade 4, n=780 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHemoglobin, any grade increase, n=7829 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHemoglobin, increase to Grade 3, n=782 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineINR (PT), any grade increase, n=6710 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineINR (PT), increase to Grade 3, n=672 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineINR (PT), increase to Grade 4, n=670 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineLymphocytes, any grade increase, n=7834 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineLymphocytes, increase to Grade 3, n=787 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineLymphocytes, increase to Grade 4, n=782 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineNeutrophils, any grade increase, n=7829 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineNeutrophils, increase to Grade 3, n=781 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineNeutrophils, increase to Grade 4, n=781 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselinePlatelets, any grade increase, n=7831 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselinePlatelets, increase to Grade 3, n=781 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselinePlatelets, increase to Grade 4, n=780 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineWBC, any grade increase, n=7832 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineWBC, increase to Grade 3, n=782 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Hematology Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineWBC, increase to Grade 4, n=780 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-Baseline

Clinical chemistry parameters were summarized according to NCI CTCAE, version 4.0: Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5, death. Data are presented for only those parameters for which an increase from Baseline occurred. Clinical chemistry parameters included: alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine amino transferase (ALT), aspartate amino transferase (AST), total bilirubin (TB), calcium (hypercalcemia and hypocalcemia), creatinine, glucose (hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia), potassium (hyperkalemia and hypokalemia), magnesium (hypermagnesemia and hypomagnesemia), sodium (hypernatremia and hyponatremia), and phosphate.

Time frame: From Baseline to investigational product discontinuation (up to 6.230 years)

Population: ATS Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ATS Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypercalcemia, any grade increase, n=7114 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineALP, any grade increase, n=7726 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineALP, increase to Grade 3, n=772 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineALP, increase to Grade 4, n=770 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineALT, any grade increase, n=7839 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineALT, increase to Grade 3, n=785 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineALT, increase to Grade 4, n=781 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineAST, any grade increase, n=7843 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineAST, increase to Grade 3, n=785 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineAST, increase to Grade 4, n=781 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineCreatinine, any grade increase, n=7726 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineCreatinine, increase Grade 3, n=770 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineCreatinine, increase Grade 4, n=770 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypercalcemia, increase to Grade 3, n=711 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypercalcemia, increase to Grade 4, n=711 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHyperglycemia, any grade increase, n=7746 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHyperglycemia, increase to Grade 3, n=771 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHyperglycemia, increase to Grade 4, n=770 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHyperkalemia, any grade increase, n=7728 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHyperkalemia, increase to Grade 3, n=774 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHyperkalemia, increase to Grade 4, n=771 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypermagnesemia, any grade increase, n=7715 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypermagnesemia, increase to Grade 3, n=771 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypermagnesemia, increase to Grade 4, n=771 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypernatremia, any grade increase, n=779 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypernatremia, increase to Grade 3, n=770 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypernatremia, increae to Grade 4, n=770 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypocalcemia, any grade increase, n=7130 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypocalcemia, increase to Grade 3, n=711 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypocalcemia, increase to Grade 4, n=710 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypoglycemia, any grade increase, n=7712 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypoglycemia, increase to Grade 3, n=770 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypoglycemia, increase to Grade 4, n=771 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypokalemia, any grade increase, n=7715 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypokalemia, increase to Grade 3, n=770 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypokalemia, increase to Grade 4, n=770 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypomagnesemia, any grade increase, n=7717 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypomagnesemia, increase to Grade 3, n=770 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHypomagnesemia, increase Grade 4, n=770 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHyponatremia, any grade increase, n=7729 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHyponatremia, increase to Grade 3, n=776 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineHyponatremia, increase to Grade 4, n=770 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselinePhosphate, any grade increase, n=7732 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselinePhosphate, increase to Grade 3, n=773 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselinePhosphate, increase to Grade 4, n=770 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineTB, any grade increase, n=7740 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineTB, increase to Grade 3, n=774 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Toxicity Grade Increase From Baseline for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters at Any Time Post-BaselineTB, increase to Grade 4, n=770 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)

Overall tumor response is defined as the number of participants achieving either a confirmed complete or partial tumor response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). RECIST guidelines were used to evaluate the measurability of tumor lesions, to determine target and non-target lesions at Baseline, and to evaluate tumor response or disease progression after study start. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, and PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (LD) of target lesions, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD, as assessed by the investigator. Confirmation of a CR/PR required a subsequent assessment of the same response or better at least 28 days after the original response.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 24/investigational product discontinuation (up to 3.460 years)

Population: ATS Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)CR+PR30 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)CR0 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)PR30 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Response of Confirmed CR+PR+6-month Stable Disease (SD)

The number of participants who achieved either a CR, a PR, or a best response of SD that occurred at least 6 months after screening per RECIST criteria was assessed. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD; and SD is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage in target lesions to qualify for PR, nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started and the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s), as assessed by the investigator. Confirmation of a CR/PR required a subsequent assessment of the same response or better at least 28 days after the original response. A confirmed response of SD required that the SD assessment occurred no earlier than 12 weeks after the screening scans.

Time frame: From the Baseline to Week 24/investigational product discontinuation (up to 1.65 years)

Population: ATS Population. An analysis was performed on 71 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With a Response of Confirmed CR+PR+6-month Stable Disease (SD)35 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Best Overall Response

The best overall response is defined as the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression (PD)/recurrence. Per RECIST: CR, the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; PR, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD; SD, neither sufficient shrinkage in target lesions to qualify for PR, nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started and the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s); PD, at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum of the LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Unknown/not evaluable is used for those participants who cannot be classified as achieving CR, PR, SD, or PD.

Time frame: From the Baseline to Week 24/investigational product discontinuation (up to 3.460 years)

Population: ATS Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Best Overall ResponseComplete Response0 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Best Overall ResponsePartial Response30 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Best Overall ResponseStable Disease31 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Best Overall ResponseProgressive Disease10 participants
Pazopanib 800 mgNumber of Participants With the Indicated Best Overall ResponseUnknown/Not Evaluable9 participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the interval between the date of the first dose of study medication to the date of death due to any cause. For participants who did not die, time to death was censored at the time of last contact. The last date of contact was defined as the maximum date of any visit date or the survival follow-up date.

Time frame: From the first dose of study medication to the earliest date of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause (up to 3.460 years)

Population: ATS Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pazopanib 800 mgOverall Survival (OS)23.5 months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Survived Until Month 12

For participants who did not die, time to death was censored at the time of last contact. The last date of contact was defined as the maximum date of any visit date or the survival follow-up date.

Time frame: From the first dose of study medication to Month 12

Population: ATS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pazopanib 800 mgPercentage of Participants Who Survived Until Month 1272 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the interval between the date of the first dose of study medication and the date of disease progression as defined by the investigator or death due to any cause. RECIST was used to evaluate the measurability of tumor lesions, to determine target and non-target lesions at Baseline, and to evaluate tumor response or disease progression after study start. Per RECIST, PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum of the LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants who did not have disease progression or did not die were censored at the follow-up visit as either follow-up ended or follow-up ongoing. Participants who received non-study anti-cancer therapies before disease progression were treated as censored.

Time frame: From the first dose of study medication to the earliest date of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause (up to 3.460 years)

Population: ATS Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pazopanib 800 mgProgression-free Survival (PFS)9.2 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026