Skip to content

Escitalopram in Treating Depression in Patients With Advanced Lung or Gastrointestinal Cancer

Symptom Management Trial in Cancer Survivors

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00387348
Enrollment
24
Registered
2006-10-13
Start date
2006-03-31
Completion date
2011-04-30
Last updated
2012-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer, Depression, Esophageal Cancer, Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer, Fatigue, Gallbladder Cancer, Gastric Cancer, Liver Cancer, Lung Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer

Keywords

fatigue, psychosocial effects of cancer and its treatment, stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, extensive stage small cell lung cancer, advanced adult primary liver cancer, depression, stage III pancreatic cancer, stage IV pancreatic cancer, stage IV esophageal cancer, stage IV gastric cancer, stage IVA colon cancer, stage IVB colon cancer, stage IVA rectal cancer, stage IVB rectal cancer, unresectable gallbladder cancer, unresectable extrahepatic bile duct cancer

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Escitalopram may help improve depression and quality of life in patients with advanced lung or gastrointestinal cancer. It is not yet known whether escitalopram is more effective than a placebo in treating depression in patients with advanced lung or gastrointestinal cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying the side effects of escitalopram and to see how well it works compared to a placebo in treating depression in patients with advanced lung or gastrointestinal cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: * Compare the efficacy of escitalopram oxalate vs placebo in treating major depressive disorder in patients with advanced lung or gastrointestinal cancer. * Compare the side effect burden of escitalopram oxalate vs placebo in these patients. * Determine potential moderators of the efficacy of escitalopram oxalate in these patients, including medical, psychological, and social variables. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients are stratified according to stage of disease (stage IIIB with effusions vs stage IV) and current treatment (radiation vs chemotherapy vs novel agent). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I: Patients receive oral placebo once daily for 4 weeks followed by oral placebo once daily for another 4 weeks * Arm II: Patients receive oral placebo once daily for 4 weeks followed by escitalopram oxalate 10 mg once daily for 4 weeks. * Arm III: Patients receive oral escitalopram oxalate 10 mg once daily for 4 weeks followed by oral placebo once daily for 4 weeks. After 8 weeks, all non-responders are offered open treatment with an antidepressant. Depression, fatigue, quality of life, anxiety, and somatization are assessed at baseline and then at 4 and 8 weeks. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 220 patients will be accrued for this study.

Interventions

escitalopram oxalate 10 mg once daily for 4 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

one placebo pill identical in appearance to the escitalpram pill once daily

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Diagnosis of any of the following for at least 4 weeks: * Stage IIIB (with effusions) or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer * Extensive stage small cell lung cancer * Stage III or IV pancreatic cancer * Stage IV liver cancer * Stage III or IV gallbladder cancer * Stage III or IV bile duct cancer * Stage IV esophageal cancer * Stage IV gastric cancer * Second line stage IV colorectal cancer * Meets diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-4th Edition and Endicott criteria for major depressive disorder * Duration of depressive symptoms ≥ 4 weeks * Hamilton Depression D 17 (HAM-D 17) Scale ≥ 14 * No active suicidality requiring immediate care or psychiatric hospitalization PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * Able to swallow pills * No active substance abuse disorder (including alcohol abuse within the past 6 months), psychotic disorder or active psychotic symptoms, organic mental disorders, or bipolar disorder * No clinical or laboratory evidence of hypothyroidism * No hypercalcemia * No severe anemia, defined as hemoglobin \< 10 g/dL * No history of multiple adverse drug reactions or allergy to study drugs * Not pregnant * No history of head trauma * No history of epilepsy PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * No other concurrent antidepressant medications or psychostimulants

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depression Response Rate of Escitalopram Oxalate 10 mg Once Daily Compared to Placebo Once Daily for Major Depressive Disorder4 weeksResponse rate was defined as a 50% reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) scores over 4 weeks. The HAM-D can have total scores that range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater depression. Scores over 14 are considered to be in the depressed range.
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Scores4 weeksThe change in HAM-D scores was calculated by subtracting the score at 4 weeks from the score at baseline. The HAM-D can have total scores that range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater depression. Scores over 14 are considered to be in the depressed range.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Side Effect Burden4 weeksSide efect burden was defined as the total score of the UKU Side Effects Rating Scale. This scale contains 48 items corresponding to side effects which are rated from 0-3, with 0 meaning not present and 1-3 rating the severity of the side effect. Higher scores represented greater side effect burden. The scale range is 0 to 144.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from the ambulatory thoracic and GI cancer clinics at MGH. Recruitment was open from 11/1/06 until 4/1/11.

Pre-assignment details

After enrollment, participants completed an assessment for major depressive disorder. 90 participants consented for study evaluation. In order to be randomized to a group, participants had to meet criteria for major depressive disorder. Of the 90 evaluated on study, only 24 were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo-Placebo
Participants in this arm were randomized to receive placebo for the first 4 weeks and placebo for the second 4 weeks
8
Placebo-Escitalopram
Participants in this arm were randomized to receive placebo for the first 4 weeks and escitalopram for the second 4 weeks
5
Escitalopram-Placebo
Participants in this arm were randomzied to receive escitalopram for the first 4 weeks and placebo for the second 4 weeks
11
Total24

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event101
Overall StudyDeath110
Overall StudyPhysician Decision101
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject022

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo-EscitalopramEscitalopram-PlaceboPlacebo-PlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants8 Participants7 Participants19 Participants
Age Continuous59.40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.84
58.36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.41
56.63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.51
58.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.68
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants11 participants8 participants24 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants4 Participants4 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 80 / 51 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 81 / 50 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Scores

The change in HAM-D scores was calculated by subtracting the score at 4 weeks from the score at baseline. The HAM-D can have total scores that range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater depression. Scores over 14 are considered to be in the depressed range.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Participants who had at least 1 follow up HAM-D assessment were included. Two participants died, one without a follow up assessment and one with a HAM-D at 2 weeks. For the participant who had the HAM-D at 2 weeks and then died, the last endpoint was carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-PlaceboChange in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Scores6.23 Change in HAM-D scoresStandard Deviation 8.37
Placebo-EscitalopramChange in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Scores10.60 Change in HAM-D scoresStandard Deviation 5.18
Escitalopram-PlaceboChange in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Scores6.45 Change in HAM-D scoresStandard Deviation 5.18
Primary

Depression Response Rate of Escitalopram Oxalate 10 mg Once Daily Compared to Placebo Once Daily for Major Depressive Disorder

Response rate was defined as a 50% reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) scores over 4 weeks. The HAM-D can have total scores that range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater depression. Scores over 14 are considered to be in the depressed range.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: The efficacy analysis was intent to treat and all randomized participants were analyzed

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Placebo-PlaceboDepression Response Rate of Escitalopram Oxalate 10 mg Once Daily Compared to Placebo Once Daily for Major Depressive Disorder3 number of participants with response 0.52
Placebo-EscitalopramDepression Response Rate of Escitalopram Oxalate 10 mg Once Daily Compared to Placebo Once Daily for Major Depressive Disorder1 number of participants with response 0.47
Escitalopram-PlaceboDepression Response Rate of Escitalopram Oxalate 10 mg Once Daily Compared to Placebo Once Daily for Major Depressive Disorder6 number of participants with response 0.52
Secondary

Side Effect Burden

Side efect burden was defined as the total score of the UKU Side Effects Rating Scale. This scale contains 48 items corresponding to side effects which are rated from 0-3, with 0 meaning not present and 1-3 rating the severity of the side effect. Higher scores represented greater side effect burden. The scale range is 0 to 144.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Participants who completed the 4 week assessment were analyzed

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-PlaceboSide Effect Burden3.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Placebo-EscitalopramSide Effect Burden2.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Escitalopram-PlaceboSide Effect Burden3.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.88

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026