Skip to content

A Randomized Trial of Buccal Compared to Oral Misoprostol Following Mifepristone for Medical Abortion up to 63 Days LMP

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00386867
Enrollment
1200
Registered
2006-10-12
Start date
2006-10-31
Completion date
2007-03-31
Last updated
2007-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abortion, Induced

Keywords

medical abortion, mifepristone, misoprostol, buccal administration

Brief summary

This open-label, randomized study will compare the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of mifepristone 200 mg followed in 24-36 hours either by buccal (i.e., in the cheeks) or oral misoprostol 800 mcg for termination of pregnancy in women up to 63 days L.M.P.

Interventions

DRUG800 mcg misoprostol via oral or buccal administration

Sponsors

Gynuity Health Projects
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* be willing and able to sign consent forms; * be eligible for medical abortion according to clinician's assessment; * be willing to undergo a surgical completion if necessary; * have ready and easy access to a telephone and emergency transportation; * speak English, Spanish, or have a translator available to translate for all study procedures; and, * agree to comply with the study procedures and visit schedule.

Exclusion criteria

* Confirmed or suspected ectopic pregnancy or undiagnosed adnexal mass; * IUD in place; * Chronic renal failure; * Concurrent long-term corticosteroid therapy; * History of allergy to mifepristone, misoprostol or other prostaglandin; * Hemorrhagic disorders or concurrent anticoagulant therapy; * Inherited porphyrias; or * Other serious physical or mental health conditions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
efficacy

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
acceptability

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026