Skip to content

Significance of an Elimination and Provocation Diet in Patients With Chronic Urticaria

Significance of an Elimination and Provocation Diet in Patients With Chronic Urticaria

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00385372
Enrollment
150
Registered
2006-10-09
Start date
2005-01-31
Completion date
2007-04-30
Last updated
2009-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Angioedema, Urticaria

Keywords

low pseudoallergen diet, elimination diet, provocation diet, oral provocation, natural food ingredients, food additives, flavours

Brief summary

Patients with chronic urticaria undertake a five week elimination diet (pseudoallergen free diet). The efficacy of the diet will be determined by symptom score, by the use of rescue medication (oral antihistamines and glucocorticosteroids) and by a Quality of Life Questionnaire on week 0 and week 5. All patients with sufficient response (regarding the urticaria score) enter a second dietary part over six weeks, whereas a provocation diet is carried out. Each diet week a choice of pseudoallergen rich food is added, sorted by the type of pseudoallergens (e.g. biogenic amines, organic acids, flavours, additives). This study is conducted to investigate if the provocation diet could be a new diagnostic intervention to elucidate clinical relevant pseudoallergens.

Detailed description

Chronic urticaria is defined as a daily or almost daily spontaneous occurrence of wheals that cause itching and lasting for at least six weeks. If there is no indication of a possible eliciting agent and because approximately 70% of patients benefit from it, a low-pseudoallergen diet should be carried out for 5 weeks. Although the low-pseudoallergen diet is successful, no explanation of the underlying mechanisms exists. On DBPC oral provocation testing with known food additives, only a small amount of patients, who experienced remission after a low-pseudoallergen diet react with new wheals and/or angioedema. For this discrepancy, natural food ingredients and new food additives are included in the dietary diagnostic. The high amount of substances, which are administrated within oral provocation testing can not reflect a realistic diet situation. Often it is impossible to ingest corresponding amounts of foods to reach the same concentration such as the provocation amount. Recording change reactions between food ingredients and the individual metabolism of the patients, the step by step food provocation method reveals itself to be most effective. In addition, individual predilections, amounts and frequency of ingested foods, are taken into consideration.

Interventions

PROCEDUREprovocation diet

Sponsors

University Hospital Muenster
Lead SponsorOTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* signed informed consent * chronic urticaria (duration: at least 6 weeks) * patients who suffered from urticaria and/or angio oedema at least once a week for a duration of at least 4 weeks) * Males and females, age between 7 and 80 years * inpatients and outpatients * oral antihistamines and glucocorticosteroids are allowed as concomitant medication (if needed)

Exclusion criteria

* pregnant or breastfeeding woman * patients suffering from diabetes mellitus * patients with cachexia * known food allergies of food which will be administrated within the elimination diet (e.g. milk, cereals) * isolated urticaria with known aetiology (e.g. physical urticaria, aquagene urticaria, urticaria factitia, cholinergic urticaria), Urticaria pigmentosa mastocytoses) * patients, seemed to be uncompliant under suspicion of the investigator

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026