Skip to content

Iv Amiodarone Versus Iv Procainamide to Treat Haemodynamically Well Tolerated Ventricular Tachycardia

Comparison of Intravenous Amiodarone Versus Intravenous Procainamide for the Acute Treatment of Regular and Haemodynamically Well Tolerated Wide QRS Tachycardia (Probably of Ventricular Origen). The PROCAMIO Multicenter Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00383799
Enrollment
302
Registered
2006-10-04
Start date
2005-09-30
Completion date
2011-06-30
Last updated
2016-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ventricular Tachycardia, Wide QRS Tachycardia

Keywords

Ventricular tachycardia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether intravenous amiodarone has less cardiac significant adverse events compared to intravenous procainamide in the acute treatment of haemodynamically well tolerated wide QRS tachycardia, the majority of them of probably ventricular origen.

Detailed description

Multicenter, prospective and randomized study in phase IV. A total of 302 patients will be included in the study within 40-50 institutions in Spain. Patients with regular and monomorphic tachycardia ≥ 120 bpm, QRS ≥ 120 ms and haemodynamically well tolerated will be randomized to receive iv amiodarone (single dosage: 5 mg/kg in 20 minutes) vs iv procainamide (single dosage: 10 mg/kg in 20 minutes). The study period will be 40 minutes from infusion initiation. Study variables include the presence of clinically cardiac significant adverse events: hypotension, syncope, heart failure, symptomatic sinus bradycardia, AV block, proarrhythmia and tachycardia acceleration (\<20 lpm)and death. Total observation period will be 24 hours after the end of the infusion.

Interventions

DRUGiv Amiodarone
DRUGiv Procainamide

Sponsors

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with stable tachycardia ≥120 lpm, QRS ≥120 ms and haemodynamically well tolerated defined as: 1)Systolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, 2) absence of dyspnea at rest, 3)absence of peripheric hypoperfusion signs and 4)no severe angina. * Age \> 18 years * Written inform consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

* Treatment with iv amiodarone or iv procainamide during the previous 24 hours * QRS tachycardia \<120 ms * Patients with QRS ≥120 ms tachycardia with haemodynamic compromise that requires urgent cardioversion for termination * Irregular tachycardia * Tachycardia that is considered as supraventricular due to physician criteria (adenosine and/or vagal manoeuvres response) * Patient that do not want to cooperate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare clinically significant cardiac adverse events occurring within 40 minutes from treatment initiation40 minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare efficacy of both therapies in relation to episode termination40 minuutes
To compare the rate of total adverse events, cardiac and non cardiac, occurring during an observation period of 24 hours after treatment was applied24 hours

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026