Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Intradermal Injections of Newfill Versus Eutrophill in the Treatment of Facial Lipoatrophy in HIV-infected Patients ANRS 132 SMILE

Randomized, Comparative, Multicenter, Patient-blinded Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Intradermal Injections of Polylactic Acid (Newfill TM) Versus Polyacrylamid Gel (Eutrophill) in the Treatment of Facial Lipoatrophy in HIV-infected Patients ANRS 132 SMILE

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00383734
Enrollment
148
Registered
2006-10-03
Start date
2006-12-31
Completion date
2010-09-30
Last updated
2011-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome

Keywords

HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome, polylactic acid, polyacrylamide gels

Brief summary

Treatment of facial lipoatrophy with dermal injections polylactic acid (Newfill TM) is a safe procedure and has been now widely used with a good efficacy. However, this therapy is not effective in all treated patients and the benefit of the injections may decrease with time necessitating re-injections several months after the first sets of injections. In this study we would like to compare the efficacy and safety of Eutrophill(polyacrylamid gel), a resorbable filler compound versus Newfill in a comparative, randomised, multicenter trial. Primary endpoint will be the self-perception by the patient with a visual analogue scale (VAS index). Secondary endpoints are a quality of life questionnaire (MOS-HIV), the a-NBC questionnaire (perception by the patient and by the doctor of the severity of the lipoatrophy), the measure of the dermal thickness and cheek skin fold as assessed by the Skinfold Caliper, the ordering of digital photographs and the evaluation of the dermal thickness by CT scan.

Detailed description

The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Eutrophill (polyacrylamid gel), a resorbable filler compound versus Newfill( polylactic acid) in a comparative, randomised, multicenter trial and patient-blinded study, in the treatment of facial lipoatrophy in HIV-infected patients, one year after the first injection (week 48). The efficacy will be assessed by measuring the median self-perception index of the patients with a visual analogue scale (VAS index).The study will compare between treatments, at week 48, week 72 and week 96 versus baseline :the median increase of the VAS index, the rate of treatment failure, the scores of 2 patients-questionnaires (a-NBC and MOS-HIV),the ordering of digital photographs,the median increase of the facial dermal thickness of the cheek and the dermal skin fold as assessed by a Skinfold Caliper. The study will compare at week 48 and week 96 versus baseline: the median increase of dermal thickness as assessed by CT scan of the face. Safety will be assessed by the frequency and nature of immediate and delayed side effects.

Interventions

DEVICENewfill

1 to 7 injections of drug

1 to 7 injections of drug

Sponsors

Procitech
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Sanofi
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age and older * confirmed laboratory diagnosis of HIV infection * facial lipoatrophy * stable antiretroviral treatment or no treatment for at least 3 months * written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* history of surgical or cosmetic intervention for facial lipoatrophy * no history of antiretroviral therapy * current opportunistic infection * currently stavudine containing antiretroviral regimen * CD4 cell count under 200per µL, plasma HIV RNA above 10000 copies per mL under antiretroviral therapy * platelets under 50000 per µL and or abnormal coagulation tests * pregnancy * major or concomitant illness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
- patient's subjective self-perception of improvement of facial lipoatrophy as assessed by a VASweek 48

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
quality of life questionnaire,NBC questionnaire, dermal thickness and cheek skin fold as assessed by the Skinfold Caliper, digital photographs, dermal thickness as assessed by CT scanweek 0, week 48 and week 96

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026