Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if ixabepilone plus cetuximab improves survival when given as 1st line chemotherapy in subjects with metastatic pancreatic cancer compared to historical data. The safety of this combination treatment will also be studied.
Interventions
Intravenous Infusion (IV), 32 mg/m\^2 every 21 days.
Initial dose of 400 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) over 2 hours) followed by a weekly lower dose of 250 mg/m\^2 IV over 1 hour.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Histologic or cytologic diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (locally advanced disease that is not surgically resectable, or distant metastatic disease) * Participants must have measurable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines * Participants must not have received prior chemotherapy, immunotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for advanced pancreas cancer * Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of 70-100 * Adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal function
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months | From time of first dose of study drug through 6 months | The percentage of participants surviving at 6 months was defined as the number of treated participants who had not died prior to 6 months from the date of their first dose divided by the total number of treated participants. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Objective Tumor Response | From time of first dose of study until 16.49 months (longest period for participant between first dose and documented disease progression | Percentage of participants with objective tumor response was determined by the number of participants with PR or CR divided by the total number of response-evaluable participants. Tumor response was assessed according RECIST criteria: PR=at least 30% reduction in the sum of the LD of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD, CR=Disappearance of all non-target lesions. |
| Median Progression Free Survival Time | From time of first dose of study until 16.49 months (longest period for participant between first dose and documented disease progression | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) time was defined as the time, in months, from the first dosing date until the date of disease progression or death from any cause. |
| Median Overall Survival Time | From the first dosing date until death (last reported death was 21 months after first dose). | Overall survival time was defined as the time in months from the first dosing date to the date of death. |
| Median Duration of Response | From first date recorded for CR or PR until the first date of disease progression or death (last participant with tumor response progressed 6.5 months after documented response). | Duration of response was defined as the number of months from when measurement criteria were first met for CR or PR (whichever was recorded first) until the first date of disease progression or death. Complete Response (CR)= disappearance of all non-target lesions, Partial Response (PR)= at least 30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD. |
| Median Time to Response | Time from first dose of study therapy until first date of PR or CR. Maximum time to response was 19 months. | Time to response was defined as the number of weeks from first dose of study therapy (ixabepilone or cetuximab) until measurement criteria were first met for PR or CR, whichever status was recorded first. Complete Response (CR)= disappearance of all non-target lesions, Partial Response (PR)= at least 30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD. |
| Best Overall Tumor Response | From time of first dose of study until 16.49 months (longest period for participant between first dose and documented disease progression) | Tumor response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria: Complete Response (CR)= disappearance of all non-target lesions, Partial Response (PR)= at least 30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD; Stable Disease (SD)= neither PR nor progressive disease (PD) criteria were met; PD = at least 20% increase in the sum of the LD of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded at or following baseline. |
| Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | From the time of first dose of study drug to ≤30 days after the end of the last dose of study drug or until resolution of study drug-related toxicity. | AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition not necessarily having a causal relationship with this treatment. Acneform rash and peripheral neuropathy were captured by multiple MedDRA preferred terms. Acneform rash included rash, rash pustular, and rash pruritic preferred terms. Peripheral neuropathy included neuromuscular toxicity, peripheral motor neuropathy, and peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy preferred terms. |
| Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | From the time of first dose of study drug to ≤30 days after the end of the last dose of study drug or until resolution of study drug-related toxicity. | Laboratory results were graded according to CTC v 3.0. Hematology laboratory evaluations included absolute neutrophil count (ANC), white blood cell count (WBC), platelets (PLT), and hemoglobin (HGB). Liver function laboratory evaluations included alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin. Renal function laboratory evaluation included creatinine. |
| Number of Participants With Dose Reduction, Dose Delay, or Dose Interruption | From the first dosing date of Cycle 1 until the last dosing date of the last cycle. Last dosing cycle for a participant was Cycle 21. | Dose reduction of ixabepilone and/or cetuximab due to toxicity was permitted for participants deriving benefit from therapy. Each drug could be dose modified independently of the others. Participants unable to start a cycle due to unacceptable toxicity related to ixabepilone or cetuximab could have therapy delayed for up to 4 weeks. If toxicities prevented the administration of ixabepilone or cetuximab therapy, participants continued receiving the other therapy as scheduled. A dose interruption for ixabepilone or cetuximab was defined as any interruption during the infusion period. |
| Percentage of Participants With Baseline Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tumor Expression | Baseline | EGFR expression was evaluated by means of an immunohistochemical assay using tumor tissue collected prior to receiving first dose. |
| Change From Baseline in FHSI-8 Total Score by Time-point | Baseline, Week 3, Week 6, Week 9, Week 12, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24 and every 3 weeks through end of study (participant death/withdrawal from study) | The FHSI-8 includes eight items representing pancreatic-related symptoms; each symptom is rated by participants on a scale of from 0 to 4. The FHSI-8 total score ranges in value from 0 to 32, with higher scores representing fewer symptoms and lower scores representing more symptoms. Scoring of the FHSI-8 was to be conducted according to the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) manual. The symptom assessment was to include treated participants who had baseline measurement and at least one on-study measurement of FHSI-8 questionnaire. |
| Number of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr) | From the time of first dose of study drug to ≤30 days after the end of the last dose of study drug or until resolution of study drug-related toxicity. | AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition not necessarily having a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, or is an important medical event. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Of the 58 participants enrolled, 4 were never treated.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab All participants were administered ixabepilone at a starting dose of 32 mg/m\^2 as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks. In addition, all participants were administered an initial dose of cetuximab (400 mg/m\^2 IV over 2 hours) followed by a weekly lower dose (250 mg/m\^2 IV over 1 hour). | 54 |
| Total | 54 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event not Related to Study Drug | 3 |
| Overall Study | Death | 2 |
| Overall Study | Disease Progression | 38 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 |
| Overall Study | Other | 1 |
| Overall Study | Participant Withdrew Consent | 1 |
| Overall Study | Request to Discontinue Treatment | 4 |
| Overall Study | Study Drug Toxicity | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Ixabepilone + Cetuximab |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 63.0 years |
| Age, Customized Age Greater than, equal to 65 years | 22 participants |
| Age, Customized Age less than 65 years | 32 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 19 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 35 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 49 / 54 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 32 / 54 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months
The percentage of participants surviving at 6 months was defined as the number of treated participants who had not died prior to 6 months from the date of their first dose divided by the total number of treated participants.
Time frame: From time of first dose of study drug through 6 months
Population: Treated participants; all participants who received at least one dose of ixabepilone or cetuximab. Participants who did not die prior to 6 months but dropped out of the study were not included in the numerator.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Percentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months | 57.4 percentage of participants |
Best Overall Tumor Response
Tumor response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria: Complete Response (CR)= disappearance of all non-target lesions, Partial Response (PR)= at least 30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD; Stable Disease (SD)= neither PR nor progressive disease (PD) criteria were met; PD = at least 20% increase in the sum of the LD of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded at or following baseline.
Time frame: From time of first dose of study until 16.49 months (longest period for participant between first dose and documented disease progression)
Population: Response-evaluable participants; all participants with measurable disease who received at least one dose of ixabepilone or cetuximab and who had at least one on-treatment tumor assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Best Overall Tumor Response | Participants with Complete Response | 0 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Best Overall Tumor Response | Participants with Partial Response | 4 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Best Overall Tumor Response | Participants with Stable Disease | 24 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Best Overall Tumor Response | Participants with Progressive Disease | 2 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Best Overall Tumor Response | Participants with Response Unable to be Determined | 1 participants |
Change From Baseline in FHSI-8 Total Score by Time-point
The FHSI-8 includes eight items representing pancreatic-related symptoms; each symptom is rated by participants on a scale of from 0 to 4. The FHSI-8 total score ranges in value from 0 to 32, with higher scores representing fewer symptoms and lower scores representing more symptoms. Scoring of the FHSI-8 was to be conducted according to the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) manual. The symptom assessment was to include treated participants who had baseline measurement and at least one on-study measurement of FHSI-8 questionnaire.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6, Week 9, Week 12, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24 and every 3 weeks through end of study (participant death/withdrawal from study)
Population: Since the combination of ixabepilone and cetuximab tested in this trial failed to meet the primary objective of sufficiently improving 6-month survival rate relative to historical control in participants with metastatic pancreatic cancer, FHSI-8 score data were collected but not summarized.
Median Duration of Response
Duration of response was defined as the number of months from when measurement criteria were first met for CR or PR (whichever was recorded first) until the first date of disease progression or death. Complete Response (CR)= disappearance of all non-target lesions, Partial Response (PR)= at least 30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD.
Time frame: From first date recorded for CR or PR until the first date of disease progression or death (last participant with tumor response progressed 6.5 months after documented response).
Population: Response-evaluable participants whose best response was PR or CR. Participants without disease progression or death were censored at the last tumor assessment date.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Median Duration of Response | 5.7 months |
Median Overall Survival Time
Overall survival time was defined as the time in months from the first dosing date to the date of death.
Time frame: From the first dosing date until death (last reported death was 21 months after first dose).
Population: Treated participants; all participants who received at least one dose of ixabepilone or cetuximab. Participants without a reported date of death were censored at the last known alive date.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Median Overall Survival Time | 7.6 months |
Median Progression Free Survival Time
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) time was defined as the time, in months, from the first dosing date until the date of disease progression or death from any cause.
Time frame: From time of first dose of study until 16.49 months (longest period for participant between first dose and documented disease progression
Population: Treated participants; all participants who received at least one dose of ixabepilone or cetuximab. Participants without disease progression or death were censored at the last tumor assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Median Progression Free Survival Time | 3.9 months |
Median Time to Response
Time to response was defined as the number of weeks from first dose of study therapy (ixabepilone or cetuximab) until measurement criteria were first met for PR or CR, whichever status was recorded first. Complete Response (CR)= disappearance of all non-target lesions, Partial Response (PR)= at least 30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD.
Time frame: Time from first dose of study therapy until first date of PR or CR. Maximum time to response was 19 months.
Population: Response-evaluable participants whose best response was PR or CR.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Median Time to Response | 8.8 weeks |
Number of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr)
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition not necessarily having a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, or is an important medical event.
Time frame: From the time of first dose of study drug to ≤30 days after the end of the last dose of study drug or until resolution of study drug-related toxicity.
Population: Treated participants; all participants who received at least one dose of ixabepilone or cetuximab. The 53 participants reporting treatment-related AEs included 1 additional participant who also developed Grade 5 viscous intestinal perforation, which was also captured under death within 30 days of last dose category.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr) | All deaths within 30 days of last dose | 7 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr) | Any SAE | 32 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr) | Gr 2 (moderate) AE leading to DC | 2 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr) | Gr 3 (severe) AE leading to DC | 9 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr) | Gr 4 (life-threatening) AE leading to DC | 3 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr) | All AEs leading to DC | 14 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr) | Gr 1 (mild) treatment-related AE | 4 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr) | Gr 2 (moderate) treatment-related AE | 13 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr) | Gr 3 (severe) treatment-related AE | 25 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr) | Gr 4 (life-threatening) treatment-related AE | 10 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr) | Gr 5 (death) treatment-related AE | 1 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr) | All treatment-related AEs | 53 participants |
Number of Participants With Dose Reduction, Dose Delay, or Dose Interruption
Dose reduction of ixabepilone and/or cetuximab due to toxicity was permitted for participants deriving benefit from therapy. Each drug could be dose modified independently of the others. Participants unable to start a cycle due to unacceptable toxicity related to ixabepilone or cetuximab could have therapy delayed for up to 4 weeks. If toxicities prevented the administration of ixabepilone or cetuximab therapy, participants continued receiving the other therapy as scheduled. A dose interruption for ixabepilone or cetuximab was defined as any interruption during the infusion period.
Time frame: From the first dosing date of Cycle 1 until the last dosing date of the last cycle. Last dosing cycle for a participant was Cycle 21.
Population: Since the combination of ixabepilone and cetuximab tested in this trial failed to meet the primary objective of sufficiently improving 6-month survival rate relative to historical control in participants with metastatic pancreatic cancer, dose modification data were collected but not summarized.
Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)
Laboratory results were graded according to CTC v 3.0. Hematology laboratory evaluations included absolute neutrophil count (ANC), white blood cell count (WBC), platelets (PLT), and hemoglobin (HGB). Liver function laboratory evaluations included alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin. Renal function laboratory evaluation included creatinine.
Time frame: From the time of first dose of study drug to ≤30 days after the end of the last dose of study drug or until resolution of study drug-related toxicity.
Population: Treated participants; all participants who received at least one dose of ixabepilone or cetuximab. n= number of participants with laboratory data available
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 0 (no abnormality) WBC, n=51 | 12 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1 (mild) WBC, n=51 | 9 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 2 (moderate) WBC, n=51 | 9 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3 (severe) WBC, n=51 | 17 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 4 (life-threatening) WBC, n=51 | 4 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1-4 WBC, n=51 | 39 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3-4 WBC, n=51 | 21 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 0 (no abnormality) ANC, n=50 | 12 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1 (mild) ANC, n=50 | 8 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 2 (moderate) ANC, n=50 | 12 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3 (severe) ANC, n=50 | 10 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 4 (life-threatening) ANC, n=50 | 8 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1-4 ANC, n=50 | 38 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3-4 ANC, n=51 | 18 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 0 (no abnormality) platelet count, n=51 | 29 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1 (mild) platelet count, n=51 | 18 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 2 (moderate) platelet count, n=51 | 4 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1-4 platelet count, n=51 | 2 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 0 (no abnormality) HGB, n=51 | 3 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1 (mild) HGB, n=51 | 28 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 2 (moderate) HGB, n=51 | 18 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3 (severe) HGB, n=51 | 2 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1-4 HGB, n=51 | 48 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3-4 HGB, n=51 | 2 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 0 (no abnormality) ALT, n=46 | 31 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1 (mild) ALT, n=46 | 10 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 2 (moderate) ALT, n=46 | 3 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3 (severe) ALT, n=46 | 2 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1-4 ALT, n=46 | 15 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 0 (no abnormality) AST, n=47 | 28 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1 (mild) AST, n=47 | 17 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3 (severe) AST, n=47 | 2 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1-4 AST, n=47 | 19 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3-4 AST, n=47 | 2 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 0 (no abnormality) alkaline phosphatase, n=47 | 18 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1 (mild) alkaline phosphatase, n=47 | 20 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 2 (moderate) alkaline phosphatase, n=47 | 5 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3 (severe) alkaline phosphatase, n=47 | 4 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1-4 alkaline phosphatase, n=47 | 29 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3-4 alkaline phosphatase, n=47 | 4 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 0 (no abnormality) total bilirubin, n=48 | 42 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1 (mild) total bilirubin, n=48 | 1 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 2 (moderate) total bilirubin, n=48 | 1 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3 (severe) total bilirubin, n=48 | 4 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1-4 total bilirubin, n=48 | 6 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3-4 total bilirubin, n=48 | 4 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 0 (no abnormality) creatinine, n=48 | 45 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1 (mild) creatinine, n=48 | 3 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1-4 creatinine, n=48 | 3 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3-4 ALT, n=46 | 2 participants |
Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition not necessarily having a causal relationship with this treatment. Acneform rash and peripheral neuropathy were captured by multiple MedDRA preferred terms. Acneform rash included rash, rash pustular, and rash pruritic preferred terms. Peripheral neuropathy included neuromuscular toxicity, peripheral motor neuropathy, and peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy preferred terms.
Time frame: From the time of first dose of study drug to ≤30 days after the end of the last dose of study drug or until resolution of study drug-related toxicity.
Population: Treated participants; all participants who received at least one dose of ixabepilone or cetuximab.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1 (mild) acneform rash | 21 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 2 (moderate) acneform rash | 13 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3 (severe) acneform rash | 1 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | All acneform rash | 35 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1 (mild) fatigue | 8 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 2 (moderate) fatigue | 13 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3 (severe) fatigue | 8 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 4 (life-threatening) fatigue | 1 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | All fatigue | 30 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1 (mild) alopecia | 13 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 2 (moderate) alopecia | 12 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | All alopecia | 25 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1 (mild) nausea | 13 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 2 (moderate) nausea | 6 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3 (severe) nausea | 3 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | All nausea | 22 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1 (mild) diarrhea | 11 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 2 (moderate) diarrhea | 4 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3 (severe) diarrhea | 1 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 4 (life-threatening) diarrhea | 2 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | All diarrhea | 18 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1 (mild) vomiting | 12 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 2 (moderate) vomiting | 2 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3 (severe) vomiting | 3 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | All vomiting | 17 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1 (mild) peripheral neuropathy | 12 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 2 (moderate) peripheral neuropathy | 1 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3 (severe) peripheral neuropathy | 3 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | All peripheral neuropathy | 16 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 1 (mild) hypomagnesemia | 7 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 2 (moderate) hypomagnesemia | 4 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 3 (severe) hypomagnesemia | 1 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | Gr 4 (life-threatening) hypomagnesemia | 3 participants |
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr) | All hypomagnesemia | 15 participants |
Percentage of Participants With Baseline Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tumor Expression
EGFR expression was evaluated by means of an immunohistochemical assay using tumor tissue collected prior to receiving first dose.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Tissue was available for a small proportion of patients and only 1 out of 11 was EGFR positive, hence EFGR expression analysis was not performed.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Tumor Response
Percentage of participants with objective tumor response was determined by the number of participants with PR or CR divided by the total number of response-evaluable participants. Tumor response was assessed according RECIST criteria: PR=at least 30% reduction in the sum of the LD of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD, CR=Disappearance of all non-target lesions.
Time frame: From time of first dose of study until 16.49 months (longest period for participant between first dose and documented disease progression
Population: Response-evaluable participants; all participants with measurable disease who received at least one dose of ixabepilone or cetuximab and who had at least one on-treatment tumor assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ixabepilone + Cetuximab | Percentage of Participants With Objective Tumor Response | 12.9 percentage of participants |