Skip to content

A Phase II, Trial of Ixabepilone Plus Cetuximab as First Line Therapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

A Phase II, Open Label Trial of Ixabepilone Plus Cetuximab as First Line Therapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00383149
Enrollment
58
Registered
2006-10-02
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2016-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Brief summary

The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if ixabepilone plus cetuximab improves survival when given as 1st line chemotherapy in subjects with metastatic pancreatic cancer compared to historical data. The safety of this combination treatment will also be studied.

Interventions

DRUGIxabepilone

Intravenous Infusion (IV), 32 mg/m\^2 every 21 days.

DRUGCetuximab

Initial dose of 400 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) over 2 hours) followed by a weekly lower dose of 250 mg/m\^2 IV over 1 hour.

Sponsors

R-Pharm
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologic or cytologic diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (locally advanced disease that is not surgically resectable, or distant metastatic disease) * Participants must have measurable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines * Participants must not have received prior chemotherapy, immunotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for advanced pancreas cancer * Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of 70-100 * Adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal function

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Surviving at 6 MonthsFrom time of first dose of study drug through 6 monthsThe percentage of participants surviving at 6 months was defined as the number of treated participants who had not died prior to 6 months from the date of their first dose divided by the total number of treated participants.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Objective Tumor ResponseFrom time of first dose of study until 16.49 months (longest period for participant between first dose and documented disease progressionPercentage of participants with objective tumor response was determined by the number of participants with PR or CR divided by the total number of response-evaluable participants. Tumor response was assessed according RECIST criteria: PR=at least 30% reduction in the sum of the LD of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD, CR=Disappearance of all non-target lesions.
Median Progression Free Survival TimeFrom time of first dose of study until 16.49 months (longest period for participant between first dose and documented disease progressionProgression-Free Survival (PFS) time was defined as the time, in months, from the first dosing date until the date of disease progression or death from any cause.
Median Overall Survival TimeFrom the first dosing date until death (last reported death was 21 months after first dose).Overall survival time was defined as the time in months from the first dosing date to the date of death.
Median Duration of ResponseFrom first date recorded for CR or PR until the first date of disease progression or death (last participant with tumor response progressed 6.5 months after documented response).Duration of response was defined as the number of months from when measurement criteria were first met for CR or PR (whichever was recorded first) until the first date of disease progression or death. Complete Response (CR)= disappearance of all non-target lesions, Partial Response (PR)= at least 30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD.
Median Time to ResponseTime from first dose of study therapy until first date of PR or CR. Maximum time to response was 19 months.Time to response was defined as the number of weeks from first dose of study therapy (ixabepilone or cetuximab) until measurement criteria were first met for PR or CR, whichever status was recorded first. Complete Response (CR)= disappearance of all non-target lesions, Partial Response (PR)= at least 30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD.
Best Overall Tumor ResponseFrom time of first dose of study until 16.49 months (longest period for participant between first dose and documented disease progression)Tumor response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria: Complete Response (CR)= disappearance of all non-target lesions, Partial Response (PR)= at least 30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD; Stable Disease (SD)= neither PR nor progressive disease (PD) criteria were met; PD = at least 20% increase in the sum of the LD of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded at or following baseline.
Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)From the time of first dose of study drug to ≤30 days after the end of the last dose of study drug or until resolution of study drug-related toxicity.AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition not necessarily having a causal relationship with this treatment. Acneform rash and peripheral neuropathy were captured by multiple MedDRA preferred terms. Acneform rash included rash, rash pustular, and rash pruritic preferred terms. Peripheral neuropathy included neuromuscular toxicity, peripheral motor neuropathy, and peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy preferred terms.
Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)From the time of first dose of study drug to ≤30 days after the end of the last dose of study drug or until resolution of study drug-related toxicity.Laboratory results were graded according to CTC v 3.0. Hematology laboratory evaluations included absolute neutrophil count (ANC), white blood cell count (WBC), platelets (PLT), and hemoglobin (HGB). Liver function laboratory evaluations included alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin. Renal function laboratory evaluation included creatinine.
Number of Participants With Dose Reduction, Dose Delay, or Dose InterruptionFrom the first dosing date of Cycle 1 until the last dosing date of the last cycle. Last dosing cycle for a participant was Cycle 21.Dose reduction of ixabepilone and/or cetuximab due to toxicity was permitted for participants deriving benefit from therapy. Each drug could be dose modified independently of the others. Participants unable to start a cycle due to unacceptable toxicity related to ixabepilone or cetuximab could have therapy delayed for up to 4 weeks. If toxicities prevented the administration of ixabepilone or cetuximab therapy, participants continued receiving the other therapy as scheduled. A dose interruption for ixabepilone or cetuximab was defined as any interruption during the infusion period.
Percentage of Participants With Baseline Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tumor ExpressionBaselineEGFR expression was evaluated by means of an immunohistochemical assay using tumor tissue collected prior to receiving first dose.
Change From Baseline in FHSI-8 Total Score by Time-pointBaseline, Week 3, Week 6, Week 9, Week 12, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24 and every 3 weeks through end of study (participant death/withdrawal from study)The FHSI-8 includes eight items representing pancreatic-related symptoms; each symptom is rated by participants on a scale of from 0 to 4. The FHSI-8 total score ranges in value from 0 to 32, with higher scores representing fewer symptoms and lower scores representing more symptoms. Scoring of the FHSI-8 was to be conducted according to the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) manual. The symptom assessment was to include treated participants who had baseline measurement and at least one on-study measurement of FHSI-8 questionnaire.
Number of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr)From the time of first dose of study drug to ≤30 days after the end of the last dose of study drug or until resolution of study drug-related toxicity.AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition not necessarily having a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, or is an important medical event.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Of the 58 participants enrolled, 4 were never treated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ixabepilone + Cetuximab
All participants were administered ixabepilone at a starting dose of 32 mg/m\^2 as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks. In addition, all participants were administered an initial dose of cetuximab (400 mg/m\^2 IV over 2 hours) followed by a weekly lower dose (250 mg/m\^2 IV over 1 hour).
54
Total54

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event not Related to Study Drug3
Overall StudyDeath2
Overall StudyDisease Progression38
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1
Overall StudyOther1
Overall StudyParticipant Withdrew Consent1
Overall StudyRequest to Discontinue Treatment4
Overall StudyStudy Drug Toxicity4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIxabepilone + Cetuximab
Age, Continuous63.0 years
Age, Customized
Age Greater than, equal to 65 years
22 participants
Age, Customized
Age less than 65 years
32 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
35 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
49 / 54
serious
Total, serious adverse events
32 / 54

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months

The percentage of participants surviving at 6 months was defined as the number of treated participants who had not died prior to 6 months from the date of their first dose divided by the total number of treated participants.

Time frame: From time of first dose of study drug through 6 months

Population: Treated participants; all participants who received at least one dose of ixabepilone or cetuximab. Participants who did not die prior to 6 months but dropped out of the study were not included in the numerator.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ixabepilone + CetuximabPercentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months57.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Best Overall Tumor Response

Tumor response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria: Complete Response (CR)= disappearance of all non-target lesions, Partial Response (PR)= at least 30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD; Stable Disease (SD)= neither PR nor progressive disease (PD) criteria were met; PD = at least 20% increase in the sum of the LD of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded at or following baseline.

Time frame: From time of first dose of study until 16.49 months (longest period for participant between first dose and documented disease progression)

Population: Response-evaluable participants; all participants with measurable disease who received at least one dose of ixabepilone or cetuximab and who had at least one on-treatment tumor assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ixabepilone + CetuximabBest Overall Tumor ResponseParticipants with Complete Response0 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabBest Overall Tumor ResponseParticipants with Partial Response4 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabBest Overall Tumor ResponseParticipants with Stable Disease24 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabBest Overall Tumor ResponseParticipants with Progressive Disease2 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabBest Overall Tumor ResponseParticipants with Response Unable to be Determined1 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in FHSI-8 Total Score by Time-point

The FHSI-8 includes eight items representing pancreatic-related symptoms; each symptom is rated by participants on a scale of from 0 to 4. The FHSI-8 total score ranges in value from 0 to 32, with higher scores representing fewer symptoms and lower scores representing more symptoms. Scoring of the FHSI-8 was to be conducted according to the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) manual. The symptom assessment was to include treated participants who had baseline measurement and at least one on-study measurement of FHSI-8 questionnaire.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6, Week 9, Week 12, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24 and every 3 weeks through end of study (participant death/withdrawal from study)

Population: Since the combination of ixabepilone and cetuximab tested in this trial failed to meet the primary objective of sufficiently improving 6-month survival rate relative to historical control in participants with metastatic pancreatic cancer, FHSI-8 score data were collected but not summarized.

Secondary

Median Duration of Response

Duration of response was defined as the number of months from when measurement criteria were first met for CR or PR (whichever was recorded first) until the first date of disease progression or death. Complete Response (CR)= disappearance of all non-target lesions, Partial Response (PR)= at least 30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD.

Time frame: From first date recorded for CR or PR until the first date of disease progression or death (last participant with tumor response progressed 6.5 months after documented response).

Population: Response-evaluable participants whose best response was PR or CR. Participants without disease progression or death were censored at the last tumor assessment date.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ixabepilone + CetuximabMedian Duration of Response5.7 months
Secondary

Median Overall Survival Time

Overall survival time was defined as the time in months from the first dosing date to the date of death.

Time frame: From the first dosing date until death (last reported death was 21 months after first dose).

Population: Treated participants; all participants who received at least one dose of ixabepilone or cetuximab. Participants without a reported date of death were censored at the last known alive date.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ixabepilone + CetuximabMedian Overall Survival Time7.6 months
Secondary

Median Progression Free Survival Time

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) time was defined as the time, in months, from the first dosing date until the date of disease progression or death from any cause.

Time frame: From time of first dose of study until 16.49 months (longest period for participant between first dose and documented disease progression

Population: Treated participants; all participants who received at least one dose of ixabepilone or cetuximab. Participants without disease progression or death were censored at the last tumor assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ixabepilone + CetuximabMedian Progression Free Survival Time3.9 months
Secondary

Median Time to Response

Time to response was defined as the number of weeks from first dose of study therapy (ixabepilone or cetuximab) until measurement criteria were first met for PR or CR, whichever status was recorded first. Complete Response (CR)= disappearance of all non-target lesions, Partial Response (PR)= at least 30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD.

Time frame: Time from first dose of study therapy until first date of PR or CR. Maximum time to response was 19 months.

Population: Response-evaluable participants whose best response was PR or CR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ixabepilone + CetuximabMedian Time to Response8.8 weeks
Secondary

Number of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr)

AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition not necessarily having a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, or is an important medical event.

Time frame: From the time of first dose of study drug to ≤30 days after the end of the last dose of study drug or until resolution of study drug-related toxicity.

Population: Treated participants; all participants who received at least one dose of ixabepilone or cetuximab. The 53 participants reporting treatment-related AEs included 1 additional participant who also developed Grade 5 viscous intestinal perforation, which was also captured under death within 30 days of last dose category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr)All deaths within 30 days of last dose7 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr)Any SAE32 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr)Gr 2 (moderate) AE leading to DC2 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr)Gr 3 (severe) AE leading to DC9 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr)Gr 4 (life-threatening) AE leading to DC3 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr)All AEs leading to DC14 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr)Gr 1 (mild) treatment-related AE4 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr)Gr 2 (moderate) treatment-related AE13 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr)Gr 3 (severe) treatment-related AE25 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr)Gr 4 (life-threatening) treatment-related AE10 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr)Gr 5 (death) treatment-related AE1 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Death Within 30 Days of Last Dose, Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE), Any Adverse Event (AE) Leading to Discontinuation (DC), or Any Treatment-related AEs By Common Terminology Criteria Version 3.0 (CTC v3) Grade (Gr)All treatment-related AEs53 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Dose Reduction, Dose Delay, or Dose Interruption

Dose reduction of ixabepilone and/or cetuximab due to toxicity was permitted for participants deriving benefit from therapy. Each drug could be dose modified independently of the others. Participants unable to start a cycle due to unacceptable toxicity related to ixabepilone or cetuximab could have therapy delayed for up to 4 weeks. If toxicities prevented the administration of ixabepilone or cetuximab therapy, participants continued receiving the other therapy as scheduled. A dose interruption for ixabepilone or cetuximab was defined as any interruption during the infusion period.

Time frame: From the first dosing date of Cycle 1 until the last dosing date of the last cycle. Last dosing cycle for a participant was Cycle 21.

Population: Since the combination of ixabepilone and cetuximab tested in this trial failed to meet the primary objective of sufficiently improving 6-month survival rate relative to historical control in participants with metastatic pancreatic cancer, dose modification data were collected but not summarized.

Secondary

Number of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)

Laboratory results were graded according to CTC v 3.0. Hematology laboratory evaluations included absolute neutrophil count (ANC), white blood cell count (WBC), platelets (PLT), and hemoglobin (HGB). Liver function laboratory evaluations included alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin. Renal function laboratory evaluation included creatinine.

Time frame: From the time of first dose of study drug to ≤30 days after the end of the last dose of study drug or until resolution of study drug-related toxicity.

Population: Treated participants; all participants who received at least one dose of ixabepilone or cetuximab. n= number of participants with laboratory data available

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 0 (no abnormality) WBC, n=5112 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1 (mild) WBC, n=519 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 2 (moderate) WBC, n=519 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3 (severe) WBC, n=5117 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 4 (life-threatening) WBC, n=514 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1-4 WBC, n=5139 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3-4 WBC, n=5121 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 0 (no abnormality) ANC, n=5012 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1 (mild) ANC, n=508 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 2 (moderate) ANC, n=5012 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3 (severe) ANC, n=5010 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 4 (life-threatening) ANC, n=508 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1-4 ANC, n=5038 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3-4 ANC, n=5118 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 0 (no abnormality) platelet count, n=5129 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1 (mild) platelet count, n=5118 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 2 (moderate) platelet count, n=514 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1-4 platelet count, n=512 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 0 (no abnormality) HGB, n=513 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1 (mild) HGB, n=5128 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 2 (moderate) HGB, n=5118 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3 (severe) HGB, n=512 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1-4 HGB, n=5148 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3-4 HGB, n=512 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 0 (no abnormality) ALT, n=4631 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1 (mild) ALT, n=4610 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 2 (moderate) ALT, n=463 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3 (severe) ALT, n=462 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1-4 ALT, n=4615 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 0 (no abnormality) AST, n=4728 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1 (mild) AST, n=4717 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3 (severe) AST, n=472 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1-4 AST, n=4719 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3-4 AST, n=472 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 0 (no abnormality) alkaline phosphatase, n=4718 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1 (mild) alkaline phosphatase, n=4720 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 2 (moderate) alkaline phosphatase, n=475 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3 (severe) alkaline phosphatase, n=474 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1-4 alkaline phosphatase, n=4729 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3-4 alkaline phosphatase, n=474 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 0 (no abnormality) total bilirubin, n=4842 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1 (mild) total bilirubin, n=481 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 2 (moderate) total bilirubin, n=481 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3 (severe) total bilirubin, n=484 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1-4 total bilirubin, n=486 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3-4 total bilirubin, n=484 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 0 (no abnormality) creatinine, n=4845 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1 (mild) creatinine, n=483 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1-4 creatinine, n=483 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Hematology, Liver Function, and Renal Laboratory Abnormalities By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3-4 ALT, n=462 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)

AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition not necessarily having a causal relationship with this treatment. Acneform rash and peripheral neuropathy were captured by multiple MedDRA preferred terms. Acneform rash included rash, rash pustular, and rash pruritic preferred terms. Peripheral neuropathy included neuromuscular toxicity, peripheral motor neuropathy, and peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy preferred terms.

Time frame: From the time of first dose of study drug to ≤30 days after the end of the last dose of study drug or until resolution of study drug-related toxicity.

Population: Treated participants; all participants who received at least one dose of ixabepilone or cetuximab.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1 (mild) acneform rash21 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 2 (moderate) acneform rash13 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3 (severe) acneform rash1 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)All acneform rash35 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1 (mild) fatigue8 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 2 (moderate) fatigue13 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3 (severe) fatigue8 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 4 (life-threatening) fatigue1 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)All fatigue30 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1 (mild) alopecia13 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 2 (moderate) alopecia12 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)All alopecia25 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1 (mild) nausea13 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 2 (moderate) nausea6 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3 (severe) nausea3 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)All nausea22 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1 (mild) diarrhea11 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 2 (moderate) diarrhea4 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3 (severe) diarrhea1 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 4 (life-threatening) diarrhea2 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)All diarrhea18 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1 (mild) vomiting12 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 2 (moderate) vomiting2 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3 (severe) vomiting3 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)All vomiting17 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1 (mild) peripheral neuropathy12 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 2 (moderate) peripheral neuropathy1 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3 (severe) peripheral neuropathy3 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)All peripheral neuropathy16 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 1 (mild) hypomagnesemia7 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 2 (moderate) hypomagnesemia4 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 3 (severe) hypomagnesemia1 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)Gr 4 (life-threatening) hypomagnesemia3 participants
Ixabepilone + CetuximabNumber of Participants With Most Common Treatment-related Nonhematologic AE (>25%) By CTC v3 Grade (Gr)All hypomagnesemia15 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Baseline Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tumor Expression

EGFR expression was evaluated by means of an immunohistochemical assay using tumor tissue collected prior to receiving first dose.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Tissue was available for a small proportion of patients and only 1 out of 11 was EGFR positive, hence EFGR expression analysis was not performed.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Objective Tumor Response

Percentage of participants with objective tumor response was determined by the number of participants with PR or CR divided by the total number of response-evaluable participants. Tumor response was assessed according RECIST criteria: PR=at least 30% reduction in the sum of the LD of all target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD, CR=Disappearance of all non-target lesions.

Time frame: From time of first dose of study until 16.49 months (longest period for participant between first dose and documented disease progression

Population: Response-evaluable participants; all participants with measurable disease who received at least one dose of ixabepilone or cetuximab and who had at least one on-treatment tumor assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ixabepilone + CetuximabPercentage of Participants With Objective Tumor Response12.9 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026