Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of Ambrisentan in Subjects With Pulmonary Hypertension

ARIES-3: A Phase 3, Long-Term, Open-Label, Multicenter Safety and Efficacy Study of Ambrisentan in Subjects With Pulmonary Hypertension

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00380068
Enrollment
224
Registered
2006-09-25
Start date
2006-08-31
Completion date
2009-05-31
Last updated
2012-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Hypertension

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ambrisentan in a broad population of participants with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Secondary objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of ambrisentan on other clinical measures of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), long-term treatment success, and survival.

Detailed description

This study was to enroll up to 200 participants with PH due to the following etiologies: 1) PAH including idiopathic and familial PAH and PAH associated with collagen vascular disease, congenital systemic-to-pulmonary shunts (including Eisenmenger's syndrome), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, drugs and toxins, thyroid disorders, glycogen storage disease, Gaucher disease, hemoglobinopathies, and splenectomy (WHO Group 1); 2) PH associated with lung diseases and/or hypoxemia, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease (ILD), sleep-disordered breathing, and alveolar hypoventilation disorders (WHO Group 3); 3) PH due to proximal or distal chronic thromboembolic obstruction (WHO Group 4); and 4) PH due to sarcoidosis (WHO Group 5). Participants with left heart disease or left heart failure were excluded (WHO Group 2). Participants could be receiving prostacyclin or sildenafil therapy at baseline, and participants who previously discontinued either bosentan, sitaxsentan, or both, due to liver function test abnormalities were eligible.

Interventions

DRUGAmbrisentan

Oral tablets taken once daily.

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Summarized Inclusion Criteria: 1. 18 years of age or older 2. Current diagnosis of PH associated with an acceptable etiology as outlined in the protocol, including: PH due to the following etiologies: 1) PAH including idiopathic and familial PAH and PAH associated with collagen vascular disease, congenital systemic-to-pulmonary shunts (including Eisenmenger's syndrome), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, drugs and toxins, thyroid disorders, glycogen storage disease, Gaucher disease, hemoglobinopathies, and splenectomy (WHO Group 1); 2) PH associated with lung diseases and/or hypoxemia, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease (ILD), sleep-disordered breathing, and alveolar hypoventilation disorders (WHO Group 3); 3) PH due to proximal or distal chronic thromboembolic obstruction (WHO Group 4); and 4) PH due to sarcoidosis (WHO Group 5). 3. Stable regimen (within four weeks) of chronic prostanoid, PDE-5 inhibitor, calcium channel blocker, or 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor therapy 4. Right heart catheterization completed prior to screening must meet pre-specified criteria 5. Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test and must agree to use a reliable double method of contraception until study completion and for at least four weeks following their final study visit. 6. Male participants must be informed of the potential risks of testicular tubular atrophy and infertility associated with taking ambrisentan and queried regarding his understanding of the potential risks as described in the Informed Consent Form. Summarized

Exclusion criteria

1. Participation in a previous clinical study with ambrisentan 2. Bosentan or sitaxsentan use within four weeks prior to the screening visit 3. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) lab value that is greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal at the screening visit 4. Pulmonary function tests not meeting the following pre-specified criteria: 1) mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) \>= 25 mm Hg; 2) PVR \> 3 mm Hg/L/min; 3) pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) or left ventricle end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) \< 15 mm Hg; 4) total lung capacity (TLC) \>= 70% of predicted normal for participants without ILD or \>= 60% of predicted normal in participants with ILD; forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) \>= 65% of predicted normal in participants without COPD or \>= 50% of predicted normal in participants with COPD 5. Contraindication to treatment with endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) 6. History of malignancies other than basal cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix within the past five years 7. Female participant who is pregnant or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)Baseline to Week 24

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Borg Dyspnea IndexBaseline to Week 48Change from Baseline to Week 48 in Borg Dyspnea Index. The Borg Dyspnea Index of Perceived Exertion Scores range from 0 to 10. Best and Worst values are: 0 (Best) to 10 (Worst). Scales are described as rating of breathlessness and its description: 0= none; 0.5= very,very slight (just noticeable); 1= very slight; 2=slight; 3= moderate; 4= somewhat severe; 5= severe; 6 (in between severe and very severe); 7= very severe; 8 (in between very, very severe and maximum); 9= very, very severe; and 10= maximum.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)Baseline to Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 48 in BNPBaseline to Week 48
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in WHO Functional ClassBaseline to Week 24Change from baseline in World Health Organization functional class (WHO) at Week 24 is the incidence of participants that improved, had no change, or worsened. WHO categories are 1 to 4 with the worse category at 4. Improvement = a category change from baseline of \<= -1: change of -3 (eg, WHO from 4 to 1), change of -2 (eg, WHO from 3 to 1), change of -1 (eg, WHO from 2 to 1). Inversely, participants worsening are those with a category change from baseline of at least +1. No change in WHO functional class represents the percentage of participants with a change in category from baseline of 0.
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in WHO Functional ClassBaseline to Week 48Change from baseline in WHO at Week 48 is expressed as the incidence of participants that improved, had no change or worsened. WHO categories range from 1 to 4 with the worse category at 4. Improvement = a category change from baseline of \<= -1: change of -3 (eg, WHO from 4 to 1), change of -2 (eg, WHO from 3 to 1), change of -1 (eg, WHO from 2 to 1). Inversely, participants worsening are those with a category change from baseline of at least +1. No change in WHO functional class represents the percentage of participants with a change in category from baseline of 0.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in SF-36 Health Survey Physical Functioning ScaleBaseline to Week 24Change from baseline to Week 24 in the SF-36 health survey physical functioning scale. 10 activities rated by health limitations using 3 categories (1= Yes, limited a lot; 2= Yes, limited a little; and 3= No, not limited at all). The best score is 3 and the worst score is 1. Scores are transformed by subtracting the unit by the lowest raw score and dividing by the raw score range. The scores are then standardized with the 1998 General United States (US) population mean and standard deviation (SD). Finally, the scores are transformed to the norm-based scoring with a mean of 50 and SD of 10.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Borg Dyspnea IndexBaseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 24 in Borg Dyspnea Index. The Borg Dyspnea Index of Perceived Exertion Scores range from 0 to 10. Best and Worst values are: 0 (Best) to 10 (Worst). Scales are described as rating of breathlessness and its description: 0= none; 0.5= very,very slight (just noticeable); 1= very slight; 2=slight; 3= moderate; 4= somewhat severe; 5= severe; 6 (in between severe and very severe); 7= very severe; 8 (in between very, very severe and maximum); 9= very, very severe; and 10= maximum.
Percent of Participants With no Clinical Worsening of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) at Week 24Baseline to Week 24Clinical worsening: occurrence of death, lung transplantation, hospitalization for PH, atrial septostomy, a change to chronic prostanoid or sildenafil treatment due to protocol-defined worsening criteria, or study withdrawal due to the addition of other clinically approved PH therapeutic agents
Percent of Participants With no Clinical Worsening of PH at Week 48Baseline to Week 48Clinical worsening: occurrence of death, lung transplantation, hospitalization for PH, atrial septostomy, a change to chronic prostanoid or sildenafil treatment due to protocol-defined worsening criteria, or study withdrawal due to the addition of other clinically approved PH therapeutic agents
Failure-free Treatment StatusBaseline to Week 24Defined by occurrence of death, lung transplantation, or study withdrawal due to the addition of other clinically approved PAH therapeutic agents
Monotherapy Treatment StatusBaseline to Week 24Defined by no addition of sildenafil, iloprost, treprostinil, or epoprostenol to ongoing ambrisentan treatment
Long-term SurvivalBaseline to Week 24Defined as not dying during study participation
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in SF-36 Health Survey Physical Functioning ScaleBaseline to Week 48Change from baseline to Week 48 in the SF-36 health survey physical functioning scale. 10 activities are rated by health limitations using 3 categories (1= Yes, limited a lot; 2= Yes, limited a little; and 3= No, not limited at all). The best score is 3 and the worst score is 1. Scores are transformed by subtracting the unit by the lowest raw score and dividing by the raw score range. The scores are then standardized with the 1998 General US population mean and standard deviation. Finally, the scores are transformed to the norm-based scoring with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

Countries

Australia, Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Enrollment occurred between September 2006 and January 2008 and the study was conducted between August 2006 and May 2009 in 39 centers in the United States, Australia and Canada

Pre-assignment details

The screening period was 4 weeks. Participants who received bosentan or sitaxsentan within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit were excluded.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ambrisentan
Eligible participants received 5 mg ambrisentan once daily for the first 24 weeks. One dose reduction to 2.5 mg was permitted during the 24-week fixed-dose treatment period if the participant did not tolerate the study drug. After the initial 24-week treatment period, investigators could adjust the study drug dose as clinically indicated (available doses were 2.5, 5, and 10 mg).
224
Total224

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAddition of other PAH therapeutic agent1
Overall StudyAdverse Event40
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy5
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1
Overall StudyLung transplant3
Overall StudyNot compliant6
Overall StudyPartipant moved away1
Overall StudyPhysician Decision2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAmbrisentan
Age Continuous55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
Sex: Female, Male
Female
156 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
68 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
203 / 224
serious
Total, serious adverse events
97 / 224

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set. Last Observation Carried forward. 4 participants were excluded from the analysis due to lack of post-baseline 6MWD data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 24 in 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)20.5 metersStandard Deviation 65.64
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [11.8, 29.3]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Borg Dyspnea Index

Change from Baseline to Week 24 in Borg Dyspnea Index. The Borg Dyspnea Index of Perceived Exertion Scores range from 0 to 10. Best and Worst values are: 0 (Best) to 10 (Worst). Scales are described as rating of breathlessness and its description: 0= none; 0.5= very,very slight (just noticeable); 1= very slight; 2=slight; 3= moderate; 4= somewhat severe; 5= severe; 6 (in between severe and very severe); 7= very severe; 8 (in between very, very severe and maximum); 9= very, very severe; and 10= maximum.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set. Last Observation Carried forward. 4 participants were excluded from the analysis due to lack of post-baseline Borg Dyspnea Index data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Borg Dyspnea Index-0.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.8, -0.3]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in SF-36 Health Survey Physical Functioning Scale

Change from baseline to Week 24 in the SF-36 health survey physical functioning scale. 10 activities rated by health limitations using 3 categories (1= Yes, limited a lot; 2= Yes, limited a little; and 3= No, not limited at all). The best score is 3 and the worst score is 1. Scores are transformed by subtracting the unit by the lowest raw score and dividing by the raw score range. The scores are then standardized with the 1998 General United States (US) population mean and standard deviation (SD). Finally, the scores are transformed to the norm-based scoring with a mean of 50 and SD of 10.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set. Last Observation Carried forward. 26 participants were excluded from the analysis due to lack of baseline or post-baseline SF-36 data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 24 in SF-36 Health Survey Physical Functioning Scale2.88 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.943
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in WHO Functional Class

Change from baseline in World Health Organization functional class (WHO) at Week 24 is the incidence of participants that improved, had no change, or worsened. WHO categories are 1 to 4 with the worse category at 4. Improvement = a category change from baseline of \<= -1: change of -3 (eg, WHO from 4 to 1), change of -2 (eg, WHO from 3 to 1), change of -1 (eg, WHO from 2 to 1). Inversely, participants worsening are those with a category change from baseline of at least +1. No change in WHO functional class represents the percentage of participants with a change in category from baseline of 0.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set. Last Observation Carried Forward. 3 participants were not analyzed due to lack of post-baseline WHO functional class data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 24 in WHO Functional Class-30 Percentage of participants
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 24 in WHO Functional Class-20.9 Percentage of participants
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 24 in WHO Functional Class-122.2 Percentage of participants
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 24 in WHO Functional Class070.1 Percentage of participants
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 24 in WHO Functional Class16.8 Percentage of participants
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 24 in WHO Functional Class20 Percentage of participants
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 24 in WHO Functional Class30 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Borg Dyspnea Index

Change from Baseline to Week 48 in Borg Dyspnea Index. The Borg Dyspnea Index of Perceived Exertion Scores range from 0 to 10. Best and Worst values are: 0 (Best) to 10 (Worst). Scales are described as rating of breathlessness and its description: 0= none; 0.5= very,very slight (just noticeable); 1= very slight; 2=slight; 3= moderate; 4= somewhat severe; 5= severe; 6 (in between severe and very severe); 7= very severe; 8 (in between very, very severe and maximum); 9= very, very severe; and 10= maximum.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Full Analysis Set. Observed data. 114 participants were excluded from the analysis due to lack of Week 48 Borg Dyspnea Index data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Borg Dyspnea Index-0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-1, -0.2]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 48 in SF-36 Health Survey Physical Functioning Scale

Change from baseline to Week 48 in the SF-36 health survey physical functioning scale. 10 activities are rated by health limitations using 3 categories (1= Yes, limited a lot; 2= Yes, limited a little; and 3= No, not limited at all). The best score is 3 and the worst score is 1. Scores are transformed by subtracting the unit by the lowest raw score and dividing by the raw score range. The scores are then standardized with the 1998 General US population mean and standard deviation. Finally, the scores are transformed to the norm-based scoring with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Full Analysis Set. Last Observation Carried forward. 25 participants were excluded from the analysis due to lack of baseline or post-baseline SF-36 data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 48 in SF-36 Health Survey Physical Functioning Scale2.80 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.634
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 48 in WHO Functional Class

Change from baseline in WHO at Week 48 is expressed as the incidence of participants that improved, had no change or worsened. WHO categories range from 1 to 4 with the worse category at 4. Improvement = a category change from baseline of \<= -1: change of -3 (eg, WHO from 4 to 1), change of -2 (eg, WHO from 3 to 1), change of -1 (eg, WHO from 2 to 1). Inversely, participants worsening are those with a category change from baseline of at least +1. No change in WHO functional class represents the percentage of participants with a change in category from baseline of 0.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Full Analysis Set. Observed Data. 3 participants were not analyzed due to lack of post-baseline WHO functional class data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 48 in WHO Functional Class-30 Percentage of participants
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 48 in WHO Functional Class-21.7 Percentage of participants
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 48 in WHO Functional Class-134.5 Percentage of participants
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 48 in WHO Functional Class057.1 Percentage of participants
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 48 in WHO Functional Class16.7 Percentage of participants
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 48 in WHO Functional Class20 Percentage of participants
AmbrisentanChange From Baseline to Week 48 in WHO Functional Class30 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Secondary

Failure-free Treatment Status

Defined by occurrence of death, lung transplantation, or study withdrawal due to the addition of other clinically approved PAH therapeutic agents

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set. Participants who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of last contact.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AmbrisentanFailure-free Treatment Status95.3 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [91.4, 97.4]
Secondary

Failure-free Treatment Status

Defined by occurrence of death, lung transplantation, or study withdrawal due to the addition of other clinically approved PAH therapeutic agents

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Full Analysis Set. Participants who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of last contact.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AmbrisentanFailure-free Treatment Status92.9 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [88.3, 95.8]
Secondary

Long-term Survival

Defined as not dying during study participation

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set. Participants who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of last contact.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AmbrisentanLong-term Survival97.1 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [93.6, 98.7]
Secondary

Long-term Survival

Defined as not dying during study participation

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Full Analysis Set. Participants who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of last contact.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AmbrisentanLong-term Survival95.3 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [91.2, 97.6]
Secondary

Monotherapy Treatment Status

Defined by no addition of sildenafil, iloprost, treprostinil, or epoprostenol to ongoing ambrisentan treatment

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set - Subset of participants who were not receiving other PH therapy at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AmbrisentanMonotherapy Treatment Status95.0 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [88.5, 97.9]
Secondary

Monotherapy Treatment Status

Defined by no addition of sildenafil, iloprost, treprostinil, or epoprostenol to ongoing ambrisentan treatment

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Full Analysis Set - Subset of participants who were not receiving other PH therapy at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AmbrisentanMonotherapy Treatment Status90.0 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [81.6, 94.7]
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set. Last Observation Carried forward. 10 participants were excluded from the analysis due to lack of baseline or post-baseline BNP data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
AmbrisentanPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)-25.5 Percent change in BNP
95% CI: [-33.6, -16.3]
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 48 in BNP

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Full Analysis Set. Observed data. 111 participants were excluded from the analysis due to lack of baseline or Week 48 BNP data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
AmbrisentanPercent Change From Baseline to Week 48 in BNP-29.2 Percent change in BNP
95% CI: [-39.8, -16.6]
Secondary

Percent of Participants With no Clinical Worsening of PH at Week 48

Clinical worsening: occurrence of death, lung transplantation, hospitalization for PH, atrial septostomy, a change to chronic prostanoid or sildenafil treatment due to protocol-defined worsening criteria, or study withdrawal due to the addition of other clinically approved PH therapeutic agents

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: Full analysis set. Participants who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of last contact.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AmbrisentanPercent of Participants With no Clinical Worsening of PH at Week 4884.1 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [78.2, 88.6]
Secondary

Percent of Participants With no Clinical Worsening of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) at Week 24

Clinical worsening: occurrence of death, lung transplantation, hospitalization for PH, atrial septostomy, a change to chronic prostanoid or sildenafil treatment due to protocol-defined worsening criteria, or study withdrawal due to the addition of other clinically approved PH therapeutic agents

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Full analysis set. Participants who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of last contact.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AmbrisentanPercent of Participants With no Clinical Worsening of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) at Week 2489.4 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [84.4, 92.8]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026