Skip to content

Use of the Stethoscope to Confirm Breathing Tube Placement

Differentiation Between Esophageal and Tracheal Intubation Utilizing Neck Auscultation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00378651
Enrollment
23
Registered
2006-09-20
Start date
2006-09-30
Completion date
2007-01-31
Last updated
2007-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation, Endotracheal

Keywords

Intubation, Endotracheal, Anesthesia, General

Brief summary

This study is intended to validate the use of neck auscultation with an electronic stethoscope during intubation to confirm tracheal tube placement. It is hypothesized that the ability to confirm correct tube placement with this technique will be similar to that of the end-tidal CO2 monitor, the current gold-standard device for confirming tracheal intubation.

Detailed description

Unrecognized esophageal intubation results in disastrous consequences. Fortunately, a variety of techniques have been cited to confirm placement of the endotracheal tube. However, even end-tidal CO2 monitoring, considered to be the gold standard, has been associated with false positive and false negative results. In addition, use of this monitor requires ventilation through the tube, resulting in gastric distention if the esophagus has been intubated. When the lateral neck is auscultated during insertion of an endotracheal tube, there is a distinct difference between the sounds generated by a tube placed in the esophagus compared to a tube inserted into the trachea. Stethoscopes are readily available in any OR setting, and ventilation and release of cricoid pressure need not occur prior to confirmation of tube placement. However, this technique has yet to be validated. A series of sounds heard at the lateral neck during both tracheal and esophageal intubation will be recorded using an electronic stethoscope. These sound files will be played to a group including both experienced and inexperienced intubators, who will be asked to identify which sounds represent tracheal and esophageal intubation. Overall accuracy will be determined for the group of listeners.

Interventions

PROCEDURENeck Auscultation

Sponsors

University of Manitoba
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

* Anticipated difficult intubation * Contraindication to esophageal intubation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Group accuracy: Correct identification of tube placement based on series of 30 sound files

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026