Skip to content

Preservation of Renal Function in Liver Transplant Recipients With Certican Therapy

Presentation of Renal Function in Liver Transplant Recipients With Certican Therapy: PROTECT Study A Twelve-month, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study of Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Certican-based Regimen Versus Calcineurin Inhibitor-based Regimen in de Novo Liver Transplant Recipients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00378014
Enrollment
276
Registered
2006-09-19
Start date
2006-08-31
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2015-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Transplantation

Keywords

Liver transplantation, everolimus, CNI

Brief summary

The study is designed to show that everolimus initiation together with reduction and thereafter discontinuation of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) will improve significantly renal function in de novo liver transplant recipients as compared to continuation of CNI-based treatment.

Interventions

DRUGeverolimus

Start dose of everolimus was 1.5 mg in the morning followed by 1.5 mg in the evening. After one week, the dose was adjusted to achieve trough levels between 5-12 ng/mL. Once trough levels were above 5ng/mL, the CNI dose was reduced to 70%. At week 8 post-baseline (latest at week 16 post baseline), CNI was completely discontinued. For patients receiving Ciclosporin A (CiA) as CNI, the everolimus dosage was adjusted to achieve a trough level of 8-12 ng/mL, prior to discontinuation of CiA. After discontinuation of CNI, everolimus was maintained at a trough level of 5-12 ng/mL.

DRUGbasiliximab

All patients who met the eligibility criteria were treated with 2 doses of basiliximab on Day 0 (transplantation) and Day 4.

DRUGCNI

Patients who met the screening eligibility received CNI-based immunosuppressive therapy for 1 month. Then at week 4 (or week 8 at maximum), patients randomized to the CNI arm continued on CNI-based immunosuppressive therapy.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males or females 18 - 70 years old * Liver transplant recipient (living or deceased donor) * Patients in whom an allograft biopsy will not be contraindicated

Exclusion criteria

* Recipients of multiple solid organ transplants or patients that have already received a transplant in the past * HCV positive patients who need an active anti-viral treatment (HCV- positive patients without active antiviral treatment are allowed) * HIV positive patients * Patients who are breast feeding * Patients with a current severe systemic infection * Presence of any hypersensitivity to drugs similar to Certican® (e.g. macrolides) * Preexisting (i.e. not related to CNI-damage) renal dysfunction that, according to the judgment of the investigator, will not significantly improve after transplantation (i.e., for example, patients that are expected to have a cGFR below 50ml/min at 4 weeks post transplantation) * Patients that have received Simulect prior to this study. * Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR)Month 11This outcome measure evaluated renal function by assessing the calculated GFR based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of the Need for a Change in the Immunosuppressive RegimenMonth 11The incidence of any changes in the immunosuppressive regimen other than allowed in the study protocol (for example, introduction of Mycophenolic acid (MPA) or sirolimus) was estimated using crude rate estimation (relative frequency).
Incidence of Renal DeteriorationBaseline, Month 11Renal deterioration was defined as a decrease by ≥25% in the cGFR compared to baseline and confirmed by one consecutive measurement. The analysis of this outcome measure was omitted because of missing relevance.
Renal Function (cGFR)Month 5This outcome measure evaluated renal function by assessing the calculated GFR based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula.
Incidence of Efficacy FailureMonth 11Efficacy failure was defined as the composite endpoint of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death, lost to follow-up (from any reason), whichever occurred first. Incidence of efficacy failure was estimated using crude rate estimation (relative frequency).
Patient and Graft SurvivalMonth 11Patient survival was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death from any cause. If a patient was not known to have died, patient survival was censored as the date of last contact. Graft survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of graft loss. If a patient was not known to suffer from a graft loss or died without graft loss, time to graft loss was censored with date of last contact or date of death, respectively. Patient and graft survival were analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method.
Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Replication in HCV-positive PatientsBaseline, Month 5HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) was measured by real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR; copies per mL).
Number of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathFrom randomization to Month 11Patients with all (serious and non-serious) adverse events, serious adverse events and death were reported.
Incidence of Treated BPARMonth 11The incidence of treated BPAR was estimated using crude rate estimation (relative frequency).

Countries

Austria, Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The core study consisted of 2 periods: 1) during the first one-month period, 276 eligible participants received the same CNI-based immunosuppressive therapy prior to randomization; 2) during the second 11-month study period, 203 participants eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the two treatment arms.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Everolimus
Basiliximab plus everolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen following the reduction and cessation of initial CNI regimen plus optional steroids according to local best practice
96
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)
Basiliximab plus CNI-based immunosuppressive regimen according to local best practice plus optional steroids according to local best practice
98
Total194

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Core (Randomization to Month 11)Administrative Problems22
Core (Randomization to Month 11)Adverse Event10
Core (Randomization to Month 11)Death53
Core (Randomization to Month 11)Graft loss12
Core (Randomization to Month 11)Lack of Efficacy01
Core (Randomization to Month 11)Lost to Follow-up01
Core (Randomization to Month 11)Protocol deviation01
Core (Randomization to Month 11)Withdrawal by Subject52
Extension (Month 12 to Month 59)Administrative problems10
Extension (Month 12 to Month 59)Adverse Event87
Extension (Month 12 to Month 59)Death12
Extension (Month 12 to Month 59)Lack of Efficacy31
Extension (Month 12 to Month 59)Lost to Follow-up11
Extension (Month 12 to Month 59)Withdrawal by Subject03

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEverolimusCalcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Total
Age, Continuous52.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
52.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
52.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants30 Participants72 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
54 Participants68 Participants122 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
92 / 10187 / 10239 / 4138 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
67 / 10158 / 10226 / 4128 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR)

This outcome measure evaluated renal function by assessing the calculated GFR based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula.

Time frame: Month 11

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EverolimusCalculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR)87.9 mL/minStandard Deviation 32
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR)84.1 mL/minStandard Deviation 34.9
Secondary

Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Replication in HCV-positive Patients

HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) was measured by real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR; copies per mL).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 5

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EverolimusHepatitis C Virus (HCV) Replication in HCV-positive PatientsBaseline, negative64.5 Percentage of participants
EverolimusHepatitis C Virus (HCV) Replication in HCV-positive PatientsBaseline, positive0.0 Percentage of participants
EverolimusHepatitis C Virus (HCV) Replication in HCV-positive PatientsBaseline, not done35.5 Percentage of participants
EverolimusHepatitis C Virus (HCV) Replication in HCV-positive PatientsMonth 5, negative62.9 Percentage of participants
EverolimusHepatitis C Virus (HCV) Replication in HCV-positive PatientsMonth 5, positive1.6 Percentage of participants
EverolimusHepatitis C Virus (HCV) Replication in HCV-positive PatientsMonth 5, not done35.5 Percentage of participants
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Replication in HCV-positive PatientsMonth 5, positive13.2 Percentage of participants
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Replication in HCV-positive PatientsBaseline, negative55.3 Percentage of participants
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Replication in HCV-positive PatientsMonth 5, negative38.2 Percentage of participants
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Replication in HCV-positive PatientsBaseline, positive0.0 Percentage of participants
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Replication in HCV-positive PatientsMonth 5, not done48.7 Percentage of participants
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Replication in HCV-positive PatientsBaseline, not done44.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Incidence of Efficacy Failure

Efficacy failure was defined as the composite endpoint of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death, lost to follow-up (from any reason), whichever occurred first. Incidence of efficacy failure was estimated using crude rate estimation (relative frequency).

Time frame: Month 11

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EverolimusIncidence of Efficacy Failure20.8 Percentage of participants
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Incidence of Efficacy Failure20.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Incidence of Renal Deterioration

Renal deterioration was defined as a decrease by ≥25% in the cGFR compared to baseline and confirmed by one consecutive measurement. The analysis of this outcome measure was omitted because of missing relevance.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 11

Secondary

Incidence of the Need for a Change in the Immunosuppressive Regimen

The incidence of any changes in the immunosuppressive regimen other than allowed in the study protocol (for example, introduction of Mycophenolic acid (MPA) or sirolimus) was estimated using crude rate estimation (relative frequency).

Time frame: Month 11

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EverolimusIncidence of the Need for a Change in the Immunosuppressive Regimen80.2 Percentage of participants
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Incidence of the Need for a Change in the Immunosuppressive Regimen73.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Incidence of Treated BPAR

The incidence of treated BPAR was estimated using crude rate estimation (relative frequency).

Time frame: Month 11

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EverolimusIncidence of Treated BPAR13.5 Percentage of Participants
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Incidence of Treated BPAR10.2 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Death

Patients with all (serious and non-serious) adverse events, serious adverse events and death were reported.

Time frame: From randomization to Month 11

Population: Safety population: This set included all randomized patients with at least one post-baseline measurement of GFR.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EverolimusNumber of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathDeaths4 Number of participants
EverolimusNumber of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathAdverse Events (serious and non-serious)98 Number of participants
EverolimusNumber of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathSerious Adverse Events67 Number of participants
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Number of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathDeaths4 Number of participants
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Number of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathAdverse Events (serious and non-serious)96 Number of participants
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Number of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathSerious Adverse Events58 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Death

Patients with all (serious and non-serious) adverse events, serious adverse events and death were reported.

Time frame: Month 12 to Month 59 post-baseline

Population: Safety population: This set included all randomized patients with at least one post-baseline measurement of GFR.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EverolimusNumber of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathAdverse Events (serious and non-serious)41 Number of participants
EverolimusNumber of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathSerious Adverse Events26 Number of participants
EverolimusNumber of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathDeaths1 Number of participants
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Number of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathAdverse Events (serious and non-serious)40 Number of participants
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Number of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathSerious Adverse Events28 Number of participants
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Number of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathDeaths2 Number of participants
Secondary

Patient and Graft Survival

Patient survival was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death from any cause. If a patient was not known to have died, patient survival was censored as the date of last contact. Graft survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of graft loss. If a patient was not known to suffer from a graft loss or died without graft loss, time to graft loss was censored with date of last contact or date of death, respectively. Patient and graft survival were analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method.

Time frame: Month 11

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EverolimusPatient and Graft SurvivalDeath4.3 Percentage of Participants
EverolimusPatient and Graft SurvivalGraft loss2.2 Percentage of Participants
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Patient and Graft SurvivalDeath4.1 Percentage of Participants
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Patient and Graft SurvivalGraft loss2.1 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Renal Function (cGFR)

This outcome measure evaluated renal function by assessing the calculated GFR based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula.

Time frame: Month 5

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EverolimusRenal Function (cGFR)88.7 mL/minStandard Deviation 31
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)Renal Function (cGFR)82.9 mL/minStandard Deviation 29.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026